deepseek-harness/scripts/snapshots/translation-prompt-v4/request-response.expected.json

{
  "request": {
    "targetFilename": "snapshot-note.zh.md",
    "messages": [
      {
        "role": "system",
        "content": "# Translation Prompt\n\nYou are a senior technical translator specializing in LLM and agent development documentation. Your task is to translate the complete source document from English to Chinese, producing natural, professional technical prose.\n\nRead each complete semantic unit, understand it, and restate it as a native technical author would write it in the target language. Do not mechanically preserve source-language syntax. Then verify the translation against the source clause by clause: preserve every proposition and add none. Fluency never justifies losing or altering meaning, and completeness never justifies unnatural word-for-word prose.\n\n## Priority\n\nApply these authorities in order:\n\n1. Preserve the source meaning and the required document structure, protected content, and formatting.\n2. Follow the injected terminology table exactly.\n3. Use the injected whole-document gold pairs to calibrate target-language voice and phrasing.\n4. Apply the general writing guidance and illustrative examples in this prompt.\n\nA lower-priority rule may refine but never override a higher-priority requirement. Gold pairs calibrate voice; they are not a translation memory. No style preference, gold-pair phrasing, or embedded example may override source meaning, required structure, protected content, or the terminology table.\n\n## Quality Requirements\n\n### Structure and Format Preservation\n- Output a complete translated document that maintains the same document frame as the source: heading hierarchy and order, list kinds and item counts, ordered-list starts, table rows and columns, link targets, and code blocks.\n- Paragraph boundaries may change within the same structural unit when the target language needs different semantic grouping. Do not merge or move content across headings, list items, table cells, or other independent structural units.\n- Keep each prose paragraph on one physical line. Use paragraph breaks, not hard-wrapped lines inside a paragraph.\n- Fenced code blocks must be byte-identical to the source, including info strings, whitespace, and ALL comments inside them. Do NOT translate or reformat any content inside code blocks. This is a hard rule with no exceptions.\n- Inline code spans must be kept verbatim. This includes commands, flags, paths, identifiers, API and event names, config keys, protocol values, version numbers, and other machine-readable tokens. Never translate or reformat them.\n- Every relative link must point to the same target as in the source. Translate link text; do not change link targets.\n- Language switcher line: when an English source contains `English | [中文](source-filename.zh.md)`, write `[English](source-filename.md) | 中文`. When a Chinese source contains `[English](source-filename.md) | 中文`, write `English | [中文](source-filename.zh.md)`. Do NOT copy the source switcher unchanged. If the source has no switcher, do not invent a filename or switcher; the pipeline inserts the canonical target switcher after parsing `<final>`.\n- Preserve emphasis marker types and the semantic spans they cover. Do not add, remove, move, or change bold and italic markers.\n\n### Faithfulness\n- Preserve every proposition in the source and add none. Every sentence, list item, note, FIXME, warning, example, caveat, prerequisite, and guarantee must have an equivalent in the translation. Count list items on both sides.\n- Preserve actors, objects, conditions, exceptions, negation, modality, causal relationships, and distinctions between concepts.\n- Preserve the exact strength and orientation of contracts. Completion and lifecycle conditions, failure behavior, directions and data flow, normal and exceptional result channels, ownership changes, and quantitative bounds must not be weakened, strengthened, reversed, or merged.\n- Translate ideas rather than source-language idioms, but never use fluency as a reason to omit or alter meaning.\n\n### Tone and Style\n- The translation must read as if originally written in the target language by a native technical author. If an expression sounds like a word-for-word rendering from the source language, rephrase it.\n- Write in a professional, formal tone appropriate for developer documentation. Never use colloquial or casual expressions.\n- Name an actor when the target language would otherwise obscure an actor that the source states or unambiguously implies. Never invent responsibility merely to avoid a passive construction.\n- Prefer established target-language engineering terms over literal renderings. Replace metaphors with direct descriptions that preserve the source meaning.\n- Use polite imperative forms where the text instructs the reader to do something. In Chinese, address the reader as `你`, not `您`.\n- Keep the author's register: concise stays concise, detailed stays detailed.\n\n### Sentence Structure\n- Break long sentences where the target language needs a pause. Avoid run-on sentences.\n- Use active voice when it improves clarity without changing or inventing the actor. Retain passive voice when the actor is unknown, irrelevant, or intentionally omitted.\n- Restructure source-language syntax into clear target-language syntax. Preserve the logical scope of conditions, concessions, negation, coordination, and modifiers.\n- Split or combine clauses when needed for readability, provided every source relationship remains explicit.\n- Translate meaning, not words. Do not invent words or expressions that a native technical author would not use.\n\n### Word Choice\n- Prefer precise, formal vocabulary over casual or colloquial alternatives.\n- When multiple synonyms exist, choose the one most commonly used in professional technical documentation of the target language.\n- Translate ordinary prose when an established target-language expression is clear. Preserve proper nouns, canonical product names, code identifiers, APIs, paths, package names, and terms that the terminology table requires to remain in the source language.\n- Use context to resolve polysemous words. A familiar word does not have one fixed rendering in every technical domain.\n- Avoid slang, internal jargon, or overly literal translations that would not be recognized by the general developer audience.\n- Do not use the same word to translate distinct source-language concepts when their distinction matters.\n- Avoid repeating the same ordinary verb in close proximity when a natural equivalent preserves the exact meaning. Never vary a terminology-table form, defined concept, or contract verb merely for stylistic variety.\n\n#### When translating into Chinese\n- When a number modifies a noun, include a natural Chinese classifier or measure word when Chinese grammar requires one. For example: \"three-role capability seam\" → \"包含三种角色的能力 seam\", not \"三角色 seam\". Do not add classifiers to code, identifiers, versions, units, or fixed names.\n\n### Punctuation\n\n#### When translating into Chinese\n- Use full-width Chinese punctuation in Chinese prose: `，。：；？！（）「」`. Keep half-width punctuation inside code spans, numbers, and complete verbatim English text.\n- Prefer colons, periods, commas, or parentheses over em dashes when they make the sentence clearer or more natural. Keep an em dash when it is the clearest natural punctuation.\n- Use enumeration commas (、) between parallel Chinese items, not regular commas.