From 445bb89f03bf6e03bb7b6bb05349e3c9fd5fa3d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tianyi Cui <53024+tianyicui@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:51:06 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs(i18n): complete core batch review contract --- .../2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml | 4 ++-- .../process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md | 6 ++++++ .../2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md | 6 ++++++ docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml | 2 +- docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md | 2 +- docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml | 2 +- docs/defensive-patterns.zh.md | 2 +- .../translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json | 4 ++-- 8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml index a1d901ad15..3bfc8414e7 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 3be1d5d8fd9dba20cfca34c79cb01d89fad8097a -2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: a8aa8812934e755fe0175c8f3f20d194e4d24b4a +2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 4bc02878a0ea3f998e411ecc2b064c1626eacf3c +2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: 90a0c2f07f68b0fb4e26cd1c4b537a30a829b10f diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md index 3be1d5d8fd..4bc02878a0 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md @@ -13,8 +13,14 @@ This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outsid - **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md). - **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR. - **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows. +- **The enforcement frontier advances in coherent review batches.** A related set enters `required` only when reviewers can evaluate it as a unit. The core frontier groups [architecture](../../../../docs/architecture.md), the [Cordis primer](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md), [defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md), the [glossary](../../../../docs/glossary.md), and [testing](../../../../docs/testing.md) because their terminology, links, and contributor contracts inform one another; admitting only part would leave the enforced corpus internally inconsistent. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it. +- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration. - **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent. +## Verification + +The verification contract covers each boundary independently. `verify-translation-pairing` pins pair completeness, hashes, switchers, and structure; [`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) pins locale-specific source selection for published pairs; [`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) pins discovery of Loader YAML and exclusion of translation records; and the [translation-prompt runnable snapshot](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts) pins the rendered system message, five reviewed example pairs, source request, and consumed response. Together these checks make pair drift, publication drift, configuration misclassification, and model-visible prompt drift review-visible. + ## Alternatives considered - **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this Agent Note: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md index a8aa881293..90a0c2f07f 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md @@ -13,8 +13,14 @@ Status: implemented - **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。 - **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。 - **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：required 的配对必须存在；任何已存在的配对必须完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）不得配对；凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest（元数据清单）中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，也必须有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退：每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中，覆盖面只增不减。 +- **执行红线按连贯的评审批次推进。** 一组相关文档只有在评审者能够将其作为整体评估时，才进入 `required`。核心红线将[架构](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、[Cordis 入门](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md)、[防御性模式](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)、[术语表](../../../../docs/glossary.md)和[测试](../../../../docs/testing.md)归为一组，因为它们的术语、链接和贡献者契约相互关联；只纳入其中一部分会使受门禁约束的文档集合内部不一致。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。 +- **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。 - **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。 +## 验证 + +验证契约分别覆盖每个边界。`verify-translation-pairing` 固定配对完整性、hash、切换行和结构；[`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) 固定已发布配对按 locale 选择对应源文件；[`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) 固定 Loader YAML 的发现以及翻译记录的排除；[翻译提示词可运行快照](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts)则固定渲染后的系统消息、五对经评审的示例、源请求和响应消费结果。这些检查共同使配对漂移、发布漂移、配置误分类和模型可见提示词漂移都可在评审中看见。 + ## 曾考虑的替代方案 - **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：本 Agent Note 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。 diff --git a/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml b/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml index 5d5dc81f2a..2f0ed06b5b 100644 --- a/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml +++ b/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.i18n.yaml @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write extension-cookbook.md: 056be4298ed2bec2b78ed777d58f1f8a60a34b78 -extension-cookbook.zh.md: 41cdd4a7d14f32494d1dd5ae4a63c098d5640bdc +extension-cookbook.zh.md: 4574bcb0fa8b27d35e0fe612da028c471b4f9533 diff --git a/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md b/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md index 41cdd4a7d1..4574bcb0fa 100644 --- a/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md +++ b/docs/cookbook/extension-cookbook.zh.md @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ export function apply(ctx: Context) { ## 客户端驱动插件（外部协议桥接） -*客户端驱动*是面向协议格式（wire format）对端的 UI 插件。它拥有 stdio，因此必须禁用 stdout 日志；通过工厂创建或恢复 agent（智能体）；将 harness 事件映射为协议消息；将请求映射为 `send()` 或 `cancel()`。每个请求从持久的 `turn/end` 恰好结算一次（即使渲染失败），并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 拆除 agent 以使 dispose（资源释放）达到静止状态。 +*客户端驱动*是面向协议格式（wire format）对端的 UI 插件。它拥有 stdio，因此必须禁用 stdout 日志；通过工厂创建或恢复 agent（智能体）；将 harness 事件映射为协议消息；将请求映射为 `send()` 或 `cancel()`。每个请求从持久的 `turn/end` 恰好结算一次（即使渲染失败），并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 拆除 agent，确保 dispose（资源释放）流程完全停稳。 `packages/ui/acp` 是完整的工作示例：它将 agent 桥接到 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）（基于 stdio 的 JSON-RPC），使 Zed 及其他 ACP 编辑器能够驱动它。