diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.i18n.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..684f23438c --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.i18n.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each +# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; +# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write +2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md: 41edf5d0bcf856bc7695af6bf651ff04c11adc01 +2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md: 9253c001e8df2a4d0f79f69f32d65c11afd13e22 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..41edf5d0bc --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Agent Note: TUI banner brand gradient + +Status: implemented + +English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md) + +## Problem + +The TUI startup banner rendered the product name `DEEPSEEK` in the palette's flat accent color, which carries no brand identity and does not resemble the wordmark on deepseek.com. The request was to make the banner match the site logo's blue gradient specifically — not to recolor the rest of the coding harness. + +The banner is the one surface where that matters, and it conflicts with a load-bearing invariant: the TUI palette is deliberately theme-agnostic. It uses only standard 16-color ANSI (SGR) codes and attributes so a user's terminal scheme remaps every color; the `themeViolations()` snapshot gate rejects any RGB, extended-palette, or explicit-background cell. A smooth logo-matching gradient cannot be built from 16 palette colors, so reproducing it requires 24-bit truecolor, which the gate flags by design. + +## Decision + +The banner paints `DEEPSEEK` with a per-letter 24-bit truecolor foreground sweeping the deepseek.com brand gradient — `#4D6BFE` → `#3982FF` → `#2498FF` — via piecewise-linear interpolation across those three stops; `HARNESS` stays bold with the default foreground. The gradient is foreground-only, so it stays legible on any terminal background, and it is confined to the banner's product name. This is the sole sanctioned exception to the theme-agnostic palette; every other surface remains standard-ANSI and theme-adaptive. + +The gradient is gated on `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor`. When truecolor is unavailable the banner falls back to the existing flat bright-blue accent, so nothing about the theme-agnostic guarantee or the recorded snapshots changes unless truecolor is explicitly in play. + +`truecolor` is a validated `Config` field with no schema default. When it is unset, `apply()` auto-detects it at the process boundary from `COLORTERM` (`truecolor` or `24bit`); an explicit config value always wins. Detection reads `process.env` only in `apply()` — never in the pure `resolveTuiConfig` resolver — keeping the resolver a pure function of its input. + +The gradient stops are fixed brand identity, treated like a protocol constant, so they are hardcoded in the plugin rather than exposed as a tunable. Whether truecolor is *enabled* is terminal- and deployment-varying, so that is the validated `Config` field. The banner text is UI-only and never reaches a model request, so no session event is required. + +## Testing + +A dedicated `banner-gradient` terminal snapshot pins the real per-letter RGB output in an xterm emulator (`fg=#4d6bfe`…`#2498ff`, each letter bold). The shared `checkpoint()` helper takes a `bannerGradient` flag: for that one checkpoint it asserts the theme violations are non-empty and that every violation ends in `rgb-fg` — i.e. truecolor is present but confined to the banner foreground, with no background or extended-palette leak. Every other checkpoint keeps the strict `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` assertion, so the fence is mechanically enforced. A `tui.spec.ts` unit test mounts with `color`+`truecolor` enabled to cover the header's gradient branch and the `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` helpers. + +## Alternatives considered + +**A theme-safe stepped gradient built from the 16-color palette.** Approximating the sweep with bright-blue palette variants would keep the banner fully theme-agnostic and avoid touching the gate. It was rejected by the requester: 16 fixed colors cannot reproduce the smooth logo gradient, and the request was explicitly to match the site wordmark. + +**Recoloring the whole harness palette blue.