\n- Keep list-item endings consistent with their grammar. Complete sentences may end with periods or other grammatically required punctuation; do not end list items with commas.\n- Put one half-width space between Chinese text and Latin words or numerals. Do not add a space next to full-width punctuation, and do not leave a meaningless half-width space between two Chinese characters.\n- Markdown emphasis markers do not create a word boundary. Determine spacing from the rendered adjacent characters: Chinese next to Chinese takes no space, while Chinese next to a Latin word or numeral takes one half-width space.\n- Use half-width digits and Latin letters, never full-width forms.\n- For RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD, MAY), translate to the corresponding Chinese term (必须、禁止、应当、可以), preserve the SOURCE emphasis span exactly, and do not weaken its normative strength: plain source stays plain (必须), italic source stays italic (*必须*), and bold source stays bold (**必须**).\n\n#### When translating into English\n- Use half-width English punctuation and standard English spacing. Preserve full-width punctuation only in verbatim Chinese text.\n- Convert enumeration commas (、) to English commas and Chinese prose quotation marks to English double quotes.\n- Convert Chinese topic-comment sentences and omitted-subject constructions into clear English subjects when the actor is stated or unambiguously implied. Do not invent an actor.\n- Use concise professional developer prose and established English technical terms. Do not transliterate Chinese engineering idioms literally.\n- Use the terminology table's English column exactly and do not carry Chinese first-occurrence glosses into English prose.\n\n## Terminology\n\nA terminology table is provided below. Follow it strictly:\n- Render every listed term exactly as specified.\n- When the target language is Chinese, use the \"中文\" column. On the document's first prose occurrence, write the \"首次出现\" value when one is specified; on later occurrences, write only the part before the parenthetical gloss.\n- When the target language is English, use the \"English\" column without a Chinese gloss; do not copy the \"中文\" or \"首次出现\" value into English prose.\n- If a term has already been glossed as part of a compound term, do not gloss it again when it appears alone later.\n- NEVER use translations listed in the \"不要译作\" column.\n- Code spans and other protected tokens remain verbatim even when their text resembles a listed term.\n- For an unlisted technical term, use an established target-language technical term when its meaning is unambiguous in context. For a Chinese target, use an established Chinese rendering from a major Chinese-language OSS or vendor source; if you cannot reliably determine such a rendering, preserve the source term and record `[Terminology: pending]` in `<review>` with a tentative rendering for human review. For an English target, use the established English technical term; if the source term has no unambiguous established equivalent, preserve it with the shortest English gloss needed to make it intelligible and record `[Terminology: pending]` in `<review>`. A tentative rendering may appear in `<review>` but must not be silently adopted in `<translation>` or `<final>`, and you must not invent or claim a specific external precedent. This rule applies to terminology only; for general prose, freely restructure and paraphrase for natural expression.\n\n# Terminology\n\n本表约定本仓库的中英术语统一译法。\n\n**通用规则：**\n- \"中文\"列为中文译文的正文默认用词。若该列为英文，则中文译文的正文中保留英文不翻译。\n- 首次出现按\"首次出现\"列书写（带括号注释）；后续出现只写括号前的部分（可能为中文，也可能为英文），不出现括号内的注释。\n- \"不要译作\"列为严格禁止的译法。\n- 如果某术语已经作为另一个术语的组成部分被括注过（如 `agent loop（智能体循环）` 中已包含 `agent` 的括注），则该术语后续单独出现时无需再次括注。\n\n## 缩写类（中英文文本中均使用缩写）\n\n| English | 中文 | 首次出现 | 不要译作 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| ACP | ACP | ACP（Agent Client Protocol） | | |\n| AI | AI | AI（人工智能） | | |\n| API | API | | | |\n| CI | CI | | | |\n| CLI | CLI | CLI（命令行界面） | | |\n| e2e | e2e | | | |\n| HMR | HMR | HMR（热模块替换） | | |\n| JSON Schema | JSON Schema | | | |\n| JSONL | JSONL | | | |\n| LLM | LLM | LLM（大语言模型） | | |\n| MCP | MCP | | | |\n| PR | PR | PR（Pull Request） | | |\n| RAG | RAG | RAG（检索增强生成） | | |\n| SDK | SDK | | | |\n| SSE | SSE | SSE（Server-Sent Events） | | |\n\n## 英文类（中英文文本中均使用英文）\n\n| English | 中文 | 首次出现 | 不要译作 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| agent | agent | agent（智能体） | | |\n| Agent Note | Agent Note | | 智能体注记、智能体笔记 | 仓库定义的文档类型，涵盖提案、已实现决策和被否决提案；中文对侧 H1 保持固定前缀 `# Agent Note: `，标题中不加术语括注 |\n| agent harness | agent harness | agent harness（智能体框架） | | agent 组合词（agent harness/workflow/loop/skill 等）整体保留英文；未括注过 agent 时首现按对应组合词或 agent 行处理 |\n| agent loop | agent loop | agent loop（智能体循环） | | |\n| blob hash | blob hash | | | `git hash-object` 的结果 |\n| Cordis | Cordis | | | |\n| dispose | dispose | dispose（资源释放） | | |\n| doc-sync | doc-sync | doc-sync（文档同步门禁） | | |\n| fiber | fiber | | | |\n| fixture | fixture | fixture（测试前置数据） | | |\n| fork | fork | | | |\n| Function Calling | Function Calling | Function Calling（函数调用） | | |\n| harness | harness | | | |\n| harness engineering | harness engineering | | | |\n| KV Cache | KV Cache | | | 专有技术名称，保持大小写与空格 |\n| lint | lint | | | |\n| mock | mock | | | 保留英文；指测试替身 |\n| loader | loader | | | |\n| manifest | manifest | manifest（元数据清单） | | |\n| monorepo | monorepo | | | |\n| Round | Round | | 回合、目标回合、Ralph 回合 | 外层策略使用 Round 时，领域层级为 Session > Round > Turn（轮次） > Step（步骤）；Round 是可选的外层策略迭代，并非每个会话轮次都具有的通用层级。Goal Round 与 Ralph Round 均保留英文。一个 Round 承载一个轮次，步骤隶属于该轮次；明确的零步骤轮次仍保持原义。 |\n| schema | schema | | | |\n| schema DSL | schema DSL | | | |\n| seam | seam | | 接缝 | 一个可替换能力的整体，包含 Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 三种角色；角色需要独立演化时才拆包，也可由同一包承担多个角色。以 `packages/bash` 为范例；Service Definition 是 Cordis `Service`（抽象类或具体 registry 服务），不是 TypeScript interface。任何单一角色、普通边界或扩展点都不能称为 seam。本仓库正文保留英文；与 `extension point` 是不同概念 |\n| skill | skill | skill（技能） | | |\n| slot | slot | | 坑位、孔位 | 客户端架构中的具名可注册位置，保留英文 |\n| spill | spill | | | 工具输出超限落盘机制；组合词写 `spill 文件`、`spill 路径` |\n| spawn | spawn | | | |\n| steering | steering | steering（中途引导） | | |\n| task id | task id | | 任务 id | 保留英文 |\n| subagent | subagent | | | |\n| transcript | transcript | transcript（文本记录） | | 指会话渲染给用户或编辑器的完整文本，区别于事件日志 |\n| waterfall | waterfall | waterfall（瀑布式事件） | | |\n| wheel | wheel 包 | | | Python 打包格式 |\n| worktree | worktree | | | git 工作区概念 |\n| Zstandard | Zstandard | | | RFC 8878 compression format; `zstd` remains a code value. |\n\n## 双语类（中英文文本各自使用中英文）\n\n| English | 中文 | 首次出现 | 不要译作 | 备注 |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| adapter | 适配器 | | | |\n| adapter contract | 适配器约定 | 适配器约定（adapter contract） | | |\n| append-only | 仅追加 | | | |\n| artifact | 产物 | | 制品 | |\n| backend | 后端 | | | |\n| background task | 后台任务 | | | |\n| block | 块 | | | |\n| build target | 构建目标 | | | |\n| cancel | 取消 | | | |\n| canary test | canary 测试 | | 金丝雀测试 | 本仓库保留 `canary` |\n| capability | 能力 | | | 必须与 `feature` → `功能` 区分 |\n| capability seam | 能力 seam | | 功能 seam、能力接缝 | 本仓库 Service Definition、Service provider 与 Consumer 三种角色组成完整可替换能力的命名架构概念；普通 `seam` 仍按其词条处理 |\n| feature | 功能 | | 能力 | SDK 产品与工程模型中的可管理产品单元 |\n| feature option | 功能选项 | | variant | 一项 SDK 功能内有限、可选择的实现或配置 |\n| checkpoint | 检查点 | | | |\n| chunk | 分片 | | | |\n| compaction | 压缩 | 压缩（compaction） | | |\n| companion tool | 配套工具 | | | |\n| composition bundle | 组合包 | | | 只约束应用或插件的组合语境，不约束所有 `bundle` |\n| Cordis plugin config | Cordis 插件配置 | | | Cordis 插件公开的 `Config` 对象或配置结构 |\n| config key | 配置键 | | | Cordis 