Files
deepseek-harness/packages/workflow
Tianyi Cui 53680ee6bc Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/provider-routed-llm-adapters
# Conflicts:
#	docs/cordis-catalog/events.md
#	docs/cordis-catalog/services.md
#	docs/event-producer-consumer.md
#	docs/module-graph.md
#	packages/context/time-context/tests/time-context.spec.ts
#	packages/cordis/tool-cordis/src/api-catalog.ts
#	packages/core/session/README.md
#	packages/core/session/src/types.ts
#	packages/core/session/tests/surface.spec.ts
#	packages/examples/acp-demo/tests/acp-agent.spec.ts
#	packages/examples/stdio-demo/tests/stdio-agent.spec.ts
#	packages/hooks/hooks-claude/tests/coverage.spec.ts
#	packages/hooks/hooks-codex/tests/coverage.spec.ts
#	packages/session-query/session-query/tests/session-query.spec.ts
#	packages/support/invariants/tests/invariants.spec.ts
#	packages/ui/acp/tests/harness.ts
2026-07-17 21:56:10 +08:00
..

workflow/ — dynamic-workflow capability family

The workflow seam: a model-written JavaScript orchestration script that fans out subagents at scale (phases, structured per-agent results, concurrency caps), modeled on Claude Code's dynamic workflows. A capability seam (see capability seams) in the bash shape: ONE engine implementation per context registers as ctx.workflows; the model-facing tool consumes it.

Package Role ctx key
workflow/ Abstract workflow seam: service base class + run vocabulary + workflow/* events ctx.workflows
workflow-workerthread/ node:worker_threads engine: one worker per run; the script's vm context lives inside the worker, agent() bridges to ctx.subagents over the message port (provides ctx.workflows)
tool-workflow/ Model-facing workflow tool over ctx.workflows (registers on ctx.tools)

The interface lives at workflow/workflow/. The engine's agent() hook rides the subagent seam (any registered provider; the shipped examples use spawn), and agent({ schema }) rides the structured-output support the in-process backends implement. The worker thread isolates the SCRIPT — the host never blocks on it, and a cancelled run's post-grace termination is real — but it is NOT a security boundary; an isolated-vm/separate-process engine (actual sandboxing) swaps in behind the same interface if that ever matters.

The proposal, decisions, and deferred work: docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md.