其 README 描述了完整的方法接口以及它在审批 seam 上注册的权限提示应答器。 diff --git a/docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml b/docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml index b39cad3e24..acdfaf96df 100644 --- a/docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml +++ b/docs/defensive-patterns.i18n.yaml @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write defensive-patterns.md: 349b916df6f7544300dacd578acf42668d9436ac -defensive-patterns.zh.md: 19565f54595195a52d1b49ff487294945171ae2d +defensive-patterns.zh.md: a6bbe317b220e31cce0e1bfc7c3b7c87d2d5cf46 diff --git a/docs/defensive-patterns.zh.md b/docs/defensive-patterns.zh.md index 19565f5459..a6bbe317b2 100644 --- a/docs/defensive-patterns.zh.md +++ b/docs/defensive-patterns.zh.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ `agent.send()` 不会在返回前翻转状态；后台任务的完成与轮次边界存在竞争；`reader.close()` 在 EOF 和 dispose（资源释放）两种情况下都会触发。切勿基于一个刚刚请求的状态来控制流程——应以实际触发的事件/promise（`agent/status`、`task.done`）驱动生命周期，并观察状态转换（先看到 `running` 再看到 `idle`），而不是把状态当作单次发送的结果：多个排队发送会在同一个 `running` 区间内连续运行多个轮次，而取消或资源释放可能丢弃尚未启动的项。这条守则是双向的：如果等待的转换永远不会发生（EOF 时没有提交过任何工作 → 永远不会进入 `running`），等待就会挂起——请显式处理「无需等待」的分支。 -## Dispose 必须达到静止，而不仅仅是请求停止 +## Dispose 必须达到完全停稳，而不仅仅是请求停止 一个清理流程如果发出 kill/abort 后就返回、而不等待工作实际停止，就会留下孤儿进程。请让清理逻辑异步化并 await 子进程退出（kill → await `done`），并在 kill 之前关闭监听器/通知注册表，使迟到的完成事件保持静默。测试应证明 dispose 确实等待了（`await fiber.dispose()` 之后 pid 已不存在），而不仅仅是进程最终会死。 diff --git a/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json b/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json index 82aebc4d6b..b0ec0a98cd 100644 --- a/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json +++ b/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ }, { "role": "user", - "content": "# Agent Note: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate\n\nStatus: implemented\n\nEnglish | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)\n\n## Problem\n\nThis repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.\n\n## Decision\n\n- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).\n- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.\n- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.\n\n## Alternatives considered\n\n- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this Agent Note: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.\n- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.\n- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.\n- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.\n- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express \"consistent as of the state this PR introduces\", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.\n- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.\n\n## Industry precedent\n\nPaired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.\n\n## Consequences\n\n- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.\n- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, \"who confirmed these consistent, and when\" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.\n- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.\n- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.\n- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. A date-named document dated on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so new date-named Agent Notes do not enlarge that backlog.\n- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p ` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.\n" + "content": "# Agent Note: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate\n\nStatus: implemented\n\nEnglish | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)\n\n## Problem\n\nThis repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.\n\n## Decision\n\n- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).\n- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired, and date-named documents on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.\n- **The enforcement frontier advances in coherent review batches.** A related set enters `required` only when reviewers can evaluate it as a unit. The core frontier groups [architecture](../../../../docs/architecture.md), the [Cordis primer](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md), [defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md), the [glossary](../../../../docs/glossary.md), and [testing](../../../../docs/testing.md) because their terminology, links, and contributor contracts inform one another; admitting only part would leave the enforced corpus internally inconsistent. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.\n- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.\n- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.\n\n## Verification\n\nThe verification contract covers each boundary independently. `verify-translation-pairing` pins pair completeness, hashes, switchers, and structure; [`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) pins locale-specific source selection for published pairs; [`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) pins discovery of Loader YAML and exclusion of translation records; and the [translation-prompt runnable snapshot](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts) pins the rendered system message, five reviewed example pairs, source request, and consumed response. Together these checks make pair drift, publication drift, configuration misclassification, and model-visible prompt drift review-visible.\n\n## Alternatives considered\n\n- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this Agent Note: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.\n- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.\n- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.\n- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.\n- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express \"consistent as of the state this PR introduces\", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.\n- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.\n\n## Industry precedent\n\nPaired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.\n\n## Consequences\n\n- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.\n- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, \"who confirmed these consistent, and when\" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.\n- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.\n- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.\n- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR. A date-named document dated on or after the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff merges bilingual or not at all, so new date-named Agent Notes do not enlarge that backlog.