Dudu-0223
70a8b57738
The web tool package exposed ./search and ./fetch as standalone subpath
plugins, but nothing consumed them, the RFC never called for them, and the
sibling dsh-tool-bash (also a multi-tool consumer) ships a single entry and
selects tools via config. The extra entries also tripped the workspace
constraints gate, whose expected `files` list covers single-entry and bin
packages but not a non-bin multi-entry one.
Collapse to a single `.` entry: drop the ./search|./fetch exports and their
lib/*.js from package.json files, delete the per-package tsdown override (the
root config's lib/types/index.js entry now suffices), and remove the
plugin-shaped name/inject exports from search.ts/fetch.ts (renaming each
apply to its applyWeb{Search,Fetch}Tool helper, still composed by the root
plugin and re-exported from the index). Selective enablement stays via the
existing { search?, fetch? } config. Docs updated to match.
web/ - web capability family
The web access capability seam: an abstract web interface, search/fetch provider implementations, and the model-facing web tools. All product packages.
| Package | Role | ctx key |
|---|---|---|
web/ |
Abstract web seam (search/fetch provider registries + selection + vocabulary + WebError) |
ctx.web |
web-search-exa/ |
Exa-backed WebSearchProvider |
(registers on ctx.web) |
web-search-perplexity/ |
Perplexity-backed WebSearchProvider |
(registers on ctx.web) |
web-fetch-local/ |
Anonymous public HTTP(S) WebFetchProvider |
(registers on ctx.web) |
tool-web/ |
Model-facing web_search/web_fetch tool schemas |
(registers on ctx.tools) |
The interface lives at web/web/. Unlike bash/fs, the seam spans two capabilities (search and fetch) with potentially multiple providers each: ctx.web is one web-access middle layer with one provider-selection policy, one abort/error vocabulary, and one product-facing "how this harness reaches the web" config surface. Providers register capabilities, not tools; tool-web is the only owner of model-facing names, schemas, prompt guidance, and presentation. A search provider swap does not change how the model asks for a query, and a fetch implementation swap does not change how the model asks for a URL.
See the web capability seam RFC for the design rationale, including why search and fetch are deliberately one seam and why web_fetch's SSRF protection is deferred.