diff --git a/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json b/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json
index 8732ae66d6..cb25d0f061 100644
--- a/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json
+++ b/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json
@@ -16,19 +16,19 @@
       },
       {
         "role": "user",
-        "content": "# Development guide\n\nEnglish | [中文](development.zh.md)\n\nThis onboarding guide helps project contributors get started with the local environment, daily workflow, and CI flow; see the Agent Notes for design rationale and technical trade-offs.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Node.js supports 22.19+ and 24+. CI covers 22.19, 24, and 26; see the [Node engine floor Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md).\n- Corepack-enabled pnpm. The repo pins `pnpm@11.7.0` in `package.json`; run `corepack enable` if `pnpm --version` does not resolve through Corepack.\n- Git.\n- Optional: a DeepSeek API key for the TUI, headless, and ACP automation demos and real-API e2e tests.\n\n## First-time setup\n\nInstall dependencies from the repo root:\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\nThe install also runs the root `postinstall` script, which installs lefthook from the repo dev dependency through `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs`; the wrapper script uses lefthook's reviewed `--force` mode so linked worktrees with an existing `core.hooksPath` do not fail normal `pnpm run …` commands.\n\nIf hooks are missing because dependencies were restored from cache or `postinstall` was skipped, install them manually:\n\n```sh\npnpm exec lefthook install --force\n```\n\nRun typecheck once after a fresh clone:\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\nThat first typecheck runs the whole-repo `tsc -b` graph: it emits every package/vendor `lib/types` and checks examples, tests, and scripts through the two no-emit aggregates described below.\n\n## TypeScript project layout\n\nThe repository's TypeScript configuration has exactly three roles; every tsconfig file plays one of them.\n\n| File | Role | Forms a program? |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | Solution root: `extends` base, `files: []`, references to the two aggregates. The whole-repo `tsc -b tsconfig.json` graph, the tsserver discovery entry, and — through the inherited `paths` — the resolution config for tsx running `examples/` and `scripts/` (their nearest tsconfig is this file). | No |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | Host aggregate: host-side packages (via references), examples, tests, scripts, website. Excludes `packages/client`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | Client aggregate: `packages/client/*` packages and their tests, `apps/web`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | Shared compilerOptions and the source `paths` map. Also the resolution facade the vitest configs point vite-tsconfig-paths at: it has no `include`, so its `paths` apply to every importer. | No |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | Browser compiler shape (`jsx`, DOM libs, `types: []`) extended by the client aggregate and every `packages/client/*` package. | No |\n\nHost and client stay two aggregate programs because both sides declaration-merge the cordis `Context` interface under the same keys with different services; one program seeing both merges reports a collision. The collision exists only inside a `ts.Program` — module resolution never triggers it — which is why the solution may reference both aggregates and one paths facade may span both sides. Two disciplines follow:\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` never gains `include` or `files`: they would leak into every extending package project and narrow the facade's match-all scope.\n- A script that builds a repo-wide `ts.Program` seeds `tsconfig.host.json` or `tsconfig.client.json` explicitly — never the root solution, because flattening both aggregates into one program collides the `Context` merges. Program-backed generators and gates (`scripts/ts-project.ts` consumers, doc-typecheck standalone mode) are host-only by decision; the client side gains program-backed tooling only with a concrete need.\n\nStatic analysis and tests resolve workspace imports through the base `paths` map to `src` and must pass on a clean tree; gates that consume built `lib/` output declare that dependency explicitly. Decision record: [solution-root note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md); the tsc-first emit pipeline is the [ts-build-config note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md).\n\nIf a relevant local check consumes built package output, build once first:\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` includes `publint`, which validates package entrypoints against the built `lib/*.js` files, and `verify-node-next-types`, which validates built declarations against a temporary NodeNext consumer. A fresh worktree has no bundled JS or declarations until `pnpm run build` runs; ordinary commits and pushes do not require that build unless their selected checks consume it.\n\n## Environment variables\n\nThe real DeepSeek adapter and key-backed agent demos read credentials from the environment or from a gitignored `.env` at the repo root:\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` is optional and defaults to the public API. Never commit real credentials. The real-API e2e suites self-skip when `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` is not set.\n\n## Git hooks\n\nlefthook is configured in `lefthook.yml` as a fast local checkpoint:\n\n- `pre-commit` runs staged-file ESLint fixes, checks the staged diff for whitespace errors, and runs the vendor manifest guard.\n- `pre-push` runs only the incremental repository typecheck (`tsc -b` over the root solution, covering both the host and client aggregates).\n\nThe vendor manifest guard checks that changes under `vendor/*/src` are staged with the matching `vendor/README.md` manifest update. See `vendor/README.md` before editing vendored code.\n\nThe hooks intentionally do not run tests, snapshots, documentation checks, builds, or hygiene. Contributors run the [checks relevant to the changed behavior](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally) once; CI owns exhaustive coverage, built-artifact smokes, and the Node 22.19, 24, and 26 compatibility matrix.\n\nContributors can opt into the comprehensive local gate set with `pnpm run check:all`. The command is independent of both Git hooks and is not an agent instruction.\n\n## CI gates\n\nThe keyless [CI workflow](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) groups independent gates into broad lanes and runs a smaller compatibility signal across supported Node versions. Artifact consumers wait for one build within their lane. The separate real-API workflow runs `pnpm run test:e2e` with its configured worker bound. See [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) and the workflow files for the current gate and job inventory.\n\n## Daily commands\n\nUse these from the repo root:\n\n```sh\npnpm run test           # unit tests\npnpm run test:coverage  # unit tests with per-file coverage gates\npnpm run test:e2e       # real-API tests; self-skips without DEEPSEEK_API_KEY\npnpm run check:all      # comprehensive opt-in gate set; not wired to Git hooks\npnpm run typecheck      # tsc -b over the root solution: emits package/vendor lib/types, checks both aggregates\npnpm run lint           # eslint .\npnpm run lint:fix       # eslint . --fix\npnpm run doc-typecheck  # compile checked TypeScript snippets in Markdown docs\npnpm run gen-cordis-catalog     # regenerate docs/cordis-catalog/events.md + services.md from source\npnpm run verify-cordis-catalog  # fail if either cordis catalog is stale\npnpm run verify-export-jsdoc    # fail if a module-level package export lacks complete JSDoc\npnpm run gen-doc-graphs     # regenerate generated relationship docs from source and curated graph definitions\npnpm run verify-doc-graphs  # fail if generated relationship docs are stale\npnpm run verify-md-wrap  # fail on hard-wrapped prose paragraphs in docs/README markdown\npnpm run verify-mermaid  # fail if a ```mermaid diagram has invalid Mermaid syntax\npnpm run verify-type-equiv  # fail if a ```ts type-equiv doc block drifts from its source type\npnpm run verify-doc-budgets  # fail if a budgeted standing doc exceeds its word ceiling\npnpm run doc-sync       # all Markdown/doc gates, scheduled concurrently; the doc-sync leaf list in scripts/run-gates.ts is the full list\npnpm run gen-module-graph     # regenerate docs/module-graph.md from package peerDeps\npnpm run verify-module-graph  # fail if docs/module-graph.md is stale\npnpm run build          # emit lib/types intermediates, then bundle lib/index.* runtime files\npnpm run verify-node-next-types  # fail if built declarations are not NodeNext-consumable\npnpm run hygiene        # knip, publint, workspace constraints, and NodeNext declaration check\n```\n\nWhen changing package public behavior, update the relevant README or JSDoc in the same change. `pnpm run doc-sync` catches checked TypeScript snippets, generated doc freshness, markdown wrap/link drift, type equivalence, translation pairing, Mermaid syntax, and doc budgets, but broader prose/API sync still needs review.\n\n## Demos\n\nThe one-shot Headless coding agent needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or repo-root `.env`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:headless \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\nThe full-screen interactive coding agent needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or repo-root `.env`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:tui\n```\n\nThe self-referential cordis-agent demo can inspect and modify its live plugin runtime and needs the same credentials:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nThe ACP automation server exposes fresh agent sessions over JSON-RPC stdio and also needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n## TODO markers\n\nUse one of three comment tags to flag known issues in the code, ordered by urgency:\n\n- `FIXME` — an issue that should block a new release. A release should not ship with an open `FIXME` unless reviewers explicitly agree the change can be merged anyway.