插件配置中的单个字段 |\n| consumer | 消费方 | | 消费者 | |\n| content block | 内容块 | | | |\n| Cookbook | 实操手册 | | | 文档标题用语 |\n| context | 上下文 | | | |\n| counterpart | 对侧文件 | | 对应物、配对物 | 双语配对语境；泛指\"另一侧\"时可写「另一侧」 |\n| configurable-provider directory | 可配置提供方目录 | | | llm seam 中 `registerConfigurableProviders()` 维护的目录；沿用 Service Catalog →「服务目录」先例 |\n| context compaction | 上下文压缩 | 上下文压缩（context compaction） | | |\n| contract | 约定 | | | 如：`pairing contract` →`配对约定` |\n| Cordis config entry | Cordis 配置项 | | | 指 `cordis.yml` 插件列表中的一项；插件实现本身写`Cordis 插件` |\n| Cordis plugin | Cordis 插件 | | | Cordis 加载的插件实现，不指 `cordis.yml` 中的一项配置 |\n| crash recovery | 崩溃恢复 | | | |\n| deploy root | 部署根目录 | | | |\n| dormant | 休眠 | | 睡眠、蛰伏 | 指已声明可配置但当前未注册路由的提供方 |\n| durability | 持久性 | | | |\n| feature requirement | 功能依赖 | | | 功能或功能选项通过 `requires` 声明的关系 |\n| event | 事件 | | | |\n| event log | 事件日志 | | | |\n| event stream | 事件流 | | | |\n| event-sourced | 事件溯源 | | | 沿用 DDD 社区通行译法 |\n| Executive summary | 摘要 | | | 事故复盘标题用语 |\n| executor | 执行器 | | | |\n| expected output | 预期输出 | | 金标 | 指 snapshot 比较产物；翻译语料的人工校准样例不在此列 |\n| extension | 扩展 | | | |\n| extension point | 扩展点 | | | 注意与 `seam` 区分 |\n| fail-fast | 快速失败 | | | |\n| fenced code block | 围栏代码块 | | | 沿用 MDN 中文翻译 |\n| fingerprint | 指纹 | | | 通用内容指纹；双语配对机制使用 sidecar record 记录两侧 blob hash |\n| finish reason | 结束原因 | | | |\n| fold | 折叠区 | | | 配置界面语境：默认收起的字段分区（collapsed →「收起」）|\n| foreground run | 前台运行 | | | |\n| freshness | 新鲜度 | | | 沿用 MDN 中文翻译；在本项目中指译文相对源文的同步状态 |\n| hook | 钩子 | | | |\n| implementation | 实现 | | | |\n| inference | 推理 | 推理（inference） | | 需要和 `reasoning` 区分时保留英文括注 |\n| info string | 信息字符串 | | | 沿用 CommonMark 中文翻译；指代码围栏 ``` 之后的语言标注 |\n| injection | 注入 | | | |\n| integration | 集成 | | | |\n| interface | 接口 | | | |\n| language switcher | 语言切换行 | | | i18n 配对机制用语：双语配对文件顶部的互链行 |\n| merge | 合并 | | | |\n| message | 消息 | | | |\n| mod | 模组 | | | |\n| model provider | 模型提供方 | | | |\n| model selection | 模型选择 | | 模型目标 | 面向 Agent 的提供方、模型和可选推理强度选择。 |\n| module | 模块 | | | |\n| non-escalation | 非升权 | | 非升级、不可升级 | 仅用于安全与权限语境，指主体不得获得超出既有授权的权限；普通升级不适用此行 |\n| npm dependency | NPM 依赖 | | | `package.json` 中的包关系；`dependencies`、`devDependencies` 等字段保持原样 |\n| opt-out ratio | opt-out 比例 | | 退出检查比例 | |\n| orphan | 遗留 | | 孤儿、孤立 | 指英文源已不存在的 `.zh.md`（如「遗留译文」）；进程语境按 OS 惯用语译「孤儿进程」 |\n| orphan branch | 孤立分支 | | 孤儿分支 | 沿用 git 官方中文翻译 |\n| package | 包 | | | 指 npm 包（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-*`）；`package.json` 等代码标识保持原样 |\n| pairing | 配对 | | | |\n| parent-subset grants | 父级子集授权 | | 父集合授权 | 指授权范围仅限于父级所持授权的子集 |\n| peer dependency | 对等依赖 | 对等依赖（peer dependency） | | |\n| permission | 权限 | | | |\n| persistence | 持久化 | | | |\n| pipeline | 流水线 | | | |\n| plugin | 插件 | | | |\n| postmortem | 事故复盘 | 事故复盘（postmortem） | 事后分析、事故记录 | 事故记录与分析文档；目录或路径中的 `postmortem` 保持代码形式 |\n| prompt | 提示词 | | | |\n| provider | 提供方 | | | |\n| provider-neutral | 提供方无关 | | 提供方中立 | |\n| quality gate | 质量门禁 | | | |\n| quiescence | 完全停稳 | | 静默、静止状态 | 指生命周期工作全部结算后的状态 |\n| reasoning | 推理 | 推理（reasoning） | | 需要和 `inference` 区分时保留英文括注 |\n| reasoning_content | 思考内容 | | | |\n| registry | 注册表 | | | |\n| replay | 回放 | | | |\n| resume | 恢复 | | | |\n| runtime | 运行时 | | | |\n| same-world subprocess | 与宿主共享文件系统和内核的子进程 | | 同世界子进程 | |\n| sandbox | 沙箱 | | | |\n| service | 服务 | | | |\n| serving surface | 对外服务接口 | | | |\n| session | 会话 | | | |\n| session event | 会话事件 | | | |\n| setup card | 设置卡片 | | | 首次运行时代替行卡直接展开的配置卡 |\n| sidecar file | 伴随文件 | | | 指与文档同目录的普通伴随文件 |\n| sidecar record | 伴随记录 | | 旁挂记录 | 指与文档同目录的伴随记录文件 |\n| smoke test | 冒烟测试 | | | |\n| snapshot | 快照 | | | |\n| source of truth | 真源 | | 事实来源、唯一来源 | |\n| spine | 主干 | | | |\n| stale | 陈旧 | | 过期 | 与 `fresh`（`新鲜`）成对；门禁输出中保留英文 `stale` 不翻译；`expired` 才译为`过期` |\n| step | 步骤 | | | |\n| stream | 流 | | | |\n| structural signature | 结构签名 | | | i18n 配对机制用语：门禁比对两侧文件时提取的有序结构序列（标题层级、代码块、列表等） |\n| Summary | 概述 | | | 事故复盘标题用语 |\n| system prompt | 系统提示词 | | | |\n| taxonomy | 分类体系 | | | |\n| token usage | token 用量 | | | |\n| tool | 工具 | | | |\n| tool call | 工具调用 | | | |\n| tool result | 工具结果 | | | |\n| tool schema | 工具 schema | | | |\n| toolkit | 工具包 | | | |\n| turn | 轮次 | | | |\n| VFS | VFS | 虚拟文件系统（VFS） | | |\n| typecheck | 类型检查 | | | |\n| vocabulary | 词汇 | | | |\n| wire format | 协议格式 | 协议格式（wire format） | | |\n| workflow | 工作流 | | | |\n| wrapper | 包装层 | | | 软件层或 SDK 包装层 |\n| wrapper script | 包装脚本 | | | 可执行脚本包装层 |\n\n\n## Output Format\n\nReturn exactly three raw XML sections in the order shown below. Do not wrap the response in a Markdown code fence and do not add analysis or text before, between, or after the sections. The fence below only displays the required format; do not reproduce the fence.\n\nThe outer section tags are framing. If Markdown inside any section body contains a line consisting only of `<translation>`, `</translation>`, `<review>`, `</review>`, `<final>`, or `</final>`, prefix that line with `\\`. If the original line already has one or more backslashes immediately before the tag, add one more. The parser removes exactly one framing escape; tags mentioned inline need no escaping.\n\n```xml\n<translation>\n(First pass: the complete translation, written as natural target-language technical prose)\n</translation>\n\n<review>\n(Second pass: actual corrections only, one correction per line with a category tag, e.g.)\n- [Tone] \"旁挂记录\" → \"伴随记录\"（生造词）\n- [Sentence] 第 3 段补充逗号断句\n- [Punctuation] 两处破折号替换为冒号\n- [Terminology: pending] source term → tentative rendering\n- 无修正\n</review>\n\n<final>\n(Complete final translation after corrections)\n</final>\n```\n\n## Self-Review Instructions\n\nAfter writing `<translation>`, verify it in two directions. First re-read it in the target language only without comparing it with the source; this makes awkward phrasing easier to notice. Then compare it against the source clause by clause for completeness and exact meaning. Resolve doubts before writing `<review>`; do not include reasoning transcripts, checks that passed, tentative suggestions, retractions, or no-op corrections.\n\n**Structure**\n- Are the heading hierarchy and order, list kind and item count, ordered-list start, table dimensions, and code block content identical to the source?\n- Are ALL comments and info strings inside code blocks left untranslated and byte-identical to the source?\n- Are inline code spans and machine-readable tokens verbatim?\n- Is an existing language switcher correctly flipped, and is no switcher or filename invented when the source lacks one?\n- Are link targets and emphasis spans preserved?\n- Does spacing across emphasis boundaries follow the same Chinese/Latin/numeral rule as ordinary prose?\n- Are wrapper-tag lines inside section bodies escaped with one additional backslash?\n\n**Faithfulness**\n- Clause by clause, is anything added, dropped, weakened, strengthened, reversed, merged, or re-bounded? Are list item counts identical on both sides?\n- Do actors, objects, conditions, exceptions, negation, modality, causal relationships, guarantees, contract directions, result channels, ownership changes, and quantities survive exactly?\n\n**Tone & Style**\n- Does every sentence read as if originally written by a native technical author?\n- Is there any colloquial, casual, overly informal, promotional, or metaphorical phrasing?\n- Are actors explicit where the target language needs them, without inventing responsibility?\n\n**Sentence Structure**\n- Are there run-on sentences that need breaking?\n- Are there stiff passive constructions that can safely become active, or active constructions that invent an actor?