Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into codex/fs-directory-listing
# Conflicts: # docs/rfc/README.md # packages/fs/fs-local/src/index.ts
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
90 files changed
+4283
-1192
No files matched your search
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ Do NOT write one for a mechanical or local choice (a variable name, a one-file r
|
||||
| [Web capability seam — provider registry and model-facing web tools](implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md) | 2026-06-24 |
|
||||
| [Make `dsh-fs-policy` an event-gate plugin, not a method interface](implemented/architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) | 2026-06-26 |
|
||||
| [Resolve filesystem paths against the caller's session cwd](implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-fs-per-session-cwd.md) | 2026-07-02 |
|
||||
| [Tagged render-intent union for tool-call presentation](implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) | 2026-07-02 |
|
||||
| [Result-time applied-hunk diffs for file mutations](implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md) | 2026-07-02 |
|
||||
| [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](implemented/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md) | 2026-07-03 |
|
||||
|
||||
### Process
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +145,7 @@ Do NOT write one for a mechanical or local choice (a variable name, a one-file r
|
||||
| [Generated cordis events + services catalog](implemented/process/2026-06-20-generated-cordis-catalog.md) | 2026-06-20 |
|
||||
| [Classify RFCs by kind via path-encoded subdirectories](implemented/process/2026-06-20-rfc-classification.md) | 2026-06-20 |
|
||||
| [Generated tool-schema catalog (boot-and-harvest)](implemented/process/2026-07-02-tool-schema-catalog.md) | 2026-07-02 |
|
||||
| [Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate](implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 2026-07-02 |
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# RFC: Result-time applied-hunk diffs for file mutations
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The [tagged render-intent union](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) gave `dsh-tool-fs` write/edit a `card:'diff'` at CALL time, derived purely from the tool's args: write ⇒ `{oldText:null, newText:content}` (the whole new file), edit ⇒ `{oldText:old_string, newText:new_string}` (the bare replaced snippet). An editor renders that as an inline diff, but it is a **context-free** diff — the bare `old_string`→`new_string` with no surrounding lines, and a `replace_all` that touched five scattered sites still renders as one snippet pair.
|
||||
|
||||
Driving `claude-agent-acp`'s own ACP bridge shows what a full editor diff looks like: after the mutation applies, it emits a SECOND `tool_call_update` whose diff is the **applied hunk with ±3 context lines** (and one hunk per changed site for `replace_all`), reconstructed from the tool's `structuredPatch`. That result-time hunk is what makes Zed show the change *in place* in the file rather than as a floating snippet. Our tools stopped at the call-time snippet; the completed result carried only the plain "updated successfully" text, no diff.
|
||||
|
||||
The obstacle is a seam boundary: `presentResult(args, result)` is a **pure function of `args` + the model-facing `result` (`{content, isError}`)** — it runs on live streaming AND on session-log replay, so it must be replay-deterministic and cannot do I/O. It never sees the file's before/after content, and `FsEditOutcome`/`FsWriteOutcome` carried only a replacement count + version, not the text. So there was no way to compute — or even carry — an applied hunk to the presenter.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Add a **persisted, tool-private presentation channel** so a tool's `execute` can attach a result-time render payload that survives replay, and use it to carry the applied-hunk diff.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. A `meta` channel on the tool result (core)
|
||||
|
||||
`ToolDefinition.execute` may now return either its model-facing `ContentBlock[]` (unchanged, the common case) OR `{ content: ContentBlock[]; meta?: unknown }`:
|
||||
|
||||
```ts ignore-check
|
||||
type ToolExecuteReturn = ContentBlock[] | { content: ContentBlock[]; meta?: unknown }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`meta` is an opaque payload the core never interprets — typed `unknown` at every seam (the tool that produced it owns and narrows its shape). It MUST be JSON-serializable: the registry threads it onto the `tool/result` **session event**, and `Session.append` runtime-validates all event data with the existing `isJsonValue` predicate, so a non-serializable `meta` is rejected at the source. On replay the same `meta` is read back and handed to `presentResult` via a widened `ToolResult` (`{ content, isError, meta? }`). Because the payload lives in the event log, the diff reproduces on session reload / snapshot replay **for free** — the event-sourcing guarantee, not a re-computation. Typing `meta` as `unknown` (rather than a shared serializable-value type) keeps the tools core free of a dependency it would otherwise take just to name the type, and the runtime `isJsonValue` gate — not the static type — is what actually enforces serializability.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the general shape ("a tool attaches durable result presentation"), not an fs-specific one — any tool can use it.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. The tool computes the hunk; the backend returns before/after (fs)
|
||||
|
||||
Per the [capability-seam split](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the storage backend returns only **storage facts** and the model-facing tool owns **presentation**:
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-fs` widens `FsEditOutcome` with `{ before: string; after: string }` and `FsWriteOutcome` with `{ before: string | null; after: string }` (`before: null` ⇒ a create, or an existing-but-undiffable binary/non-UTF-8 file). The local backend already holds both texts at write time; it returns them as raw LF-normalized text, with **no diff/UI concept** entering the seam.