\n- `TODO` — an issue that should be fixed soon, once we have the resources.\n- `XXX` — an issue that we may fix someday; lowest priority, no commitment.\n\nPick the tag that matches the urgency so anyone scanning the code can tell a release blocker from a someday-maybe.\n\n## Documenting types verbatim (`ts type-equiv`)\n\nThe [core data structures](core-data-structures/core.md) docs paste source-equivalent declarations together with their original JSDoc so a reader sees the exact shape and source contract. To keep a paste from drifting when source changes, fence it as ` ```ts type-equiv ` (instead of ` ```ts `) and register it in `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` with the source file and symbol it mirrors:\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/core-data-structures/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv` (part of `doc-sync`) then extracts that symbol's declaration and attached JSDoc from source via the TypeScript parser and asserts the block matches both. For a class whose implementation bodies do not belong in the catalog, use ` ```ts public-api ` and set `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`; the checked projection retains the public fields, constructor, accessors, methods, and original class/member JSDoc while omitting bodies and private or protected members. Comparison ignores whitespace and non-JSDoc comments but requires every original JSDoc comment, including member documentation, so readers see the source contract beside the exact shape. The gate enforces a 1:1 correspondence by document, symbol, and projection between primary blocks and manifest entries; a paired `.zh.md` block reuses its unsuffixed sibling's entry only when the whole tracked fence sequence is byte-identical and ordered identically. `doc-typecheck` applies the same derivative rule to compilable fences, while skipping both source-equivalence fence kinds from compilation and its opt-out ratio. When you change a documented declaration or its JSDoc, the gate fails until you update the paste; when you add or remove a primary block, update the manifest in the same change.\n\n## Architecture context\n\nRead `docs/architecture.md` before changing anything under `packages/`. The codebase is built around Cordis plugins, event-sourced sessions, typed service seams, and explicit extension points.\n"
+        "content": "# Development guide\n\nEnglish | [中文](development.zh.md)\n\nThis onboarding guide helps project contributors get started with the local environment, daily workflow, and CI flow; see the Agent Notes for design rationale and technical trade-offs.\n\n## Prerequisites\n\n- Node.js supports 22.19+ and 24+. CI covers 22.19, 24, and 26; see the [Node engine floor Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md).\n- Corepack-enabled pnpm. The repo pins `pnpm@11.7.0` in `package.json`; run `corepack enable` if `pnpm --version` does not resolve through Corepack.\n- Git.\n- Optional: a DeepSeek API key for the TUI, headless, and ACP automation demos and real-API e2e tests.\n\n## First-time setup\n\nInstall dependencies from the repo root:\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\nThe install also runs the root `postinstall` script, which installs lefthook from the repo dev dependency through `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs`; the wrapper script uses lefthook's reviewed `--force` mode so linked worktrees with an existing `core.hooksPath` do not fail normal `pnpm run …` commands.\n\nIf hooks are missing because dependencies were restored from cache or `postinstall` was skipped, install them manually:\n\n```sh\npnpm exec lefthook install --force\n```\n\nRun typecheck once after a fresh clone:\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\nThat first typecheck runs the whole-repo `tsc -b` graph: it emits every package/vendor `lib/types` and checks examples, tests, and scripts through the two no-emit aggregates described below.\n\n## TypeScript project layout\n\nThe repository's TypeScript configuration has exactly three roles; every tsconfig file plays one of them.\n\n| File | Role | Forms a program? |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | Solution root: `extends` base, `files: []`, references to the two aggregates. The whole-repo `tsc -b tsconfig.json` graph, the tsserver discovery entry, and — through the inherited `paths` — the resolution config for tsx running `examples/` and `scripts/` (their nearest tsconfig is this file). | No |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | Host aggregate: host-side packages (via references), examples, tests, scripts, website. Excludes `packages/client`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | Client aggregate: `packages/client/*` packages and their tests, `apps/web`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | Shared compilerOptions and the source `paths` map. Also the resolution facade the vitest configs point vite-tsconfig-paths at: it has no `include`, so its `paths` apply to every importer. | No |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | Browser compiler shape (`jsx`, DOM libs, `types: []`) extended by the client aggregate and every `packages/client/*` package. | No |\n\nHost and client stay two aggregate programs because both sides declaration-merge the cordis `Context` interface under the same keys with different services; one program seeing both merges reports a collision. The collision exists only inside a `ts.Program` — module resolution never triggers it — which is why the solution may reference both aggregates and one paths facade may span both sides. Two disciplines follow:\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` never gains `include` or `files`: they would leak into every extending package project and narrow the facade's match-all scope.\n- A script that builds a repo-wide `ts.Program` seeds `tsconfig.host.json` or `tsconfig.client.json` explicitly — never the root solution, because flattening both aggregates into one program collides the `Context` merges. Program-backed generators and gates (`scripts/ts-project.ts` consumers, doc-typecheck standalone mode) are host-only by decision; the client side gains program-backed tooling only with a concrete need.\n\nStatic analysis and tests resolve workspace imports through the base `paths` map to `src` and must pass on a clean tree; gates that consume built `lib/` output declare that dependency explicitly. Decision record: [solution-root note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md); the tsc-first emit pipeline is the [ts-build-config note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md).\n\nIf a relevant local check consumes built package output, build once first:\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` includes `publint`, which validates package entrypoints against the built `lib/*.js` files, and `verify-node-next-types`, which validates built declarations against a temporary NodeNext consumer. A fresh worktree has no bundled JS or declarations until `pnpm run build` runs; ordinary commits and pushes do not require that build unless their selected checks consume it.\n\n## Environment variables\n\nThe real DeepSeek adapter and key-backed agent demos read credentials from the environment or from a gitignored `.env` at the repo root:\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` is optional and defaults to the public API. Never commit real credentials. The real-API e2e suites self-skip when `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` is not set.\n\n## Git hooks\n\nlefthook is configured in `lefthook.yml` as a fast local checkpoint:\n\n- `pre-commit` runs staged-file ESLint fixes, checks the staged diff for whitespace errors, and runs the vendor manifest guard.\n- `pre-push` runs only the incremental repository typecheck (`tsc -b` over the root solution, covering both the host and client aggregates).\n\nThe vendor manifest guard checks that changes under `vendor/*/src` are staged with the matching `vendor/README.md` manifest update. See `vendor/README.md` before editing vendored code.\n\nThe hooks intentionally do not run tests, snapshots, documentation checks, builds, or hygiene. Contributors run the [checks relevant to the changed behavior](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally) once; CI owns exhaustive coverage, built-artifact smokes, and the Node 22.19, 24, and 26 compatibility matrix.\n\nContributors can opt into the comprehensive local gate set with `pnpm run check:all`. The command is independent of both Git hooks and is not an agent instruction.\n\n## CI gates\n\nThe keyless [CI workflow](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) groups independent gates into broad lanes and runs a smaller compatibility signal across supported Node versions. Artifact consumers wait for one build within their lane. The separate real-API workflow runs `pnpm run test:e2e` with its configured worker bound. See [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) and the workflow files for the current gate and job inventory.\n\n## Daily commands\n\nUse these from the repo root:\n\n```sh\npnpm run test           # unit tests\npnpm run test:coverage  # unit tests with per-file coverage gates\npnpm run test:e2e       # real-API tests; self-skips without DEEPSEEK_API_KEY\npnpm run check:all      # comprehensive opt-in gate set; not wired to Git hooks\npnpm run typecheck      # tsc -b over the root solution: emits package/vendor lib/types, checks both aggregates\npnpm run lint           # eslint .