\n- Are conditions, concessions, negation, coordination, and modifiers scoped clearly?\n\n**Word Choice**\n- Are there overly literal translations that sound unnatural?\n- Are ordinary prose words left untranslated despite an established target-language expression?\n- Does each polysemous word fit its local context?\n- Is the same target-language word used for distinct source concepts, or is a defined term varied merely to avoid repetition?\n- Is any slang or internal jargon present?\n\n**Terminology**\n- For a Chinese target, are first-occurrence glosses correctly applied to the true first prose occurrence, neither missing nor repeated? For an English target, are Chinese glosses absent?\n- Are any \"不要译作\" forbidden translations present?\n- Do protected tokens remain untouched even when they resemble terminology entries?\n- For an unlisted term, does a Chinese target use an established Chinese rendering or preserve the source term as pending when no reliable rendering is known, and does an English target use the established English technical term or preserve only an ambiguous source term with the shortest necessary gloss and a pending notice?\n\n**Punctuation** (when target is Chinese)\n- Are punctuation, mixed-script spacing, quotation marks, Latin letters, and digits in their required forms?\n- Are there em dashes that make the sentence less clear and should be replaced, while natural em dashes remain intact?\n- Are list-item endings grammatically consistent, with none ending in commas?\n- Do RFC 2119 keywords preserve the source emphasis span and normative strength exactly?\n\nRecord actual corrections in `<review>`, then output the corrected complete document in `<final>`. If no correction or pending terminology notice is needed, write exactly `- 无修正` in `<review>` and copy `<translation>` unchanged into `<final>`. If `<review>` contains only pending terminology notices, copy `<translation>` unchanged into `<final>`.\n\n## Examples\n\nBelow are representative examples of common problems and their corrections. Follow the \"Good\" versions within the rule each example illustrates; examples do not override source context or higher-priority requirements.\n\n### Colloquial verb → Professional verb\n- Source: `The repo pins pnpm@11.7.0 in package.json`\n- Bad: `仓库在 package.json 中钉住 pnpm@11.7.0`\n- Good: `该仓库在 package.json 中固定使用 pnpm@11.7.0`\n\n### Run-on sentence → Natural phrasing with pause\n- Source: `Read docs/architecture.md before changing anything under packages/.`\n- Bad: `改动 packages/ 下的任何东西之前先读 docs/architecture.md。`\n- Good: `在修改 packages/ 目录下的任何内容之前，请先阅读 docs/architecture.md。`\n\n### Stiff passive voice → Active and natural\n- Source: `a green gate means the pair was confirmed consistent at these exact contents, not that the confirmation was sound.`\n- Bad: `门禁绿意味着这对文档曾在当前内容上被确认一致，不意味着这次确认本身是对的。`\n- Good: `门禁通过意味着这组文档在当前内容上的一致性得到了确认，不代表确认本身正确可靠。`\n\n### Invented word → Natural expression\n- Source: `A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable`\n- Bad: `旁挂记录两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查`\n- Good: `伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查`\n\n### Em-dash → Colon/period\n- Source: `FIXME — an issue that should block a new release. A release should not ship with an open FIXME unless reviewers explicitly agree the change can be merged anyway.`\n- Bad: `FIXME——应当阻塞新版本发布的问题。除非评审者明确同意可以照常合入，发布不应带着未解决的 FIXME 出门。`\n- Good: `FIXME：应当阻塞新版本发布的问题。除非评审者明确同意该更改可以合并，否则发布版本不应包含未解决的 FIXME。`\n\n### Overly literal → Meaningful rendering\n- Source: `awkward phrasing is easier to notice when you read the translation without comparing it with the source`\n- Bad: `不把译文和原文比较时，尴尬的措辞更容易被注意`\n- Good: `不对照原文阅读译文时，更容易察觉别扭的表达`\n\n### Terminology — do not translate what should be kept in English\n- Source: `typed service seams, and explicit extension points`\n- Bad: `类型化的服务 seam（扩展点）与显式扩展点`\n- Good: `类型化的服务 seam 与显式扩展点`\n\n### Slang/jargon → Professional phrasing\n- Source: `The committed agent workflow lives in .agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs`\n- Bad: `进仓的 agent 工作流见 .agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs`\n- Good: `仓库内置的 agent 工作流见 .agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs`\n\n### \"For humans\" — translate the intent, not the word\n- Source: `For humans, start with the development guide`\n- Bad: `对于人工读者，请先从开发指南开始`（\"人工读者\"生硬）\n- Good: `面向开发者：请先阅读开发指南`（\"开发者\"自然，且中文里冒号在此处更自然）\n\n### Code block comments — NEVER translate\n- Source code block contains: `# full-screen TUI coding agent (needs DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)`\n- Bad: `# 全屏 TUI coding agent（需要 DEEPSEEK_API_KEY）`\n- Good: `# full-screen TUI coding agent (needs DEEPSEEK_API_KEY)` (keep exactly as-is, byte-for-byte)\n\n### Language switcher — flip direction\n- Source file (English) has: `English | [中文](README.zh.md)`\n- Bad (copying source unchanged): `English | [中文](README.zh.md)`\n- Good (flipped for Chinese file): `[English](README.md) | 中文`\n\n---\n\nNow translate the following document:"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "# DeepSeek Harness\n\nEnglish | [中文](README.zh.md)\n\nDeepSeek Harness (`dsh`) is an open-source coding agent built on the DeepSeek Harness SDK.\n\nIt uses an architecture where **everything is a plugin**.\n\n## Internal testing notice\n\nDeepSeek Harness is under internal testing. Features and interfaces may change.\n\nThe internal build uploads all Session Logs by default to help diagnose reported problems. Set `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` to disable telemetry. Send feedback through the internal WeChat group.\n\n## Run from source\n\nClone this repo, complete the [dependency and API-key setup](docs/user/guide/quickstart.md#step-1-install-and-configure-the-api-key), then run:\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh web\n```\n\n## Use DeepSeek Harness\n\n### Web UI\n\nStart the recommended local interface from the repository root:\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh web\n```\n\nThe command builds the repository before starting the Web UI, which is served at `http://127.0.0.1:3080` by default.\n\n### Profiles\n\nThe source CLI boots profiles — ordered stacks of plugin-bundle patch layers under your own overrides in `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>`:\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh --profile web                       # the browser UI\npnpm dsh plugin --profile tui add <package>  # install a plugin into a custom profile\npnpm dsh --profile tui                       # boot it\n```\n\nThe [CLI reference](apps/cli/README.md#profiles) describes profile layout, layer semantics, and config dump commands.\n\n### Headless\n\nRun one task, print the final answer, and exit:\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh run \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\n### Automation and SDKs\n\nFrom a source checkout with `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or its root `.env`, start the ACP automation server:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\nThe [Python SDK](python/README.md) drives a bundled JSON-RPC runtime. The [examples](examples/README.md) cover the runnable headless, ACP, JSON-RPC, Code Mode, and self-referential compositions.\n\n## Why DeepSeek Harness\n\nBuilt-in capabilities cover file reading, editing, and search; shell and persistent PTY execution; reusable skills; task tracking, goals, plans, todos, and background tasks; subagents and workflows; sandboxing and approvals; settings and credentials; persistent, resumable, forkable, and queryable sessions; LSP and web access; context compaction; and telemetry. Each composition selects the subset appropriate to its surface. The Web UI includes Plan Mode.