diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml index 2a32b80867..a29d76697f 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md -2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 338534d2d2eeb4b1d6df79b32f0d4ec5b6695d39 -2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: d6e3c2f56ac0251e59a434cd76c198b0434991be +2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 82bf6e01b61d3f9f49e7b21164d324231c0ed150 +2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: ed6c3a2d7bb913b4ab1debafb2699f6262595a9f diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md index 338534d2d2..82bf6e01b6 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it ### TodoPanel: the durable list as a persistent strip -The panel mounts through the `conversation.input.dock` slot (a plain registrant plugin, `todoDockEntry`, using `ctx.slots.inject` with no `ConversationService` edge, `order: -1` above the queue rows), hidden while empty, collapsible to a header of title + `"/ tasks · in progress"` (no in-progress content hint when collapsed). Status glyphs are the figma todo set (green check ring / blue fading ring / dashed pending ring) on a tip-surface card (`--dsw-specific-tip`, 14px radius, `width: calc(100% - 88px)` / `max-width: 776px` centered; InputBar top pad 6px is the gap to the composer card). It reads `snapshot.todos` via the standard-kit `useSession` hook the dock entry receives — no store, no service, no ctx. The inner component stays props-complete and framework-free; the dock adapter is a one-line wrapper. +The panel mounts through the `conversation.input.dock` slot (a plain registrant plugin, `todoDockEntry`, using `ctx.slots.inject` with no `ConversationService` edge, `order: -1` above the queue rows), hidden while empty, collapsible to a header of title + `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted; no in-progress content hint when collapsed). Status glyphs are the figma todo set (green check ring / blue fading ring / dashed pending ring) on a tip-surface card (`--dsw-specific-tip`, 14px radius, `width: calc(100% - 88px)` / `max-width: 776px` centered; InputBar top pad 6px is the gap to the composer card). It reads `snapshot.todos` via the standard-kit `useSession` hook the dock entry receives — no store, no service, no ctx. The inner component stays props-complete and framework-free; the dock adapter is a one-line wrapper. ### TodoRow: the per-call row through the keyed toolview slot diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md index d6e3c2f56a..ed6c3a2d7b 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented ### TodoPanel：持久化列表作为一条常驻横条 -面板经 `conversation.input.dock` slot 挂载（普通注册者插件 `todoDockEntry` 使用 `ctx.slots.inject`，不依赖 `ConversationService`，`order: -1` 排在队列条上方），空列表时隐藏，可折叠为标题加 `"<已完成>/<总数> tasks · in progress"` 的表头（折叠态不再附带进行中条目正文）。状态图标为 figma todo 套件（绿色勾选环／蓝色渐隐环／虚线未开始环），卡片使用 tip 表面（`--dsw-specific-tip`、14px 圆角、`width: calc(100% - 88px)`／`max-width: 776px` 居中；InputBar 顶部 6px 内边距是到输入卡的间距）。它经 dock entry 收到的标准件 `useSession` hook 读取 `snapshot.todos`——无 store、无 service、无 ctx。内部组件保持 props 完备且框架无关；dock 适配件只是一行包装。 +面板经 `conversation.input.dock` slot 挂载（普通注册者插件 `todoDockEntry` 使用 `ctx.slots.inject`，不依赖 `ConversationService`，`order: -1` 排在队列条上方），空列表时隐藏，可折叠为标题加以 `·` 连接的各状态计数的表头（本地化，形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略；折叠态不再附带进行中条目正文）。状态图标为 figma todo 套件（绿色勾选环／蓝色渐隐环／虚线未开始环），卡片使用 tip 表面（`--dsw-specific-tip`、14px 圆角、`width: calc(100% - 88px)`／`max-width: 776px` 居中；InputBar 顶部 6px 内边距是到输入卡的间距）。它经 dock entry 收到的标准件 `useSession` hook 读取 `snapshot.todos`——无 store、无 service、无 ctx。内部组件保持 props 完备且框架无关；dock 适配件只是一行包装。 ### TodoRow：经 keyed toolview slot 的逐调用行 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.i18n.yaml index 9dd6946ab5..d227299170 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md -2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: b380ee86154f8436416126725a7bb486f6dc052d -2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: f007cc5645df211adc8e391f72ad2d90666e9c0f +2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 8480107920ace22b6f79b96145bb9d2103455f5a +2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 81d5411e374daa64c7e112d0269ea733b15a133b diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md index b380ee8615..8480107920 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The durable-log invariant deliberately does NOT follow the flag. A log written w ## The display surfaces are part of the change -Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `0/8 已完成 · ` while seven others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign in [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) has since replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix. +Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · ` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign in [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) has since replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix. The row takes `planSummary` in `toolviews/plan-summary.ts`. It names the first active item and counts the rest, so the row reports how many tasks are running instead of implying one. Naming every active item was rejected: the row is a single line, and an unbounded join would overflow it — the count degrades predictably where a list does not. The derivation sits inside the toolviews domain rather than in `contract/`, the inter-domain face: the panel computes its own counts inline and shares nothing with the row, so a contract module would declare a sharing relationship that no longer exists. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md index f007cc5645..81d5411e37 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Status: implemented ## 展示面是本次改动的一部分 -解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `0/8 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外七个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。其后 [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) 的面板重做已把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。 +解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。其后 [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) 的面板重做已把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。 工具行改用 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 中的 `planSummary`。它给出第一个活跃条目，并计数其余活跃项，因此工具行报告的是有多少任务在跑，而不是暗示只有一个。列出全部活跃条目被否决了：工具行是单行，无上界的拼接会溢出——在列表做不到的地方，计数能够可预测地降级。该推导放在 toolviews 域内而非 `contract/`（域间共享面）：面板自行内联计算其计数，与工具行不共享任何东西，因此放进 contract 会声明一种已不存在的共享关系。 diff --git a/apps/web/tests/built-boot.snapshot.ts b/apps/web/tests/built-boot.snapshot.ts index ef6ee9b70e..3d1536e923 100644 --- a/apps/web/tests/built-boot.snapshot.ts +++ b/apps/web/tests/built-boot.snapshot.ts @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ // @vitest-environment jsdom -// The built-bundle boot smoke: the ONE assembled-jsdom test that loads the -// real `packages/client/*/lib/client.js` artifacts through AppWebEntry's -// ModuleLoader path (loadBundle) and proves the boot graph -// assembles — staged activation across the immediately tier and the inject -// layers, per-plugin CSS injection, and a rendered journey reaching chat -// content from the keyless FixtureApiClient transport. +// The built-bundle boot smoke: the assembled-jsdom test that owns the boot +// graph itself. Other files share the same scaffolding (assembled-boot.ts) to +// reach a surface only the built bundles expose; this one asserts that the +// graph assembles at all — staged activation across the immediately tier and +// the inject