\npnpm run lint:fix       # eslint . --fix\npnpm run doc-typecheck  # compile checked TypeScript snippets in Markdown docs\npnpm run gen-cordis-catalog     # regenerate docs/cordis-catalog/events.md + services.md from source\npnpm run verify-cordis-catalog  # fail if either cordis catalog is stale\npnpm run verify-export-jsdoc    # fail if a module-level package export lacks complete JSDoc\npnpm run gen-doc-graphs     # regenerate generated relationship docs from source and curated graph definitions\npnpm run verify-doc-graphs  # fail if generated relationship docs are stale\npnpm run verify-md-wrap  # fail on hard-wrapped prose paragraphs in docs/README markdown\npnpm run verify-mermaid  # fail if a ```mermaid diagram has invalid Mermaid syntax\npnpm run verify-type-equiv  # fail if a ```ts type-equiv doc block drifts from its source type\npnpm run verify-doc-budgets  # fail if a budgeted standing doc exceeds its word ceiling\npnpm run gen-translation-brief   # print the minimal-update briefing for out-of-sync translation pairs (--apply splices code-only edits)\npnpm run doc-sync       # all Markdown/doc gates, scheduled concurrently; the doc-sync leaf list in scripts/run-gates.ts is the full list\npnpm run gen-module-graph     # regenerate docs/module-graph.md from package peerDeps\npnpm run verify-module-graph  # fail if docs/module-graph.md is stale\npnpm run build          # emit lib/types intermediates, then bundle lib/index.* runtime files\npnpm run verify-node-next-types  # fail if built declarations are not NodeNext-consumable\npnpm run hygiene        # knip, publint, workspace constraints, and NodeNext declaration check\n```\n\nWhen changing package public behavior, update the relevant README or JSDoc in the same change. `pnpm run doc-sync` catches checked TypeScript snippets, generated doc freshness, markdown wrap/link drift, type equivalence, translation pairing, Mermaid syntax, and doc budgets, but broader prose/API sync still needs review.\n\n## Demos\n\nThe one-shot Headless coding agent needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or repo-root `.env`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:headless \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\nThe full-screen interactive coding agent needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or repo-root `.env`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:tui\n```\n\nThe self-referential cordis-agent demo can inspect and modify its live plugin runtime and needs the same credentials:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nThe ACP automation server exposes fresh agent sessions over JSON-RPC stdio and also needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n## TODO markers\n\nUse one of three comment tags to flag known issues in the code, ordered by urgency:\n\n- `FIXME` — an issue that should block a new release. A release should not ship with an open `FIXME` unless reviewers explicitly agree the change can be merged anyway.\n- `TODO` — an issue that should be fixed soon, once we have the resources.\n- `XXX` — an issue that we may fix someday; lowest priority, no commitment.\n\nPick the tag that matches the urgency so anyone scanning the code can tell a release blocker from a someday-maybe.\n\n## Documenting types verbatim (`ts type-equiv`)\n\nThe [core data structures](core-data-structures/core.md) docs paste source-equivalent declarations together with their original JSDoc so a reader sees the exact shape and source contract. To keep a paste from drifting when source changes, fence it as ` ```ts type-equiv ` (instead of ` ```ts `) and register it in `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` with the source file and symbol it mirrors:\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/core-data-structures/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv` (part of `doc-sync`) then extracts that symbol's declaration and attached JSDoc from source via the TypeScript parser and asserts the block matches both. For a class whose implementation bodies do not belong in the catalog, use ` ```ts public-api ` and set `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`; the checked projection retains the public fields, constructor, accessors, methods, and original class/member JSDoc while omitting bodies and private or protected members. Comparison ignores whitespace and non-JSDoc comments but requires every original JSDoc comment, including member documentation, so readers see the source contract beside the exact shape. The gate enforces a 1:1 correspondence by document, symbol, and projection between primary blocks and manifest entries; a paired `.zh.md` block reuses its unsuffixed sibling's entry only when the whole tracked fence sequence is byte-identical and ordered identically. `doc-typecheck` applies the same derivative rule to compilable fences, while skipping both source-equivalence fence kinds from compilation and its opt-out ratio. When you change a documented declaration or its JSDoc, the gate fails until you update the paste; when you add or remove a primary block, update the manifest in the same change.\n\n## Architecture context\n\nRead `docs/architecture.md` before changing anything under `packages/`. The codebase is built around Cordis plugins, event-sourced sessions, typed service seams, and explicit extension points.\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "assistant",
-        "content": "# 开发指南\n\n[English](development.md) | 中文\n\n本指南覆盖参与 DeepSeek Harness 开发所需的本地环境搭建、日常工作流与 CI 流程；设计动机与技术权衡请查阅相应 Agent Note。\n\n## 前置条件\n\n- Node.js 支持 22.19+ 与 24+。CI 覆盖 22.19、24 和 26；见 [Node 引擎下限 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md)。\n- 启用了 Corepack 的 pnpm。仓库在 `package.json` 中固定使用 `pnpm@11.7.0`；如果 `pnpm --version` 无法通过 Corepack 解析，请先运行 `corepack enable`。\n- Git。\n- 可选：一个 DeepSeek API key，用于 TUI、headless 和 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）自动化 agent（智能体）演示以及真实 API 的 e2e 测试。\n\n## 首次搭建\n\n在仓库根目录安装依赖：\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\n安装过程同时会运行根目录的 `postinstall` 脚本，该脚本通过 `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs` 从仓库 dev 依赖安装 lefthook。包装脚本使用 lefthook 经过评审的 `--force` 模式，确保已存在 `core.hooksPath` 的关联 worktree 不会导致正常的 `pnpm run …` 命令失败。\n\n如果依赖是从缓存恢复或 `postinstall` 被跳过而导致缺少钩子，请手动安装：\n\n```sh\npnpm exec lefthook install --force\n```\n\n新克隆后请先运行一次类型检查：\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\n首次类型检查会执行全仓 `tsc -b tsconfig.json` 图：发射每个 package/vendor 的 `lib/types`，并通过下述两个 no-emit 聚合检查示例、测试和脚本。\n\n## TypeScript 项目布局\n\n仓库的 TypeScript 配置只有三种角色；每个 tsconfig 文件恰好扮演其中一种。\n\n| 文件 | 角色 | 是否构成 program？ |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | solution 根：`extends` base、`files: []`、引用两个聚合。全仓 `tsc -b tsconfig.json` 图、tsserver 发现入口，并经继承的 `paths` 充当 tsx 运行 `examples/` 与 `scripts/` 时的解析配置（它们最近的 tsconfig 就是此文件）。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | host 聚合：host 侧各包（经 references）、示例、测试、脚本、website。排除 `packages/client`。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | client 聚合：`packages/client/*` 各包及其测试、`apps/web`。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | 共享 compilerOptions 与源码 `paths` 映射。同时是各 vitest 配置让 vite-tsconfig-paths 指向的解析门面：它没有 `include`，因此其 `paths` 适用于任何 importer。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | 浏览器编译形状（`jsx`、DOM lib、`types: []`），由 client 聚合和每个 `packages/client/*` 包 extends。 | 否 |\n\nhost 与 client 保持两个聚合 program，是因为两侧在相同键下以不同服务对 cordis `Context` 接口做声明合并；单一 program 同时看到两份合并会报冲突。这种冲突只存在于 `ts.Program` 内部——模块解析永远不会触发它——所以 solution 可以同时引用两个聚合，一个 paths 门面也可以横跨两侧。由此推出两条纪律：\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` 永不添加 `include` 或 `files`：它们会泄漏进每个 extends 它的包项目，并收窄门面的全匹配范围。\n- 构造全仓 `ts.Program` 的脚本显式种子 `tsconfig.host.json` 或 `tsconfig.client.json`——永不种子根 solution，因为把两个聚合展平进一个 program 会撞上 `Context` 合并冲突。基于 program 的生成器与门禁（`scripts/ts-project.ts` 的消费者、doc-typecheck standalone 模式）按决策仅覆盖 host 侧；client 侧只在出现真实需求时再获得基于 program 的工具。\n\n静态分析和测试通过 base 的 `paths` 映射把工作区 import 解析到 `src`，且必须在干净树上通过；消费构建产物 `lib/` 的门禁显式声明该依赖。决策记录：[solution-root note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)；tsc-first 发射管线见 [ts-build-config note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md)。\n\n如果相关的本地检查需要使用构建后的包产物，请先构建一次：\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` 包含 `publint`（用构建出的 `lib/*.js` 文件校验 package 入口点）和 `verify-node-next-types`（用一个临时的 NodeNext 消费方校验构建出的声明文件）。新 worktree 在 `pnpm run build` 运行之前没有打包的 JS 和声明文件；普通提交和推送无需构建，除非所选检查会使用这些产物。\n\n## 环境变量\n\n真实的 DeepSeek 适配器和需要密钥的 agent 演示从环境变量或仓库根目录一个被 gitignore 的 `.env` 文件读取凭证：\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` 可选，默认为公开 API。请勿提交真实凭证。未设置 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` 时，真实 API 的 e2e 套件会自动跳过。\n\n## Git 钩子\n\nlefthook 在 `lefthook.yml` 中配置，作为快速的本地检查点：\n\n- `pre-commit` 运行对暂存文件的 ESLint 修复，检查暂存 diff 中的空白错误，并运行 vendor manifest（元数据清单）守卫；\n- `pre-push` 只运行仓库增量类型检查（对根 solution 执行 `tsc -b`，覆盖 host 与 client 两个聚合）。\n\nvendor manifest 守卫检查 `vendor/*/src` 下的改动是否连同对应的 `vendor/README.md` manifest 更新一起暂存。请在编辑 vendor 代码前先阅读 `vendor/README.md`。\n\n这些钩子有意不运行测试、快照、文档检查、构建或 `hygiene`。贡献者只运行一次[与改动行为相关的检查](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally)；CI 负责全量覆盖率门禁、构建产物冒烟测试，以及 Node 22.19、24 和 26 兼容性矩阵。\n\n贡献者可以选择运行 `pnpm run check:all`，执行全面的本地门禁集。该命令独立于两个 Git 钩子，也不是对 agent 的指令。\n\n## CI 门禁\n\nkeyless [CI 工作流](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 将独立门禁分组到若干宽粒度 lane，并在受支持的 Node 版本上运行一组较小的兼容性检查。产物消费方在各自 lane 内等待一次 build。单独的真实 API 工作流按其配置的 worker 上限运行 `pnpm run test:e2e`。当前门禁和 job 清单以 [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) 和工作流文件为准。\n\n## 日常命令\n\n在仓库根目录使用：\n\n```sh\npnpm run test           # unit tests\npnpm run test:coverage  # unit tests with per-file coverage gates\npnpm run test:e2e       # real-API tests; self-skips without DEEPSEEK_API_KEY\npnpm run check:all      # comprehensive opt-in gate set; not wired to Git hooks\npnpm run typecheck      # tsc -b over the root solution: emits package/vendor lib/types, checks both aggregates\npnpm run lint           # eslint .