Two review responses that belong together — the same review argued the
engine was defending the wrong threat while a benign-input bug wedged
the product.
1) Drop hostile-value containment; state the trust premise.
Scripts are model-written — the same trust level as the model's bash
access — yet successive pre-push review rounds had ratcheted in defenses
that only matter against an adversarial author: trap-free proxy
rejection, accessor-never-invoked descriptor walks, realm-side
pre-rendering of thrown values, realm-built promises/arrays/error clones
with structural fatal recognition. That same author keeps a documented,
accepted, unkillable event-loop spin, so containing its error VALUES is
cost without a threat model — and the planned hardened engine
(worker/isolated-vm) gets value isolation by serialization and deletes
all of this machinery anyway.
What stays, because benign scripts hit it constantly: result never
rejects; dropped hook promises cannot become unhandled rejections; the
value boundary rejects LOUD everything JSON cannot carry (now a plain
recursive walk — getters are read ordinarily and their result is what
crosses; a throwing read fails loud); a "__proto__" key still copies as
a data property; the fatal-vs-null combinator discipline (now host
instanceof — unforgeable from the realm and simpler than clone-shape
recognition). What changes for scripts (documented in the engine
README): hooks hand back host values and host errors — in-script
`instanceof Error` on a hook failure is false (branch on e.name/e.code)
— and args are host-cloned once so a script cannot mutate the caller's
object. realm.ts drops 289 → 173 lines; the hostile-value test tables go
with it. The premise now leads the engine module doc, the README, and
the RFC's engine section, with the removed machinery recorded under
What was rejected.
2) result settles within the dispose grace of a cancellation.
Review finding (verified through the real registry + tool + engine): a
script parked on a promise no hook owns — `await new Promise(() => {})`,
`await Promise.race([])`, a returned never-settling thenable — could not
be settled by cancel(): hooks reject and children abort, but nothing
touches a promise the engine does not own, so `result` stayed pending
FOREVER (the previous cut even pinned that as intended). The tool awaits
run.result BEFORE its disposing finally, the registry awaits the tool,
the loop awaits the registry — one such script wedged the whole agent
turn past any abort, unrecoverable in-process; the mock engine in the
tool's abort test settles result on cancel, which is exactly the
behavior the real engine lacked, so no existing test could see it.
The seam contract now says it out loud: once a run is cancelled, result
SETTLES within the implementation's bounded grace even if the script
never does. The vm engine arms an abandon channel in cancel(); drive()
races the script against it, force-settling 'cancelled' at the grace
(the abandoned settlement stays contained; a post-slice synchronous spin
remains the documented limitation). dispose()'s outer race now exists
for child quiescence only, and `workflow/end` again fires exactly once
per started run. The old 'result stays pending' pin is FLIPPED to the
new contract (the pinned behavior was the bug); new regressions cover
cancel-then-settle on a parked script, a never-settling returned
thenable, and the full composition through the REAL registry + tool +
vm engine (tool-workflow gains workflow-vm/subagent devDeps for it).
agentsStarted JSDoc clarified while touching the vocabulary (accepted
calls, including ones still queued at cancellation).
Tianyi Cui
2accf85714