\n- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p ` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.\n" }, { "role": "assistant", - "content": "# Agent Note：通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档\n\nStatus: implemented\n\n[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文\n\n## 问题\n\n本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。\n\n## 决策\n\n- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。\n- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：required 的配对必须存在；任何已存在的配对必须完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）不得配对；凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest（元数据清单）中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，也必须有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退：每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中，覆盖面只增不减。\n- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。\n\n## 曾考虑的替代方案\n\n- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：本 Agent Note 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。\n- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**：否决。本仓库没有将 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架；如果移动所有英文文件，所有既有交叉引用都要随之修改；且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑，而非原样工作。\n- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**：否决。适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自身的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁触及不到的地方。\n- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**：否决。每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 易读性，且局部不一致不可见。\n- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**：否决，改用 blob hash。同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。\n- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**：否决。纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的对侧文件会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号才与门禁的承诺名实相符。\n\n## 业界先例\n\n带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`），但这些仓库都没有在 CI 中**强制**配对或一致性检查；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国以外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit，为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计将两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加上 hash 配对门禁，再加一个仓库内置的 agent skill 替代 bot 服务。\n\n## 后果\n\n- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新对侧并重新记录配对。门禁将 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。\n- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。\n- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。\n- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。\n- 推进天然是渐进的：`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog（待翻清单，`--list`），而非红色的 CI；因此配对按可评审的批次落地，无需一个巨型 PR。凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest 中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，都必须配齐双语文件，因此新建的日期命名 Agent Note 不会增加这份 backlog。\n- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p ` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。\n" + "content": "# Agent Note：通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档\n\nStatus: implemented\n\n[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文\n\n## 问题\n\n本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。\n\n## 决策\n\n- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。\n- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：required 的配对必须存在；任何已存在的配对必须完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）不得配对；凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest（元数据清单）中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，也必须有完整配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单只进不退：每个合并的翻译批次将自己的文件加入其中，覆盖面只增不减。\n- **执行红线按连贯的评审批次推进。** 一组相关文档只有在评审者能够将其作为整体评估时，才进入 `required`。核心红线将[架构](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、[Cordis 入门](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md)、[防御性模式](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md)、[术语表](../../../../docs/glossary.md)和[测试](../../../../docs/testing.md)归为一组，因为它们的术语、链接和贡献者契约相互关联；只纳入其中一部分会使受门禁约束的文档集合内部不一致。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。\n- **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。\n- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。\n\n## 验证\n\n验证契约分别覆盖每个边界。`verify-translation-pairing` 固定配对完整性、hash、切换行和结构；[`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) 固定已发布配对按 locale 选择对应源文件；[`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) 固定 Loader YAML 的发现以及翻译记录的排除；[翻译提示词可运行快照](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts)则固定渲染后的系统消息、五对经评审的示例、源请求和响应消费结果。这些检查共同使配对漂移、发布漂移、配置误分类和模型可见提示词漂移都可在评审中看见。\n\n## 曾考虑的替代方案\n\n- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：本 Agent Note 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。\n- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**：否决。本仓库没有将 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架；如果移动所有英文文件，所有既有交叉引用都要随之修改；且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑，而非原样工作。\n- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**：否决。适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自身的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁触及不到的地方。\n- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**：否决。每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 易读性，且局部不一致不可见。\n- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**：否决，改用 blob hash。同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。\n- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**：否决。纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的对侧文件会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号才与门禁的承诺名实相符。\n\n## 业界先例\n\n带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`），但这些仓库都没有在 CI 中**强制**配对或一致性检查；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国以外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit，为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计将两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加上 hash 配对门禁，再加一个仓库内置的 agent skill 替代 bot 服务。\n\n## 后果\n\n- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新对侧并重新记录配对。门禁将 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。\n- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。\n- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。\n- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。\n- 推进天然是渐进的：`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog（待翻清单，`--list`），而非红色的 CI；因此配对按可评审的批次落地，无需一个巨型 PR。凡文件名以日期开头且日期不早于 manifest 中 `requiredSince` 分界日期的文档，都必须配齐双语文件，因此新建的日期命名 Agent Note 不会增加这份 backlog。\n- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p ` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。\n" }, { "role": "user",