** The original phrasing was "update the harness color to blue." That was narrowed to the banner only; a global blue palette would break theme-agnosticism everywhere, not just on one brand surface. + +**Always emitting truecolor.** Many terminals lack 24-bit support and would render the raw or degraded codes. Gating on detection with an ANSI fallback keeps the banner correct everywhere while still showing the gradient where it works. + +**Detecting truecolor inside `resolveTuiConfig`.** The resolver is a pure defaulting step and must not read `process.env`. Environment probing belongs at the process boundary in `apply()`, so `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` stay driven purely by their config input and remain fully testable with a fake terminal. + +## Consequences + +The banner now carries the DeepSeek brand identity on truecolor terminals while the theme-agnostic guarantee holds everywhere else — and even on the banner itself when truecolor is unavailable. The cost is one narrow, documented crack in the theme-agnostic invariant: a fixed-color surface that will not adapt to a user's terminal scheme, accepted because it is brand identity and foreground-only, so it stays legible on both light and dark backgrounds. The crack is fenced by the `banner-gradient` snapshot assertion, which confines truecolor to the banner foreground and fails if any other RGB, extended-palette, or background color ever appears. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9253c001e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Agent Note: TUI 启动横幅品牌渐变 + +Status: implemented + +[English](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md) | 中文 + +## 问题 + +TUI 启动横幅原本用调色板的扁平强调色渲染产品名 `DEEPSEEK`,它不承载任何品牌标识,也不像 deepseek.com 上的字标。需求明确是让横幅匹配站点 logo 的蓝色渐变——而不是给整个 coding harness 重新上色。 + +横幅是唯一在意这件事的界面,而它与一条承重不变量冲突:TUI 调色板刻意做到主题无关。它只使用标准 16 色 ANSI(SGR)代码与属性,好让用户的终端配色方案能够重映射每一种颜色;`themeViolations()` 快照门禁会拒绝任何 RGB、扩展调色板或显式背景色的单元格。用 16 种调色板颜色无法拼出平滑的、与 logo 一致的渐变,因此复现它需要 24 位真彩色(truecolor),而门禁按设计会将其标记出来。 + +## 决策 + +横幅用逐字母的 24 位真彩色前景色渲染 `DEEPSEEK`,沿 deepseek.com 品牌渐变——`#4D6BFE` → `#3982FF` → `#2498FF`——在这三个色标之间做分段线性插值;`HARNESS` 保持加粗并使用默认前景色。渐变仅作用于前景色,因此在任何终端背景上都保持可读,并且被限制在横幅的产品名内。这是主题无关调色板唯一获准的例外;其余每个界面都保持标准 ANSI 且随主题自适应。 + +渐变以 `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor` 为开关。当真彩色不可用时,横幅回退到既有的扁平亮蓝强调色,因此除非显式启用真彩色,主题无关保证与已录制的快照都不会改变。 + +`truecolor` 是一个经校验的 `Config` 字段,schema 不设默认值。当它未设置时,`apply()` 会在进程边界从 `COLORTERM`(`truecolor` 或 `24bit`)自动探测;显式的配置值始终优先。探测只在 `apply()` 中读取 `process.env`——绝不在纯粹的 `resolveTuiConfig` 解析器中——从而让解析器保持为其输入的纯函数。 + +渐变色标是固定的品牌标识,被当作协议常量对待,因此硬编码在插件里,而不作为可调项暴露。是否*启用*真彩色则随终端与部署而变,所以那才是经校验的 `Config` 字段。横幅文本仅面向界面,永不进入任何模型请求,因此不需要会话事件。 + +## 测试 + +一个专门的 `banner-gradient` 终端快照在 xterm 模拟器中固定了真实的逐字母 RGB 输出(`fg=#4d6bfe`…`#2498ff`,每个字母加粗)。共享的 `checkpoint()` 辅助函数接受一个 `bannerGradient` 标志:仅对该 checkpoint,它断言主题违规项非空,且每一项都以 `rgb-fg` 结尾——即真彩色确实存在,但被限制在横幅前景色,没有背景色或扩展调色板的泄漏。其余每个 checkpoint 都保持严格的 `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` 断言,因此这道围栏是机械强制的。一个 `tui.spec.ts` 单元测试在同时启用 `color` 与 `truecolor` 时挂载,以覆盖 header 的渐变分支以及 `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` 辅助函数。 + +## 曾考虑的替代方案 + +**用 16 色调色板拼出的主题安全阶梯渐变。** 用亮蓝的调色板变体近似这段渐变可以让横幅完全保持主题无关,并避免触碰门禁。它被需求方否决了:16 种固定颜色无法复现平滑的 logo 渐变,而需求明确是匹配站点字标。 + +**给整个 harness 调色板重新上蓝色。** 最初的说法是"把 harness 颜色改成蓝色"。它被收窄到只改横幅;全局蓝色调色板会在各处而非仅一个品牌界面上破坏主题无关性。 + +**始终发射真彩色。** 许多终端不支持 24 位,会渲染出原始或降级的代码。以探测为开关并配以 ANSI 回退,能让横幅在各处都正确,同时仍在支持的地方展示渐变。 + +**在 `resolveTuiConfig` 内探测真彩色。** 该解析器是纯粹的默认值填充步骤,绝不能读取 `process.env`。环境探测属于 `apply()` 中的进程边界,从而让 `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` 完全由其配置输入驱动,并在使用假终端时保持完全可测。 + +## 后果 + +现在横幅会在真彩色终端上承载 DeepSeek 品牌标识,而主题无关保证在其余各处依然成立——甚至当真彩色不可用时在横幅自身上也成立。代价是主题无关不变量上一道狭窄且有记录的裂缝:一个不会随用户终端配色方案自适应的固定颜色界面,之所以接受,是因为它是品牌标识且仅作用于前景色,从而在浅色与深色背景上都保持可读。这道裂缝由 `banner-gradient` 快照断言把守,它将真彩色限制在横幅前景色,一旦其他任何 RGB、扩展调色板或背景色出现就会失败。 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.i18n.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..8732101ab2 --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.i18n.