|
||||
- `dsh-tool-fs` computes the contextual hunk from before/after and attaches it as `meta: { diffs: FileDiff[] }`. A contextual hunk is computed only when a before-version exists — edit always; write on overwrite; a create has no before, matching `claude-agent-acp`'s empty `structuredPatch` on create. But the completed `tool_call_update` is ALWAYS a `diff` card for a successful mutation: an ACP `tool_call_update.content` REPLACES the call's content, so rendering the model-facing result text would clobber the pending diff. So `write`'s result falls back to an args-derived whole-file diff (`oldText: null`) when it has no contextual hunk (a create, or an overwrite whose content is unchanged), and `edit` — which always changes content — always has a hunk. A failed/aborted/policy-rejected mutation applied nothing, so it carries no `meta` and falls through to the generic error rendering (its message must show).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. The bridge renders a `diff` result card
|
||||
|
||||
`ToolResultView` gains a `DiffResultView { card:'diff'; title?; diffs: FileDiff[] }`; the bridge's result-side `switch (view.card)` gets a `diff` arm emitting the `{type:'diff'}` `ToolCallContent` blocks (mirroring the call-side arm). An ACP `tool_call_update.content` REPLACES the call's content in an editor, so the result diff **supersedes** the call-time snippet (and keeps the model-facing result text from clobbering it) — the two-update sequence (call snippet, then result diff) matches `claude-agent-acp` exactly.
|
||||
|
||||
### The diff algorithm — a third-party runtime dependency over vendoring
|
||||
|
||||
Computing hunks-with-context is a solved problem with sharp edge cases (grouping, context coalescing, the trailing-newline marker). Rather than hand-roll it, `dsh-tool-fs` takes a runtime dependency on the npm [`diff`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/diff) package (a `^9.0.0` range, exact-pinned by the lockfile; it ships its own types) and uses its `structuredPatch`. The repo's default is to vendor Cordis-framework source, but that policy is about the *framework*; a leaf tool package taking a small, well-known, self-typed utility dependency is the same shape as `dsh-acp` depending on `@agentclientprotocol/sdk`. Vendoring a diff algorithm would be re-implementing a battle-tested one for no benefit — the [pre-release "foundation over blast radius"](../../../../AGENTS.md) reasoning does not argue for re-deriving standard algorithms. The dependency's output is normalized in one small module (`packages/fs/tool-fs/src/diff.ts`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- **Live incremental diff streaming.** The hunk is computed once, after the mutation completes; there is no per-keystroke diff.
|
||||
- **Diffing a binary/non-UTF-8 overwrite.** `before` is `null` for such a file (it has no text diff basis); the write still succeeds and the result renders a whole-file diff (`oldText: null`) rather than a contextual hunk.
|
||||
- **Rename/move diffs.** Only content diffs of a single resolved path.
|
||||
- **Bounding the overwrite diff basis.** An overwrite reads the whole prior file into memory to compute the contextual hunk (on top of the new content already held), so a very large text overwrite allocates both texts for a UI-only diff. A future refinement can bound the pre-read and fall back to a whole-file / no contextual diff above a size threshold; tracked as `TODO(overwrite-diff-bound)` at the read site.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- Completes the one remaining representation difference named as a non-goal in [Tagged render-intent union](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) — that RFC's Non-goals section is updated to record that applied-hunk diffs shipped here.
