Two findings from the pre-ready review, both verified:
- verify-rfc-format scanned raw lines, so an RFC quoting a Status line,
a banned heading, or the grandfather comment inside a fenced example
would false-positive. The content scans (duplicate Status, H2 headings,
banned headings, grandfather, legacy marker) now ignore fenced blocks;
the positional header-block checks stay raw. Verified: a fenced
'Status: implemented' + '## Plan' + grandfather quote inside a walked
RFC no longer trips the gate.
- The companion RFC's pre-format corpus counts were imprecise: 27
distinct Status spellings (reasons collapsed), not 'some fifteen';
nineteen implemented files carrying thirty proposal-era heading
occurrences, not 'over twenty files'; three English files (plus one zh
counterpart) with no status, not four.
Define the in-file RFC contract in docs/rfc/README.md § The file format:
the header block (`# RFC: <title>` plus a dateless Status enum
cross-checked against the lifecycle folder), the per-lifecycle body
skeleton (a Problem opener everywhere; Proposal/Alternatives considered/
Acceptance criteria/Risks in proposed/; present-tense Decision/
Consequences with proposal-era headings banned in implemented/; the
frozen proposal shape in rejected/), and a mandatory Alternatives
considered section with a date-fenced grandfather comment for pre-format
RFCs whose alternatives are not reconstructible from the record.
Enforce it with a new doc-sync gate, scripts/verify-rfc-format.ts, and
normalize all 112 RFCs to it: ~15 Status-line spellings collapse to the
enum, 29 Context openers become Problem, the 39 legacy-format XXX debt
markers are resolved and banned from reappearing, proposal-era sections
in implemented RFCs are rewritten to shipped reality (including the
web/fs/subagent seam RFCs' migration plans and test checklists, closing
the doc-tiers deferred-work item on the web seam), every RFC gains an
Alternatives considered section or the grandfather comment, and the
bilingual pair is re-mirrored and re-recorded.
Move the generated index tables out of README.md into a fully generated
docs/rfc/INDEX.md — gen-rfc-index now writes the whole file, and
verify-rfc-classification checks its freshness and rejects index-shaped
rows in the curated README — which makes room for the format contract to
live in the README front door instead of a separate FORMAT.md.
The decision record, and the first RFC written in the new format, is
docs/rfc/implemented/process/2026-07-05-uniform-rfc-format.md.
Tianyi Cui