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each +# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; +# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: +# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write +2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md: 37263854b6cc77283215c3c1378f9908ff966611 +2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md: ca796e49cb9d3a9abc0acd64a39448bc3f9ad50e diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..37263854b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Agent Note: The banner returns, borderless + +Status: implemented + +English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md) + +## Problem + +The [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) removed the boxed startup banner: it deleted `HeaderComponent` and its sweep, moved the model into the footer, dropped the session id, and rendered `welcome` as the transcript's first line. The user's verdict reversed that: bring the banner back — "just remove the border". The four-row box frame was the objectionable chrome, not the identifying facts it carried (model, session id) nor the sweep-in motion. + +## Decision + +- `HeaderComponent` and its left-to-right sweep return, but render **borderless**: no `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` corners and no `│` side bars. Each line is a single leading space plus `truncateToWidth`-clipped content, so the sweep's width clip can never tear an escape sequence and no fixed frame is drawn. +- The header carries the title (`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`), a `` detail line, and — when `welcome` is set — a muted subtitle. With `welcome` unset the header is title + detail only. +- The model **also** stays in the footer's left segment. The no-banner note's footer model prefix is kept, not reverted, so the driving model stays glanceable after the transient banner scrolls out of view. +- `welcome` reverts to a banner subtitle; the transcript-first-line notice is removed from `rebuildTranscript`. +- The sweep animates only when `welcome` is unset. A configured `welcome` renders the whole banner immediately, keeping fixtures and snapshots frame-deterministic. The sweep starts after `ui.start()` succeeds and is cleared through the same `detachListeners` path via `stopBannerReveal`, which also resets the clip so a header disposed mid-sweep re-renders whole. + +This supersedes the [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) (which superseded the [banner-sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)): the banner and its sweep return borderless, while the model's footer home the no-banner note added stays. + +## Alternatives considered + +**Keep the box but thin it or use lighter glyphs.** Rejected: the instruction was "just remove the border"; any surrounding glyph is the frame chrome the user objected to. + +**Drop the model from the footer now that the banner shows it again.** Rejected: the banner is transient and scrolls away with the transcript, while the footer keeps the model visible for the whole session — the reason the no-banner note put it there, deliberately preserved. + +**Leave the session id out, as the no-banner note decided.** Rejected: with the box gone the detail line costs one row, and the user asked for the banner "as before", which carried `model • session-id`. + +## Consequences + +- Boot output with `welcome` unset is animation-dependent again (the sweep); configured welcomes stay frame-deterministic, so every snapshot and scripted fixture keeps a fixed subtitle. +- The model now appears twice at boot — banner detail and footer — intended redundancy: the banner is transient, the footer persistent. +- `/clear` empties the transcript but not the header, so the banner and its configured subtitle survive `/clear`, unlike the no-banner welcome line that `/clear` wiped. +- All pi-tui terminal snapshots and the examples/tui-agent replay snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows return with no box glyphs; footer rows keep the model prefix. +- Anything that anchored on banner absence re-anchors on its presence: the PTY smoke boots on the detail line's `main-session-` id (revealed late in the sweep) and asserts `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` present with no box corners. + +## Testing + +`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the borderless banner sweeps to natural completion — no box corners, title and `main-session` detail present — with at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured `welcome` renders the whole banner with no clipped frame; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep interval mid-sweep. The tui-agent and dsh-CLI PTY smokes boot on the `main-session-` detail marker and assert no box corners. Snapshots verify the full frames. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ca796e49cb --- /dev/null +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Agent Note: 横幅回归,无边框 + +Status: implemented + +[English](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md) | 中文 + +## Problem + +[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) 删掉了带框的启动横幅:它删除了 `HeaderComponent` 及其扫入动画,把模型移入页脚,丢弃了会话 id,并把 `welcome` 渲染为 transcript 的第一行。用户的裁决把这一切反转:把横幅拿回来——"just remove the border"。令人反感的装饰是那四行盒子边框,而不是它承载的识别信息(模型、会话 id),也不是扫入动效。 + +## Decision + +- `HeaderComponent` 及其从左到右的扫入动画回归,但以**无边框**方式渲染:没有 `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` 边角,也没有 `│` 侧边。每一行都是一个前导空格加上经 `truncateToWidth` 裁剪的内容,因此扫入的宽度裁剪永远不会撕裂转义序列,也不绘制任何固定边框。 +- 头部承载标题(`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`)、一条 `` 详情行,以及——当设置了 `welcome` 时——一条弱化的副标题。`welcome` 未设置时头部只有标题加详情。 +- 模型**同时**保留在页脚的左段。移除横幅那版 note 加入的页脚模型前缀被保留而非回退,因此在短暂的横幅滚出视野后,会话使用的模型仍可一瞥可见。 +- `welcome` 恢复为横幅副标题;transcript 第一行的通知从 `rebuildTranscript` 中移除。 +- 仅当 `welcome` 未设置时才播放扫入动画。配置了 `welcome` 会立即渲染整个横幅,使 fixture 和快照保持帧确定性。扫入在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,并经与之前相同的 `detachListeners` 路径通过 `stopBannerReveal` 清理;后者还会重置裁剪,使扫入中途被销毁的头部重新完整渲染。 + +本 note 取代[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md)(后者取代了[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)):横幅及其扫入动画以无边框方式回归,而移除横幅那版 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。 + +## Alternatives considered + +**保留盒子但做细或改用更轻的字符。** 否决:指令是 "just remove the border";任何环绕的字符都是用户所反对的边框装饰。 + +**既然横幅重新显示模型,就把模型从页脚移除。** 否决:横幅是短暂的,会随 transcript 滚走,而页脚在整个会话中保持模型可见——这正是移除横幅那版 note 把它放在那里的原因,此处刻意保留。 + +**像移除横幅那版 note 那样,把会话 id 留在外面。** 否决:盒子去掉后详情行只占一行,且用户要求横幅"和以前一样",而以前它承载 `model • session-id`。 + +## Consequences + +- `welcome` 未设置时的启动输出再次依赖动画(扫入);配置了欢迎语则保持帧确定性,因此每个快照和脚本 fixture 都保留一个固定副标题。 +- 模型现在在启动时出现两次——横幅详情与页脚——这是有意的冗余:横幅短暂,页脚常驻。 +- `/clear` 清空 transcript 但不清头部,因此横幅及其配置的副标题在 `/clear` 后存活,不同于被 `/clear` 清掉的移除横幅那版的欢迎行。 +- 全部 pi-tui 终端快照与 examples/tui-agent 回放快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行以无盒子字符方式回归;页脚行保留模型前缀。 +- 一切锚定横幅缺失的内容改为锚定其存在:PTY 冒烟测试以详情行的 `main-session-` id 为启动标记(它在扫入后段才被揭示),并断言 `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` 出现且无盒子角。 + +## Testing + +`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:无边框横幅扫入至自然完成——无盒子角、标题与 `main-session` 详情出现——且至少有一帧扫入中途被裁剪;配置的 `welcome` 完整渲染横幅且无裁剪帧;未设置 `welcome` 的横幅无副标题;销毁会在扫入中途清掉扫入定时器。tui-agent 与 dsh CLI 的 PTY 冒烟测试以 `main-session-` 详情标记为启动标记并断言无盒子角。快照验证完整帧。 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.i18n.yaml b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.i18n.yaml index e9ef3a7671..56333563f5 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.i18n.yaml +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.i18n.yaml @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority; # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with: # pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write -2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md: 284d02df4b1fe3445a76b030aa873164081aa571 -2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md: 83bf7ffa27ca1abef0e71a1847b5aa1bd54bbe87 +2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md: f5f4b1b847740e741ec3e33a6116e7497e955bd1 +2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md: 956fe03e2c0b09ea7378ffd53ffbe8d712d1e152 diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md index 284d02df4b..f5f4b1b847 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ Status: implemented English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md) +> **Superseded** by the [borderless-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md): the banner and its sweep return without the box. The model's footer home this note added stays. + ## Problem The TUI opened with a boxed product banner ("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + model/session detail), most recently with a sweep-in animation ([banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)). The user's verdict: remove it. A product title re-read on every boot is chrome, the box spends four rows before any content, and the identifying facts it carried (model, session) have better homes. diff --git a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md index 83bf7ffa27..956fe03e2c 100644 --- a/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md +++ b/.