diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.i18n.yaml index db80fbcfa9..341ea482c0 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.i18n.yaml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: -# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 313d687b49da0d08b0ec321bcb655b642f7a5af3 -2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: 6be129b7b16ff01d73dc94f7ce6d299ee2c10e55 +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md +2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: cb9d9487cd274696ae20dddab8c6888b4cf4b833 +2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: 77538105ba2841479238045327de493c5a835b7f diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md index 313d687b49..cb9d9487cd 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ The bash seam exposes `resolve`, `run`, and `start`. `start(spec)` returns a `Ba For background bash, `dsh-tool-bash` registers the calling agent as owner. Its hooks map `kill()` to cancellation, `done` to a completed or killed `TaskOutcome`, and `readOutput()` to the process's bounded incremental output plus spill and sandbox notices. Generic task tools own ids, status lines, listing, waiting, and completion notices. -For background subagents, `dsh-tool-subagent` creates a task-owned `AbortController` and begins provider startup inside the task starter. Cancellation aborts the same signal before or after provider readiness. `done` awaits both the child result and child disposal, maps completed output to a final result, maps abort to `killed`, and maps other stop reasons or infrastructure failures to `failed`. Intermediate child history remains in the child session and is not exposed through `readOutput()`. +For background subagents, `dsh-tool-subagent` creates a task-owned `AbortController` and begins provider startup inside the task starter. Cancellation aborts the same signal before or after provider publication. `done` awaits both the child result and child disposal, maps completed output to a final result, maps abort to `killed`, and maps other stop reasons or infrastructure failures to `failed`. Intermediate child history remains in the child session and is not exposed through `readOutput()`. ## Alternatives considered diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md index 6be129b7b1..77538105ba 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas 对于后台 bash，`dsh-tool-bash` 将调用方 agent 注册为所有者。其钩子将 `kill()` 映射为取消，将 `done` 映射为 completed 或 killed 的 `TaskOutcome`，并将 `readOutput()` 映射为进程的有界增量输出，以及溢出文件与沙箱通知。通用任务工具拥有 id、状态行、列表、等待和完成通知。 -对于后台 subagent，`dsh-tool-subagent` 创建由任务拥有的 `AbortController`，并在任务 starter 内启动提供方。无论提供方就绪前后，取消都会中止同一个 signal。`done` 同时等待子运行结果和子运行释放，将已完成输出映射为最终结果，将中止映射为 `killed`，并将其他停止原因或基础设施失败映射为 `failed`。中间子历史保留在子会话中，不通过 `readOutput()` 暴露。 +对于后台 subagent，`dsh-tool-subagent` 创建由任务拥有的 `AbortController`，并在任务 starter 内启动提供方。无论提供方发布前后，取消都会中止同一个 signal。`done` 同时等待子运行结果和子运行释放，将已完成输出映射为最终结果，将中止映射为 `killed`，并将其他停止原因或基础设施失败映射为 `failed`。中间子历史保留在子会话中，不通过 `readOutput()` 暴露。 ## 备选方案 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.i18n.yaml index cbaedf3ab9..d05f034c0f 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.i18n.yaml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: -# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md: 232fc02d66411b5ee8a21943795a3be4713bf238 -2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md: 39d558f8cde0183a3590d268aca36ea85e5f5c63 +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md +2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md: d6b865977a76061784c88dbad089fa5963be8c7e +2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md: 5b6b9b1ca582d83a267a30f8f76e38ea87d52e9b diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md index 232fc02d66..d6b865977a 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md @@ -260,19 +260,19 @@ Skill registry definitions and approval policies are readonly same-process contr Skill still validates external skill files and parsed provider output, routes catalogs through the calling agent's tool view, and disposes registrations exactly. Approval still resolves policy, observes cancellation, routes `approval/request` by `request.agent`, records the durable audit pair, and contains answerer and post-commit observer failures. -## Subagents: readiness is the start promise +## Subagents: publication is the start promise -Subagent startup has one ownership transfer. The provider owns partial resources until its start promise fulfills with a ready published run; the caller owns the returned run and must dispose it. +Subagent startup has one ownership transfer. The provider owns unpublished resources until its start promise fulfills with a published run; the caller owns the returned run and must dispose it. ### The service contract has one cancellation channel -`SubagentProvider.start()` and `SubagentService.start()` return `Promise`. The promise fulfills only after the backend has established the child it promises, so callers and `subagent/start` observers never need a second `run.started` readiness promise. +`SubagentProvider.start()` and `SubagentService.start()` return `Promise`. The promise fulfills after the backend crosses its publication boundary, so callers and `subagent/start` observers never need a second `run.started` promise. Provider work that fails before publication rejects `start()`; prompt, turn, cancellation, and infrastructure outcomes after publication settle through `SubagentRun.result` without hiding the child id, as required by the [durable catalog decision](../feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md). -`SubagentStartRequest.signal` is required. Aborting it requests cancellation during startup and after readiness. `SubagentRun.dispose()` also requests cancellation and awaits quiescence. There is no separate public `run.cancel()` channel. +`SubagentStartRequest.signal` is required. Aborting it requests cancellation during startup and across the published run's remaining readiness or turn work. `SubagentRun.dispose()` also requests cancellation and awaits quiescence. There is no separate public `run.cancel()` channel. -Optional `sendMessage()` supports a live backend that can accept steering. Optional `resume()` returns `Promise` because the resumed child has the same asynchronous readiness boundary. +Continuable conversations use their separate creation and follow-up operations and have no `SubagentRun`; their manager owns each resident `AgentHandle`. -The service validates provider capabilities and request semantics before calling the provider. A provider rejection cleans any partial resources before the rejection escapes and emits no `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` pair. After fulfillment, the service attaches result observation, emits scoped start, and returns the run. Provider removal prevents later starts but does not revoke a run already accepted by the provider. +The service validates provider capabilities and request semantics before calling the provider. A provider rejection cleans unpublished resources before the rejection escapes and emits no `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` pair. After fulfillment, the service attaches result observation, emits scoped start, and returns the run; a post-publication result rejection closes that pair. Provider removal prevents later starts but does not revoke a run already accepted by the provider. ### In-process providers reuse the core transaction @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ The design is enforced at types, runtime escape points, generated contracts, and ### Types make the ordinary path hard to misuse -Readonly contracts describe borrowed same-process values. `Scoped` marks event receivers, `agentEvents()` fuses carrier and subject, tool inputs omit registry-owned tokens, and subagent async return types expose readiness directly. +Readonly contracts describe borrowed same-process values. `Scoped` marks event receivers, `agentEvents()` fuses carrier and subject, tool inputs omit registry-owned tokens, and subagent async return types expose publication and settlement directly. TypeScript cannot govern JavaScript casts, direct Cordis dispatch, process messages, or durable files, so runtime enforcement remains at those escape points. @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ Parallel sentinels can all mirror whether one operation is live. One transaction ### Keep synchronous subagent start plus `run.started` -This splits provider acceptance from readiness and forces every consumer to register a partial run, attach result observation, await readiness, and clean up readiness failure. An async start promise makes provider-to-caller ownership transfer the readiness boundary itself. +This splits provider acceptance from publication and forces every consumer to register a partial run, attach result observation, await publication, and clean up publication failure. An async start promise keeps provider-to-caller ownership transfer at publication; the existing result promise owns any remaining readiness instead of adding another lifecycle promise. ### Restore selected prompt or tool contributions after assembly @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ The implementation is smaller and its proof follows the same shape as its owners - Durable, queued, model, worker, process, and wire values are owned at their real boundary; typed same-process values follow readonly contracts. - ToolRegistry's presentation, lookup, and execution resolve the same live view before expert assembly transforms, and committed results have one immutable observation point. - Registry contributions are deterministic inputs, while the trusted assembly waterfall owns the final model-visible composition. -- Subagent start returns only a ready run, required signals cancel pending or live work, and disposal reaches the backend's quiescence contract. +- Subagent start returns only a published run, required signals cancel pending or live work, and disposal reaches the backend's quiescence contract. - Worker/process result precedence and cleanup remain correct under death, late messages, and bounded teardown. ### Costs and limits diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md index 39d558f8cd..5b6b9b1ca5 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md @@ -260,19 +260,19 @@ Skill 注册表定义和 approval 策略是 readonly 的同进程契约。它们 Skill 仍然验证外部 skill 文件和解析的提供方输出，通过调用 agent 的工具视图路由目录，并精确 dispose 注册。Approval 仍然解析策略、观察取消、按 `request.agent` 路由 `approval/request`、记录持久化审计对，并隔离应答者和提交后观察者的失败。 -## Subagent：就绪即 start promise +## Subagent：发布即 start promise -Subagent 启动有一次所有权转移。提供方拥有部分资源直到其 start promise 以一个就绪的已发布 run 兑现；调用方拥有返回的 run 并必须 dispose 它。 +Subagent 启动有一次所有权转移。提供方拥有未发布资源，直到其 start promise 以一个已发布 run 兑现；调用方拥有返回的 run 并必须 dispose 它。 ### 服务契约有一个取消通道 -`SubagentProvider.start()` 和 `SubagentService.start()` 返回 `Promise`。Promise 仅在后端建立了它所承诺的子级之后才兑现，因此调用方和 `subagent/start` 观察者从不需要第二个 `run.started` 就绪 promise。 +`SubagentProvider.start()` 和 `SubagentService.start()` 返回 `Promise`。Promise 会在后端跨过发布边界后兑现，因此调用方和 `subagent/start` 观察者从不需要第二个 `run.started` promise。提供方工作如果在发布前失败，`start()` 就会被拒绝；发布后的提示词、轮次、取消与基础设施结果会通过 `SubagentRun.result` 结算，且不会隐藏 child id，这也是[持久化目录决策](../feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md)所要求的契约。 -`SubagentStartRequest.signal` 是必需的。中止它会在启动期间和就绪之后请求取消。`SubagentRun.dispose()` 也请求取消并等待完全停稳。没有单独的公开 `run.cancel()` 通道。 +`SubagentStartRequest.signal` 是必需的。中止它会在启动期间，以及已发布 run 的剩余就绪或轮次工作中请求取消。`SubagentRun.dispose()` 也请求取消并等待完全停稳。没有单独的公开 `run.cancel()` 通道。 -可选的 `sendMessage()` 支持能接受 steering 的活跃后端。可选的 `resume()` 返回 `Promise`，因为恢复的子级有相同的异步就绪边界。 +可继续对话使用各自独立的创建和后续操作，并且没有 `SubagentRun`；其管理器拥有每个驻留中的 `AgentHandle`。 -服务在调用提供方之前验证提供方能力和请求语义。提供方拒绝在拒绝逃出之前清理所有部分资源，且不发射 `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` 对。兑现之后，服务附加结果观察、发射作用域 start 并返回 run。提供方移除阻止后续 start，但不撤销提供方已接受的 run。 +服务在调用提供方之前验证提供方能力和请求语义。提供方 rejection 在逃出之前清理未发布资源，且不发射 `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` 对。兑现之后，服务附加结果观察、发射作用域 start 并返回 run；发布后的结果 rejection 会结束该事件对。提供方移除会阻止后续 start，但不撤销提供方已接受的 run。 ### 进程内提供方复用核心事务 @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ Worker 边界仍然序列化请求和结果。宿主保留首个终端结果仲 ### 类型使常规路径难以误用 -Readonly 契约描述借用的同进程值。`Scoped` 标记事件接收器，`agentEvents()` 融合载体和主体，工具输入省略注册表拥有的 token，subagent 异步返回类型直接暴露就绪性。 +Readonly 契约描述借用的同进程值。`Scoped` 标记事件接收器，`agentEvents()` 融合载体和主体，工具输入省略注册表拥有的 token，subagent 异步返回类型直接暴露发布与结算。 TypeScript 无法管控 JavaScript 强制转换、直接 Cordis dispatch、进程消息或持久化文件，因此运行时强制保留在这些逃逸点。 @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ TypeScript 无法管控 JavaScript 强制转换、直接 Cordis dispatch、进 ### 保留同步 subagent start 加 `run.started` -这将提供方接受与就绪分离，迫使每个消费方注册部分 run、附加结果观察、等待就绪并清理就绪失败。异步 start promise 使提供方到调用方的所有权转移本身成为就绪边界。 +这将提供方接受与发布分离，迫使每个消费方注册部分 run、附加结果观察、等待发布并清理发布失败。异步 start promise 将提供方到调用方的所有权转移保持在发布边界；现有的结果 promise 负责所有剩余就绪工作，无需增加另一个生命周期 promise。 ### 在 assembly 之后恢复选定的提示词或工具贡献 @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ Worker 消息、进程死亡和持久化输入确实跨越所有权和序列化 - 持久化、队列、模型、worker、进程和协议格式的值在其真实边界处被拥有；类型化的同进程值遵循 readonly 契约。 - ToolRegistry 的展示、查找和执行在专家 assembly 变换之前解析相同的活跃视图，已提交的结果有一个不可变的观察点。 - 注册表贡献是确定性输入，而可信的 assembly waterfall 拥有最终的模型可见组合。 -- Subagent start 仅返回就绪的 run，必需的 signal 取消待定或活跃的工作，dispose 到达后端的完全停稳契约。 +- Subagent start 仅返回已发布的 run，必需的 signal 取消待定或活跃的工作，dispose 到达后端的完全停稳契约。 - Worker/进程结果优先级和清理在死亡、迟到消息和有界拆除下保持正确。 ### 代价与局限 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml index e603129715..ca90cebb0e 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md -2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: b7081591cf7e5e3c586c74c5a71b4317376135cb -2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 89557182ca7781f4fb59b8daf866aaca96cf20ee +2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 7ad2a2403eb9962b369b016070e8ca378ed55c60 +2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 90850c469f1444e7f6cd105551e6cc21920e91d9 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md index b7081591cf..7ad2a2403e 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ The remaining frame types are not re-copied here; the full unions are `MuxFrame` - **History = event replay**: one fold (client side); history pagination and live increments share one code path; the server maintains no second materialized-snapshot system. History **page boundaries align to message boundaries** (never cut mid-message; chunks group with their finalized message), and the tail page includes the in-flight partial's chunks. - **Prompt correlation**: the prompt's rpcId rides MessageSource (`'user-rpc'`) into the `user/message` event; the client uses it to promote the optimistic echo. - **Reconnect = rebuild**: no resume cursor (`mux`'s `since` signature is a reserved seat, ignored if passed); on disconnect reopen the stream + refetch history; compare `subscribed.lastSeq` with the history tail seq and backfill once if there is a seam. -- **Cold sessions resume implicitly**: when `history`/`prompt` hits an unattached session the impl auto-resumes, deduplicating concurrent triggers with an in-flight table; attachment status is not exposed to clients (`running` already covers it). +- **Cold session handling follows ownership**: `session.history` and the source read for `session.fork` inspect persistence without an Agent, while Agent-bound ordinary-session methods such as `prompt` resume through a deduplicated in-flight table. Session-backed subagents reject that generic resume path, and attachment status is not exposed to clients (`running` already covers it). - **Approvals/questions**: the requested frame mints a stable rpcId on acceptance; first answer wins, and the host's in-memory pending table (keyed by rpcId) is the only referee; after a mux reopen, still-pending requested frames replay after the subscribed frame (rpcId reused verbatim — refresh recovery). The audit events `approval/asked`/`decided` continue through the durable log — frames = the live control plane, events = the durable audit. **Status**: the contract and frame types are shipped; the host-side pending table/wire answerer is unimplemented (`respond` in `api-proxy.ts` is a stub, always `not-pending`); PendingCard v1 is display-only. - **No protocol version**: client and host release bound together; `host.describe` has no protocolVersion field; introduce one when an independently released client appears. - **Reserved-seam discipline**: the map holds only implemented methods; an unknown method fails loud at envelope parse (`bad-request`) — no not-implemented fallback code. The reservation list (implementing = copy the signature into the domain interface + add the map row + add the schema pair): `session.fork`, `prompt.mode` gaining `'inject'`, `task.list`, `host.listModels`, describe gaining `hostInstanceId`. (`session.rename` graduated from this list: it appends a user-source `session/title` event.) diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md index 89557182ca..90850c469f 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ export type ResponseValue = - **历史 = 事件重放**：一套 fold（client 侧），历史分页与 live 增量同一条代码路径；server 不做物化快照第二套。history **页边界对齐消息边界**（绝不从消息中间截断；chunk 随定稿消息归组），尾页含进行中 partial 的 chunk。 - **prompt 关联**：prompt 的 rpcId 经 MessageSource（`'user-rpc'`）透传进 `user/message` 事件，client 以此把乐观回显转正。 - **重连 = 重建**：不做续传 cursor（`mux` 的 `since` 签名留座、传了忽略）；断线重开流 + 重拉 history；`subscribed.lastSeq` 与 history 尾 seq 比对，有缝再补拉一次。 -- **冷 session 隐式 resume**：`history`/`prompt` 命中未 attach 的 session 时 impl 自动 resume，并发触发用在途表去重；attach 与否不对客暴露（`running` 已覆盖）。 +- **冷会话处理遵循所有权**：`session.history` 与 `session.fork` 的源端读取会在不获取 Agent 的情况下检查持久化存储，而绑定到 Agent 的普通会话方法（如 `prompt`）则通过在途表去重后恢复会话。由会话支撑的 subagent 会拒绝这条通用恢复路径，且附加状态不对客户端暴露（`running` 已经覆盖）。 - **审批/问答**：requested 帧受理时 mint 稳定 rpcId；先到先赢，host 内存 pending 表（keyed by rpcId）是唯一裁判；mux 重开后在 subscribed 帧后重放仍 pending 的 requested 帧（rpcId 原样复用，刷新恢复）。审计事件 `approval/asked`/`decided` 照旧走 durable 日志——帧=live 控制面，事件=durable 审计。**现状**：契约与帧类型已 shipped，host 侧 pending 表/wire answerer 未实现（`api-proxy.ts` 的 `respond` 是 stub，恒回 `not-pending`）；PendingCard v1 只展示。 - **不设协议版本**：client 与 host 绑定发布，`host.describe` 无 protocolVersion 字段；出现独立发布的 client 时再引入。 - **预留接缝纪律**：map 只含已实现方法，未知 method 在信封 parse 即 fail loud（`bad-request`），不设 not-implemented 兜底码。预留清单（实现时把签名抄进域接口+map 加行+schema 加对即升格）：`session.fork`、`prompt.mode` 加 `'inject'`、`task.list`、`host.listModels`、describe 加 `hostInstanceId`。（`session.rename` 已从本清单毕业：追加 user 来源的 `session/title` 事件。） diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.i18n.yaml index 01334b2d8b..55efb87b8f 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md -2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md: ca6145f3ce404b88d2a144483c6f1145fe0a9a7e -2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md: d492c4ac5f39328e75d991b285004e2d19c56283 +2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md: 9d0685876b4d1bac339961c67ab08f620e499464 +2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md: 8fa9625ea6c58b0b07d964ef2580b670893a3d75 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md index ca6145f3ce..9d0685876b 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ A bracket owner reads it positionally: an unmatched opening marker before `sessi The constructor is the placement because it is the single waist every seeded session passes through. All six entry points reach it: `agents.resume()`, config-driven startup on a persisted id (`restoreOrCreateConfigured`), `sessions.fork()`, a subagent fork child, `coordinator.adopt()`'s live-prefix path, and a bare `sessions.create(id, {seed})`. A boundary written at persistence load would miss both fork paths — and a forked child inheriting a still-running parent's open `compact/start` is precisely the case that must be classifiable. A boundary written at loop start would miss `fork()` and `adopt()`, and would have to fire on `SessionStartSource: 'startup'`, which is what a fork child publishes, so that field would stop discriminating. -Two guards keep the marker precise. An omitted seed writes nothing because the session is fresh. A seed already ending in one is not re-marked, which makes the write idempotent. Idempotence is load-bearing rather than tidiness — `agentFor()` resumes a cold session on first touch, so merely opening one in a client is a pickup, and without the guard browsing would grow a log by one event per visit. +Two guards keep the marker precise. An omitted seed writes nothing because the session is fresh. A seed already ending in one is not re-marked, which makes the write idempotent. Idempotence is load-bearing rather than tidiness: each Agent-bound pickup of a cold session passes through `agentFor()`, and without the guard repeated controls would grow the log even when they perform no work. The inspection-only `session.history` and `session.fork` source paths do not create this boundary in the source. ## Persistence needs no changes diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md index d492c4ac5f..8fa9625ea6 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.zh.md @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Status: implemented 选择构造函数，是因为它是每一个带种子会话都必经的唯一收窄处。全部六个入口都会到达它：`agents.resume()`、在已持久化 id 上的配置驱动启动（`restoreOrCreateConfigured`）、`sessions.fork()`、子代理 fork 子会话、`coordinator.adopt()` 的实时前缀路径，以及裸的 `sessions.create(id, {seed})`。在持久化加载时写入的边界会漏掉两条 fork 路径——而一个继承了仍在运行的父会话开放 `compact/start` 的 fork 子会话，恰恰是必须可判定的场景。在 loop 启动时写入的边界会漏掉 `fork()` 与 `adopt()`，并且不得不在 `SessionStartSource: 'startup'` 上触发——那正是 fork 子会话发布的取值，于是该字段将不再具有区分力。 -两条守卫让这个标记保持精确。省略种子时不写入任何内容，因为这是全新会话。种子本身已以该事件结尾时不会重复标记，这让写入具备幂等性。幂等性是承重的，而不是为了整洁——`agentFor()` 会在首次触碰时恢复一个冷会话，因此在客户端里仅仅打开一个会话就是一次接手；没有这条守卫，浏览会让日志每访问一次就增长一个事件。 +两条守卫让这个标记保持精确。省略种子时不写入任何内容，因为这是全新会话。种子本身已以该事件结尾时不会重复标记，这让写入具备幂等性。幂等性是承重的，而不是为了整洁：每次绑定到 Agent 的冷会话接手都会经过 `agentFor()`；没有这条守卫，重复的控件操作即使没有执行任何工作，也会让日志增长。只执行检查的 `session.history` 与 `session.fork` 源端路径不会在源会话中创建这条边界。 ## 持久化无需任何改动 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.i18n.yaml index c20d347fc9..c78049cc8d 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md -2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md: 943e95d6951a28929c4f8ce4d0b6e17224b08ede -2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md: bbadd8adf8fd5bb0604ef87d322e48ce4c2ed759 +2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md: b8bba45009c126495a8b03ee36d6eb2cccac9a93 +2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md: 0e1fffae8819bea81b91fae10c76dbadc78474fe diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md index 943e95d695..b8bba45009 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The browser cannot repair that loss by resending visible rows. It does not own t ## Decision -`session.cancel` is the Web Host API's active-turn stop. It calls `agent.cancel({ kind: 'user' }, { keepInbox: true })`, preserving pending inbox work while cooperatively aborting the current turn. The underlying option preserves queued and steering entries; the Web Queue projection continues to expose only queued entries. +`session.cancel` is the Web Host API's active-turn stop for ordinary sessions. It rejects session-backed subagents with `agent-busy`; otherwise it calls `agent.cancel({ kind: 'user' }, { keepInbox: true })`, preserving pending inbox work while cooperatively aborting the current turn. The underlying option preserves queued and steering entries; the Web Queue projection continues to expose only queued entries. The AgentLoop starts no concurrent replacement turn. It closes and flushes the interrupted turn, reaches cancellation quiescence, and then claims the next waking queued occurrence through its existing FIFO driver. That claim emits `agent/inbox/dequeue`, so the Host's authoritative `session/queue` snapshot retires the claimed row and leaves the remaining tail visible. The browser neither resends nor promotes any row. Work that ignores cancellation delays this handoff until it settles. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md index bbadd8adf8..0e1fffae88 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.zh.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Web 停止按钮调用 `session.cancel`，后者映射到广义 `agent.cancel({ ## 决策 -`session.cancel` 是 Web Host API 的活动轮次停止操作。它调用 `agent.cancel({ kind: 'user' }, { keepInbox: true })`，在协作式中止当前轮次的同时保留待处理 inbox 工作。底层选项会保留 queued 和 steering 入队项；Web Queue 投影继续只暴露 queued 入队项。 +`session.cancel` 是 Web Host API 面向普通会话的活动轮次停止操作。它会以 `agent-busy` 拒绝由会话支撑的 subagent；否则会调用 `agent.cancel({ kind: 'user' }, { keepInbox: true })`，在协作式中止当前轮次的同时保留待处理 inbox 工作。底层选项会保留 queued 和 steering 入队项；Web Queue 投影继续只暴露 queued 入队项。 AgentLoop 不会启动并发的替代轮次。它会关闭并 flush 被中断的轮次，达到取消的完全停稳，然后通过现有 FIFO 驱动器认领下一个可唤醒的 queued 入队项。该认领会发出 `agent/inbox/dequeue`，因此 Host 的权威 `session/queue` 快照会退役已认领行，并使剩余队尾保持可见。浏览器既不重发，也不提升任何行。忽略取消的工作会延迟这一交接，直到该工作结算。 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.i18n.yaml index 3d1140f5cf..feb73d00dd 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.i18n.yaml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: -# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md: 9c17a93751de209e5e4e5a0ca7d7b1d8e5656a47 -2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md: 6294c84a8fa11e492316f4b69048aa5f477aa04f +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md +2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md: 043092884731c403a11b71ef8b5a410e9e5af7e0 +2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md: 6a4a5798199ca7d6d7c011668a319d65a0553208 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md index 9c17a93751..0430928847 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md @@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ A new package group `packages/subagent/`: ### The primitive: async `start → SubagentRun` -A provider exposes `start(request) → Promise`. Fulfillment publishes a ready child and transfers its run handle to the caller. One signal covers cancellation before and after readiness; `dispose()` cancels remaining work and awaits quiescence. A rejected start cleans partial resources and emits no lifecycle event. `start` is transport-neutral; `spawn` names only the fresh in-process backend. +A provider exposes `start(request) → Promise`. Fulfillment publishes a child and transfers its run handle to the caller. Work that fails before publication rejects `start()`, while prompt, turn, cancellation, and infrastructure outcomes after publication settle through `run.result` without hiding the child id. One signal covers cancellation before and after publication; `dispose()` cancels remaining work and awaits quiescence. A rejected start cleans unpublished resources and emits no lifecycle event, while a post-publication result failure closes the published lifecycle pair. `start` is transport-neutral; `spawn` names only the fresh in-process backend. ### Two kinds of optional capability, discovered two ways - **Start-time features** (`outputSchema`, `depthLimit`, `toolFilter`, `persona`) ride on a static `provider.capabilities` descriptor. The service checks every requested one BEFORE delegating and **rejects loud** (`SubagentError('UNSUPPORTED_CAPABILITY')`) if the provider lacks it — never accepted-then-ignored. They must be checked before a run exists, which is why they cannot be runtime methods. -- **Runtime features** (steering via `sendMessage`, follow-up via `resume`) are **optional methods** on `SubagentRun`. The method's presence IS the capability, and TypeScript narrowing is the discovery mechanism: a consumer cannot call an absent method without narrowing first, so there is no silent-degradation path and no separate flags object to keep in sync. +- **Continuable creation** is the optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable` method; presence is the capability and TypeScript narrowing is the discovery mechanism, so no separate flag can drift from the implementation. The continuation manager owns later delivery and cold resume directly through `AgentHandle`, while one-shot `SubagentRun` has no steering or resume operation, as refined by [continuable subagents](2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md). ### Fork vs. fresh are separate backends, not a flag @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Each subagent runs in its **own `Session`** (own id, `parentSession` lineage), p ### Synchronous collect (first cut) -`dsh-tool-subagent` passes its execution signal to `start()`, awaits the child result, and disposes the run in `finally`. Non-completed outcomes become error results rather than successful partial output. This foreground consumer does not use the run's optional steering method. +`dsh-tool-subagent` passes its execution signal to `start()`, awaits the child result, and disposes the run before reporting. Non-completed outcomes become error results rather than successful partial output, and independent result and disposal rejections retain both diagnostics. ### Provider selection is config, not model-facing diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md index 6294c84a8f..6a4a579819 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md @@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ bash seam（[能力 seam](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)）在 ### 原语：异步 `start → SubagentRun` -提供方暴露 `start(request) → Promise`。完成时发布一个就绪的子 agent 并将其运行句柄转交给调用方。一个信号覆盖就绪前后的取消；`dispose()`（资源释放）取消剩余工作并等待完全停稳。启动失败时清理部分资源，不发出生命周期事件。`start` 与传输方式无关；`spawn` 仅指代全新的进程内后端。 +提供方暴露 `start(request) → Promise`。完成时发布一个子 agent，并将其运行句柄转交给调用方。发布前失败的工作会拒绝 `start()`，而发布后的提示词、轮次、取消与基础设施结果会通过 `run.result` 结算，且不会隐藏 child id。同一个信号覆盖发布前后的取消；`dispose()`（资源释放）取消剩余工作并等待完全停稳。启动被拒绝时会清理未发布资源，且不发出生命周期事件；发布后的结果失败则会结束已经发布的生命周期事件对。`start` 与传输方式无关；`spawn` 仅指代全新的进程内后端。 ### 两类可选能力，两种发现方式 - **启动时功能**（`outputSchema`、`depthLimit`、`toolFilter`、`persona`）挂在静态的 `provider.capabilities` 描述符上。服务在委派之前检查每个被请求的功能，如果提供方不支持则**大声拒绝**（`SubagentError('UNSUPPORTED_CAPABILITY')`），绝不接受后静默忽略。这些功能必须在 run 存在之前检查，因此不能是运行时方法。 -- **运行时功能**（通过 `sendMessage` 进行 steering、通过 `resume` 进行后续对话）是 `SubagentRun` 上的**可选方法**。方法的存在本身即为能力，TypeScript 类型收窄即为发现机制：消费方不经收窄就无法调用不存在的方法，因此不存在静默降级路径，也不需要额外的 flags 对象来保持同步。 +- **可继续创建**使用可选的 `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable` 方法；方法是否存在本身即为能力，TypeScript 类型收窄即为发现机制，因此不需要可能与实现失同步的独立 flag。继续执行管理器直接通过 `AgentHandle` 负责后续投递与从持久化存储恢复，而一次性 `SubagentRun` 没有 steering 或 resume 操作，具体由[可继续 subagent](2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md)细化。 ### Fork 与 fresh 是独立后端，而非一个 flag @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ bash seam（[能力 seam](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)）在 ### 同步收集（首版） -`dsh-tool-subagent` 将其执行信号传给 `start()`，等待子 agent 结果，并在 `finally` 中 dispose 该 run。非完成态的结果变为错误结果，而非成功的部分输出。这个前台消费方不使用 run 的可选 steering 方法。 +`dsh-tool-subagent` 将其执行信号传给 `start()`，等待子 agent 结果，并在报告前 dispose 该 run。非完成态的结果变为错误结果，而非成功的部分输出；相互独立的结果与 dispose rejection 会保留两项 diagnostic。 ### 提供方选择是配置，不面向模型 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.i18n.yaml index fb39bd26db..d50b2323e3 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.i18n.yaml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: -# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md: 12b34f2a28cfa311a48904cd5396ec16d9123641 -2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md: 58f035a14d55bc0b4e7f670111909074c3f53b2b +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md +2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md: 679c57c3173a32b8cfccc6611b4ba74487e7f7e3 +2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md: 487943ab5cfe78226cde912854099fc56a5833a6 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md index 12b34f2a28..679c57c317 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ For a background call, the tool validates the parent and refuses an already-abor The task registration maps the subagent seam as follows: - `kind` is `subagent`, `label` is the model-supplied description, and `owner` is the parent agent. -- `cancel(reason?)` aborts the task-owned controller. The same signal covers pending provider startup and the ready child. +- `cancel(reason?)` aborts the task-owned controller. The same signal covers pending provider startup and the published run's remaining work. - `done` awaits provider startup, the child result, and `run.dispose()`. Completed runs return final text, aborted runs become `killed`, and other stop reasons become `failed`. Startup, result, and disposal failures become failed outcomes rather than rejected task promises. - `readOutput` is absent. While live, `task_output` returns status only; after settlement, it returns final output idempotently. Intermediate child activity remains in the child session. @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Streaming child history into the parent would blur the log boundary and make pro ## Testing -Unit coverage pins stop-reason mapping, dispose-before-report behavior, startup and result failures, pre-aborted refusal, detachment from the starting call's signal, cancellation before and after provider readiness, collection through the real task tools, the no-surface preflight fence, missing-runtime failure, and per-instance schema gating. Snapshot coverage pins the model-facing schemas. +Unit coverage pins stop-reason mapping, dispose-before-report behavior, startup and result failures, pre-aborted refusal, detachment from the starting call's signal, cancellation before and after provider publication, collection through the real task tools, the no-surface preflight fence, missing-runtime failure, and per-instance schema gating. Snapshot coverage pins the model-facing schemas. ## Consequences diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md index 58f035a14d..487943ab5c 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ subagent 需要与其他长时间运行的工具相同的启动、收集、列 任务注册按以下方式映射 subagent seam： - `kind` 为 `subagent`，`label` 为模型提供的描述，`owner` 为父 agent（智能体）。 -- `cancel(reason?)` 中止任务自有的控制器。同一个信号同时覆盖尚未完成的提供方启动和已就绪的子级。 +- `cancel(reason?)` 中止任务自有的控制器。同一个信号同时覆盖尚未完成的提供方启动和已发布 run 的剩余工作。 - `done` 等待提供方启动、子级结果和 `run.dispose()`。已完成的运行返回最终文本，已中止的运行变为 `killed`，其他停止原因变为 `failed`。启动、结果和资源释放失败会转换为失败结果，而不是被拒绝的任务 Promise。 - `readOutput` 不存在。任务存活期间，`task_output` 只返回状态；结算后，它以幂等方式返回最终输出。中间的子级活动仍保留在子会话中。 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ agent 和日志可能以会话为作用域，但任务注册表和可预测 id ## 测试 -单元测试覆盖固定了停止原因映射、在报告前释放资源、启动与结果失败、对预中止的拒绝、从启动调用信号分离、在提供方就绪前后取消、通过真实任务工具收集、无控制接口的预检防线、运行时缺失失败，以及每实例 schema 开关。快照覆盖固定了面向模型的 schema。 +单元测试覆盖固定了停止原因映射、在报告前释放资源、启动与结果失败、对预中止的拒绝、从启动调用信号分离、在提供方发布前后取消、通过真实任务工具收集、无控制接口的预检防线、运行时缺失失败，以及每实例 schema 开关。快照覆盖固定了面向模型的 schema。 ## 影响 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.i18n.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a7d065d42d --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.i18n.