\n\n- **Everything is a plugin.** Models, tools, policies, storage, context management, and interfaces are composable [Cordis plugins](docs/user/develop/basic/index.md), so deployments can extend or replace behavior without forking the agent loop. See the [architecture](docs/architecture.md) for the underlying design.\n- **Runs are reconstructable.** Anything visible to the model is logged in the authoritative session stream; persistence, resume/fork/query, replay, telemetry, and UIs derive from the same events. See the [session-log architecture](docs/architecture.md#session-log).\n- **Code Mode (opt-in).** It exposes a `run_code` tool and a generated TypeScript SDK; only program output re-enters model context. See [Code Mode](packages/core/tools/README.md#code-mode).\n- **Self-referential Cordis tools are opt-in.** They let the agent inspect its live runtime and mount or unmount plugins while it runs. See the [Cordis tools](packages/self-modification/tool-cordis/README.md).\n\n## Community\n\nFollow <a href=\"https://x.com/Deepseekharness\">DeepSeek Harness on Twitter</a> for project updates.\n\n## Development\n\nStart with the [development guide](docs/development.md) and read the [architecture](docs/architecture.md) before changing packages.\n\nFor agents, follow [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md).\n\nDeepSeek Harness is currently in internal testing.\n\n## License\n\n[BSD 3-Clause](LICENSE)\n\nThird-party dependencies and their licenses are disclosed in [THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md](THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md).\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "# DeepSeek Harness\n\n[English](README.md) | 中文\n\nDeepSeek Harness（`dsh`）是一款基于 DeepSeek Harness SDK 构建的开源 coding agent（智能体）。\n\n它采用了**一切皆插件**的架构。\n\n## 内测声明\n\nDeepSeek Harness 正处于内部测试阶段，功能和接口可能发生变化。\n\n为帮助诊断上报的问题，内测版本默认上传所有会话日志。设置 `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` 可关闭遥测。请通过内部企业微信群反馈问题和建议。\n\n## 从源码运行\n\n克隆本仓库，完成[依赖安装和 API 密钥配置](docs/user/guide/quickstart.md#step-1-install-and-configure-the-api-key)，然后运行：\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh web\n```\n\n## 使用 DeepSeek Harness\n\n### Web UI\n\n请从仓库根目录启动推荐的本地界面：\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh web\n```\n\n该命令会先构建仓库，再启动 Web UI。Web UI 默认通过 `http://127.0.0.1:3080` 提供服务。\n\n### Profile\n\n源码 CLI（命令行界面）会启动 profile：按序叠放的插件组合包 patch 层，之上再叠加你在 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>` 中的自有覆盖层：\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh --profile web                       # the browser UI\npnpm dsh plugin --profile tui add <package>  # install a plugin into a custom profile\npnpm dsh --profile tui                       # boot it\n```\n\nprofile 布局、层语义与配置输出命令详见 [CLI（命令行界面）参考](apps/cli/README.md#profiles)。\n\n### Headless\n\n运行一项任务，打印最终答案后退出：\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh run \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\n### 自动化与 SDK\n\n在源码检出中通过环境变量或根目录 `.env` 设置 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`，然后启动 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）自动化服务器：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n[Python SDK](python/README.md) 驱动随附的 JSON-RPC 运行时。[示例](examples/README.md)涵盖可运行的 headless、ACP、JSON-RPC、Code Mode 和自指组合。\n\n## 为什么选择 DeepSeek Harness\n\n内置功能涵盖文件读取、编辑与搜索、shell 和持久 PTY 执行、可复用 skill（技能）、任务跟踪、目标、计划、待办事项与后台任务、subagent 与工作流、沙箱与审批、设置与凭据、可持久化、恢复、fork 与查询的会话、LSP 与 Web 访问、上下文压缩（context compaction），以及遥测。每个组合只选用适合其使用方式的能力子集。Web UI 包含 Plan Mode。\n\n- **一切皆插件。** 模型、工具、策略、存储、上下文管理和界面均为可组合的 [Cordis 插件](docs/user/develop/basic/index.md)，部署方无需 fork agent loop（智能体循环）即可扩展或替换行为。底层设计见[架构文档](docs/architecture.md)。\n- **运行可重建。** 凡是模型可见的内容，都会记录在权威会话流中；持久化、恢复／fork／查询、回放、遥测和 UI 均从同一组事件派生。参见[会话日志架构](docs/architecture.md#session-log)。\n- **Code Mode（需显式启用）。** 它会提供 `run_code` 工具和生成的 TypeScript SDK，只有程序输出会重新进入模型上下文。参见 [Code Mode](packages/core/tools/README.md#code-mode)。\n- **自指 Cordis 工具需显式启用。** 这些工具可让 agent 检查自身的实时运行时，并在运行中挂载或卸载插件。参见 [Cordis 工具](packages/self-modification/tool-cordis/README.md)。\n\n## 社区\n\n扫描二维码，或打开 <a href=\"https://wj.qq.com/s2/27234598/03eb/\">DeepSeek Harness 微信社区申请页面</a> 申请加入。\n\n<p>\n  <img src=\"assets/community-wecom-survey.png\" alt=\"DeepSeek Harness 微信社区二维码\" width=\"240\">\n</p>\n\n## 开发\n\n请先阅读[开发指南](docs/development.md)；修改包之前，请阅读[架构文档](docs/architecture.md)。\n\n面向 agent：遵循 [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md)。\n\nDeepSeek Harness 目前处于内测阶段。\n\n## 许可证\n\n[BSD 3-Clause](LICENSE)\n\n第三方依赖及其许可证在 [THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md](THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md) 中披露。\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "# Development guide\n\nEnglish | [中文](development.zh.md)\n\nThe setup tutorial takes a new contributor from prerequisites to a checked checkout. The contributor reference that follows covers repository layout, daily workflow, and CI organization. Design rationale and implementation details belong to the linked Agent Notes and scripts.\n\n## Setup tutorial\n\n### Prerequisites\n\n- Node.js supports 22.19+ and 24+. CI covers 22.19, 24, and 26; see the [Node engine floor Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md).\n- Corepack-enabled pnpm. The repo pins `pnpm@11.7.0` in `package.json`; run `corepack enable` if `pnpm --version` does not resolve through Corepack.\n- Git 2.26 or newer; hook setup enables Git's worktree-specific configuration extension.\n- Optional: a DeepSeek API key for the Web, headless, and ACP automation demos and real-API e2e tests.\n\n### First-time setup\n\nInstall dependencies from the repo root:\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\nThe install also configures worktree-local Lefthook hooks and the `dsh-translation-pairing` Git merge driver through `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs`. The [worktree-local hooks Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.md) owns the hook-path safety contract; the [automatic pairing merges Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md) owns the merge driver.\n\nIf either integration is missing because dependencies were restored from cache or `postinstall` was skipped, install them manually:\n\n```sh\nnode scripts/install-lefthook.mjs\n```\n\nIf the wrapper rejects existing Git configuration or reports a stale lock, follow its diagnostic and the linked Agent Note rather than editing worktree metadata speculatively. After moving a checkout, rerun the wrapper to regenerate the owned path.\n\nRun typecheck once after a fresh clone:\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\nSetup is complete when `pnpm run typecheck` exits successfully.\n\n## Contributor reference\n\n### TypeScript project layout\n\nThe repository uses isolated Host and Client aggregates. An ordinary package is registered in exactly one aggregate: Host packages in `tsconfig.host.json` and Client packages in `tsconfig.client.json`.