fix(workspace): make deletion recoverable

This commit is contained in:
NI0317
2026-07-27 14:37:04 +08:00
parent 187cf6f804
commit 7bd96af5eb
13 files changed
+294 -20

No files matched your search

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md: cae01d529bc6fd97da6fb61839bd5ec8e21557e2
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md: 76377ebc5e93101e1e3efce1d29c3c654df032c2
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md: 58ae5c4bef2cf1cb0a0158eda5eb37daf2e9703d
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md: 7a79a1ccc53a0d4fd7e5ab453239ade955313c6e
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Registry operations serialize create and delete. Deletion first writes the Works
The Host stream keeps its committed-id set through the preceding global-order write and removes the id only on the table deletion. Create rollback therefore emits no false removal, while every connected tab receives exactly the id needed to delete its projection.
Create and delete write a durable `pendingMutation` before their record/order pair can diverge. Startup completes only the named create or delete and clears the marker; it never infers crash provenance from an orphan row alone. Unmarked order/table divergence therefore retains the registry's fail-loud corruption behavior. A deletion whose table write committed but marker cleanup failed still reports success—the requested state and removal frame are already committed—and the next startup clears that marker idempotently.
## Client convergence
`WorkspaceManager` treats both `host/workspace-changed` and `host/workspace-removed` as ordered deltas replayed over an in-flight `workspace.list` response. A successful unary delete removes the row immediately instead of waiting for its own stream echo. Removal is idempotent, and a process-local tombstone rejects late changed frames or stale baseline rows for the never-reused Workspace id. A reconnect still refreshes from `workspace.list`; Session state is never pruned by a Workspace delta.
@@ -40,14 +42,16 @@ The menu, Modal, and buttons retain their existing structure and design tokens.
**Delete the table row and repair order later.** Rejected because a crash or write failure would leave an initialized registry whose order and table disagree. The registry updates both under one serialized operation and restores the prior order on table failure.
**Delete every unreferenced row at startup.** Rejected because the same shape can come from unexplained order corruption; silently discarding it could lose Workspace metadata and Session accounting. Recovery requires the explicit pending marker written by the owning mutation.
**Refetch both lists after success.** Rejected because the committed removal frame plus immediate unary echo is sufficient, preserves the current Session object, and avoids turning a local mutation into two list requests. Reconnect baselines remain the repair path.
## Verification
Workspace package tests pin successful metadata-only deletion, unknown-id idempotence, table-failure rollback, and cache/table invariant behavior. Apiproxy and carrier tests pin the schema, handler, `workspace-not-found`, retained Session/folder, and committed `host/workspace-removed` frame. Client tests pin unary direct echo, duplicate removal, late changed frames, and deletion racing an in-flight baseline. Component tests pin confirmation, pending-state duplicate suppression, success, failure, Cancel, Escape, and Close.