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each +# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; +# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md +2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md: 6bbbfb25fb24eba95de888c9d23c79e24fc8535b +2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md: e23fbe67cc2d16a2c01a1b7ed4884008f8932dd4 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6bbbfb25fb --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +# Agent Note: Continuable background subagents + +Status: implemented + +English | [中文](2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md) + +This record is superseded by [Continuable subagents](2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md), which replaces its Task-backed activation model, routing, cancellation, and durability semantics with one durable Session plus at most one process-local Activation. Its service-placement and provider-capability policy were already superseded by [Merge subagent control into the subagent service](../simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md) and [Intent-named subagent continuation operations](../simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md). Only the durable child-session and descriptor rationale remains in force. + +## Problem + +The subagent tool treats each delegation as one owned `SubagentRun`: foreground calls and background Tasks collect the result and then dispose the run. Disposal bounds the number of live child Agents and releases their scoped services, listeners, and provider resources. The persisted child session may survive, but the parent has no durable catalog or tool path for discovering that child and starting another turn on it. + +A Task, a run, and a child session have different lifetimes. A Task represents one background turn and has one terminal result. A `SubagentRun` owns one activation of a child. A persisted child session may contain many turns initiated by the parent or a human. Continuation must preserve per-run disposal rather than retain every historical child Agent in memory. + +## Decision + +A continuable background subagent is a durable child session with a series of Task-backed activations. The child session id, transcript, lineage, and declared composition survive in persistence. Each initial or resumed activation creates a fresh Task, `AgentHandle`, and `SubagentRun`, drives one turn, collects its result, and disposes the run before the Task becomes terminal. + +The Task's result and cancellation boundary belong to the child activation, not to whichever caller supplied its first message. Task access is authorized by the parent session id, while the Task registry retains the exact live parent Agent instance for notification and teardown. Parent and human messages therefore share one activation result while the parent remains its runtime owner: + +```text +durable child Session + activation 1: Task 1 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose + activation 2: Task 2 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose + activation 3: Task 3 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose +``` + +Foreground delegation keeps its one-shot behavior. Continuation covers background in-process spawn and fork children. Each `tool-subagent` instance selects `backgroundMode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'`; configured continuable mode requires the mounted provider's `resume` capability, while a resumable provider may still use one-shot background policy. ACP children remain one-shot until the deferred ACP continuation work below is complete. + +`ctx.subagents` is the only public service. Ordinary `start` stays collection-, Activation-, and persistence-agnostic: it validates provider capabilities, resolves the one-shot descriptor, dispatches one run, observes run lifecycle, and returns a holder-owned run. An injected internal continuation manager owns stable child ids, continuable descriptor persistence and lookup, Activation lifecycle, and routing through `startContinuable` and `followup`; provider preparation uses a private closure before the manager composes the child itself. The provider-bound `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent` plugin and human-facing adapters call the intent operations for continuable background work; foreground and one-shot background delegation use ordinary `start`. The globally named model tool is a thin optional adapter in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control`, and its presence does not decide whether continuable work starts. Parent-to-child enumeration, the shared one-shot/continuable descriptor identity, and `list_agents` belong to the [durable subagent catalog](2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md). + +### Task and cancellation ownership + +The initial background delegation asks `ctx.subagents` to start the child and register its Task. A continuable provider confirms the activation's final session state durable before fulfilling a successful run result. Task settlement awaits that result, calls `run.dispose()` through the continuation manager's settlement path, and only then records the `TaskOutcome`; `task_kill` aborts the active run, whose settlement path still disposes it. A terminal Task therefore leaves the durable child session but no live child Agent. A required durability checkpoint with no installed listener or a failing listener rejects the run with stable code `DURABILITY_FAILED` and the checkpoint failure as its cause; the manager records a failed Task whose detail explains that the latest state was not confirmed persisted and may be unavailable or stale on resume. + +Every later turn creates another Task. Its producer resources cover only that activation, never the child session. It reaches one terminal status, has one result, and is never reopened. The exact live parent Agent remains the Task registry owner: disposing that instance cancels, awaits, and removes its Tasks. Task APIs authorize a caller whose session id matches that owner, but a same-id replacement does not become the notification or teardown target. This preserves the `settleRun()` contract and bounds Task-owned live children by concurrent work rather than historical session count. + +Opening a child session in a human-facing adapter reads its persisted transcript and does not resume an Agent merely to display it. Human input starts or joins the same Task-backed activation used by parent input through the continuation manager. A human-started Task retains the exact currently loaded parent Agent as its notification target, and `task_output` remains the single result path. The existing completion listener injects at most one unsolicited notice while the Task is unreported; `kill`, a terminal read, or a terminal wait may mark it reported and suppress that notice. Human interaction is therefore permitted only while that parent instance remains live. A user-owned conversation that may outlive the parent and explicitly merge a conclusion back belongs to [interactive side sessions](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md), not this Task-owned lifecycle. + +`TaskService.start()` rejects producers when no Task control surface is attached. A human-facing adapter that accepts child input must therefore attach a Task control surface, or run in a deployment that loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`; loading the Task service alone is insufficient. SDK-generated spawn and fork compositions mount `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` with the subagent tools. This dependency is the cost of using the same Task result, cancellation, and notification path for parent- and human-started activations. + +Cancellation always targets the whole current activation. If human and parent messages have joined one turn, either caller's cancellation aborts that turn, disposes its run, and settles its Task as `killed`; the messages do not have independent results or cancellation rights. `followup()` requires the caller's signal, and abort while live steering awaits request admission aborts the activation-owned controller so the provider discards the pending message and the call settles only after the child reaches quiescence. Independent cancellation requires a later message to start a separate turn instead of steering the current one. + +A cold-resume Task creates its activation-owned `AbortController` before descriptor lookup or any provider await; the lookup, direct-parent authorization, and descriptor fold run inside the Task producer, so the same signal covers them and their failures settle that Task as `failed`. A persistence call that has no signal need not stop its underlying I/O, but the continuation manager rechecks cancellation after every such await and cannot begin or publish child work afterward. Before Agent publication, abort makes the provider reject only after its creation transaction has rolled back and reached quiescence. After publication, the provider closes the creation-signal handoff race, attaches the same signal to the live run before returning it, and cancellation stops the child turn. `task_kill` and exact-owner disposal use this path even when provider resume has not returned a `SubagentRun`; Task settlement waits for rollback or run disposal and records `killed` only after the activation is quiescent. + +### Active run association + +The continuation manager keeps a process-local association from child session id to its current Task and, after provider publication, its run. It installs the Task association before awaiting provider start or resume, fills in the returned run, and removes the association only after run disposal and Task terminal publication. This association exists only so parent and human senders can find the same activation; it is not a durable catalog, public `ManagedSubagent`, admission reservation, or run-state machine. + +For a continuable initial activation, the continuation manager allocates the stable child session id before Task creation and passes it as `SubagentProviderStartRequest.continuation`; in-process spawn and fork publish that exact id instead of allocating one internally. Ordinary `SubagentStartRequest` has no continuation field. The background tool returns canonical `{ kind: 'background', taskId, subagentId }`, rendered as `started subagent as task `. The child id names the durable conversation across activations, while the Task id names only the current activation. A failed initial Task or a process exit before the first child flush can leave an **unmaterialized child**: the caller holds a child id without a durable header and descriptor. Later by-id operations report that id as unavailable (the started Task fails with that detail), and durable enumeration omits it. + +Every continuable child turn is admitted through this Task-backed path. A non-terminal Task is the only supported live activation; when no activation exists, its run has already been disposed and the durable child is resumable. Before routing any by-id operation, the continuation manager synchronously compares its association with `ctx.agents.get(childId)`. A registry Agent with no association, or a registry Agent different from the associated `run.localAgent`, is an ownership conflict: the manager fails rather than adopting an idle Agent or attaching an untracked turn. When neither exists, cold resume may proceed; a competing publication after that check still loses at the Agent registry collision