Threading a status reader and a patch callback made both call sites long
enough to read as the same code again; handing over the store is one line at
each and says the same thing.
The shared picker's id fallback on both trust levels, the chip refusing an
unrelated settings namespace, a refused `settings.describe`, and a blank
draft that names no source. Drops the picker's `title`, which this layer's
one caller never passes.
The chip renders name and description on two lines with its own icon and
alignment, so it is not the same control as the settings row — the shared
picker carries the row, and the chip keeps its shape.
The settings row and the composer seat differ in where they sit, what they
call the current value, and when they refuse a pick — not in how the picker
behaves. Extracting it also stops the row from reading like the permission
row it has nothing to do with.
The row and the management section opened `load` the same way — refuse a
concurrent read, mark the store loading, read, fold both refusal shapes into
the store's error. What differs between them starts after that.
The chip and the settings row both spread the same three fields, and
`exactOptionalPropertyTypes` makes the absent-vs-undefined dance verbose
enough that the duplication gate flagged it.
The package landed here with one store spec; the rest of its tests were written
three layers up, so this layer and the two above it failed the per-file
coverage gate on 191 locations while every test passed.
Adds the node half's invariant companion, the two components, the registration
apply, and the stores' failure paths. `currentValue` drops a `?? ''` that an
empty roster already returned before reaching — the same shape the later layer
arrived at, so the two converge instead of conflicting.
ChatView's bottom-follow recognized only wheel gestures as reader input,
so touch panning, scrollbar dragging, and keyboard paging could not leave
the bottom of a streaming transcript. Replace the wheel listener with
device-agnostic attribution: a scroll position deviating from the
observed-top ledger of the last delivered or written scrollTop is reader
input. Adds keyboard-paging and touch-style fling e2e scenarios (red under
the old implementation) and the bilingual Agent Note triplet.
Six review findings on the select surface, all reachable from the wire:
**Resume read the header, not the log.** The switch was recorded as
`agent-preset/selected` and every projection resolved from it, but `agentFor`
still composed from `inspected.meta.agentPreset` — the value written once at
creation. A blank session that switched and then ran turns came back after a
restart under the ORIGINAL preset, restoring that history under the tool set it
was not produced with, which is the mismatch this feature exists to prevent.
`inspected` already carries the events.
**Cold summaries dropped the preset entirely.** `summarizeCold` hand-copied
three header fields and omitted the fourth, so a restored session reported no
preset and the picker showed the deployment default. It now uses the same
projection the attached path does.
**`select` had no gate.** Two concurrent selects both passed the blank check;
the second `unmountPresetFor` then found no record, because the first had
already removed it, and both mounts installed into one agent layer. Selects on
one session now queue, and the blank check is re-read inside the queue. This is
not turn admission — a `session.prompt` racing a switch is the agent loop's to
reserve — but it closes the select-versus-select tear-down.
**A same-id restore was skipped.** The roster is a live directory, so "the same
inputs that worked a moment ago" does not hold: a changed file is exactly how a
same-id reselect fails, and skipping the restore left the agent with no
composition at all.
**`writable` was dead state**, initialized true and never set, so the row could
never disable. It now carries `settings.describe`'s bit — a browser that may
not write settings sees the current default and no control, rather than one
whose write answers `settings-not-exposed`.
**`list` was documented as id-ordered.** It is root-precedence order with each
root's own presets sorted, first root to supply an id winning.
Copying is already its own action, offered on the row being copied, so the two
routes now arrive at the same editor by whichever one the author chose. **New
preset** starting from some preset nobody named put a composition in the editor
that the author had to recognise as unwanted before deleting it — and the
preset it copied was the deployment default, which is the one least likely to
be what someone reaching for "new" wanted.
A blank draft has no source, so it names none and makes no read: the editor's
"copied from" line and header clause appear only when there is a source.
Authoring writes a FILE, not a settings field, so nothing on the wire announces
it — `settings/changed` covers the default moving, never the directory. The
chip therefore kept the roster it read when it first mounted, and a preset
authored to be used was missing from the one screen that starts sessions.
The page that changes the directory now says so, and every surface reading the
same roster re-reads it. The chip subscribes rather than being reached from the
outer scope, because it is registered later, under `conversation`/`sessions`.
The General row and the preset page already re-read on `settings/changed`, but
the hero chip did not — so changing the default and starting a session without
reloading composed the previous default. That is the one session the setting
claims to govern ("对此后新建的会话生效"), and the chip is what decides it.
A staged pick still wins: `load()` prefers the stage over the refreshed
fallback, so a refresh never overwrites a choice the user just made.
The preference row rendered `option.id` while every other surface — the
new-session chip, the session header label, the preset cards — renders the
metadata name. So the same roster read `标准模式` on one screen and `standard`
on the next, and the id is addressing, not a label. A preset that names itself
nothing still falls back to its id, which is then all there is to say about it.
The row's Chinese copy also still ended on the English word: the section is
`Agent 预设`, so the sentence about a running session keeping its composition
says 预设 too.
Yichen Jiang
Turtle
fz
creatixchu
Chinesezjc