|
||||
- Builds on the [filesystem capability seam](2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md) (the before/after are storage facts the backend returns) and [event-sourced sessions](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) (the `meta` payload persists on the `tool/result` event, so replay reproduces the card).
|
||||
- The `meta` channel is deliberately generic: a future tool (a structured search, a data-table result) can attach its own durable result presentation without another core change.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
# RFC: Tagged render-intent union for tool-call presentation
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
A tool declares how its calls render in a UI (an editor's tool-call card) through two callbacks, `presentCall`/`presentResult` on `ToolDefinition`, returning `ToolCallPresentation` / `ToolResultPresentation` with an optional `ToolTerminal` sub-shape. These grew incrementally into a **bag of optional fields**: `title`, `kind`, `rawInput`, `content`, `locations`, `terminal` on the call; `title`, `content`, `terminal` on the result; `cwd`/`output`/`exitCode`/`signal` on `ToolTerminal`. The split of responsibility is muddy:
|
||||
|
||||
- The call-side and result-side `terminal` fields overlap, and the bridge reconciles a `content` block AND a `terminal` block AND `rawInput` per call, stitching them together with ad-hoc conditionals.
|
||||
- Which combinations are *valid* is unwritten: a `terminal` call that also sets `content` means "description above the card"; a generic call that sets `terminal` is meaningless but representable. The type permits nonsense.
|
||||
- There is no way to express the one file-tool affordance an editor most wants — a **diff card** (`{path, oldText, newText}`, which Zed renders as an inline diff / new-file preview). `ToolCallPresentation.content` is the *LLM* `ContentBlock[]` vocabulary (text/image), so a tool literally cannot ask for a diff.
|
||||
|
||||
The existing `FIXME(tool-presentation)` in `packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` named the fix: "redesign the type so a tool declares its render INTENT once (e.g. a tagged union over card kinds) rather than a bag of optional fields the bridge stitches together." The rejected RFC [Collapse tool-owned UI presentation](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md) deferred it explicitly: rich rendering "should return later as a tagged render-intent union after there are at least two real tools and two real consumers to validate the vocabulary." That bar is now met — two producer families (`dsh-tool-bash`, `dsh-tool-fs`) and two consumers (the ACP bridge live path + the snapshot-golden replay path).
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Replace the optional-field bag with a **`card`-tagged discriminated union**. A tool declares one render intent per call/result; the bridge switches on the tag.
|
||||
|
||||
```ts ignore-check
|
||||
type FileLocation = { path: string; line?: number }
|
||||
type FileDiff = { path: string; oldText: string | null; newText: string } // oldText null ⇒ new file
|
||||
|
||||
// presentCall → ToolCallView
|
||||
type ToolCallView = GenericCallView | TerminalCallView | DiffCallView
|
||||
interface GenericCallView { card: 'generic'; title: string; kind?: ToolCallKind; rawInput?: unknown; content?: ContentBlock[]; locations?: FileLocation[] }
|
||||
interface TerminalCallView { card: 'terminal'; title: string; description?: string; cwd?: string }
|
||||
interface DiffCallView { card: 'diff'; title: string; diffs: FileDiff[]; locations?: FileLocation[] }
|
||||
|
||||
// presentResult → ToolResultView
|
||||
type ToolResultView = GenericResultView | TerminalResultView
|
||||
interface GenericResultView { card: 'generic'; title?: string; content?: ContentBlock[] }
|
||||
interface TerminalResultView { card: 'terminal'; title?: string; output?: string; exitCode?: number; signal?: string }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`card` is **required** on every variant — a real discriminant, not an optional default. The bridge does `switch (view.card) { case 'generic': … case 'terminal': … case 'diff': … default: assertNever(view) }`. The union is **closed** (per the [switch-exhaustiveness convention](../../../../AGENTS.md)): a fourth render intent (a table, a chart) needs new bridge code to render it anyway, so a plugin-added variant that the bridge silently drops would be worse than a compile error. Adding a variant breaks compilation at the bridge switch — exactly the signal we want.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why a tagged union beats the field-bag
|
||||
|
||||
- **Invalid states become unrepresentable.** A generic card cannot carry terminal output; a terminal card cannot carry a diff. The old bag permitted all of these.