boundary. + +Routing follows the Task association. A running Task accepts live delivery through the run's optional confirmed `SubagentRun.steer` capability. An absent Task starts a fresh Task and cold-resumes the child. In-process spawn and fork first synchronously require the child to be `running` and reject an already committed structured capture, then call `Agent.steer()` and await that exact message's admission receipt. The default loop gives every steering item a message-owned receipt and resolves it `admitted` only after `agent/step` and asynchronous prompt assembly succeed, the message is appended, immutable request history is captured, and `step/start` commits; terminal turn policy, cancellation, and disposal resolve pending receipts `rejected`. A non-terminal turn close may carry pending steering into a later queued turn without acknowledging it. Providers must check the live status before `Agent.steer()` so its idle path cannot start a turn outside the observed run. If Task settlement or terminal policy wins after association lookup but before request admission, `steer()` rejects, `send_message` reports the message as not delivered, and that call does not fall through to cold resume; a later retry after Task terminal may start the next activation. + +The continuation manager does not serialize two callers that race a stopped child through paths outside it, nor does it model a separate settling phase between result production and disposal. The synchronous association install before the producer's first await admits one activation per child in this process — a competing `followup` during resume load observes the pending activation and fails explicitly — while a bypassing publication still loses at the Agent registry's same-session collision boundary. Delivery racing startup, cancellation, completion, or cleanup may also fail. These limitations are explicit rather than hidden behind a larger lifecycle abstraction. + +### Model-facing `send_message` + +The model receives one `send_message(subagent_id, message)` tool backed by `SubagentService.followup()`, matching the intent verb on `Agent`. The service operation owns steer-or-resume orchestration and is distinct from the run's `SubagentRun.steer?()`, which only delivers to an already active run. The tool performs no lifecycle routing of its own. It attributes the follow-up as `{ kind: 'coordinator', senderSessionId: parent.id }` and forwards `{ source, signal }`; the service requires both facts in one options object. The source crosses both live steering and cold resume, while cancellation owns only a pending live-delivery wait because a cold-resume Task returns immediately and owns its later cancellation. The child model still receives ordinary user-role content, while the durable source prevents model-generated follow-ups from being classified as direct human input. A human adapter instead supplies `{ kind: 'user' }` and its interaction signal. The tool lives in the separately loaded `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control` package so provider-bound `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent` instances can continue registering distinct delegation tools for spawn, fork, or ACP without registering duplicate global control tools. + +- If the child has a running Task and live-steering capability, the service calls `run.steer(message, source)` and returns the existing Task id; it creates no Task of its own. +- If the child has no running Task, `send_message` creates a fresh Task, cold-resumes the durable session with the message, and returns the new Task id. +- If the active provider cannot accept live delivery, confirmed steering loses its admission race, or a live child exists outside the Task association, `send_message` fails rather than silently starting, resuming, or adopting an untracked turn. + +The service result identifies the route as `steered` with the existing Task id or `started` with the new Task id. Failure is explicit and says that the message was not delivered. The model-facing tool renders these distinctions so timing-dependent routing is observable to the caller. + +A delivered message has no independent result: its effect is reflected in the current Task's eventual result. A started follow-up has the fresh Task's result and existing `task_output` read path. The subagent layer adds no second completion injection. + +Human input uses the same `followup` operation. The UI may display the child transcript and current Task state, while cancellation calls the Task service with the loaded parent as caller. Tool schema and UI adapters are consumers of one service contract rather than separate execution paths. + +### Durable child handle and cold resume + +The continuation manager snapshots every descriptor input with the seam's `snapshotSubagentDescriptor()` (built on [`snapshotJsonValue`](../../../../packages/core/session/src/json.ts)) before Task creation, matching the detached lossless-JSON boundary already used by Agent messages. A child-scoped setup contribution — a prepended one-shot `agent/prompt-submit` listener installed by the in-process driver — appends one model-hidden `subagent/descriptor` event before downstream prompt admission can block or throw. Allowed admission opens the initial child turn afterward; rejected admission leaves the descriptor as a pre-turn log-only fact, and the activation's final required checkpoint persists it. The event carries no `surfaceOp`, remains outside model history, and survives when compaction replaces surface history. A known child id is resumable only when loading that child session yields a supported descriptor in the child's own suffix (after `seedLength`, so a fork seed cannot leak an ancestor's descriptor) and its header identifies the caller as the direct parent. + +The continuable arm of the versioned descriptor (`SUBAGENT_DESCRIPTOR_VERSION` in [descriptor.ts](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent/src/descriptor.ts)) carries `mode: 'continuable'`, the subagent provider name, resolved child `agentOptions.provider` and `agentOptions.model`, and optional `persona` and `toolFilter`. It does not snapshot the merge-extensible `AgentOptions` object: unrelated extension values cannot make continuation fail merely because they are not JSON. It deliberately omits `subagentDepth`; cold resume relies on the persisted header's `delegationDepth` rather than reconstructing depth from the descriptor. `outputSchema` belongs to one activation's result contract rather than durable child composition. The child header remains authoritative for the child id, `cwd`, `parentSession`, `seedLength`, and `delegationDepth`, while the persisted child transcript owns the fork seed and subsequent history. [`delegationDepthOf()`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent/src/index.ts) takes the maximum of header and runtime values, so reconstructed runtime options may deepen the persisted value but never lower it and a resumed child cannot regain a top-level delegation budget. + +Cold resume cannot depend on an optional method of `SubagentRun`, because that run has been disposed and is not retained across process restart. A run represents one disposable activation and exposes only activation-scoped operations. `SubagentRun.steer?()` names the confirmed live-only capability so it cannot be confused with service orchestration or the model-facing tool. + +The internal continuation manager's resume path loads the known child session, folds its descriptor, authorizes the persisted `parentSession`, and runs inside the Task it creates. It passes a fully resolved `SubagentProviderResumeRequest`, including the Task-owned cancellation signal, through a private service closure whose only responsibility is capability-checked provider dispatch and the ordinary run lifecycle observation used by `start`. The selected `SubagentProvider.resume?()` owns transport-specific reconstruction (in-process: `parent.ctx.agents.resume` under the currently loaded parent scope) and returns a fresh run. Presence of the provider method is the continuation capability, so no redundant capability flag exists. `SubagentService.followup()` chooses between the associated run's `steer?()` operation and this cold-resume path. Neither private provider dispatch nor a provider enumerates durable children or associates Tasks. + +The background tool validates and snapshots descriptor inputs before calling `TaskService.start()`. A synchronous validation failure rejects the tool call and creates no Task. The tool otherwise returns the child and Task ids immediately, without waiting for child publication or descriptor durability. In-process continuable providers perform a final `SessionStore.flush()` after the child becomes idle and before reading the result; `true` confirms at least one durability listener participated, `false` is a required-checkpoint failure, and rejection carries a listener failure. This retries a failed loop checkpoint while the child is still live. If the final confirmation fails, the provider rejects instead of returning unconfirmed output, the continuation manager disposes the run, and the already-created Task settles as `failed` with the durability diagnosis in its detail. Cancellation during the confirmation owns the still-unpublished activation result, so a completed child turn or a later checkpoint failure cannot replace the Task's `killed` outcome. Foreground one-shot runs retain the loop's best-effort checkpoint behavior. In-process spawn and fork reconstruct composition under the currently loaded parent scope. A fork resume loads the child's own persisted transcript, which already contains the completed-turn prefix captured at initial creation; it never forks the parent's newer history again. Resuming a parent does not eagerly resume its children. + +TODO (ACP continuation): persist the remote ACP session id as provider-specific descriptor data and implement `AcpProvider.resume?()` as spawn, initialize, `loadSession`, then prompt. The initial ACP run must verify `initialize.agentCapabilities.loadSession`, and every resumed process must use the same durable backend; replayed history from `loadSession` must not be collected as the new activation's output. Because ACP load support is negotiated per child rather than established solely by the provider method's presence, this follow-up must also define how a start result advertises child-specific continuation before ACP children enter the durable catalog. + +### Result and notification ownership + +Every continuable child activation has exactly one Task and one `TaskOutcome`, regardless of whether the parent or a human supplied the first message. The generic Task reporting contract may inject at most one unsolicited completion notice to the retained parent owner while the Task is unreported; reads, waits, and cancellation may suppress it. Running delivery joins that activation and creates neither a second Task nor a second result. The child transcript remains the human-facing detailed record; Task output remains the parent-facing final result. + +Task records and active-run associations are process-local. Persistence makes the child session resumable after restart, but does not recover an interrupted Task, its result, or its notification. Durable Task recovery is a separate concern. + +## Alternatives considered + +**Retain every background child after Task settlement.