Files
deepseek-harness/docs/adr/0007-quality-gates.md
T
Tianyi Cui 066f94c7e0 docs: unwrap hard-wrapped Markdown to one line per paragraph
Hard line breaks mid-paragraph make docs harder to edit and diff — a
one-word change reflows and re-diffs the whole paragraph. Reflow all
tracked non-vendor Markdown (plus vendor/AGENTS.md) so each prose
paragraph is a single line; soft-wrapping is the editor's job. Fenced
code, tables, and list structure are preserved (wrapped list items fold
to one line per bullet). Documents the convention in AGENTS.md.
2026-06-13 20:27:04 +08:00

1.6 KiB

ADR 0007: Mechanical quality gates over prose guidelines

Status: accepted (2026-06-11)

Context

This codebase is developed primarily by coding agents. Agents follow enforced gates far more reliably than prose conventions, and "a lot of work" is not a cost argument when agents do the labor. Early evidence: tests that didn't typecheck shipped (vitest doesn't typecheck) and were only caught by a review.

Decision

Every AGENTS.md promise gets a command that exits non-zero, wired into git hooks and CI both calling the same package.json scripts:

  • Max-strict TypeScript (noUncheckedIndexedAccess, exactOptionalPropertyTypes, …); tests and examples typecheck in CI via tsconfig.typecheck.json (vendored packages resolve as built declarations).
  • ESLint strict-type-checked + @stylistic (the house style, enforced); vendored code excluded.
  • Per-file 100% coverage on packages/*/src (v8); unreachable defensive guards carry /* v8 ignore */ with stated reasons instead of deletion.
  • knip (dead code/deps), publint (package correctness), yarn constraints (workspace rules: private, cordis peer+dev, uniform version, ESM).
  • lefthook pre-commit (lint staged, typecheck, vendor-manifest guard) and pre-push (tests, hygiene); CI runs the full matrix on node 24/26 plus a demo smoke test driving the echo-agent end to end.

Consequences

  • Conventions survive agent turnover; violations fail fast and locally.
  • The gates themselves are code to maintain; config changes are reviewed like any change.
  • 100%-coverage pressure can produce assertion-free tests — mutation testing is the planned counterweight (see RFC 002).