|
||||
- **The bridge switches instead of stitching.** One arm per card kind, each producing exactly the wire shape that card needs, rather than reconciling five optional fields whose interactions are undocumented.
|
||||
- **`diff` is a first-class intent.** `dsh-tool-fs` write/edit declare `card:'diff'`; the bridge emits an ACP `{type:'diff', path, oldText, newText}` `ToolCallContent` (already in the SDK's `ToolCallContent` union, previously unused by the bridge). This is the affordance the redesign unlocks.
|
||||
|
||||
### Producer mapping
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-tool-fs` read → `generic` (`kind:'read'`, a follow-along `location`); write → `diff` (`oldText:null`); edit → `diff` (`oldText:old_string || null`, `newText:new_string ?? ''`). This mirrors `claude-agent-acp`'s `toolInfoFromToolUse` Read/Write/Edit arms field-for-field.
|
||||
- `dsh-tool-bash` foreground → `terminal` call + `terminal` result; `run_in_background` and `bash_output`/`bash_kill` → `generic`.
|
||||
- `dsh-tool-todo` → `generic`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Terminal fallback ownership
|
||||
|
||||
`TerminalResultView` carries only `output`/`exitCode`/`signal`. A UI without the terminal capability needs a fenced ` ```console ` text fallback; that derivation moves to the **bridge** (it wraps `output` in a fenced block on the no-capability path), rather than the tool double-encoding it. This keeps the bash tool's result a single structured shape and preserves the existing capability-gated behavior byte-for-byte.
|
||||
|
||||
### Purity preserved
|
||||
|
||||
`presentCall`/`presentResult` remain pure functions of `args` (+ the result for `presentResult`) — they run on live streaming AND session-log replay, so they must be replay-deterministic. Every view is derived from args alone: write's diff is new-file style (`oldText:null`) because the tool has no old content at call time; edit's diff is `old_string`→`new_string`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relative-path display titles
|
||||
|
||||
`claude-agent-acp` relativizes a file card's title path against the session cwd (`toDisplayPath`) — `Read src/foo.ts`, not `/abs/proj/src/foo.ts` — while keeping `locations[]`/`diff.path` **raw** (the editor opens the real path). Our `presentCall` is pure/args-only and cannot see the session cwd, so this relativization happens at the **bridge**, which already threads the session cwd into tool-call rendering (the same cwd it uses to resolve a terminal card's header). The bridge relativizes the title only, by an exact structured replace of the known `locations[0].path`/`diffs[0].path` substring — generic over the file-card kinds, never special-casing tool names.
|
||||
|
||||
## Non-goals
|
||||
|
||||
- **Live incremental `terminal_output_delta` streaming** and **command classification** — the terminal-rendering RFC's own deferred follow-ups, untouched here.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- Supersedes the deferral in [Collapse tool-owned UI presentation](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md) (rejected — "wait for two real tools and two real consumers, then a tagged render-intent union"). That bar is now met; this is that union.
|
||||
- Extended by [Result-time applied-hunk diffs](2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md), which adds a persisted `meta` channel so write/edit emit a result-time `DiffResultView` — the applied change (a contextual hunk with context lines / one per `replace_all` site, or a whole-file diff for a create) — on top of this union's call-time diff card.
|
||||
- Folds `ToolTerminal` into the `terminal` views described by [ACP terminal and tool-call rendering](../feature/2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md) (the `_meta` terminal-card convention and capability gate are unchanged; only the harness-side presentation type changes).
|
||||
- The ACP SDK's `Diff` / `ToolCallContent` types back the new `diff` card.
|
||||
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ The rule that settled the remaining cases: ***the type you write, hold, or recei
|
||||
- A data structure is **core** if it flows through the agent-loop spine — the loop holds, derives, streams, or logs it on every turn regardless of which plugins load (`Message`, `StreamChunk`, `SessionEvent`, the `Agent` handle) — **or** it is the single headline type a plugin author writes against a pipeline (`ToolDefinition`).
|
||||
- `ToolDefinition` is core (it is what every tool author writes) **even though the loop never holds one** — authoring-importance overrides the strict flows-through-spine rule for this one headline type. But its typing machinery — the `SchemaSpec`/`InferArgs` DSL — is a sub-page detail (you write a `ToolDefinition`; the type-level machinery that types it you do not). That is the spine-vs-seam line made sharp.