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ Status: implemented [English](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) | 中文 +> **已被取代**,见[无边框横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md):横幅及其扫入动画回归,只是去掉了盒子。本 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。 + ## Problem TUI 启动时展示一个带框的产品横幅("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + 模型/会话详情),最近一版还带扫入动画([横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md))。用户的裁决:删掉它。每次启动都被重读的产品标题是装饰,盒子在任何内容之前先占掉四行,而它承载的识别信息(模型、会话)有更好的去处。 diff --git a/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/banner-gradient.expected.txt b/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/banner-gradient.expected.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..312b7737dd --- /dev/null +++ b/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/banner-gradient.expected.txt @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +terminal 96x36 buffer=normal length=36 base=0 viewport=0 +lifecycle started=1 stopped=0 progress=inactive +title "DSH snapshot" +cursor hidden column=1 viewportRow=4 bufferRow=4 +viewport +0| " DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + style 1-1 fg=#4d6bfe bold + style 2-2 fg=#4772fe bold + style 3-3 fg=#4278ff bold + style 4-4 fg=#3c7fff bold + style 5-5 fg=#3685ff bold + style 6-6 fg=#308bff bold + style 7-7 fg=#2a92ff bold + style 8-8 fg=#2498ff bold + style 10-16 bold +1| " Snapshot agent ready." + style 1-21 fg=bright-black +2| " deepseek-v4-flash • main-session" + style 1-34 dim +3| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" + style 0-95 dim +4| " " + style 1-1 inverse +5| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" + style 0-95 dim +6| "deepseek-v4-flash /workspace/project ↑0 ↓0 tools:collapsed" + style 0-43 dim + style 81-95 dim +7-35| diff --git a/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/resume-sessions.expected.txt b/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/resume-sessions.expected.txt index 6e44fa8165..ffa82ce4b9 100644 --- a/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/resume-sessions.expected.txt +++ b/packages/ui/tui/tests/snapshots/resume-sessions.expected.txt @@ -1,28 +1,32 @@ terminal 92x32 buffer=normal length=32 base=0 viewport=0 lifecycle started=1 stopped=0 progress=inactive title "DSH snapshot" -cursor hidden column=1 viewportRow=9 bufferRow=9 +cursor hidden column=1 viewportRow=10 bufferRow=10 buffer -0| -1| " Snapshot agent ready. " +0| " DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + style 1-8 fg=bright-blue bold + style 10-16 bold +1| " Snapshot agent ready." style 1-21 fg=bright-black -2| -3| " Resumable sessions " +2| " deepseek-v4-flash • main-session" + style 1-34 dim +3| +4| " Resumable sessions " style 1-18 fg=bright-blue bold -4| " 2024-01-02 03:04 (current) " +5| " 2024-01-02 03:04 (current) " style 1-16 fg=bright-black style 17-26 fg=green -5| " RESUME_SESSION_ID=main-session dsh " -6| " 2024-01-01 00:00 " +6| " RESUME_SESSION_ID=main-session dsh " +7| " 2024-01-01 00:00 " style 1-16 fg=bright-black -7| " RESUME_SESSION_ID=earlier-session dsh " -8| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" +8| " RESUME_SESSION_ID=earlier-session dsh " +9| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" style 0-91 dim -9| " " +10| " " style 1-1 inverse -10| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" +11| "────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────" style 0-91 dim -11| "deepseek-v4-flash /workspace/project ↑0 ↓0 tools:collapsed" +12| "deepseek-v4-flash /workspace/project ↑0 ↓0 tools:collapsed" style 0-43 dim style 77-91 dim -12-31| +13-31|