These goldens were recorded on a machine with personal skills under ~/.dsh and
~/.agents, so every one of them pinned a context-injection row a clean runner
cannot produce — which is why the browser lane failed on CI and passed
locally. master's scaffold fix confines skill-local's host-level roots to the
temp world; re-recording against it removes the row and nothing else.
seeded-history keeps its row: that scenario seeds the event itself.
Merging master swapped the plain "▸ 上下文注入" button for the shared
DisclosureRow, which every conversation golden carrying an injected-context
row renders. The only change in all twelve files is that row.
The master merge moved the TUI composition into `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml`
and I carried the `settings-local` / `credentials-local` rows across without
adding them to the resolver manifest. Bare specifiers in an app config resolve
through that manifest's dependencies, so the whole tree failed to boot:
dsh: plugin(s) failed to load: @deepseek-ai/dsh-settings-local,
@deepseek-ai/dsh-credentials-local
which took every TUI PTY smoke with it. `verify-cordis-config` did not catch
it, so the boot smoke was the first signal.
The lane boots the host spine through the shared scaffold, so it belongs to
tsconfig.host.json and must stay out of the client-registered apps/web project
— one program cannot hold both sides of the cordis Context merges.
The Web composer now renders a request that declares the `plan-review` intent
as its own surface: the waiting-approval card language — amber "Plan review"
strip, the plan as the scrolling markdown body, the question as the card's
accessible name — over one decision row of Chat about it / Refuse / Approve.
Gone from that surface are the 1/1 pager, the numbered radio rows, the custom
answer row, and Skip/Submit, which made approving a plan read as sitting an
exam.
Approve and Refuse answer with the asker's own option labels and keep its
descriptions as tooltips; Chat about it cancels the request so the composer
returns and the user can simply say what they want. Copy is bilingual under the
existing `question` namespace.
The shape choice lives inside the single composer entry rather than a second
chain registration, so the two surfaces cannot race the same carrier, and
`planReviewOf` falls back to the generic flow for any request it cannot render
as a card — the client sits downstream of a wire boundary and every request
must stay answerable.
Review follow-ups on the approval takeover:
The scroll region is now a tab stop (tabIndex + named role="group"). The
question composer's scroll body needs none — its option rows are focusable and
pull the container along — but this one holds nothing but text, so a
keyboard-only user could reach the buttons and never the command's tail, and
approve what they could not finish reading.
The action row's padding reproduces the 14px gap it had inside the body: the
flex gap of 6 plus its 8px top margin, neither of which reaches it now that the
row sits outside the scroll region. The resting card is unchanged again.
Yichen Jiang
imccyu
imccyu
Tianyi Cui
creatixchu
kingwl