|
||||
- `ToolSchema` is core (it is a field of `GenerateOptions`, the model request that flows through every step) even though it is conceptually part of the tool pipeline — *flows through the spine* wins over *conceptual home* when they conflict.
|
||||
- The tool-presentation vocabulary (`ToolCallPresentation`, …, carrying a `FIXME(tool-presentation)` redesign marker), the `SessionPersistence` durability seam, and bash vocabulary are sub-pages.
|
||||
- The tool-presentation vocabulary (`ToolCallView`/`ToolResultView`, …), the `SessionPersistence` durability seam, and bash vocabulary are sub-pages.
|
||||
|
||||
`core.md` is a **self-contained spine doc**: it states the exact type definition of each spine structure with minimal prose and links to sub-pages for the per-seam detail. The sub-pages are `llm-streaming.md`, `session.md`, `persistence.md` (split from session along the in-memory-model vs. durability-seam line), `tools.md`, and `bash.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 517a6371eca5d747313c7efdb2756a50257701e4
|
||||
2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: f8f68bf5d4d7e6795318d9dd435a525f20a4f407
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md).
|
||||
- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: required pairs exist, every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical), and excluded (generated or bilingual-by-construction) files stay unpaired. The `required` list in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) is a ratchet: each merged translation batch adds its files, so coverage only grows.
|
||||
- **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — the design first proposed for this RFC: `.zh.md` files carried an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation flowed EN → ZH only. Revised in review: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese RFC, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.
|
||||
- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.
|
||||
- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.
|
||||
- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.
|
||||
- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express "consistent as of the state this PR introduces", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.
|
||||
- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.
|
||||
|
||||
## Industry precedent
|
||||
|
||||
Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus a committed agent skill in place of a bot service.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.
|
||||
- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
|
||||
- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
|
||||
- Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
|
||||
- Rollout is incremental by design: documents outside `required` are visible backlog (`--list`), not red CI, so pairs land in reviewable batches without a big-bang PR.
|
||||
- The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# 通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 背景
|
||||
|
||||
本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。没有机制、纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的方式：一侧继续演进，另一侧默默地说谎，而没有门禁会注意到。对这类不变式，本仓库一贯的答案是把它编码成机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。**一对文档是三个兄弟文件：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，加一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典——一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束这对文件的是两侧必须说同样的话，且配对整体合入（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../i18n/terminology.md)。
|
||||
- **旁挂记录两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。**`foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致状态下各自的完整 git blob hash。此后改了任一侧而没重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来——纯内容比较、无需查询历史——而且同一个 PR 里改动的文件也能算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 里是一个显式、可见的动作。
|
||||
- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。**门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行：required 的配对存在；任何已存在的配对完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 都匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的文件（生成物或本身即双语的）保持不配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `required` 清单是一个棘轮：每个合入的翻译批次把自己的文件加进去，覆盖面只增不减。
|
||||
- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。**进仓的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../../.agents/skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 同一模式：skill 承载工作流，并把真源让给文档。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**——本 RFC 最初提出的设计：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。评审中修订：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 RFC，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的旁挂记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制原样保留。
|
||||
- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**——否决：本仓库没有把 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架，挪动每个英文文件会搅动所有既有交叉引用，且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑而不是原样工作。
|
||||
- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**——否决：适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自己的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁够不到的地方。
|
||||
- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**——否决：每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 工效，且局部不一致不可见。
|
||||
- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**——否决，改用 blob hash：同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。
|
||||
- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**——否决：纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的另一侧会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号与门禁的承诺名实相符。
|
||||
|
||||
## 业界先例
|
||||
|
||||
带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`）——但这些仓库都没有在 CI 里**强制**配对或一致性；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国之外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit、为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计把两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加 hash 对门禁，再加一个进仓 agent skill（技能）替代 bot 服务。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新另一侧并重新记录配对——门禁把 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。
|
||||
- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
|
||||
- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢——由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）禁止中文先行撰写。
|
||||
- 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让它们的生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时移出排除清单。
|
||||
- 推进天然是渐进的：`required` 之外的文档是可见的 backlog（`--list`），不是红的 CI，因此配对按可评审的批次落地，无需一个巨型 PR。
|
||||
- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），所以这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user