\npnpm run lint:fix       # eslint . --fix\npnpm run doc-typecheck  # compile checked TypeScript snippets in Markdown docs\npnpm run gen-cordis-catalog     # regenerate docs/cordis-catalog/events.md + services.md from source\npnpm run verify-cordis-catalog  # fail if either cordis catalog is stale\npnpm run verify-export-jsdoc    # fail if a module-level package export lacks complete JSDoc\npnpm run gen-doc-graphs     # regenerate generated relationship docs from source and curated graph definitions\npnpm run verify-doc-graphs  # fail if generated relationship docs are stale\npnpm run verify-md-wrap  # fail on hard-wrapped prose paragraphs in docs/README markdown\npnpm run verify-mermaid  # fail if a ```mermaid diagram has invalid Mermaid syntax\npnpm run verify-type-equiv  # fail if a ```ts type-equiv doc block drifts from its source type\npnpm run verify-doc-budgets  # fail if a budgeted standing doc exceeds its word ceiling\npnpm run doc-sync       # all Markdown/doc gates, scheduled concurrently; the doc-sync leaf list in scripts/run-gates.ts is the full list\npnpm run gen-module-graph     # regenerate docs/module-graph.md from package peerDeps\npnpm run verify-module-graph  # fail if docs/module-graph.md is stale\npnpm run build          # emit lib/types intermediates, then bundle lib/index.* runtime files\npnpm run verify-node-next-types  # fail if built declarations are not NodeNext-consumable\npnpm run hygiene        # knip, publint, workspace constraints, and NodeNext declaration check\n```\n\n修改 package 的公开行为时，请在同一个变更中更新相关 README 或 JSDoc。`pnpm run doc-sync` 能检测到被检查的 TypeScript 片段、生成文档的新鲜度、Markdown 换行/链接漂移、type-equiv、翻译配对、Mermaid 语法和文档预算，但更广泛的行文/API 同步仍需评审把关。\n\n## 演示\n\n单次运行的 Headless coding agent 需要环境变量或仓库根目录 `.env` 中的 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:headless \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\n全屏交互式 coding agent 需要环境变量或仓库根目录 `.env` 中的 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:tui\n```\n\n自指的 cordis-agent 演示可以检查并修改其实时插件运行时，并需要相同的凭证：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nACP 自动化服务器通过 JSON-RPC stdio 提供全新 agent 会话，同样需要 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n## TODO 标记\n\n请使用以下三种注释标签之一标记代码中的已知问题，按紧急程度排序：\n\n- `FIXME`：应当阻塞新版本发布的问题。除非评审者明确同意该更改可以合并，否则发布版本不应包含未解决的 `FIXME`；\n- `TODO`：应当尽快修复的问题，等资源到位即可处理；\n- `XXX`：也许某天会修复的问题，优先级最低，不作承诺。\n\n请选择与紧急程度匹配的标签，让浏览代码的人一眼分清「发布阻塞」和「有空再说」。\n\n## 逐字记录类型（`ts type-equiv`）\n\n[核心数据结构](core-data-structures/core.md)文档会把与源码等价的声明及其原始 JSDoc 一并粘贴，让读者看到确切形状和源码契约。为防止粘贴内容在源码变化时漂移，请将其围栏为 ` ```ts type-equiv `（而不是 ` ```ts `），并在 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` 中登记它镜像的源文件和符号：\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/core-data-structures/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv`（`doc-sync` 的一环）随后通过 TypeScript 解析器从源码提取该符号的声明及其附带的 JSDoc，并断言代码块同时匹配两者。对于不应把实现体写进目录的类，请使用 ` ```ts public-api ` 并设置 `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`；门禁检查的投影会保留公共字段、构造函数、访问器、方法以及类和成员的原始 JSDoc，同时省略实现体和私有或受保护成员。比对会忽略空白和非 JSDoc 注释，但要求保留每条原始 JSDoc（包括成员文档），让读者同时看到源码契约和确切形状。该门禁按文档、符号和投影，在主块与 manifest 条目之间强制 1:1 对应；只有当配对 `.zh.md` 块的完整受跟踪围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件按字节一致且顺序相同时，才会复用后者的条目。`doc-typecheck` 对可编译围栏应用同一派生规则，同时跳过两种源码等价围栏的编译，并将其排除在 opt-out 比例之外。当你改动一个已记录的类型声明或其 JSDoc 时，门禁会失败直到你更新粘贴内容；当你增删一个主块时，请在同一个变更里更新 manifest。\n\n## 架构上下文\n\n在修改 `packages/` 目录下的任何内容之前，请先阅读 `docs/architecture.md`。这套代码围绕 Cordis 插件、事件溯源的会话、类型化的服务 seam 与显式扩展点构建。\n"
+        "content": "# 开发指南\n\n[English](development.md) | 中文\n\n本指南覆盖参与 DeepSeek Harness 开发所需的本地环境搭建、日常工作流与 CI 流程；设计动机与技术权衡请查阅相应 Agent Note。\n\n## 前置条件\n\n- Node.js 支持 22.19+ 与 24+。CI 覆盖 22.19、24 和 26；见 [Node 引擎下限 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md)。\n- 启用了 Corepack 的 pnpm。仓库在 `package.json` 中固定使用 `pnpm@11.7.0`；如果 `pnpm --version` 无法通过 Corepack 解析，请先运行 `corepack enable`。\n- Git。\n- 可选：一个 DeepSeek API key，用于 TUI、headless 和 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）自动化 agent（智能体）演示以及真实 API 的 e2e 测试。\n\n## 首次搭建\n\n在仓库根目录安装依赖：\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\n安装过程同时会运行根目录的 `postinstall` 脚本，该脚本通过 `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs` 从仓库 dev 依赖安装 lefthook。包装脚本使用 lefthook 经过评审的 `--force` 模式，确保已存在 `core.hooksPath` 的关联 worktree 不会导致正常的 `pnpm run …` 命令失败。\n\n如果依赖是从缓存恢复或 `postinstall` 被跳过而导致缺少钩子，请手动安装：\n\n```sh\npnpm exec lefthook install --force\n```\n\n新克隆后请先运行一次类型检查：\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\n首次类型检查会执行全仓 `tsc -b tsconfig.json` 图：发射每个 package/vendor 的 `lib/types`，并通过下述两个 no-emit 聚合检查示例、测试和脚本。\n\n## TypeScript 项目布局\n\n仓库的 TypeScript 配置只有三种角色；每个 tsconfig 文件恰好扮演其中一种。\n\n| 文件 | 角色 | 是否构成 program？ |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | solution 根：`extends` base、`files: []`、引用两个聚合。全仓 `tsc -b tsconfig.json` 图、tsserver 发现入口，并经继承的 `paths` 充当 tsx 运行 `examples/` 与 `scripts/` 时的解析配置（它们最近的 tsconfig 就是此文件）。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | host 聚合：host 侧各包（经 references）、示例、测试、脚本、website。排除 `packages/client`。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | client 聚合：`packages/client/*` 各包及其测试、`apps/web`。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | 共享 compilerOptions 与源码 `paths` 映射。同时是各 vitest 配置让 vite-tsconfig-paths 指向的解析门面：它没有 `include`，因此其 `paths` 适用于任何 importer。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | 浏览器编译形状（`jsx`、DOM lib、`types: []`），由 client 聚合和每个 `packages/client/*` 包 extends。 | 否 |\n\nhost 与 client 保持两个聚合 program，是因为两侧在相同键下以不同服务对 cordis `Context` 接口做声明合并；单一 program 同时看到两份合并会报冲突。这种冲突只存在于 `ts.Program` 内部——模块解析永远不会触发它——所以 solution 可以同时引用两个聚合，一个 paths 门面也可以横跨两侧。由此推出两条纪律：\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` 永不添加 `include` 或 `files`：它们会泄漏进每个 extends 它的包项目，并收窄门面的全匹配范围。\n- 构造全仓 `ts.Program` 的脚本显式种子 `tsconfig.host.json` 或 `tsconfig.client.json`——永不种子根 solution，因为把两个聚合展平进一个 program 会撞上 `Context` 合并冲突。基于 program 的生成器与门禁（`scripts/ts-project.ts` 的消费者、doc-typecheck standalone 模式）按决策仅覆盖 host 侧；client 侧只在出现真实需求时再获得基于 program 的工具。\n\n静态分析和测试通过 base 的 `paths` 映射把工作区 import 解析到 `src`，且必须在干净树上通过；消费构建产物 `lib/` 的门禁显式声明该依赖。决策记录：[solution-root note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)；tsc-first 发射管线见 [ts-build-config note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md)。\n\n如果相关的本地检查需要使用构建后的包产物，请先构建一次：\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` 包含 `publint`（用构建出的 `lib/*.js` 文件校验 package 入口点）和 `verify-node-next-types`（用一个临时的 NodeNext 消费方校验构建出的声明文件）。新 worktree 在 `pnpm run build` 运行之前没有打包的 JS 和声明文件；普通提交和推送无需构建，除非所选检查会使用这些产物。\n\n## 环境变量\n\n真实的 DeepSeek 适配器和需要密钥的 agent 演示从环境变量或仓库根目录一个被 gitignore 的 `.env` 文件读取凭证：\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` 可选，默认为公开 API。请勿提交真实凭证。未设置 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` 时，真实 API 的 e2e 套件会自动跳过。\n\n## Git 钩子\n\nlefthook 在 `lefthook.yml` 中配置，作为快速的本地检查点：\n\n- `pre-commit` 运行对暂存文件的 ESLint 修复，检查暂存 diff 中的空白错误，并运行 vendor manifest（元数据清单）守卫；\n- `pre-push` 只运行仓库增量类型检查（对根 solution 执行 `tsc -b`，覆盖 host 与 client 两个聚合）。\n\nvendor manifest 守卫检查 `vendor/*/src` 下的改动是否连同对应的 `vendor/README.md` manifest 更新一起暂存。请在编辑 vendor 代码前先阅读 `vendor/README.md`。\n\n这些钩子有意不运行测试、快照、文档检查、构建或 `hygiene`。贡献者只运行一次[与改动行为相关的检查](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally)；CI 负责全量覆盖率门禁、构建产物冒烟测试，以及 Node 22.19、24 和 26 兼容性矩阵。\n\n贡献者可以选择运行 `pnpm run check:all`，执行全面的本地门禁集。该命令独立于两个 Git 钩子，也不是对 agent 的指令。\n\n## CI 门禁\n\nkeyless [CI 工作流](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 将独立门禁分组到若干宽粒度 lane，并在受支持的 Node 版本上运行一组较小的兼容性检查。产物消费方在各自 lane 内等待一次 build。单独的真实 API 工作流按其配置的 worker 上限运行 `pnpm run test:e2e`。当前门禁和 job 清单以 [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) 和工作流文件为准。\n\n## 日常命令\n\n在仓库根目录使用：\n\n```sh\npnpm run test           # unit tests\npnpm run test:coverage  # unit tests with per-file coverage gates\npnpm run test:e2e       # real-API tests; self-skips without DEEPSEEK_API_KEY\npnpm run check:all      # comprehensive opt-in gate set; not wired to Git hooks\npnpm run typecheck      # tsc -b over the root solution: emits package/vendor lib/types, checks both aggregates\npnpm run lint           # eslint .\npnpm run lint:fix       # eslint . --fix\npnpm run doc-typecheck  # compile checked TypeScript snippets in Markdown docs\npnpm run gen-cordis-catalog     # regenerate docs/cordis-catalog/events.md + services.md from source\npnpm run verify-cordis-catalog  # fail if either cordis catalog is stale\npnpm run verify-export-jsdoc    # fail if a module-level package export lacks complete JSDoc\npnpm run gen-doc-graphs     # regenerate generated relationship docs from source and curated graph definitions\npnpm run verify-doc-graphs  # fail if generated relationship docs are stale\npnpm run verify-md-wrap  # fail on hard-wrapped prose paragraphs in docs/README markdown\npnpm run verify-mermaid  # fail if a ```mermaid diagram has invalid Mermaid syntax\npnpm run verify-type-equiv  # fail if a ```ts type-equiv doc block drifts from its source type\npnpm run verify-doc-budgets  # fail if a budgeted standing doc exceeds its word ceiling\npnpm run gen-translation-brief   # print the minimal-update briefing for out-of-sync translation pairs (--apply splices code-only edits)\npnpm run doc-sync       # all Markdown/doc gates, scheduled concurrently; the doc-sync leaf list in scripts/run-gates.ts is the full list\npnpm run gen-module-graph     # regenerate docs/module-graph.md from package peerDeps\npnpm run verify-module-graph  # fail if docs/module-graph.md is stale\npnpm run build          # emit lib/types intermediates, then bundle lib/index.* runtime files\npnpm run verify-node-next-types  # fail if built declarations are not NodeNext-consumable\npnpm run hygiene        # knip, publint, workspace constraints, and NodeNext declaration check\n```\n\n修改 package 的公开行为时，请在同一个变更中更新相关 README 或 JSDoc。`pnpm run doc-sync` 能检测到被检查的 TypeScript 片段、生成文档的新鲜度、Markdown 换行/链接漂移、type-equiv、翻译配对、Mermaid 语法和文档预算，但更广泛的行文/API 同步仍需评审把关。