Files
deepseek-harness/docs/adr/0008-tsdown-over-dumble.md
T
Tianyi Cui 630bbddf9a Replace dumble with tsdown for JS bundling
dumble (0.2.x, ~530 dl/wk, single-maintainer) was a bus-factor risk as
the load-bearing bundler. tsdown (rolldown-based, ~2.5M dl/wk, actively
maintained) replaces it while output stays list-identical, verified by
snapshot diff: 17 JS bundles, externals preserved, schemastery dual
.mjs/.cjs and logger-console node+browser entries intact.

Root tsdown.config.ts uses workspace globs ['vendor/*', 'packages/*']
(explicit, so examples/* stays excluded); two per-package overrides in
vendor/ cover the special shapes and are logged in vendor/README.md as
ours (not upstream sync surface). scripts/build.ts (dumble
orchestration) is deleted; yarn build = tsc -b && tsdown. tsc -b keeps
owning declarations (dts: false, clean: false).

Rationale recorded in ADR 0008 (also covers the direct-esbuild and
pkgroll alternatives).

Gates: lint, typecheck, 134 tests, hygiene (knip/publint/constraints),
demo smoke all green.
2026-06-11 22:34:43 +08:00

2.6 KiB

ADR 0008: tsdown for JS bundling instead of dumble

Status: accepted (2026-06-11)

Context

The initial build used dumble, the cordiverse zero-config esbuild wrapper that upstream Cordis itself builds with — maximum alignment with the vendored packages' conventions (it reads each package.json and infers entries/formats from the exports field). But dumble is a liability as a load-bearing tool in this repo: v0.2.x, ~530 npm downloads/week, effectively one maintainer, and we were invoking it through a custom orchestration script (scripts/build.ts) because it has no workspace mode.

Build output currently matters only for yarn build + publint (nothing publishes yet; dev/test/demo run unbuilt via tsx), so the switching cost is at its lowest now and only grows once packages publish.

Decision

Replace dumble with tsdown (rolldown-based, ~2.5M downloads/week, VoidZero-backed, actively released):

  • Root tsdown.config.ts with workspace: ['vendor/*', 'packages/*'] (explicit globs, not workspace: true, which would also pick up examples/* — they have package.json files but are not yarn workspaces).
  • Shared shape: entry src/index.ts, outDir: 'lib', ESM, platform: node, target: es2024, fixedExtension: false (keeps .js for "type": "module" packages), dts: false (tsc -b owns declarations), clean: false (lib/ holds tsc's .d.ts output).
  • Two per-package overrides in vendor/ (ours, like the regenerated tsconfigs; logged in vendor/README.md): schemastery (dual .mjs/.cjs via outExtensions), logger-console (two single-entry passes so the shared base class is inlined into each entry instead of a hash-named chunk, matching upstream's published shape).
  • scripts/build.ts deleted; yarn build = tsc -b && tsdown.

Alternatives considered: direct esbuild script (most established engine, zero wrapper risk, but hand-maintains the per-package spec table tsdown's workspace mode gives us); pkgroll (closest drop-in philosophically, but 78k dl/wk and Rollup-based — strictly weaker maintenance story than tsdown); keep dumble (perfect upstream alignment, unacceptable bus factor).

Consequences

Output file lists are byte-for-byte-list identical to dumble's (verified by snapshot diff at migration time); externals still come from each package's dependencies/peerDependencies. We give up dumble's exports-field inference — new packages with non-default shapes need a per-package tsdown.config.ts instead of just package.json fields. Future option: tsdown could also absorb declaration bundling (isolatedDeclarations) if tsc -b ever becomes the bottleneck; that would be a new ADR.