** This is the Codex-style resident-session model: follow-up delivery is cheap, but historical children retain Agent scopes, session memory, listeners, and provider resources until an explicit residency limit or eviction policy removes them. Per-activation disposal uses persistence as the continuation boundary and preserves the current resource bound. + +**Let human turns run without Tasks.** A parent message joining such a turn has no Task result or completion notice, and UI cancellation has unclear effects on the parent's contribution. Giving every activation one Task makes completion and cancellation properties of the child turn rather than its initiating caller. + +**Keep one Task for the lifetime of a child session.** A terminal Task cannot naturally become running again, and one result cannot represent multiple turns. Fresh activation-scoped Tasks preserve the generic Task contract. + +**Create a Task for every message.** Steering joins an existing turn and has no independent final result, so a Task created for steering would duplicate the active Task or report a result it does not own. Only a message that starts an activation creates a Task. + +**Split `send_message` and `follow_up`.** Separate delivery operations expose an implementation-state distinction to the model without removing stopped-child races. One operation follows the Claude Code model: deliver to running work or resume a new Task-backed lifecycle. + +**Keep `resume?()` on the disposed run.** Retaining a disposed `SubagentRun` only to call `resume()` makes the old run double as a durable child handle and cannot reconstruct that object after restart. Service dispatch plus provider reconstruction makes the persistence boundary explicit. + +**Put control orchestration on `SubagentService`.** This service-placement alternative is the [merged-service decision](../simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md); the [intent-operation refinement](../simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md) keeps provider start/resume dispatch reusable only inside the service while isolating optional Task and persistence work in an injected internal manager. + +**Add explicit activation phases.** Public `starting`/`running`/`settling` states could describe admission and cleanup precisely, but would add a lifecycle protocol the implementation does not otherwise need. The synchronous association install closes duplicate process-local cold resume without exposing those phases. + +## Testing + +- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` pins the continuable durability boundary: an absent or detached flush listener and a permanent listener failure reject with `DURABILITY_FAILED`, a transient loop-checkpoint failure can succeed on the final confirmation, cancellation owns either final-checkpoint outcome, resume also confirms durability, and foreground runs remain best-effort. `packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` drives the real stack (agent loop, JSONL persistence, spawn/fork providers, Task service, and `ctx.subagents`) keylessly: initial and resumed activations create fresh Tasks and dispose their runs before terminal; the descriptor event is pre-turn, model-hidden, versioned, durable under the service-allocated child id, and survives blocked or throwing initial prompt admission; cancellation, steering, cold follow-up, authorization, ownership conflicts, and resume races retain the contracts described above. +- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` pins the `send_message` schema, coordinator attribution, both route renderings, the not-delivered failure, the no-agent rejection, and HMR disposal. +- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` covers the configured background route: continuable mode requires a resumable provider and returns both ids without requiring `send_message`, while one-shot mode keeps the plain Task acknowledgement even when the provider can resume. +- `packages/sdk/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` pins the Task service and model-facing Task controls in generated spawn and fork compositions. +- The keyless ACP snapshot scenario `subagent-continuable` (examples/acp-agent) pins the model-visible transcript: the two-id acknowledgement, a final durability-confirmation failure rendered through `task_output` without unconfirmed child output, and a `send_message` follow-up whose started Task fails with the id unavailable. + +## Consequences + +- Every follow-up after settlement pays persistence load and scoped setup cost; in exchange, live children stay bounded by concurrent work rather than historical session count. Continuable creation fails clearly when persistence is unavailable or the stored composition cannot be reconstructed. +- Two callers may still race a stopped child through paths outside the continuation manager. The Agent registry prevents duplicate same-session publication; a losing Task fails and its message is not delivered. A message may also race cancellation, terminal status publication, or run disposal. Admission is not claimed to be atomic or exactly-once; the synchronous process-local association install closes duplicate cold resume through `followup` without a public lifecycle state machine. +- Driving a continuable child through the ordinary Agent API bypasses its Task association. `ctx.subagents` rejects that live child as an ownership conflict; adapters must display persisted transcripts without loading an Agent and submit human input through `SubagentService.followup()`. +- The active-run association coordinates only one runtime. Concurrent resume from multiple processes is not serialized; that deployment requires a persistence-level lease or compare-and-set operation. +- Human interaction requires the exact parent Agent instance to remain live because owner disposal cancels and removes its Tasks. It also requires an attached Task control surface. Standalone child interaction requires a future separation between Task access ownership and durable notification targeting. +- The background tool returns child and Task ids before child publication and descriptor durability. Startup failure, a failed final durability confirmation, or process exit before the first child flush leaves the Task failed and may leave an unmaterialized or stale child id; by-id control reports missing state as unavailable rather than retroactively changing the tool acknowledgement. +- Persisting explicit composition fields in the child log makes their lossless-JSON and compatibility contract part of resume. Later support for another composition input requires a deliberate descriptor-version change rather than implicitly persisting merge-extensible `AgentOptions` fields. +- Task records and active-run associations are process-local even though child sessions are durable. Restart recovers the session, not in-flight work or its Task notification. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e23fbe67cc --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +# Agent Note: 可继续的后台 subagent + +Status: implemented + +[English](2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md) | 中文 + +本记录已由[可继续的 subagent](2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md)取代——后者以一个持久 Session 加至多一个进程内 Activation（驻留期）替换了其基于 Task 的 activation 模型、路由、取消和持久性语义。其服务放置与提供方功能策略此前已由[将 subagent 控制合并到 subagent 服务](../simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md)和[以意图命名的 subagent 继续执行操作](../simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md)取代。仅持久 child 会话与 descriptor 的设计依据仍然有效。 + +## 问题 + +subagent 工具将每次委派视为一个独占的 `SubagentRun`：前台调用和后台 Task 收集结果后 dispose（资源释放）该 run。这种所有权关系能够限制存活 child agent（智能体）的数量，并释放其作用域服务、监听器及提供方资源。持久化的 child 会话可能继续存在，但 parent 缺少持久化目录和工具路径，无法发现该 child 并为其启动另一轮次。 + +Task、run 和 child 会话具有不同的生命周期。一个 Task 表示一轮后台执行，并且只有一个终态结果。一个 `SubagentRun` 拥有 child 的一次激活。一个持久化 child 会话可以包含多个由 parent 或用户发起的轮次。继续执行必须保留逐 run dispose 的约定，而不能把所有历史 child agent 都留在内存中。 + +## 决策 + +一个可继续的后台 subagent，是由一系列 Task 支撑的短期激活共同组成的持久化 child 会话。child session id、transcript（文本记录）、谱系及声明的组合配置均保留在持久化存储中。每次初始激活或恢复激活都会创建新的 Task、`AgentHandle` 和 `SubagentRun`，驱动一个轮次、收集结果，并在 Task 进入终态前 dispose 该 run。 + +Task 的结果和取消边界属于 child 激活，不属于为该激活提供第一条消息的调用方。Task 访问根据 parent session id 授权，而 Task 注册表仍保留当前存活的精确 parent Agent 实例，用于通知与资源清理。因此，只要 parent 仍是运行时 owner，parent 消息和用户消息便会共享同一个激活结果： + +```text +durable child Session + activation 1: Task 1 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose + activation 2: Task 2 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose + activation 3: Task 3 -> SubagentRun -> AgentHandle -> dispose +``` + +前台委派保持一次性行为。继续执行覆盖后台的进程内 spawn 和 fork child。每个 `tool-subagent` 实例都会选择 `backgroundMode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'`；配置为可继续模式时，所挂载提供方必须具备 `resume` 功能，而可恢复的提供方仍可采用一次性后台策略。在下述 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）后续工作完成前，ACP child 仍保持一次性行为。 + +`ctx.subagents` 是唯一的公开服务。普通 `start` 不感知 child 集合、Activation 与持久化：它校验提供方功能、解析一次性描述符、分发一个 run、观察 run 生命周期，并返回由持有方负责的 run。注入的内部继续执行管理器负责管理稳定的 child id、可继续描述符持久化与查找、Activation 生命周期，以及通过 `startContinuable` 和 `followup` 进行的路由；管理器自行组合 child 之前，提供方通过私有闭包提供准备数据。按提供方绑定的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent` 插件及面向用户的适配器调用这些意图操作来处理可继续后台工作；前台和一次性后台委派使用普通 `start`。全局命名的模型工具是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control` 中的可选轻量适配器，它是否存在不会决定是否启动可继续工作。parent 到 child 的枚举、一次性／可继续模式共享的描述符身份与 `list_agents` 属于[持久化 subagent 目录](2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md)。 + +### Task 与取消的所有权 + +初始后台委派请求 `ctx.subagents` 启动 child 并注册其 Task。可继续提供方只有在确认本次激活的最终会话状态已持久化后，才会返回成功的 run 结果。Task 结算流程等待该结果，通过继续执行管理器的结算路径调用 `run.dispose()`，然后才记录 `TaskOutcome`；`task_kill` 中止活跃 run，其结算路径仍会 dispose 该 run。因此，终态 Task 会留下持久化 child 会话，但不会留下存活的 child agent。必需的持久性检查点若没有已安装的监听器或任一监听器失败，run 会以稳定错误码 `DURABILITY_FAILED` 拒绝，并将检查点失败保留为失败原因；管理器会记录失败的 Task，其详情说明最新状态未确认已持久化，因此恢复时可能不可用或已陈旧。 + +后续每个轮次都会创建另一个 Task。该轮 producer 持有的执行资源仅服务于这次激活，不属于 child 会话。它只会到达一次终态、只产生一个结果，也不会重新打开。Task 注册表中当前注册的那个存活 parent agent 实例仍是其 owner：dispose 该实例会取消、等待并移除其 Task。Task API 会授权 session id 与该 owner 匹配的调用方，但 id 相同的替代实例不会成为通知或资源清理目标。这一设计保留 `settleRun()` 契约，并使 Task 所拥有的存活 child 数量受并发工作量限制，而不是随历史会话数量增长。 + +用户界面适配器打开 child 会话时，只读取持久化 transcript，不会仅为展示而恢复 agent。用户输入通过继续执行管理器，启动或加入与 parent 输入相同的 Task 激活。由用户启动的 Task 会保留当前加载的精确 parent Agent 作为通知目标，`task_output` 仍是唯一结果路径。只要 Task 尚未标记为已报告，现有完成监听器最多注入一条主动通知；`kill`、终态读取或终态等待都可能将其标记为已报告，并抑制这条通知。因此，仅允许在该 parent 实例保持存活时进行用户交互。可以比 parent 存活更久、并将结论显式合并回去的用户自有会话属于[交互式 side session](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md)，不属于这一由 Task 持有的生命周期。 + +如果没有附加 Task 控制面，`TaskService.start()` 会拒绝 producer。因此，接受 child 输入的用户界面适配器必须附加 Task 控制面，或运行于加载了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 的部署中；仅加载 Task 服务并不足够。SDK 生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合在挂载 subagent 工具时，也会挂载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 与 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`。这项依赖是 parent 和用户启动的激活共用 Task 结果、取消和通知路径所付出的代价。 + +取消始终作用于当前完整激活。如果用户消息和 parent 消息已经加入同一个轮次，任一调用方发起取消都会中止该轮次、dispose 其 run，并将对应 Task 结算为 `killed`；这些消息没有独立的结果或取消权。`followup()` 要求调用方提供信号；若在线 steering 正在等待请求准入时该信号被中止，激活自有的 controller 会被中止，以便提供方丢弃待处理消息，并且该调用仅在子 agent 完全停稳后结算。若需要独立取消，后续消息必须另起轮次，而不能加入当前轮次。 + +从持久化存储恢复的 Task 会在查找描述符或等待任何提供方操作之前，创建由本次激活持有的 `AbortController`；描述符查找、直接 parent 鉴权和描述符归并都在该 Task producer 内部执行，因此同一信号覆盖它们，其失败会将该 Task 结算为 `failed`。对于不接受信号的持久化调用，可以让底层 I/O 执行完毕；但继续执行管理器必须在每次这类 await 返回后重新检查取消状态，如已取消，之后不得开始或发布任何 child 工作。在 Agent 发布前收到中止信号时，提供方必须先回滚其创建事务并达到完全停稳状态，然后才让恢复调用以拒绝结束。Agent 发布后，提供方必须消除创建期间移交取消信号时的竞态，在返回前将同一信号附加到存活 run；之后取消会停止 child 轮次。即使提供方的恢复调用尚未返回 `SubagentRun`，`task_kill` 与对确切 owner 实例的 dispose 仍通过这条路径生效。