\n\n| File | Role | Forms a program? |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | Solution root: `extends` base, `files: []`, and references to the two aggregates. It is the tsserver discovery entry and the entry for explicitly running the complete Project Reference graph; through the inherited `paths`, it is also the resolution config for tsx running `examples/` and `scripts/`. | No |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | Host aggregate: Host packages, examples, tests, scripts, website, and the exceptional Host project of `api/remotes`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | Client aggregate: `packages/client/*` packages and their tests, `apps/web`, and the exceptional Client project of `api/remotes`. | Yes |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | Shared compilerOptions and the source `paths` map. Also the resolution facade the vitest configs point vite-tsconfig-paths at: it has no `include`, so its `paths` apply to every importer. | No |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | Browser compiler settings (`jsx`, DOM libs, `types: []`) extended by the Client aggregate and every `packages/client/*` package. | No |\n\nHost and Client stay two aggregate programs because both sides declaration-merge the cordis `Context` interface under the same keys with different services; one program seeing both merges reports a collision. The collision exists only inside a `ts.Program` — module resolution never triggers it — which is why the solution may reference both aggregates and one paths facade may span both sides. Three disciplines follow:\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` never gains `include` or `files`: they would leak into every extending package project and narrow the facade's match-all scope.\n- A script that builds a repo-wide `ts.Program` seeds `tsconfig.host.json` or `tsconfig.client.json` explicitly — never the root solution, because flattening both aggregates into one program collides the `Context` merges.\n- A new package is registered in exactly one aggregate. Having both a Node loader entry and a browser entry is not a reason to split a package; an ordinary Client plugin produces both runtime artifacts during the Client build phase.\n\n`api/remotes` is the repository's only package with split Host and Client tsconfigs. Its Host entry must participate in the Host TypeRT graph, while its Client entry imports `/remote` declarations that Host tsdown must generate first. The package-root `tsconfig.json` is therefore only a solution, and the two aggregates and direct consumers reference `tsconfig.host.json` or `tsconfig.client.json` respectively. The workspace `constraints` gate walks the reachable Project Reference graph and checks each referencing project's own compiler face: a single-config target remains valid from either face, while a split target must name the matching leaf rather than its solution root or opposite leaf. Do not copy this structure to other packages; the [`api-remotes` README](../packages/api/remotes/README.md) explains the Host/Client split and build order.\n\nThe root build follows the generated dependency order:\n\n```sh\ntsc -b tsconfig.host.json\ntsdown --env.DSH_BUILD_FACE host\ntsc -b tsconfig.client.json\ntsdown --env.DSH_BUILD_FACE client\npnpm run build:web\n```\n\nBoth tsdown passes use the same complete workspace match. They neither scan build artifacts to discover Client packages nor maintain a Host/Client package filter list. Package-local tsdown configs select entries for the current phase through `DSH_BUILD_FACE`: an ordinary Client plugin produces both its Node loader and browser bundle during the Client phase; `api-remotes` uses `hostPhase: true` to produce its Host entry early and only its browser bundle during the Client phase. Tsdown consumes only the JavaScript emitted to `lib/types` by the preceding tsc phase.\n\nTypeRT runs only during Host tsdown, seeded by `tsconfig.host.json`. It analyzes Host types and generates both Host reflection artifacts and the Host-for-Client Remote projection; Client tsdown does not start TypeRT. Consequently, `pnpm run typecheck` runs the complete Host lib phase before Client tsc, while `pnpm run build` continues through Client tsdown and the Web build. The [API Remotes generated-contract build note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-api-remotes-generated-contract-build.md) records this ordering decision.\n\nStatic analysis and tests resolve workspace imports through the base `paths` map to `src` and must pass on a clean tree; gates that consume built `lib/` output declare that dependency explicitly. Generated Host-for-Client Remote declarations are the deliberate exception: the public `typecheck`, `lint`, and `doc-typecheck` commands generate them first, while internal `*:contracts-ready` scripts assume that an invoking public command or scheduler gate already depends on the TypeRT contract-generation pass or the complete build. See the [solution-root note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md) for the two-aggregate setup, the [ts-build-config note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md) for tsc-first emit ownership, and the [TypeRT Remote note](../.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md) for the gate-preparation contract.\n\nBusiness services declare callable methods on the Host with `@Remote` or `@RemoteScope`; the Host build generates Host-for-Client types and runtime contributions, and the Client's `api-remotes` composition loads those contributions under `ctx.remote` and scoped `agentCtx.remote` namespaces. See [API Gateway](api-gateway.md) for the generated artifacts on both sides, their assembly relationships, the SRC development fallback, and the Web build order.\n\nIf a relevant local check consumes built package output, build once first:\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` includes `publint`, which validates package entrypoints against the built `lib/*.js` files, and `verify-node-next-types`, which validates built declarations against a temporary NodeNext consumer. A fresh worktree has no bundled JS or declarations until `pnpm run build` runs; ordinary commits and pushes do not require that build unless their selected checks consume it.\n\n### Environment variables\n\nThe real DeepSeek adapter and key-backed agent demos read credentials from the environment or from a gitignored `.env` at the repo root:\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` is optional and defaults to the public API. Never commit real credentials. The real-API e2e suites self-skip when `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` is not set.\n\n### Git integrations\n\nThe pairing merge driver derives a conflicted `.i18n.yaml` record from the confirmed ancestor, current, and other owner blobs when both language files use Git's default text strategy and merge cleanly. It fails closed on owner conflicts, non-text merge configuration, or invalid records; after an already-stopped merge, run `pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts`, which stages every safe pairing record and exits unsuccessfully if other pairing conflicts still need manual work. See the [bilingual documentation contract](i18n/README.md#the-pairing-contract) for the exact files and states the driver accepts.\n\nThe installer probes the exact Node/tsx driver entrypoint before publishing its worktree configuration. If that runtime later becomes unavailable, the Node-independent launcher writes Git's ordinary text result, leaves the sidecar unresolved, and prints the recovery path; restore dependencies and run `pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts`, or run `git merge --abort`. If `pre-merge-commit` rejects an otherwise clean merge, Git leaves the complete result staged without a commit; repair the failure and run `git commit`, or abort. The [automatic pairing merges Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md#failure-contract) owns the exact index and `MERGE_HEAD` states.