layers, per-plugin CSS injection, and a rendered journey reaching +// chat content from the keyless FixtureApiClient transport. // // Component behavior remains owned by per-package suites (SlotTestRuntime // benches over src). This smoke additionally pins the resident interaction diff --git a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml index 6abe3037ec..ebf039c0de 100644 --- a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml +++ b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md -README.md: c34a5027aa6c606b3e1704d24c542db82ed01e73 -README.zh.md: 3fdb165b868b002b2444e542a697d3f719a50c24 +README.md: e02c569bb0efe9219844d86e029f499ce406929d +README.zh.md: 884dcfccd7b1af7a674a126b14bc2c3b08b3d3b0 diff --git a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md index c34a5027aa..e02c569bb0 100644 --- a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md +++ b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ A `grep`/`glob` call declaring the `search` render intent renders its result inl Tool rows use the keyed, session-scoped `'conversation.chat.toolview'` slot; its render site dispatches via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site fallback. The owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openFile`), and `ToolRowProps` composes it with the session standard kit. A registrant is a plain plugin with only the slot service edge: `ctx.slots.inject('conversation.chat.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '', inject? }, Row))`. The declaration is the activation and reload dependency; `ConversationService` is required only by registrations that call its actions. Trajectory and waterfall toolview slots share this shape and use their own render sites; RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders. -The todo surfaces are two registrations over that shape, both using slot declaration injection without a `ConversationService` edge. `TodoRow` takes the `'conversation.chat.toolview'` key `todo_write` and summarizes what the call attempted (`/ 已完成 · ` plus a `+` count of the other active ones, parsed from its args through `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` `planSummary`, falling back to the generic summary on malformed or wrongly-shaped model JSON, and keeping the generic dot for non-ok execution states so a cancelled call never reads as a completed update). When the deployment permits parallel work, several items may be `in_progress` at once, so `planSummary` names the first and counts the rest, and deliberately returns the two unjoined: the row ellipsizes its summary text, so a count concatenated onto the end of the task name would be the first thing a narrow row clips. The row hands the count to `ToolRow`'s `summarySuffix`, the shared row's non-shrinking slot beside that ellipsized text (an error row drops it, since its collapsed summary is the failure line). `TodoDock` takes the `'conversation.input.dock'` list slot at `order: 0` — before Goal and Queue — and is the plan strip: it reads the host-computed `todos` projection via `useProjection` (standing plan: latest `todo/write` with no later `turn/start`) and renders `TodoPanel`, which takes the plain list, hides itself while the list is empty, and starts collapsed as a header of title plus `"/ tasks · in progress"` (status glyphs are the figma check / progress / dashed-pending set), so it reports the parallel count without needing a name to truncate. The dock adapter owns the selection so the panel stays a pure function of its props; the standing list lives here rather than in the row so the row stays one line. Anything the input-zone composer chain hides (a `conversation.composer` takeover such as ui-question's) hides the whole dock, this strip included. +The todo surfaces are two