Task 结算会等待回滚或 run dispose 完成，只有在激活完全停稳后才记录 `killed`。 + +### 活跃 run 关联 + +继续执行管理器在进程内维护 child session id 到当前 Task 的关联，并在提供方发布后将 run 填入该关联。它会在等待提供方 start 或 resume 之前安装 Task 关联，填入返回的 run，并且只在 run dispose 完成且 Task 终态发布后才移除该关联。该关联只用于让 parent 发送方和用户发送方找到同一次激活；它不是持久化 child 目录、公开的 `ManagedSubagent`、准入预留或 run 状态机。 + +对于可继续 child 的初始激活，继续执行管理器会在创建 Task 前分配稳定的 child session id，并将其作为 `SubagentProviderStartRequest.continuation` 传递；进程内 spawn 和 fork 会发布这一确切 id，而不是在内部另行分配。普通 `SubagentStartRequest` 不含 continuation 字段。后台工具返回规范的 `{ kind: 'background', taskId, subagentId }`，渲染为 `started subagent as task `。child id 在多次激活中始终指代同一个持久化对话，Task id 则只指代当前激活。初始 Task 失败，或进程在 child 首次 flush 之前退出，都可能留下一个 **unmaterialized child**：调用方持有 child id，但不存在持久化 header 和描述符。后续按 id 的操作会报告该 id 不可用（已启动的 Task 会带着该详情失败），持久化枚举也不会列出它。 + +每个可继续 child 轮次都通过这条由 Task 支撑的路径准入。非终态 Task 是唯一受支持的存活激活；不存在激活时，其 run 已被 dispose，持久化 child 可以恢复。在路由任何按 id 的操作之前，继续执行管理器会同步将自身关联与 `ctx.agents.get(childId)` 比较。如果注册表中的 Agent 没有关联，或者它与所关联的 `run.localAgent` 不同，就属于所有权冲突：管理器会失败，而不会接管 idle Agent 或附加未受跟踪的轮次。二者均不存在时，可以从持久化存储恢复；如果检查后又有竞争方发布，仍会在 Agent 注册表的冲突边界上失败。 + +系统依据 Task 关联进行路由。运行中的 Task 通过 run 可选且提供确认语义的 `SubagentRun.steer` 功能接收在线消息。Task 不存在时，系统创建新 Task，并从持久化存储恢复 child。进程内 spawn 和 fork 会先同步要求 child 处于 `running` 状态，并拒绝已经提交结构化捕获的 child；随后调用 `Agent.steer()`，等待该消息专属的准入回执。默认循环会为每个 steering 项目提供一份归属于该消息的回执；只有在 `agent/step` 与异步提示词组装成功后，系统追加该消息、捕获不可变的请求历史并提交 `step/start`，回执才会解析为 `admitted`。终止型轮次策略、取消和 dispose（资源释放）会将待处理回执解析为 `rejected`。非终止型轮次关闭可以把待处理 steering 带入后续排队轮次，但不会确认其准入。提供方必须在调用 `Agent.steer()` 前检查存活状态，避免其 idle 路径在观察到的 run 之外启动轮次。如果查找关联之后、请求获准之前，Task 结算或终止策略率先完成，`steer()` 会拒绝，`send_message` 会报告消息未送达，而且该次调用不会改用从持久化存储恢复路径；在 Task 终态发布后重试，才可能启动下一次激活。 + +继续执行管理器不会串行化两个通过其外部路径同时争抢已停止 child 的调用方，也不会为结果产生与 dispose 之间的阶段单独建立 settling 状态。在 producer 首次 await 之前同步安装的关联，使本进程内每个 child 只准入一次激活——resume 加载期间竞争的 `followup` 会观察到待处理的激活并显式失败——而绕开该关联的发布仍会在 Agent 注册表相同会话的冲突边界上失败。发送也可能因与启动、取消、完成或清理发生竞态而失败。这些限制是明确的，而非隐藏在更大的生命周期抽象之后。 + +### 面向模型的 `send_message` + +模型获得一个由 `SubagentService.followup()` 支撑的 `send_message(subagent_id, message)` 工具，与 `Agent` 上的意图动词一致。该服务操作负责在 steering 与恢复之间编排；它不同于 run 的 `SubagentRun.steer?()`，后者只能向已活跃的 run 发送消息。工具本身不执行生命周期路由。该工具将后续消息的来源标记为 `{ kind: 'coordinator', senderSessionId: parent.id }`，并转发 `{ source, signal }`；服务要求在一个选项对象中同时提供这两项信息。来源会贯穿在线 steering 和 cold resume 两条路径，而取消只控制尚未完成的在线投递等待，因为 cold resume Task 会立即返回，并自行负责后续取消。child 模型收到的仍是普通的 user role 内容，而持久化的来源信息可防止模型生成的后续消息被归类为直接用户输入。用户适配器则提供 `{ kind: 'user' }` 及其交互信号。该工具位于单独加载的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control` 包中，因此按提供方绑定的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent` 实例可以继续为 spawn、fork 或 ACP 注册不同的委派工具，而不会重复注册全局控制工具。 + +- 如果 child 存在运行中的 Task 并支持在线消息，服务会调用 `run.steer(message, source)` 并返回现有 task id；它不会创建新 Task。 +- 如果 child 没有运行中的 Task，`send_message` 会创建新 Task，使用该消息从持久化存储恢复会话，并返回新的 task id。 +- 如果活跃提供方无法接收在线消息、带确认语义的 steering 在准入竞态中失败，或 Task 关联之外存在存活 child，`send_message` 会失败，而不会静默启动、恢复或接管未受跟踪的轮次。 + +服务结果将路由标识为 `steered` 并携带现有 task id，或标识为 `started` 并携带新的 task id。失败结果会明确说明消息未送达。面向模型的工具会呈现这些差异，让调用方能够观察由时序决定的实际路由。 + +发送到现有 run 的消息没有独立结果，其效果体现在当前 Task 的最终结果中。启动的后续轮次具有新 Task 的结果，并使用现有 `task_output` 读取路径。subagent 层不会再注入第二份完成通知。 + +用户输入使用同一个 `followup` 操作。UI 可以展示 child transcript 和当前 Task 状态，取消操作则以已加载 parent 作为调用方访问 Task 服务。工具 schema 与 UI 适配器消费同一个服务契约，不建立彼此独立的执行路径。 + +### 持久化 child handle 与从持久化存储恢复 + +继续执行管理器在创建 Task 前，通过 seam 的 `snapshotSubagentDescriptor()`（基于 [`snapshotJsonValue`](../../../../packages/core/session/src/json.ts) 构建）对每项描述符输入建立快照；这一边界与 Agent 消息现有的分离式无损 JSON 边界一致。作用于 child 作用域的 setup contribution——由进程内驱动前置安装的一次性 `agent/prompt-submit` 监听器——会在下游 prompt admission 能够阻止请求或抛出异常之前追加一个对模型隐藏的 `subagent/descriptor` 事件。admission 获准后才会开启 child 的初始轮次；admission 被拒绝时，描述符会作为轮次前的仅日志事实保留，并由该 activation 最终的必需检查点持久化。该事件不携带 `surfaceOp`，不进入模型历史，并在压缩替换 surface 历史时继续保留。只有在加载已知 child id 对应的 child 会话后，能在该 child 自身的后缀中（`seedLength` 之后，因此 fork seed 不会泄露祖先的描述符）得到受支持的描述符，且会话 header 将调用方标识为直接 parent 时，该 id 才可恢复。 + +版本化描述符的可继续分支（[descriptor.ts](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent/src/descriptor.ts) 中的 `SUBAGENT_DESCRIPTOR_VERSION`）携带 `mode: 'continuable'`、subagent 提供方名称、已解析的 child `agentOptions.provider` 和 `agentOptions.model`，以及可选的 `persona` 与 `toolFilter`。它不会对可通过声明合并扩展的 `AgentOptions` 对象建立快照：与此无关的扩展值不会仅因无法表示为 JSON 而导致继续执行失败。描述符会特意省略 `subagentDepth`；从持久化存储恢复时，系统依赖持久化 header 中的 `delegationDepth`，而不根据描述符重建深度。`outputSchema` 属于单次激活的结果契约，不属于持久化 child 组合配置。child header 仍是 child id、`cwd`、`parentSession`、`seedLength` 和 `delegationDepth` 的权威信息，持久化 child transcript 则负责保存 fork seed 和后续历史。[`delegationDepthOf()`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent/src/index.ts) 会在 header 值和运行时值中取最大值，因此重建后的运行时选项可以加深持久化值，但绝不能降低它，恢复后的 child 无法重新获得顶层委派预算。 + +从持久化存储恢复不能依赖 `SubagentRun` 的可选方法，因为该 run 已被 dispose，并且进程重启后不会保留。run 表示一次可 dispose 的激活，只暴露作用于当前激活的操作。`SubagentRun.steer?()` 这一名称明确指代提供确认语义且仅适用于在线消息的功能，以免该功能与服务编排或面向模型的工具混淆。 + +内部继续执行管理器的恢复路径会加载已知 child 会话、归并其描述符、根据持久化的 `parentSession` 鉴权，并在其创建的 Task 内部运行。它通过私有服务闭包传递完全解析的 `SubagentProviderResumeRequest`，其中包含由 Task 持有的取消信号；该闭包只负责在检查提供方功能后进行分发，并执行 `start` 所使用的普通 run 生命周期观察。选中的 `SubagentProvider.resume?()` 负责传输相关的重建（进程内：在当前加载的 parent 作用域下执行 `parent.ctx.agents.resume`），并返回一个新 run。提供方是否存在该方法本身就是继续执行功能，无需额外功能标志。`SubagentService.followup()` 在关联 run 的 `steer?()` 操作与该持久化恢复路径之间做出选择。私有的提供方分发与提供方本身都不会枚举持久化 child 或关联 Task。 + +后台工具会在调用 `TaskService.start()` 前校验描述符输入并建立快照。同步校验失败会拒绝工具调用，且不会创建 Task。除此之外，工具会立即返回 child id 和 Task id，不等待 child 发布或描述符持久化完成。进程内可继续提供方会在 child 进入 idle 后、读取结果之前执行最终的 `SessionStore.flush()`；返回 `true` 表示至少有一个持久性监听器参与，返回 `false` 表示必需的检查点失败，而拒绝则携带监听器失败。此操作会在 child 仍存活时重试循环中失败的检查点。如果最终确认失败，提供方会拒绝而不返回未经确认的输出，继续执行管理器会 dispose 该 run，已经创建的 Task 会结算为 `failed`，其详情包含持久性诊断。最终确认期间发生取消时，尚未发布的激活结果由取消操作接管；即使 child 轮次已记录为完成，或之后的检查点失败，也不能取代 Task 的 `killed` 结果。前台一次性运行仍保留循环仅尽力执行检查点的行为。进程内 spawn 和 fork 会在当前已加载的 parent 作用域下重建组合配置。恢复 fork 时只加载 child 自己的持久化 transcript，其中已经包含初始创建时捕获的已完成轮次前缀；系统绝不会再次 fork parent 更新后的历史。恢复 parent 不会立即恢复其 child。 + +TODO（ACP 继续执行）：将远端 ACP session id 作为提供方专用描述符数据持久化，并实现 `AcpProvider.resume?()`，依次执行 spawn、initialize、`loadSession` 和 prompt。初始 ACP run 必须检查 `initialize.agentCapabilities.loadSession`，恢复后的每个进程必须使用同一个持久化后端；`loadSession` 回放的历史消息不得计入新激活的输出。由于 ACP 的加载支持是按 child 协商的，不能仅根据提供方是否存在该方法来确定，因此该后续工作还必须定义 start 结果如何声明单个 child 支持继续执行，之后才能将 ACP child 写入持久化目录。 + +### 结果与通知所有权 + +每次可继续 child 激活都恰好拥有一个 Task 和一个 `TaskOutcome`，无论第一条消息由 parent 还是用户提供。只要 Task 尚未标记为已报告，通用 Task 报告契约最多会向保留的 parent owner 注入一条主动完成通知；读取、等待和取消都可能抑制该通知。发送到运行中激活的消息会加入该激活，不会创建第二个 Task 或第二份结果。child transcript 是面向用户的详细记录；Task 输出是面向 parent 的最终结果。 + +Task 记录和活跃 run 关联都位于进程内。持久化使 child 会话可在重启后恢复，但不会恢复中断的 Task、其结果或通知。持久化 Task 恢复属于另一个问题。 + +## 已考虑的替代方案 + +**在 Task 结算后保留所有后台 child。** 这是 Codex 风格的常驻会话模型：发送后续消息成本较低，但历史 child 会持续占用 agent 作用域、会话内存、监听器和提供方资源，直至显式常驻数量上限或淘汰策略将其移除。逐激活 dispose 使用持久化作为继续执行边界，同时保留当前的资源上限。 + +**允许用户轮次不使用 Task。** parent 消息加入此类轮次后，没有对应的 Task 结果或完成通知；UI 取消对 parent 所发消息的影响也不明确。让每次激活都拥有一个 Task，可使完成与取消成为 child 轮次的属性，而不是初始调用方的属性。 + +**在 child 会话整个生命周期内复用一个 Task。** 终态 Task 无法自然地再次进入运行状态，一个结果也无法表示多个轮次。每次激活创建新 Task 可以保留通用 Task 契约。 + +**为每条消息创建 Task。** 发送到现有 run 的消息会加入已有轮次，不产生独立的最终结果；为这类消息创建 Task，会重复当前 Task，或报告一个它并不拥有的结果。只有启动新激活的消息才会创建 Task。 + +**拆分 `send_message` 与 `follow_up`。** 两个独立的投递操作会向模型暴露实现状态差异，却无法消除 child 已停止时的竞态。单一操作采用 Claude Code 模型：向运行中的工作发送消息，或恢复一个由新 Task 支撑的生命周期。 + +**在已 dispose 的 run 上保留 `resume?()`。** 如果仅为调用 `resume()` 而保留已 dispose 的 `SubagentRun`，旧 run 会同时充当持久化 child handle，而且进程重启后无法重建该对象。由服务分发、提供方重建，可明确表达持久化边界。 + +**将控制编排放在 `SubagentService` 上。** 这一服务放置方案即[服务合并决策](../simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md)；[意图操作细化](../simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md)将提供方 start／resume 分发的复用限制在服务内部，同时将可选的 Task 与持久化工作隔离在注入的内部管理器中。 + +**增加显式激活阶段。** 公开的 `starting`／`running`／`settling` 状态可以准确描述准入和清理，但会引入实现本身并不需要的生命周期协议。同步安装关联无需暴露这些阶段，即可消除进程内重复的 cold resume。 + +## 测试 + +- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` 固定可继续执行的持久性边界：缺少 flush 监听器、flush 监听器已脱离或监听器持续失败时，均会以 `DURABILITY_FAILED` 拒绝；循环检查点的瞬时失败可在最终确认成功后继续完成，发生取消时最终检查点无论成功还是失败都由取消优先决定结果，resume 同样会确认持久性，而前台运行仍采用尽力而为策略。`packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` 以无密钥方式驱动真实栈（agent loop、JSONL 持久化、spawn／fork 提供方、Task 服务和 `ctx.subagents`）：初始及恢复后的激活都会创建新 Task，并在进入终态前 dispose 各自的 run；描述符事件位于轮次前、对模型隐藏、带版本、在服务分配的 child id 下持久化，并在初始 prompt admission 阻止请求或抛出异常时仍保留；取消、steering、cold follow-up、授权、所有权冲突与 resume 竞态保留上述契约。 +- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` 固定 `send_message` 的 schema、coordinator 来源标记、两种路由渲染、未送达失败、无 agent 时的拒绝，以及 HMR（热模块替换）dispose。 +- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` 覆盖配置的后台路由：可继续模式要求提供方可恢复，并在不要求 `send_message` 的情况下返回两个 id；即使提供方可以恢复，一次性模式仍保持普通的 Task 确认消息。 +- `packages/sdk/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` 固定生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合中的 Task 服务及面向模型的 Task 控制工具。 +- 无密钥 ACP 快照场景 `subagent-continuable`（examples/acp-agent）固定模型可见的 transcript：双 id 确认消息、最终持久性确认失败（该失败通过 `task_output` 呈现，且不包含未经确认的 child 输出），以及一次 `send_message` 后续操作——其已启动的 Task 会带着「id 不可用」失败。 + +## 影响 + +- 每次完成结算后的后续轮次都需要承担持久化加载和作用域 setup 成本；作为交换，存活 child 的数量受并发工作量限制，而不是随历史会话数量增长。持久化不可用或存储的组合配置无法重建时，可继续 child 的创建会明确失败。 +- 两个调用方仍可能通过继续执行管理器外部的路径争抢已停止的 child。Agent 注册表会阻止相同会话的重复发布；失败的 Task 会失败，且其消息不会送达。消息也可能与取消、终态状态发布或 run dispose 发生竞态。准入不承诺原子或恰好执行一次；在进程内同步安装的关联无需公开生命周期状态机，即可通过 `followup` 消除重复的 cold resume。 +- 通过普通 Agent API 驱动可继续 child 会绕过其 Task 关联。`ctx.subagents` 会将该存活 child 视为所有权冲突并拒绝；适配器必须在不加载 Agent 的情况下展示持久化 transcript，并通过 `SubagentService.followup()` 提交用户输入。 +- 活跃 run 关联只能协调一个运行时。多个进程同时恢复时不会串行化；此类部署需要持久化层的租约或 compare-and-set 操作。 +- 用户交互要求作为 owner 的那个精确 parent Agent 实例保持存活，因为 dispose owner 会取消并移除其 Task。用户交互还要求附加 Task 控制面。若要单独与 child 交互，后续必须将 Task 访问所有权与持久化通知目标分离。 +- 后台工具会在 child 发布和描述符持久化之前返回 child id 和 Task id。启动失败、最终持久性确认失败，或进程在 child 首次 flush 之前退出，都会使 Task 失败，并可能留下 unmaterialized 或陈旧的 child id；按 id 的控制操作会将缺失状态报告为不可用，而不会追溯修改工具确认消息。 +- 将显式组合字段持久化到 child 日志后，其无损 JSON 与兼容性契约便成为恢复契约的一部分。后续如需支持其他组合配置输入，必须明确更改描述符版本，不能隐式持久化可通过声明合并扩展的 `AgentOptions` 字段。 +- Task 记录和活跃 run 关联位于进程内，而 child 会话具有持久性。重启会恢复会话，但不会恢复进行中的工作或其 Task 通知。 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.i18n.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aefda46d41 --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.i18n.