\n\n## 演示\n\n单次运行的 Headless coding agent 需要环境变量或仓库根目录 `.env` 中的 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:headless \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\n全屏交互式 coding agent 需要环境变量或仓库根目录 `.env` 中的 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:tui\n```\n\n自指的 cordis-agent 演示可以检查并修改其实时插件运行时，并需要相同的凭证：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nACP 自动化服务器通过 JSON-RPC stdio 提供全新 agent 会话，同样需要 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n## TODO 标记\n\n请使用以下三种注释标签之一标记代码中的已知问题，按紧急程度排序：\n\n- `FIXME`：应当阻塞新版本发布的问题。除非评审者明确同意该更改可以合并，否则发布版本不应包含未解决的 `FIXME`；\n- `TODO`：应当尽快修复的问题，等资源到位即可处理；\n- `XXX`：也许某天会修复的问题，优先级最低，不作承诺。\n\n请选择与紧急程度匹配的标签，让浏览代码的人一眼分清「发布阻塞」和「有空再说」。\n\n## 逐字记录类型（`ts type-equiv`）\n\n[核心数据结构](core-data-structures/core.md)文档会把与源码等价的声明及其原始 JSDoc 一并粘贴，让读者看到确切形状和源码契约。为防止粘贴内容在源码变化时漂移，请将其围栏为 ` ```ts type-equiv `（而不是 ` ```ts `），并在 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` 中登记它镜像的源文件和符号：\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/core-data-structures/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv`（`doc-sync` 的一环）随后通过 TypeScript 解析器从源码提取该符号的声明及其附带的 JSDoc，并断言代码块同时匹配两者。对于不应把实现体写进目录的类，请使用 ` ```ts public-api ` 并设置 `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`；门禁检查的投影会保留公共字段、构造函数、访问器、方法以及类和成员的原始 JSDoc，同时省略实现体和私有或受保护成员。比对会忽略空白和非 JSDoc 注释，但要求保留每条原始 JSDoc（包括成员文档），让读者同时看到源码契约和确切形状。该门禁按文档、符号和投影，在主块与 manifest 条目之间强制 1:1 对应；只有当配对 `.zh.md` 块的完整受跟踪围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件按字节一致且顺序相同时，才会复用后者的条目。`doc-typecheck` 对可编译围栏应用同一派生规则，同时跳过两种源码等价围栏的编译，并将其排除在 opt-out 比例之外。当你改动一个已记录的类型声明或其 JSDoc 时，门禁会失败直到你更新粘贴内容；当你增删一个主块时，请在同一个变更里更新 manifest。\n\n## 架构上下文\n\n在修改 `packages/` 目录下的任何内容之前，请先阅读 `docs/architecture.md`。这套代码围绕 Cordis 插件、事件溯源的会话、类型化的服务 seam 与显式扩展点构建。\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "user",
-        "content": "# Bilingual documentation\n\nEnglish | [中文](README.zh.md)\n\nThis repo's documentation is read by people and agents both inside and outside the company, so every document in scope is maintained in English and Simplified Chinese. This page defines the pairing contract, enforcement gate, scope, and exclusions; [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) defines how to translate; [terminology.md](terminology.md) is the terminology source of truth. The committed agent workflow lives in [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md).\n\n## The pairing contract\n\n- **Both languages carry equal authority.** A document may be authored and reviewed in either language first — a Chinese-first Agent Note is as legitimate as an English-first one — and the counterpart is translated from it. Neither file outranks the other; what binds them is that they must say the same thing.\n- **A pair is three sibling files.** The English `foo.md`, the Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`, all in the same directory. No locale directories, no separate translation repo, no interleaved bilingual files. Pairs merge whole: a PR never lands one language without the other two files.\n- **The consistency record.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last time the two were confirmed to say the same thing:\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  Blob hashes, not commit hashes, so the record is computable for files edited in the same PR (`git hash-object foo.md`) and consistency is a pure content comparison. The recorded hash also recovers the exact last-confirmed text of either side (`git cat-file -p <hash>`), so an out-of-sync pair is updated by diffing the edited side against its last-confirmed state and patching the counterpart minimally — never by re-translating whole files. After bringing the pair back in line, `pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write` re-records both hashes; that yaml diff is the reviewable act of confirming consistency.\n- **Language switcher.** Both files link to each other immediately after their H1 heading: the English file carries `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)` and the Chinese file carries `[English](foo.md) | 中文`.\n- **Structure mirrors the counterpart.** Heading depths and order, list kinds, ordered-list starts, list item counts, table row and column counts, link targets, and verbatim code blocks match one to one across the pair — see [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) for the full preservation rules. Existing Markdown gates apply to `.zh.md` files unchanged (`verify-md-wrap`, `verify-md-links`).\n\n## The gate: verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing` (part of `doc-sync`, which contributors run locally for documentation changes and CI runs exhaustively) enforces the contract mechanically:\n\n1. Every document in scope has a complete pair. README discovery is case-insensitive on the basename, so `missions/readme.md` is in scope alongside the other documentation roots.\n2. Every pair artifact that exists at all is complete and consistent: all three files present, each side's current blob hash equals the recorded one (editing either side without re-confirming the pair goes red), both sides carry the language switcher, and the structural signatures match in order — heading depths, verbatim code blocks (info string and content), table row and column counts, list kinds, ordered-list starts, item counts, and every link target apart from the switcher.\n3. Files listed as `excluded` have no `.zh.md` and no `.i18n.yaml` at all. Frozen Agent Notes under `.agents/notes/archived/` are outside this evolving gate; their dedicated verifier requires and seals the complete existing triplet instead.\n\nSource-oriented code gates consume an exact `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative of its unsuffixed sibling instead of compiling or manifesting the same code twice. The sequence must match in length, order, fence kind, and byte-exact body; otherwise both copies remain independently checked and the pairing gate reports the structural mismatch.\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` prints the current pairing state of every document in scope — missing, out-of-sync, or ok. It never fails; `missing` and `out-of-sync` rows identify violations that the normal check rejects.\n\nThe practical rule this gate creates: **when a PR edits either side of a paired document, the same PR updates the counterpart and re-records the pair** (run the [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) skill, then `--write`), exactly like the repo's existing doc-sync rule for code and READMEs. A PR that leaves a pair out of sync goes red in CI.\n\nThe gate's limit, stated plainly: **a green gate means the pair was confirmed consistent at these exact contents, not that the confirmation was sound.** It checks hashes and shape; it cannot judge whether the two sides actually say the same thing, or whether the wording is accurate, well-termed, and natural — that is the reviewer's half of the contract, per [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md). A re-recorded pair with a sloppy counterpart passes the gate; it must not pass review.\n\n## Scope and exclusions\n\n**Scope**: every non-vendor README, plus every active document under `.agents/notes/**`, `docs/**`, and `python/**`. README matching is case-insensitive on the basename and covers future directories without another manifest edit. Dependency and ignored build-output trees and the frozen `.agents/notes/archived/` tree are discovery exclusions, not evolving translation source.\n\n**Excluded** (never paired, and the gate rejects a `.zh.md` or `.i18n.yaml` for them):\n\n- `docs/cordis-catalog/`, `docs/tool-catalog/`, `docs/config-catalog.md`, `docs/persistence-catalog.md`, `docs/module-graph.md`, `docs/agent-lifecycle.md`, `docs/capability-seams.md`, `docs/event-producer-consumer.md`, `docs/graph-atlas.md`, and `docs/tool-execution-pipeline.md` — generated files; their generators emit English only today, so a hand-written translation would go stale on every regeneration. The planned follow-up is to teach the generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point these leave the exclusion list.\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`, `.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md`, and their `CLAUDE.md` instruction symlinks — agent instructions, maintained in English only like the root `AGENTS.md`.\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` and [style-samples.md](style-samples.md) — both are bilingual by construction.\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md) — the automated pipeline's prompt template; its body is machine-consumed verbatim, so a paired translation would change pipeline behavior.\n- `.agents/notes/archived/` — frozen historical triplets. [`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) validates their completeness and content seals; translation maintenance must never rewrite them.\n\n**Universal requirement**: every current or future document in scope must merge as a complete bilingual pair. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions; there is no per-file rollout list, date cutoff, or README-specific policy class.\n\n## Division of labor\n\nCounterparts here are produced by an agent running [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) and reviewed by a human — inference is cheap here, review attention is the scarce resource. The gate checks pair completeness, recorded hashes, switchers, and its documented structural signature. Review still owns translation quality, terminology, and structural requirements that the signature does not encode. The prompt contract is executable: [scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) renders the committed template (terminology injected; the template carries its own calibrated rules) into either direction and parses the three-section response, while `verify-translation-prompt` exercises both render directions and the checked-in example in `doc-sync`.\n"