registrations over that shape, both using slot declaration injection without a `ConversationService` edge. `TodoRow` takes the `'conversation.chat.toolview'` key `todo_write` and summarizes what the call attempted (`/ 已完成 · ` plus a `+` count of the other active ones, parsed from its args through `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` `planSummary`, falling back to the generic summary on malformed or wrongly-shaped model JSON, and keeping the generic dot for non-ok execution states so a cancelled call never reads as a completed update). When the deployment permits parallel work, several items may be `in_progress` at once, so `planSummary` names the first and counts the rest, and deliberately returns the two unjoined: the row ellipsizes its summary text, so a count concatenated onto the end of the task name would be the first thing a narrow row clips. The row hands the count to `ToolRow`'s `summarySuffix`, the shared row's non-shrinking slot beside that ellipsized text (an error row drops it, since its collapsed summary is the failure line). `TodoDock` takes the `'conversation.input.dock'` list slot at `order: 0` — before Goal and Queue — and is the plan strip: it reads the host-computed `todos` projection via `useProjection` (standing plan: latest `todo/write` with no later `turn/start`) and renders `TodoPanel`, which takes the plain list, hides itself while the list is empty, and starts collapsed as a header of title plus its own `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted; status glyphs are the figma check / progress / dashed-pending set), so it reports the parallel count without needing a name to truncate. The dock adapter owns the selection so the panel stays a pure function of its props; the standing list lives here rather than in the row so the row stays one line. Anything the input-zone composer chain hides (a `conversation.composer` takeover such as ui-question's) hides the whole dock, this strip included. `QueueDock` is the terminal input-dock entry at `order: 20`. It hides while empty, renders one pending row directly, and defaults two or more rows to a collapsed `" 条排队消息"` header whose button expands or collapses the complete list. The header exposes `aria-expanded` and `aria-controls`; the expanded list scrolls within a 180px height bound. An active edit or mutation keeps its rows visible, and emptying the queue restores the collapsed default for the next queue. Each visible ordinary-session row remains a single-line preview with its exact-occurrence edit, delete, and strict-steer actions; addressed subagents retain the rows as a read-only projection because their continuation transport does not expose queue mutation. If strict steer loses to a closed window, the original occurrence remains queued for normal delivery; if the driver already claimed it, normal delivery is already underway. Neither converged race displays a failure, while transport and unknown failures do. diff --git a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md index 3fdb165b86..884dcfccd7 100644 --- a/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md +++ b/packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Think 行默认保持折叠，并在不展开思维链的情况下暴露实时 审批经由本包声明的链接管编辑器：`ApprovalPanel` 注册为按选择器路由的 `'conversation.composer'` 配置项（ui-question 模式），在审批等待未决期间取代 InputBar 占据编辑器（琥珀色条、理由标题、来自运行中调用参数的配对命令行、一次性的拒绝／允许）。`contract/slots.ts` 中的 `PendingApproval` 领域面在运行时 `PendingWait` 载体之上拥有 wire 编码——带审计关联的 `ApprovalResponsePayload` 值；广播的 `approval/resolved` 帧使等待落定并恢复编辑器。运行时 manager 会将所有审批或问题等待通过 `SessionSummary.pendingInteraction` 投影出来，未实例化的 Session 也不例外；`ui-workspace` 负责其侧边栏呈现。未决等待完全离开消息流：问题（ui-question）与审批（ApprovalPanel）都经编辑器接管作答，不再保留只读占位卡。