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each +# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; +# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md +2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md: 0dd7eebac74689004014248c7178dba540ef4662 +2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.zh.md: 33b0296cf9914d1975fb1dc84564b498a09bd511 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0dd7eebac7 --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.md @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +# Agent Note: Durable subagent catalog and list_agents + +Status: implemented + +English | [中文](2026-07-22-durable-subagent-catalog-and-list-agents.zh.md) + +## Problem + +Continuable background subagents expose a stable child id and persist reconstruction data in that child's session, so `send_message` can resume a known child without any listing operation. Discovery has two consumers with different needs: a UI may show both one-shot work and continuable conversations, while the model should receive only children on which `send_message` is meaningful. The durable Session and Activation design is owned by [continuable subagents](../../implemented/feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md); this note owns the shared durable inventory and the model-facing projection. + +Enumeration must cross-check immutable session lineage, descriptor validity, and the live-preferred session corpus without loading or resuming an Agent merely to display it. Trace lineage supplies candidates but cannot distinguish an ordinary session fork from a subagent, so the child log needs durable classification. The contract must also define how lifecycle mode, missing or corrupt records, deletion, unsupported versions, and repeated child-log loads affect service and tool consumers. + +## Decision + +Parent-to-child enumeration is a service capability with consumer-specific projections. `SubagentService.listChildren(parentSessionId: SessionId)` ([subagent/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent/src/index.ts)) does the following: + +- use `ctx.sessionQuery.traceSession(parentSessionId)` to obtain the parent's direct live-preferred child sessions; +- read and validate each candidate's `subagent/descriptor` event without activating the child; +- silently omit candidates without a descriptor, and omit a candidate that becomes unavailable or has a corrupt or unsupported descriptor with a per-child diagnostic; +- expose every local session-backed subagent whose supported valid descriptor carries a durable creation `label` and `mode`, regardless of whether its provider is currently registered; +- report corpus activity separately as `running` or `inactive`, without implying completion or resumability; +- return every resulting child in stable `createdAt` ascending, child-id ascending order. + +Every ordinary local start receives a `one-shot` descriptor with an optional caller-owned display label, while the continuation manager persists a labeled `continuable` descriptor containing its additional reconstruction fields. The model-facing delegation tool already owns a short `description` and supplies it for one-shot display; lower-level callers such as workflows need not invent presentation metadata. The model-facing `list_agents` adapter filters the service result to continuable children and maps `inactive` to its existing `complete` presentation; a UI can consume both modes and choose an id-based fallback for unlabeled one-shot history. Descriptor persistence, by-id lookup, direct-parent authorization, and provider-independent cold resume remain owned by the implemented Activation contract. Listing consumes those facts but cannot weaken them or invent a second descriptor representation. + +### Enumeration decision + +The first implementation consumes `ctx.sessionQuery.traceSession(parentSessionId)` and considers only the trace's first-level descendants. The target may be live or persisted; tracing the logical corpus does not load or resume an Agent. Session query already merges `ctx.sessions` with `ctx.sessionPersistence` using live precedence, preserves immutable-header consistency, derives direct-child lineage from `SessionHeader.parentSession`, and sorts siblings by `createdAt` ascending and child id ascending. `listChildren()` does not reproduce that corpus logic or inspect the continuation manager's process-local Activation map. + +Corpus construction precedes per-child descriptor inspection. A failure while building the initial trace, including persistence listing failure, a live/persisted header conflict anywhere in the observed corpus, or invalid target lineage, fails the whole `list_agents` call because no trustworthy candidate set exists. Only failures after a successful trace are isolated to one candidate; "corrupt child" in that per-child contract therefore means corrupt loaded event surface or descriptor data, not a corpus-level header conflict. + +Session lineage is broader than subagent identity: an ordinary `ctx.sessions.fork()` also creates a direct child. The session header gains no `kind` discriminator; each candidate must instead contain exactly one valid `subagent/descriptor` event in its own suffix. `SubagentService.start()` resolves `{ mode: 'one-shot', provider, label? }` before ordinary provider dispatch, while the continuation manager snapshots and seeds `{ mode: 'continuable', ...composition }` during initial child creation. The local in-process one-shot driver appends its resolved descriptor only during initial creation, and cold resume appends no further descriptor; a second event is corruption rather than evidence of another Activation. Agent creation is the one-shot publication boundary: a rejection means no child was published, while prompt, turn, cancellation, and infrastructure outcomes after publication settle through the returned run without hiding its id. The descriptor event is the sole evidence that a traced child is a session-backed subagent. A candidate without it is an ordinary fork, a remote child without a local session record, or another non-subagent session and is omitted without a diagnostic. + +The published logical record is also the activity source: `SessionRecord.live` means `running`, while `live: false, persisted: true` means `inactive`. Activity comes directly from the trace and causes no additional child-log load. `inactive` encodes neither successful completion nor resumability: it may describe settled one-shot history or a continuable child for which `send_message` can materialize another Activation. Conversely, `running` says only that the session is live: a live continuable Agent outside the continuation manager's matching Activation still appears as `running`, but `send_message` rejects it as an ownership conflict. A child is not visible before its session is published, and no process-local Activation entry is added as a second candidate or activity source. Listing is a snapshot that may race publication, disposal, or a later message; `send_message` remains the authoritative delivery-time operation. + +The subagent service keeps `sessionQuery` optional so start and follow-up remain available without it. Its public `listChildren(parentSessionId: SessionId)` method resolves the optional service and dynamically loads the optional session-query runtime only when called; ordinary subagent imports, start, and follow-up therefore do not evaluate that package. Listing belongs directly to `SubagentService`: it interprets the query's lineage, events, and live state without resolving the Activation-based continuation manager or consulting Agent registrations, Activations, or providers, so a deployment with sessions, `subagents`, and `sessionQuery` can list even when `agents` is absent. The method throws `SubagentError` with stable code `SUBAGENT_CONTROL_SESSION_QUERY_UNAVAILABLE` before loading the runtime or doing query work when the query service is absent. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control` exports separately loadable tool plugins: the `send_message` adapter requires only `subagents`, while the `list_agents` adapter requires both `subagents` and `sessionQuery` at load. A deployment may therefore use `send_message` without installing or loading session query; the list-tool fiber remains inactive until the required service is available, while another direct service consumer receives the same explicit call-time contract. + +`listChildren(parentSessionId, signal?)` forwards the caller's signal to `traceSession()` and the conditional exact `readEvent()` operation. `listEvents()` has no cancellation parameter, so the listing path checks the signal before and after that await and after each candidate settles. If any query operation rejects after the signal aborts, the service normalizes the result to `SubagentError` with stable code `CANCELLED`; a backend abort error or a diagnostic-mapped query error cannot escape or become a successful partial listing. + +This descriptor-read path is the correctness baseline, not a claim that work is linear only in the number of direct children. Let D be the number of direct-child candidates, C be the number of persisted sessions scanned by each persistence listing, and L_i be the size of candidate i's full log. One corpus trace is followed by `sessionQuery.listEvents(childId)` for every candidate. A candidate with no descriptor is omitted, and one with multiple descriptors is diagnosed without another read; only a candidate with exactly one descriptor is loaded again through `sessionQuery.readEvent({ sessionId: childId, seq })`. The read must return the same immutable session header observed by the trace, including the direct-parent relationship, and its target must still be the located descriptor event; a mismatch is per-child corruption. In the persisted-only worst case, each exact read repeats `persistence.list()`, loads the full child log, and clones its events, for O(D × C + Σ L_i) work up to constant factors; a candidate with exactly one descriptor pays those costs twice, while other candidates pay them once. A live candidate similarly takes one detached in-memory snapshot of its full log, or two when its descriptor is read. Session query resolves persisted candidates through the persistence seam's non-mutating `inspect()` read, which returns the valid stored prefix without repairing a torn tail or closing an interrupted turn, so listing is storage-read-only; repair remains the resume path's concern. The first version accepts these repeated reads as the no-index correctness baseline, but deployments must treat total corpus and child-log size—not only direct-child count—as the capacity constraint. Listing creates no Agent and appends no catalog, descriptor, or repair event. The model-hidden descriptor remains outside the conversation surface and survives compaction, so compacted and uncompacted children must enumerate identically. + +If measured scale later requires an index, that index is derived state: session headers and child descriptors remain authoritative, and rebuilding or corruption fallback must reproduce the same results. An index cannot become a second authorization source or make an unpublished child visible. + +### `list_agents` contract + +`SubagentService.listChildren(parentSessionId: SessionId)` returns `Promise`, one array preserving the trace's candidate order rather than separate child and diagnostic arrays. `SubagentListEntry` is a closed union discriminated by its readonly `kind`: + +- `kind: 'child'` carries readonly `id: SessionId`, `mode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'`, and `activity: 'running' | 'inactive'`; a continuable child carries `label: string`, while a one-shot child carries `label?: string`; +- `kind: 'diagnostic'` carries readonly `id: SessionId` and `reason: 'corrupt' | 'unsupported' | 'unavailable'`. + +A valid descriptor produces one child entry, a per-child inspection failure produces one diagnostic entry, and a candidate without a descriptor produces no entry. `mode` is durable creation policy; `activity` is a process-local corpus snapshot. Activity is neither `AgentStatus`, the manager's internal Activation state, nor a durable outcome, and the result does not expose the internal `createdAt` sorting key. Exact Activation states and durable outcomes such as successful completion, failure, cancellation, and stop reason require a separate durable activation record and are outside this feature. + +The model-facing `list_agents` tool takes no arguments, derives `parentSessionId` from the current execution Agent, and is a thin adapter in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent-control`. It keeps diagnostics, drops `one-shot` child entries, maps a continuable child's `running` activity to `running` and `inactive` activity to `complete`, then renders ` [] —