+        "content": "# Bilingual documentation\n\nEnglish | [中文](README.zh.md)\n\nThis repo's documentation is read by people and agents both inside and outside the company, so every document in scope is maintained in English and Simplified Chinese. This page defines the pairing contract, enforcement gate, scope, and exclusions; [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) defines how to translate; [terminology.md](terminology.md) is the terminology source of truth. The committed agent workflow lives in [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md).\n\n## The pairing contract\n\n- **Both languages carry equal authority.** A document may be authored and reviewed in either language first — a Chinese-first Agent Note is as legitimate as an English-first one — and the counterpart is translated from it. Neither file outranks the other; what binds them is that they must say the same thing.\n- **A pair is three sibling files.** The English `foo.md`, the Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`, all in the same directory. No locale directories, no separate translation repo, no interleaved bilingual files. Pairs merge whole: a PR never lands one language without the other two files.\n- **The consistency record.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last time the two were confirmed to say the same thing:\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  Blob hashes, not commit hashes, so the record is computable for files edited in the same PR (`git hash-object foo.md`) and consistency is a pure content comparison. The recorded hashes also recover the exact last-confirmed text of either side, so an out-of-sync pair is updated by patching the counterpart minimally against the edited side's diff — never by re-translating whole files. `pnpm run gen-translation-brief <pair>` assembles that update's working set mechanically at the narrowest safely aligned granularity — changed Markdown units, then heading sections, then whole document — with the edited side's diff since last confirmation, each changed span's three-way text, the terminology rows the change touches, and the binding update rules; a change confined to the pair's byte-identical code fences is computed outright, and `--apply` splices it into the counterpart after structural validation ([briefed-updates Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md)). After bringing the pair back in line, `pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>` re-records both hashes; that yaml diff is the reviewable act of confirming consistency, which is why `--write` requires naming the pairs you confirmed (`--write --all` is the explicit corpus-wide form).\n- **Language switcher.** Both files link to each other immediately after their H1 heading: the English file carries `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)` and the Chinese file carries `[English](foo.md) | 中文`.\n- **Structure mirrors the counterpart.** Heading depths and order, list kinds, ordered-list starts, list item counts, table row and column counts, link targets, and verbatim code blocks match one to one across the pair — see [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) for the full preservation rules. Existing Markdown gates apply to `.zh.md` files unchanged (`verify-md-wrap`, `verify-md-links`).\n\n## The gate: verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing` (part of `doc-sync`, which contributors run locally for documentation changes and CI runs exhaustively) enforces the contract mechanically:\n\n1. Every document in scope has a complete pair. README discovery is case-insensitive on the basename, so `missions/readme.md` is in scope alongside the other documentation roots.\n2. Every pair artifact that exists at all is complete and consistent: all three files present, each side's current blob hash equals the recorded one (editing either side without re-confirming the pair goes red), both sides carry the language switcher, and the structural signatures match in order — heading depths, verbatim code blocks (info string and content), table row and column counts, list kinds, ordered-list starts, item counts, and every link target apart from the switcher.\n3. Files listed as `excluded` have no `.zh.md` and no `.i18n.yaml` at all. Frozen Agent Notes under `.agents/notes/archived/` are outside this evolving gate; their dedicated verifier requires and seals the complete existing triplet instead.\n\nSource-oriented code gates consume an exact `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative of its unsuffixed sibling instead of compiling or manifesting the same code twice. The sequence must match in length, order, fence kind, and byte-exact body; otherwise both copies remain independently checked and the pairing gate reports the structural mismatch.\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` prints the current pairing state of every document in scope — missing, out-of-sync, or ok. It never fails; `missing` and `out-of-sync` rows identify violations that the normal check rejects.\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing <pair...>` checks just the named pairs — any of a pair's three files (or its bare stem) names it — so an update loop verifies its own pair in seconds instead of re-scanning the corpus. The no-argument corpus-wide form is what `doc-sync` and CI run; a scoped green never substitutes for it at PR level.\n\nThe practical rule this gate creates: **when a PR edits either side of a paired document, the same PR updates the counterpart and re-records the pair** (run the [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) skill, then `--write <pair>`), exactly like the repo's existing doc-sync rule for code and READMEs. A PR that leaves a pair out of sync goes red in CI.\n\nThe gate's limit, stated plainly: **a green gate means the pair was confirmed consistent at these exact contents, not that the confirmation was sound.** It checks hashes and shape; it cannot judge whether the two sides actually say the same thing, or whether the wording is accurate, well-termed, and natural — that is the reviewer's half of the contract, per [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md). A re-recorded pair with a sloppy counterpart passes the gate; it must not pass review.\n\n## Scope and exclusions\n\n**Scope**: every non-vendor README, plus every active document under `.agents/notes/**`, `docs/**`, and `python/**`. README matching is case-insensitive on the basename and covers future directories without another manifest edit. Dependency and ignored build-output trees and the frozen `.agents/notes/archived/` tree are discovery exclusions, not evolving translation source.\n\n**Excluded** (never paired, and the gate rejects a `.zh.md` or `.i18n.yaml` for them):\n\n- `docs/cordis-catalog/`, `docs/tool-catalog/`, `docs/config-catalog.md`, `docs/persistence-catalog.md`, `docs/module-graph.md`, `docs/agent-lifecycle.md`, `docs/capability-seams.md`, `docs/event-producer-consumer.md`, `docs/graph-atlas.md`, and `docs/tool-execution-pipeline.md` — generated files; their generators emit English only today, so a hand-written translation would go stale on every regeneration. The planned follow-up is to teach the generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point these leave the exclusion list.\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`, `.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md`, and their `CLAUDE.md` instruction symlinks — agent instructions, maintained in English only like the root `AGENTS.md`.\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` and [style-samples.md](style-samples.md) — both are bilingual by construction.\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md) — the automated pipeline's prompt template; its body is machine-consumed verbatim, so a paired translation would change pipeline behavior.\n- `.agents/notes/archived/` — frozen historical triplets. [`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) validates their completeness and content seals; translation maintenance must never rewrite them.\n\n**Universal requirement**: every current or future document in scope must merge as a complete bilingual pair. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions; there is no per-file rollout list, date cutoff, or README-specific policy class.\n\n## Division of labor\n\nCounterparts here are produced by an agent running [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) and reviewed by a human — inference is cheap here, review attention is the scarce resource. The gate checks pair completeness, recorded hashes, switchers, and its documented structural signature. Review still owns translation quality, terminology, and structural requirements that the signature does not encode. The prompt contract is executable: [scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) renders the committed template (terminology injected; the template carries its own calibrated rules) into either direction and parses the three-section response, while `verify-translation-prompt` exercises both render directions and the checked-in example in `doc-sync`.\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "assistant",
