The PR appended a superseded warning to one obsolete durability clause while leaving the same active decision record with mutually incompatible claims about Task-backed continuations, provider resume dispatch, and persistence guarantees. Because implemented Agent Notes are current authority rather than a review-history log, readers could still derive an API and ownership model that no longer exists.
Rewrite the affected decision, alternatives, and consequences in place around the activation-based implementation: ordinary starts remain holder-owned one-shot runs; continuable starts return durable child and accepted message identities; the manager owns materialization, follow-up/report routing, cold resume, and teardown; providers only contribute detached first-create data through prepareContinuable; and flush participation is observable but is not proof that a persistence backend stored state.
Keep the English and Chinese records equivalent, move the Chinese dispose glossary to its new first use, and refresh the pairing sidecar. This commit changes documentation authority only; it does not change runtime behavior.
Validated with the scoped translation-pairing writer and checker, verify-md-wrap, verify-agent-note-format, verify-agent-note-classification, and git diff --cached --check.
Tianyi Cui
ab4120ac96