Workspace package tests pin successful metadata-only deletion, same-path re-registration, unknown-id idempotence, table-failure rollback, explicit-marker restart recovery, unexplained-corruption rejection, and cache/table invariant behavior. Apiproxy and carrier tests pin the schema, handler, `workspace-not-found`, retained Session/folder, fresh-id re-registration, and committed `host/workspace-removed` frame. Client tests pin unary direct echo, duplicate removal, late changed frames, and deletion racing an in-flight baseline. Component tests pin confirmation, pending-state duplicate suppression, success, failure, Cancel, Escape, and Close.
The assembled keyless Web scenario registers an existing temporary project directory, accounts a persisted Session, makes that Session current, confirms deletion in Chromium, and verifies the Workspace group disappears while Ungrouped retains the current Session. It checks the user file and JSONL log before and after deletion and repeats the UI, directory, and log assertions after reload.
## Consequences
Deleting a Workspace is intentionally reversible by registering the same directory again, although its prior manual Session order is gone; re-registration does not automatically re-adopt existing Sessions after bootstrap. The operation gives up a one-click cleanup of Session histories or source directories in exchange for a deletion boundary that matches what the record actually owns.
Deleting a Workspace is intentionally reversible by registering the same directory again with a fresh id, although its prior manual Session order is gone; re-registration does not automatically re-adopt existing Sessions after bootstrap. The operation gives up a one-click cleanup of Session histories or source directories in exchange for a deletion boundary that matches what the record actually owns.
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Workspace 注册已有代码目录,使 GUI 能够为目录命名,并对其
Host 流在前一笔全局顺序写入期间继续保留其已提交 id 集合,只在删除表行时移除该 id。因此,创建回滚不会发出错误的移除帧,而每个已连接标签页都能收到从自身投影中删除该记录所需的准确 id。
Create 与 delete 会在记录/顺序对可能分叉之前写入持久 `pendingMutation`。启动时只补全其中明确命名的 create 或 delete,并清除该标记;系统绝不会仅凭孤立表行的形状推断崩溃来源。因此,没有标记的顺序/表分叉仍会保持注册表原有的损坏直接失败语义。如果删除的表写入已经提交、但标记清理失败,操作仍会报告成功——请求状态和移除帧都已经提交——下一次启动会以幂等方式清除该标记。
## 客户端收敛
`WorkspaceManager``host/workspace-changed``host/workspace-removed` 都视为有序增量,并在进行中的 `workspace.list` 响应之上回放。成功的一元删除会立即移除行,无需等待本次操作自己的流回显。移除操作具有幂等性;由于 Workspace id 永不复用,进程本地删除标记会拒绝延迟到达的 changed 帧或陈旧基线行。重连仍从 `workspace.list` 刷新;Workspace 增量绝不会剪除会话状态。
@@ -40,14 +42,16 @@ Host 流在前一笔全局顺序写入期间继续保留其已提交 id 集合
**先删除表行,之后再修复顺序。** 不予采纳,因为崩溃或写入失败会使已初始化注册表的顺序与表不一致。注册表会在同一串行操作内更新二者,并在表操作失败时恢复此前顺序。
**启动时删除所有未引用表行。** 不予采纳,因为来源不明的顺序损坏也会呈现相同形状;静默丢弃可能损失 Workspace 元数据和 Session 账本。恢复必须依赖拥有该变更的操作预先写入的明确待处理标记。
**成功后重新拉取两个列表。** 不予采纳,因为已提交的移除帧与即时一元回显已足够,既能保留当前会话对象,也避免将局部变更扩大为两次列表请求。重连基线仍是修复路径。
## Verification
Workspace 包测试固定了仅删除元数据的成功路径、未知 id 的幂等行为、表操作失败回滚,以及缓存/表不变量行为。Apiproxy 与载体测试固定了 schema、处理器、`workspace-not-found`、保留会话/文件夹,以及已提交的 `host/workspace-removed` 帧。客户端测试固定了一元直接回显、重复移除、延迟到达的 changed 帧,以及删除与进行中基线并发的行为。组件测试固定了确认交互、待处理状态下抑制重复提交、成功、失败、Cancel、Escape 与 Close。
Workspace 包测试固定了仅删除元数据的成功路径、同路径重新注册、未知 id 的幂等行为、表操作失败回滚、明确标记的重启恢复、来源不明损坏的拒绝,以及缓存/表不变量行为。Apiproxy 与载体测试固定了 schema、处理器、`workspace-not-found`、保留会话/文件夹、使用新 id 重新注册,以及已提交的 `host/workspace-removed` 帧。客户端测试固定了一元直接回显、重复移除、延迟到达的 changed 帧,以及删除与进行中基线并发的行为。组件测试固定了确认交互、待处理状态下抑制重复提交、成功、失败、Cancel、Escape 与 Close。
组装后的无密钥 Web 场景会注册一个已有临时项目目录,将持久化会话计入账本,把该会话设为当前会话,在 Chromium 中确认删除,并验证 Workspace 分组消失,而 Ungrouped 保留当前会话。该场景在删除前后检查用户文件和 JSONL 日志,并在刷新后重复验证 UI、目录与日志。
## Consequences
删除 Workspace 后仍可重新注册同一目录,因此该操作有意设计为可逆;但此前的手动会话顺序会丢失,重新注册后,系统也不会在 bootstrap 结束后自动重新收编现有会话。该操作放弃一键清理会话历史或源码目录,以换取与记录实际所有权一致的删除边界。
删除 Workspace 后仍可使用新 id 重新注册同一目录,因此该操作有意设计为可逆;但此前的手动会话顺序会丢失,重新注册后,系统也不会在 bootstrap 结束后自动重新收编现有会话。该操作放弃一键清理会话历史或源码目录,以换取与记录实际所有权一致的删除边界。