-        "content": "# 双语文档\n\n[English](README.md) | 中文\n\n本仓库的文档会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）阅读，因此范围内的每篇文档都以英文和简体中文维护。本页定义配对契约、强制门禁、范围与排除规则；[translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) 定义如何翻译；[terminology.md](terminology.md) 是术语真源。仓库内置的 agent 工作流见 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)。\n\n## 配对契约\n\n- **两种语言同权。** 一篇文档可以先用任一语言撰写和评审（先写中文的 Agent Note 与先写英文的一样正当），另一侧由它翻译而来。两个文件谁也不高于谁；约束它们的是二者必须说同样的话。\n- **一对文档是三个同目录文件。** 英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，加一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`，都在同一目录。不用语言目录，不用独立翻译仓库，不用中英混排的单文件。配对必须整体合并：PR（Pull Request）永远不会只带一种语言而缺其余两个文件。\n- **一致性记录。**`foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次被确认「说同样的话」时各自的完整 git blob hash：\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  用 blob hash 而不是 commit hash，这样同一个 PR 里改动的文件也能算出记录（`git hash-object foo.md`），一致性是纯内容比较。记录的 hash 还能还原任一侧上次确认时的确切文本（`git cat-file -p <hash>`），所以失去同步的配对是「把被改的一侧与其上次确认状态做 diff、再最小化地修补另一侧」，从不整篇重译。两侧对齐后，`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write` 重新记录两个 hash；那份 yaml diff 就是「确认一致」这个动作本身，可以被评审。\n- **语言切换行。** 两个文件在各自 H1 标题之后立即互链：英文文件带 `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)`，中文文件带 `[English](foo.md) | 中文`。\n- **结构与另一侧一一对应。** 标题深度与顺序、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量、表格行列数、链接目标与逐字节一致的代码块在配对两侧一一对应；完整保持规则见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。既有 Markdown 门禁对 `.zh.md` 文件原样生效（`verify-md-wrap`、`verify-md-links`）。\n\n## 门禁：verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing`（`doc-sync`（文档同步门禁）的一环，贡献者会针对文档变更在本地运行，CI 则会完整运行）机械地强制执行这份契约：\n\n1. 范围内的每篇文档都有完整配对。发现 README 时，basename 不区分大小写，因此 `missions/readme.md` 与其他文档根一样属于范围。\n2. 任何已存在的配对产物都完整且一致：三个文件齐全、每一侧的当前 blob hash 等于记录值（改了任一侧而没重新确认配对就变红）、双方都带语言切换行、结构签名按序一致：标题深度、逐字节一致的代码块（信息字符串与内容）、表格行列数、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量，以及除切换行之外的每个链接目标。\n3. 列为 `excluded` 的文件完全没有 `.zh.md`，也没有 `.i18n.yaml`。`.agents/notes/archived/` 下冻结的 Agent Note 不受这个持续演进的门禁约束；专用校验器会要求其现有的三个配对文件完整，并将其封存。\n\n面向源码的代码门禁会把精确的 `.zh.md` 围栏序列视为其无后缀兄弟文件的派生内容，而不会再次编译相同代码或在 manifest 中重复登记。该序列必须在长度、顺序、围栏类型和按字节精确的正文上一致；否则两份副本仍会独立受检，配对门禁也会报告结构不匹配。\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` 打印范围内每篇文档的当前配对状态（missing、out-of-sync 或 ok）。它从不失败；其中 missing 与 out-of-sync 行指出普通检查会拒绝的违规。\n\n这个门禁带来的实际规则是：**当一个 PR 修改了已配对文档的任一侧时，同一个 PR 更新另一侧并重新记录配对**（运行 [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) skill（技能），再 `--write`），与本仓库既有的代码与 README 的 doc-sync 规则完全一致。留下失去同步的配对的 PR 会在 CI 变红。\n\n把门禁的边界说白：**门禁通过意味着这组文档在当前内容上的一致性得到了确认，不代表确认本身正确可靠。** 它检查记录的 hash 与结构签名；它无法判断两侧是否真的在说同样的话，也无法判断措辞是否准确、术语是否得当、行文是否自然；这部分契约由评审者把关，见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。重新记录了 hash 但另一侧翻得潦草的配对能通过门禁；它不得通过评审。\n\n## 范围与排除\n\n**范围**：除 vendor 源码外的全部 README，以及 `.agents/notes/**`、`docs/**` 与 `python/**` 下的全部活跃文档。匹配 README 时只看文件名且不区分大小写，因此今后新增的目录无需再修改 manifest。依赖目录、被忽略的构建产物目录以及冻结的 `.agents/notes/archived/` 目录树只在发现阶段排除，不属于持续演进的翻译源文档。\n\n**排除**（永不配对，门禁拒绝为它们建 `.zh.md` 或 `.i18n.yaml`）：\n\n- `docs/cordis-catalog/`、`docs/tool-catalog/`、`docs/config-catalog.md`、`docs/persistence-catalog.md`、`docs/module-graph.md`、`docs/agent-lifecycle.md`、`docs/capability-seams.md`、`docs/event-producer-consumer.md`、`docs/graph-atlas.md` 与 `docs/tool-execution-pipeline.md`：生成文件；生成器目前只输出英文，手写译文在每次重新生成时必然陈旧。计划中的后续工作是让生成器同时输出中文，届时这些文件移出排除清单。\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`、`.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md` 以及指向它们的 `CLAUDE.md` 指令符号链接：agent 指令，与根 `AGENTS.md` 一样只以英文维护。\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` 与 [style-samples.md](style-samples.md)：二者本身即为中英对照文档。\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md)：自动翻译流水线的提示词模板；正文逐字进入模型请求，配对翻译会改变流水线行为。\n- `.agents/notes/archived/`：冻结的历史三文件配对。[`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) 校验其完整性和内容封存记录；翻译维护绝不能重写这些文件。\n\n**统一要求**：当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档，合并时都必须构成完整的双语配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项；不存在逐文件推进清单、日期分界或 README 专用政策类别。\n\n## 分工\n\n这里的对侧文件由运行 [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 的 agent 生成，再由人评审：在这里推理（inference）很便宜，评审注意力才是稀缺资源。门禁负责检查配对是否完整、记录的 hash、语言切换行以及本文列出的结构签名；翻译质量、术语和签名未涵盖的结构要求仍由评审把关。提示词契约也有可执行实现：[scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) 会把仓库内置的模板（注入术语表；模板自带经人工校准的规则）渲染为英译中或中译英两个方向的提示词，并解析三段式响应；`doc-sync` 中的 `verify-translation-prompt` 会检查两个渲染方向与仓库内示例。\n"
+        "content": "# 双语文档\n\n[English](README.md) | 中文\n\n本仓库的文档会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）阅读，因此范围内的每篇文档都以英文和简体中文维护。本页定义配对契约、强制门禁、范围与排除规则；[translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) 定义如何翻译；[terminology.md](terminology.md) 是术语真源。仓库内置的 agent 工作流见 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)。\n\n## 配对契约\n\n- **两种语言同权。** 一篇文档可以先用任一语言撰写和评审（先写中文的 Agent Note 与先写英文的一样正当），另一侧由它翻译而来。两个文件谁也不高于谁；约束它们的是二者必须说同样的话。\n- **一对文档是三个同目录文件。** 英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，加一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`，都在同一目录。不用语言目录，不用独立翻译仓库，不用中英混排的单文件。配对必须整体合并：PR（Pull Request）永远不会只带一种语言而缺其余两个文件。\n- **一致性记录。**`foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次被确认「说同样的话」时各自的完整 git blob hash：\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  用 blob hash 而不是 commit hash，这样同一个 PR 里改动的文件也能算出记录（`git hash-object foo.md`），一致性是纯内容比较。记录的 hash 还能还原任一侧上次确认时的确切文本，所以失去同步的配对是「按被改一侧的 diff 最小化地修补另一侧」，从不整篇重译。`pnpm run gen-translation-brief <pair>` 会以能安全对齐的最窄粒度——先是有改动的 Markdown 单元，再是标题小节，最后是整篇文档——机械地汇集这次更新的工作集：被改一侧自上次确认以来的 diff、每个改动块的三方文本、改动触及的术语表行，以及有约束力的更新规则；仅落在配对中逐字节一致的围栏代码块内的改动可以直接算出，`--apply` 则经结构签名校验后把它拼接进对侧文件（[briefed-updates Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md)）。两侧对齐后，`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>` 重新记录两个 hash；那份 yaml diff 就是「确认一致」这个动作本身，可以被评审，也正因如此，`--write` 要求点名你确认过的配对（`--write --all` 是显式的全语料形式）。\n- **语言切换行。** 两个文件在各自 H1 标题之后立即互链：英文文件带 `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)`，中文文件带 `[English](foo.md) | 中文`。\n- **结构与另一侧一一对应。** 标题深度与顺序、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量、表格行列数、链接目标与逐字节一致的代码块在配对两侧一一对应；完整保持规则见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。既有 Markdown 门禁对 `.zh.md` 文件原样生效（`verify-md-wrap`、`verify-md-links`）。\n\n## 门禁：verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing`（`doc-sync`（文档同步门禁）的一环，贡献者会针对文档变更在本地运行，CI 则会完整运行）机械地强制执行这份契约：\n\n1. 范围内的每篇文档都有完整配对。发现 README 时，basename 不区分大小写，因此 `missions/readme.md` 与其他文档根一样属于范围。\n2. 任何已存在的配对产物都完整且一致：三个文件齐全、每一侧的当前 blob hash 等于记录值（改了任一侧而没重新确认配对就变红）、双方都带语言切换行、结构签名按序一致：标题深度、逐字节一致的代码块（信息字符串与内容）、表格行列数、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量，以及除切换行之外的每个链接目标。\n3. 列为 `excluded` 的文件完全没有 `.zh.md`，也没有 `.i18n.yaml`。`.agents/notes/archived/` 下冻结的 Agent Note 不受这个持续演进的门禁约束；专用校验器会要求其现有的三个配对文件完整，并将其封存。\n\n面向源码的代码门禁会把精确的 `.zh.md` 围栏序列视为其无后缀兄弟文件的派生内容，而不会再次编译相同代码或在 manifest 中重复登记。该序列必须在长度、顺序、围栏类型和按字节精确的正文上一致；否则两份副本仍会独立受检，配对门禁也会报告结构不匹配。\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` 打印范围内每篇文档的当前配对状态（missing、out-of-sync 或 ok）。它从不失败；其中 missing 与 out-of-sync 行指出普通检查会拒绝的违规。\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing <pair...>` 只检查被点名的配对——配对的三个文件中的任意一个（或其裸词干）都能点名它——因此更新循环几秒内就能验证自己的配对，而不必重新扫描全语料。`doc-sync` 与 CI 运行的是无参数的全语料形式；限定范围的绿灯在 PR 层面永远不能替代它。\n\n这个门禁带来的实际规则是：**当一个 PR 修改了已配对文档的任一侧时，同一个 PR 更新另一侧并重新记录配对**（运行 [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) skill（技能），再 `--write <pair>`），与本仓库既有的代码与 README 的 doc-sync 规则完全一致。留下失去同步的配对的 PR 会在 CI 变红。\n\n把门禁的边界说白：**门禁通过意味着这组文档在当前内容上的一致性得到了确认，不代表确认本身正确可靠。** 它检查记录的 hash 与结构签名；它无法判断两侧是否真的在说同样的话，也无法判断措辞是否准确、术语是否得当、行文是否自然；这部分契约由评审者把关，见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。重新记录了 hash 但另一侧翻得潦草的配对能通过门禁；它不得通过评审。\n\n## 范围与排除\n\n**范围**：除 vendor 源码外的全部 README，以及 `.agents/notes/**`、`docs/**` 与 `python/**` 下的全部活跃文档。匹配 README 时只看文件名且不区分大小写，因此今后新增的目录无需再修改 manifest。依赖目录、被忽略的构建产物目录以及冻结的 `.agents/notes/archived/` 目录树只在发现阶段排除，不属于持续演进的翻译源文档。\n\n**排除**（永不配对，门禁拒绝为它们建 `.zh.md` 或 `.i18n.yaml`）：\n\n- `docs/cordis-catalog/`、`docs/tool-catalog/`、`docs/config-catalog.md`、`docs/persistence-catalog.md`、`docs/module-graph.md`、`docs/agent-lifecycle.md`、`docs/capability-seams.md`、`docs/event-producer-consumer.md`、`docs/graph-atlas.md` 与 `docs/tool-execution-pipeline.md`：生成文件；生成器目前只输出英文，手写译文在每次重新生成时必然陈旧。计划中的后续工作是让生成器同时输出中文，届时这些文件移出排除清单。\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`、`.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md` 以及指向它们的 `CLAUDE.md` 指令符号链接：agent 指令，与根 `AGENTS.md` 一样只以英文维护。\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` 与 [style-samples.md](style-samples.md)：二者本身即为中英对照文档。\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md)：自动翻译流水线的提示词模板；正文逐字进入模型请求，配对翻译会改变流水线行为。\n- `.agents/notes/archived/`：冻结的历史三文件配对。[`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) 校验其完整性和内容封存记录；翻译维护绝不能重写这些文件。\n\n**统一要求**：当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档，合并时都必须构成完整的双语配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项；不存在逐文件推进清单、日期分界或 README 专用政策类别。\n\n## 分工\n\n这里的对侧文件由运行 [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 的 agent 生成，再由人评审：在这里推理（inference）很便宜，评审注意力才是稀缺资源。门禁负责检查配对是否完整、记录的 hash、语言切换行以及本文列出的结构签名；翻译质量、术语和签名未涵盖的结构要求仍由评审把关。提示词契约也有可执行实现：[scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) 会把仓库内置的模板（注入术语表；模板自带经人工校准的规则）渲染为英译中或中译英两个方向的提示词，并解析三段式响应；`doc-sync` 中的 `verify-translation-prompt` 会检查两个渲染方向与仓库内示例。\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "user",
@@ -40,11 +40,11 @@
       },
       {
         "role": "user",
-        "content": "# Agent Note: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate\n\nStatus: implemented\n\nEnglish | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)\n\n## Problem\n\nThis repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.\n\n## Decision\n\n- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).\n- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.\n- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.\n- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.\n- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.\n\n## Verification\n\nThe verification contract covers each boundary independently. `verify-translation-pairing` pins pair completeness, hashes, switchers, and structure; [`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) pins locale-specific source selection for published pairs; [`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) pins discovery of Loader YAML and exclusion of translation records; and the [translation-prompt runnable snapshot](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts) pins the rendered system message, five reviewed example pairs, source request, and consumed response. Together these checks make pair drift, publication drift, configuration misclassification, and model-visible prompt drift review-visible.\n\n## Alternatives considered\n\n- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this Agent Note: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.\n- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.\n- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.\n- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.\n- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express \"consistent as of the state this PR introduces\", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.\n- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.\n\n## Industry precedent\n\nPaired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.\n\n## Consequences\n\n- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.\n- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, \"who confirmed these consistent, and when\" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.\n- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.\n- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.\n- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.\n- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.\n"
