fix: name run_code's required description argument in its model-facing prose

The transport schema requires both `code` and `description`, but the tool
description and both SDK instruction flavors described the call as passing a
program. `description` was reachable only through the parameter schema, so a
model following the prose emitted `{code}` alone and lost the whole written
program to an INVALID_ARGS rejection.

The length and format guidance stays in RUN_CODE_DESCRIPTION_PARAM_DESCRIPTION
alone, so the schema and the prompt cannot drift.

Fixes #2426
This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
2026-08-12 23:30:51 +08:00
parent c4e24071d6
commit 63fecf2534
24 changed files with 77 additions and 48 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ ask_user_question pauses the tool call until the active UI provider returns a hu
### `run_code`
Execute a TypeScript program against the available tools. Write the BODY of an async function (erasable syntax only; top-level `await` and `return` work) and call tools as `await tools.name(args)` per the declarations in the system prompt. Only what you print or return comes back — curate it.
Execute a TypeScript program against the available tools. Takes two required arguments: `code`, the BODY of an async function (erasable syntax only; top-level `await` and `return` work), and `description`, a short summary of what the program does. Call tools as `await tools.name(args)` per the declarations in the system prompt. Only what you print or return comes back — curate it.
```json
{