编辑器底行的 Access 席位挂载 `PermissionSelect`，由 host 计算的 `permissions` 投影经标准工具包 `useProjection` 供数（key 缺席即隐藏 chip）；chip 打开 Menu 原语下拉，其中 kebab-case 预设名渲染为 Title Case 标签；普通安全预设会立即经输入栏注入的 `command` 回调提交 `/permission `，而 `danger-full-access` 在界面中显示为 `Full access`，选择后先打开页面内的 Modal 风险确认。用户勾选确认项前启用按钮始终不可用；取消、Escape、关闭按钮与点击遮罩都不会提交命令。 -todo 两个面就是在该形状上的两个注册项，都使用 slot 声明注入，不依赖 `ConversationService`。`TodoRow` 占用 `'conversation.chat.toolview'` 的 `todo_write` key，摘要该次调用「试图写入」的内容（从其 args 经 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 的 `planSummary` 解析出 `<已完成>/<总数> 已完成 · <进行中条目>`，以及「其余活跃项的数量」`+`；模型 JSON 残缺或形状不对时回落到通用摘要；非 ok 执行状态保留通用状态点，使被取消的调用绝不读成一次已完成的更新）。部署允许并行工作时，可以有多个条目同时处于 `in_progress`，因此 `planSummary` 给出第一个活跃条目并计数其余，且刻意不把两者拼成一个字符串：行会对摘要文本做省略号截断，把数量接在任务名末尾时，窄行最先裁掉的正是这个数量。该行把数量交给 `ToolRow` 的 `summarySuffix`——共享行在被截断文本旁的不收缩位（出错的行会丢弃它，因为其折叠摘要是失败首行）。`TodoDock` 以 `order: 0` 占用 `'conversation.input.dock'` 列表 slot（位于 Goal 与 Queue 之前），是计划条：它经 `useProjection` 读取 host 计算的 `todos` 投影（站立计划：其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write`）并渲染 `TodoPanel`，后者接收纯列表，在列表为空时自我隐藏；列表非空时面板初始折叠，表头显示标题加 `"<已完成>/<总数> tasks · in progress"`（状态图标为 figma 的勾选／进行中／虚线未开始一组），因此它无需一个可被截断的任务名即可报告并行数量。选取由 dock 适配器负责，因此面板保持为其 props 的纯函数；站立列表放在此处而非行内，行才能保持单行。输入区 composer 链隐藏的一切（例如 ui-question 对 `conversation.composer` 的接管）也会隐藏整个 dock，包括这条计划条。 +todo 两个面就是在该形状上的两个注册项，都使用 slot 声明注入，不依赖 `ConversationService`。`TodoRow` 占用 `'conversation.chat.toolview'` 的 `todo_write` key，摘要该次调用「试图写入」的内容（从其 args 经 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 的 `planSummary` 解析出 `<已完成>/<总数> 已完成 · <进行中条目>`，以及「其余活跃项的数量」`+`；模型 JSON 残缺或形状不对时回落到通用摘要；非 ok 执行状态保留通用状态点，使被取消的调用绝不读成一次已完成的更新）。部署允许并行工作时，可以有多个条目同时处于 `in_progress`，因此 `planSummary` 给出第一个活跃条目并计数其余，且刻意不把两者拼成一个字符串：行会对摘要文本做省略号截断，把数量接在任务名末尾时，窄行最先裁掉的正是这个数量。该行把数量交给 `ToolRow` 的 `summarySuffix`——共享行在被截断文本旁的不收缩位（出错的行会丢弃它，因为其折叠摘要是失败首行）。`TodoDock` 以 `order: 0` 占用 `'conversation.input.dock'` 列表 slot（位于 Goal 与 Queue 之前），是计划条：它经 `useProjection` 读取 host 计算的 `todos` 投影（站立计划：其后没有更晚 `turn/start` 的最近一次 `todo/write`）并渲染 `TodoPanel`，后者接收纯列表，在列表为空时自我隐藏；列表非空时面板初始折叠，表头显示标题加它自行计算的、以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化，形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略；状态图标为 figma 的勾选／进行中／虚线未开始一组），因此它无需一个可被截断的任务名即可报告并行数量。选取由 dock 适配器负责，因此面板保持为其 props 的纯函数；站立列表放在此处而非行内，行才能保持单行。输入区 composer 链隐藏的一切（例如 ui-question 对 `conversation.composer` 的接管）也会隐藏整个 dock，包括这条计划条。 `QueueDock` 是 `order: 20` 的末端 input-dock 条目。队列为空时隐藏；只有一个待处理项时直接渲染该行；存在两个或更多待处理项时，默认收起为 `" 条排队消息"` 表头，其按钮可展开或收起完整列表。表头暴露 `aria-expanded` 和 `aria-controls`；展开后的列表以 180px 为高度上限，并可滚动。存在进行中的编辑或变更时，列表行会保持可见；队列清空后，下一次出现队列时会恢复默认收起状态。普通会话中的每条可见行仍是单行预览，并提供针对精确单次入队项的编辑、删除和严格 steering（中途引导）操作；已寻址 subagent 则保留只读行，因为其继续执行传输不提供 Queue 变更。如果严格 steering 输给已关闭的窗口，原单次入队项会留在 Queue 中正常投递；如果驱动器已经认领该项，正常投递就已开始。这两种已收敛的竞态都不显示失败，传输和未知错误仍会显示。 diff --git a/packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/plan-summary.ts b/packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/plan-summary.ts index 9c81f008fe..6fc37d8c28 100644 --- a/packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/plan-summary.ts +++ b/packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/plan-summary.ts @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ * Pure plan derivation for the todo_write row's one-line summary. Several items * may be `in_progress` at once — parallel work runs concurrent tasks, so a * summary built from one active item would silently drop the rest. The plan - * strip header derives its own `/ tasks · in progress` counts - * inline and shares nothing with this, so this stays inside the toolviews - * domain rather than in `contract/` (the inter-domain face). + * strip header derives its own counts inline and shares nothing with this, so + * this stays inside the toolviews domain rather than in `contract/` (the + * inter-domain face). * @module */