+        "content": "# Agent Note: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate\n\nStatus: implemented\n\nEnglish | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)\n\n## Problem\n\nThis repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.\n\n## Decision\n\n- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).\n- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>`, which requires naming the confirmed pairs — bulk re-record is an explicit `--write --all`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.\n- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.\n- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.\n- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.\n\n## Verification\n\nThe verification contract covers each boundary independently. `verify-translation-pairing` pins pair completeness, hashes, switchers, and structure; [`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) pins locale-specific source selection for published pairs; [`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) pins discovery of Loader YAML and exclusion of translation records; and the [translation-prompt runnable snapshot](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts) pins the rendered system message, five reviewed example pairs, source request, and consumed response. Together these checks make pair drift, publication drift, configuration misclassification, and model-visible prompt drift review-visible.\n\n## Alternatives considered\n\n- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this Agent Note: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.\n- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.\n- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.\n- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.\n- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express \"consistent as of the state this PR introduces\", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.\n- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.\n\n## Industry precedent\n\nPaired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.\n\n## Consequences\n\n- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.\n- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, \"who confirmed these consistent, and when\" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.\n- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.\n- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.\n- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.\n- The recorded hashes double as the update tool: [gen-translation-brief](2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md) recovers either side's last-confirmed text from them and assembles the minimal-update briefing, so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "assistant",
-        "content": "# Agent Note：通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档\n\nStatus: implemented\n\n[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文\n\n## 问题\n\n本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。\n\n## 决策\n\n- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。\n- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对；每个现有配对都完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项，因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。\n- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对；政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。\n- **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。\n- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。\n\n## 验证\n\n验证契约分别覆盖每个边界。`verify-translation-pairing` 固定配对完整性、hash、切换行和结构；[`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) 固定已发布配对按 locale 选择对应源文件；[`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) 固定 Loader YAML 的发现以及翻译记录的排除；[翻译提示词可运行快照](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts)则固定渲染后的系统消息、五对经评审的示例、源请求和响应消费结果。这些检查共同使配对漂移、发布漂移、配置误分类和模型可见提示词漂移都可在评审中看见。\n\n## 曾考虑的替代方案\n\n- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：本 Agent Note 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。\n- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**：否决。本仓库没有将 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架；如果移动所有英文文件，所有既有交叉引用都要随之修改；且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑，而非原样工作。\n- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**：否决。适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自身的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁触及不到的地方。\n- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**：否决。每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 易读性，且局部不一致不可见。\n- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**：否决，改用 blob hash。同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。\n- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**：否决。纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的对侧文件会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号才与门禁的承诺名实相符。\n\n## 业界先例\n\n带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`），但这些仓库都没有在 CI 中**强制**配对或一致性检查；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国以外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit，为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计将两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加上 hash 配对门禁，再加一个仓库内置的 agent skill 替代 bot 服务。\n\n## 后果\n\n- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新对侧并重新记录配对。门禁将 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。\n- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。\n- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。\n- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。\n- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径，要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外，却看似已经强制执行。\n- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。\n"
+        "content": "# Agent Note：通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档\n\nStatus: implemented\n\n[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文\n\n## 问题\n\n本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。\n\n## 决策\n\n- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。\n- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>`，要求点名所确认的配对；批量重新记录是显式的 `--write --all`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对；每个现有配对都完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项，因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。\n- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对；政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。\n- **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。\n- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。\n\n## 验证\n\n验证契约分别覆盖每个边界。`verify-translation-pairing` 固定配对完整性、hash、切换行和结构；[`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) 固定已发布配对按 locale 选择对应源文件；[`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) 固定 Loader YAML 的发现以及翻译记录的排除；[翻译提示词可运行快照](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts)则固定渲染后的系统消息、五对经评审的示例、源请求和响应消费结果。这些检查共同使配对漂移、发布漂移、配置误分类和模型可见提示词漂移都可在评审中看见。\n\n## 曾考虑的替代方案\n\n- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：本 Agent Note 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。\n- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**：否决。本仓库没有将 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架；如果移动所有英文文件，所有既有交叉引用都要随之修改；且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑，而非原样工作。\n- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**：否决。适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自身的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁触及不到的地方。\n- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**：否决。每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 易读性，且局部不一致不可见。\n- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**：否决，改用 blob hash。同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。\n- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**：否决。纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的对侧文件会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号才与门禁的承诺名实相符。\n\n## 业界先例\n\n带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`），但这些仓库都没有在 CI 中**强制**配对或一致性检查；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国以外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit，为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计将两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加上 hash 配对门禁，再加一个仓库内置的 agent skill 替代 bot 服务。\n\n## 后果\n\n- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新对侧并重新记录配对。门禁将 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。\n- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。\n- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。\n- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。\n- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径，要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外，却看似已经强制执行。\n- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具：[gen-translation-brief](2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md) 会从中还原任一侧上次确认的文本并组装最小更新简报，因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。\n"
       },
       {
         "role": "user",