\n\nlefthook is configured in `lefthook.yml` as a fast local checkpoint:\n\n- `pre-commit` verifies staged pairing records against the staged owner blobs, validates staged files with the project-free `.oxlintrc.staged.json` profile and applies Oxlint fixes with one bounded retry, regenerates `THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md` when a staged file is one of its inputs, checks the staged diff for whitespace errors, and runs the vendor manifest guard.\n- `pre-merge-commit` performs the same index-backed pairing check before Git creates an automatic merge commit.\n- `pre-push` runs `pnpm run typecheck`, which completes the Host lib phase, including generated TypeRT contracts, before the Client TypeScript check.\n\nThe vendor manifest guard checks that changes under `vendor/*/src` are staged with the matching `vendor/README.md` manifest update. See `vendor/README.md` before editing vendored code.\n\nApart from the scoped staged-record verification, the hooks intentionally do not run tests, snapshots, documentation checks, builds, or hygiene. Contributors run the [checks relevant to the changed behavior](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally) once; CI owns exhaustive coverage, built-artifact smokes, and the Node 22.19, 24, and 26 compatibility matrix.\n\nContributors can opt into the comprehensive local gate set with `pnpm run check:all`. The command is independent of the Git hooks and is not an agent instruction.\n\n### CI gates\n\nThe keyless [CI workflow](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) groups independent gates into broad lanes and runs a smaller compatibility signal across supported Node versions. Artifact consumers wait for one build within their lane. The separate real-API workflow runs `pnpm run test:e2e` with its configured worker bound. See [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) and the workflow files for the current gate and job inventory.\n\n### Daily commands\n\nThe root [contributor instructions](../AGENTS.md#commands) summarize common commands, while [`package.json`](../package.json) and [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) own the current script and gate inventories. Select the smallest checks that cover the changed surface. Documentation changes use `pnpm run doc-sync`; package-public behavior changes also update the owning README or JSDoc, and built-artifact checks require `pnpm run build` first.\n\n### Demos\n\nThe one-shot Headless coding agent needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` in the environment or repo-root `.env`:\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh run \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\nThe self-referential cordis demo can inspect and modify its live plugin runtime and needs the same credentials (`web` by default, or `acp`):\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nThe ACP automation server exposes fresh agent sessions over JSON-RPC stdio and also needs `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`:\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n### TODO markers\n\nUse one of three comment tags to flag known issues in the code, ordered by urgency:\n\n- `FIXME` — an issue that should block a new release. A release should not ship with an open `FIXME` unless reviewers explicitly agree the change can be merged anyway.\n- `TODO` — an issue that should be fixed soon, once we have the resources.\n- `XXX` — an issue that we may fix someday; lowest priority, no commitment.\n\nPick the tag that matches the urgency so anyone scanning the code can tell a release blocker from a someday-maybe.\n\n### Documenting types verbatim (`ts type-equiv`)\n\nThe [subsystems](subsystems/README.md) pages paste source-equivalent declarations together with their original JSDoc so a reader sees the exact type definition and source contract. To keep a paste from drifting when source changes, fence it as ` ```ts type-equiv ` (instead of ` ```ts `) and register it in `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` with the source file and symbol it mirrors:\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/subsystems/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv` (part of `doc-sync`) then extracts that symbol's declaration and attached JSDoc from source via the TypeScript parser and asserts the block matches both. For a class whose implementation bodies do not belong in the catalog, use ` ```ts public-api ` and set `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`; the checked projection retains the public fields, constructor, accessors, methods, and original class/member JSDoc while omitting bodies and private or protected members. Comparison ignores whitespace and non-JSDoc comments but requires every original JSDoc comment, including member documentation, so readers see the source contract beside the exact type definition. The gate enforces a 1:1 correspondence by document, symbol, and projection between primary blocks and manifest entries; a paired `.zh.md` block reuses its unsuffixed sibling's entry only when the whole tracked fence sequence is byte-identical and ordered identically. `doc-typecheck` applies the same derivative rule to compilable fences, while skipping both source-equivalence fence kinds from compilation and its opt-out ratio. When you change a documented declaration or its JSDoc, the gate fails until you update the paste; when you add or remove a primary block, update the manifest in the same change.\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "# 开发指南\n\n[English](development.md) | 中文\n\n搭建教程引导新贡献者从准备前置条件开始，直到检出通过检查。后面的贡献者参考介绍仓库布局、日常工作流和 CI 组织方式。设计依据与实现细节属于链接的 Agent Note 和脚本。\n\n## 搭建教程\n\n### 前置条件\n\n- Node.js 支持 22.19+ 与 24+。CI 覆盖 22.19、24 和 26；见 [Node 引擎下限 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-06-node-engine-floor.md)。\n- 启用了 Corepack 的 pnpm。仓库在 `package.json` 中固定使用 `pnpm@11.7.0`；如果 `pnpm --version` 无法通过 Corepack 解析，请先运行 `corepack enable`。\n- Git 2.26 或更高版本；钩子设置会启用 Git 的 worktree 专属配置扩展。\n- 可选：一个 DeepSeek API key，用于 Web、headless 和 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）自动化 agent（智能体）演示以及真实 API 的 e2e 测试。\n\n### 首次搭建\n\n在仓库根目录安装依赖：\n\n```sh\npnpm install\n```\n\n安装过程还会通过 `scripts/install-lefthook.mjs` 配置 worktree 本地的 Lefthook 钩子和 `dsh-translation-pairing` Git 合并驱动。[worktree 本地钩子 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-27-worktree-local-lefthook.md) 负责钩子路径的安全约定；[自动配对合并 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md) 负责合并驱动。\n\n如果依赖是从缓存恢复或 `postinstall` 被跳过而导致任一集成缺失，请手动安装：\n\n```sh\nnode scripts/install-lefthook.mjs\n```\n\n如果包装脚本拒绝现有 Git 配置或报告陈旧锁，请遵循其诊断和所链接的 Agent Note，不要凭猜测编辑 worktree 元数据。移动检出目录后，请重新运行包装脚本以重新生成自有路径。\n\n新克隆后请先运行一次类型检查：\n\n```sh\npnpm run typecheck\n```\n\n`pnpm run typecheck` 成功退出即表示搭建完成。\n\n## 贡献者参考\n\n### TypeScript 项目布局\n\n仓库使用相互隔离的 Host 与 Client aggregate。普通 package 只登记进其中一个 aggregate；Host 包进入 `tsconfig.host.json`，Client 包进入 `tsconfig.client.json`。\n\n| 文件 | 角色 | 是否构成 program？ |\n|---|---|---|\n| `tsconfig.json` | solution 根：`extends` base、`files: []`、引用两个 aggregate。它是 tsserver 发现入口，也是显式执行整张 Project Reference 图时的入口；经继承的 `paths` 充当 tsx 运行 `examples/` 与 `scripts/` 时的解析配置。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.host.json` | Host aggregate：Host package、示例、测试、脚本和 website，以及 `api/remotes` 的 Host 特例 project。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.client.json` | Client aggregate：`packages/client/*` package 及其测试、`apps/web`，以及 `api/remotes` 的 Client 特例 project。 | 是 |\n| `tsconfig.base.json` | 共享 compilerOptions 与源码 `paths` 映射。同时是各 vitest 配置让 vite-tsconfig-paths 指向的解析门面：它没有 `include`，因此其 `paths` 适用于任何 importer。 | 否 |\n| `tsconfig.base.client.json` | 浏览器编译设置（`jsx`、DOM lib、`types: []`），由 Client aggregate 和每个 `packages/client/*` package extends。 | 否 |\n\nHost 与 Client 保持两个 aggregate program，是因为两侧在相同键下以不同服务对 cordis `Context` 接口做声明合并；单一 program 同时看到两份合并会报冲突。这种冲突只存在于 `ts.Program` 内部——模块解析永远不会触发它——所以 solution 可以同时引用两个 aggregate，一个 paths 门面也可以横跨两侧。由此推出三条纪律：\n\n- `tsconfig.base.json` 永不添加 `include` 或 `files`：它们会泄漏进每个 extends 它的包项目，并收窄门面的全匹配范围。\n- 构造全仓 `ts.Program` 的脚本显式种子 `tsconfig.host.json` 或 `tsconfig.client.json`——永不种子根 solution，因为把两个 aggregate 展平进一个 program 会撞上 `Context` 合并冲突。\n- 新 package 只登记进一个 aggregate。包同时具有 Node loader 入口和 browser 入口并不构成拆分理由；普通 Client plugin 的两份运行时产物都在 Client 构建阶段生成。\n\n`api/remotes` 是唯一拆分 Host/Client tsconfig 的仓库特例。它的 Host 入口必须进入 Host TypeRT 图，而 Client 入口导入 Host tsdown 才会生成的 `/remote` 声明，因此本包根 `tsconfig.json` 只作为 solution，两个 aggregate 和直接消费方分别引用 `tsconfig.host.json` 或 `tsconfig.client.json`。workspace `constraints` 门禁遍历可达的 Project Reference 图，并按各引用 project 自身的 compiler face 检查：只有单一配置的目标可由任一 face 引用，拆分配置的目标则必须引用匹配的 leaf，不得引用 solution 根或另一侧 leaf。不要把该结构推广到其他包；[`api-remotes` README](../packages/api/remotes/README.md) 说明 Host/Client 拆分与构建顺序。\n\n根构建按生成依赖排序：\n\n```sh\ntsc -b tsconfig.host.json\ntsdown --env.DSH_BUILD_FACE host\ntsc -b tsconfig.client.json\ntsdown --env.DSH_BUILD_FACE client\npnpm run build:web\n```\n\n两次 tsdown 都使用同一组完整 workspace 匹配，不扫描构建产物来发现 Client package，也不维护 Host/Client package 过滤表。包内 tsdown 配置根据 `DSH_BUILD_FACE` 决定当前阶段的入口：普通 Client plugin 在 Client 阶段同时生成 Node loader 与 browser bundle；`api-remotes` 通过 `hostPhase: true` 提前生成 Host 入口，再在 Client 阶段只生成 browser bundle。tsdown 只消费 `lib/types` 中由前置 tsc 发射的 JavaScript。\n\nTypeRT 只在 Host tsdown 中以 `tsconfig.host.json` 为种子运行。它分析 Host 类型并生成 Host 反射产物及 Host-for-Client Remote 投影；Client tsdown 不启动 TypeRT。`pnpm run typecheck` 因此先执行完整 Host lib 阶段，再运行 Client tsc；`pnpm run build` 继续执行 Client tsdown 和 Web 构建。该顺序的决策记录见 [API Remotes 生成约定构建 Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-api-remotes-generated-contract-build.md)。\n\n静态分析和测试通过 base 的 `paths` 映射把工作区 import 解析到 `src`，且必须在干净树上通过；消费构建产物 `lib/` 的门禁显式声明该依赖。生成的 Host-for-Client Remote 声明是有意设置的例外：公共 `typecheck`、`lint` 和 `doc-typecheck` 命令会先生成这些声明，而内部 `*:contracts-ready` 脚本假定调用它的公共命令或调度器门禁已经依赖 TypeRT 约定生成阶段或完整构建。两个 aggregate 的设置见 [solution-root Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)，tsc-first 发射职责见 [ts-build-config Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-17-ts-build-config.md)，门禁准备约定见 [TypeRT Remote Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md)。\n\n业务 Service 在 Host 使用 `@Remote` 或 `@RemoteScope` 声明可调用方法；Host 构建生成 Host-for-Client 类型与运行时贡献，Client 的 `api-remotes` 组合加载这些贡献并挂到 `ctx.remote` 与作用域 `agentCtx.remote` namespace。两侧的生成产物、装配关系、SRC 开发回退和 Web 构建顺序见 [API Gateway](api-gateway.md)。\n\n如果相关的本地检查需要使用构建后的包产物，请先构建一次：\n\n```sh\npnpm run build\n```\n\n`pnpm run hygiene` 包含 `publint`（用构建出的 `lib/*.js` 文件校验 package 入口点）和 `verify-node-next-types`（用一个临时的 NodeNext 消费方校验构建出的声明文件）。新 worktree 在 `pnpm run build` 运行之前没有打包的 JS 和声明文件；普通提交和推送无需构建，除非所选检查会使用这些产物。\n\n### 环境变量\n\n真实的 DeepSeek 适配器和需要密钥的 agent 演示从环境变量或仓库根目录一个被 gitignore 的 `.env` 文件读取凭证：\n\n```sh\nDEEPSEEK_API_KEY=sk-...\nDEEPSEEK_BASE_URL=https://... # optional\n```\n\n`DEEPSEEK_BASE_URL` 可选，默认为公开 API。请勿提交真实凭证。未设置 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` 时，真实 API 的 e2e 套件会自动跳过。\n\n### Git 集成\n\n当两种语言的文件都使用 Git 默认文本策略且能干净合并时，配对合并驱动会根据已确认的祖先、当前和另一侧的配对文档 blob，推导出发生冲突的 `.i18n.yaml` 记录。配对文档发生冲突、存在非文本合并配置或记录无效时，它会拒绝处理并保留冲突；如果合并已经因冲突而停止，请运行 `pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts`，该命令会暂存每份可安全生成的配对记录；如果其他配对冲突仍需手工处理，则以非零状态退出。[双语文档约定](i18n/README.md#the-pairing-contract)列出该驱动接受的确切文件和状态。\n\n安装脚本在发布 worktree 配置前，会探测确切的 Node/tsx 驱动入口点。如果该运行时之后变得不可用，不依赖 Node 的启动器会写入 Git 的普通文本合并结果、让伴随文件保持未解决状态，并打印恢复路径；请恢复依赖后运行 `pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts`，或运行 `git merge --abort`。如果 `pre-merge-commit` 拒绝原本能干净完成的合并，Git 会把完整结果留在暂存区但不创建提交；请修复失败后运行 `git commit`，或中止合并。确切的索引与 `MERGE_HEAD` 状态由[自动配对合并 Agent Note](../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md#failure-contract)负责记录。\n\nlefthook 在 `lefthook.yml` 中配置，作为快速的本地检查点：\n\n- `pre-commit` 对照暂存的配对文档 blob 校验暂存的配对记录，使用不加载项目的 `.oxlintrc.staged.json` 配置验证暂存文件，并通过一次有界重试应用 Oxlint 修复，在暂存文件属于 `THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md` 的输入时重新生成该文件，然后检查暂存 diff 中的空白错误，并运行 vendor manifest（元数据清单）守卫；\n- `pre-merge-commit` 在 Git 创建自动合并提交前执行同样以索引为准的配对检查；\n- `pre-push` 运行 `pnpm run typecheck`；该命令会先完成包含 TypeRT 约定生成的完整 Host lib 阶段，再运行 Client TypeScript 检查。\n\nvendor manifest 守卫检查 `vendor/*/src` 下的改动是否连同对应的 `vendor/README.md` manifest 更新一起暂存。请在编辑 vendor 代码前先阅读 `vendor/README.md`。\n\n除限定范围的暂存记录校验外，这些钩子有意不运行测试、快照、文档检查、构建或 `hygiene`。贡献者只运行一次[与改动行为相关的检查](../AGENTS.md#run-relevant-checks-locally)；CI 负责全量覆盖率门禁、构建产物冒烟测试，以及 Node 22.19、24 和 26 兼容性矩阵。\n\n贡献者可以选择运行 `pnpm run check:all`，执行全面的本地门禁集。该命令独立于 Git 钩子，也不是对 agent 的指令。\n\n### CI 门禁\n\nkeyless [CI 工作流](../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 将独立门禁分组到若干宽粒度 lane，并在受支持的 Node 版本上运行一组较小的兼容性检查。产物消费方在各自 lane 内等待一次 build。单独的真实 API 工作流按其配置的 worker 上限运行 `pnpm run test:e2e`。当前门禁和 job 清单以 [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) 和工作流文件为准。\n\n### 日常命令\n\n根目录的[贡献者说明](../AGENTS.md#commands)概述常用命令，[`package.json`](../package.json) 与 [scripts/run-gates.ts](../scripts/run-gates.ts) 则负责当前脚本和门禁清单。请选择覆盖变更表面的最小检查集。文档变更使用 `pnpm run doc-sync`；package 公开行为变更还需更新所属 README 或 JSDoc，而基于构建产物的检查需要先运行 `pnpm run build`。\n\n### 演示\n\n单次运行的 Headless coding agent 需要环境变量或仓库根目录 `.env` 中的 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm dsh run \"summarize this workspace\"\n```\n\n自指的 cordis 演示可以检查并修改其实时插件运行时，并需要相同的凭证（默认 `web`，也可用 `acp`）：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:cordis\n```\n\nACP 自动化服务器通过 JSON-RPC stdio 提供全新 agent 会话，同样需要 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`：\n\n```sh\npnpm run demo:acp\n```\n\n### TODO 标记\n\n请使用以下三种注释标签之一标记代码中的已知问题，按紧急程度排序：\n\n- `FIXME`：应当阻塞新版本发布的问题。除非评审者明确同意该更改可以合并，否则发布版本不应包含未解决的 `FIXME`；\n- `TODO`：应当尽快修复的问题，等资源到位即可处理；\n- `XXX`：也许某天会修复的问题，优先级最低，不作承诺。\n\n请选择与紧急程度匹配的标签，让浏览代码的人一眼分清「发布阻塞」和「有空再说」。\n\n### 逐字记录类型（`ts type-equiv`）\n\n[子系统](subsystems/README.md)页面会把与源码等价的声明及其原始 JSDoc 一并粘贴，让读者看到确切类型定义和源码约定。为防止粘贴内容在源码变化时漂移，请将其围栏为 ` ```ts type-equiv `（而不是 ` ```ts `），并在 `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` 中登记它镜像的源文件和符号：\n\n```json\n{ \"doc\": \"docs/subsystems/session.md\", \"symbol\": \"SessionEvent\", \"source\": \"packages/core/session/src/types.ts\" }\n```\n\n`pnpm run verify-type-equiv`（`doc-sync` 的一环）随后通过 TypeScript 解析器从源码提取该符号的声明及其附带的 JSDoc，并断言代码块同时匹配两者。对于不应把实现体写进目录的类，请使用 ` ```ts public-api ` 并设置 `\"projection\": \"public-api\"`；门禁检查的投影会保留公共字段、构造函数、访问器、方法以及类和成员的原始 JSDoc，同时省略实现体和私有或受保护成员。比对会忽略空白和非 JSDoc 注释，但要求保留每条原始 JSDoc（包括成员文档），让读者同时看到源码约定和确切类型定义。该门禁按文档、符号和投影，在主块与 manifest 条目之间强制 1:1 对应；只有当配对 `.zh.md` 块的完整受跟踪围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件按字节一致且顺序相同时，才会复用后者的条目。`doc-typecheck` 对可编译围栏应用同一派生规则，同时跳过两种源码等价围栏的编译，并将其排除在 opt-out 比例之外。当你改动一个已记录的类型声明或其 JSDoc 时，门禁会失败直到你更新粘贴内容；当你增删一个主块时，请在同一个变更里更新 manifest。\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "# Bilingual documentation\n\nEnglish | [中文](README.zh.md)\n\nThis repo's documentation is read by people and agents both inside and outside the company, so every document in scope is maintained in English and Simplified Chinese. This page defines the pairing contract, checks, scope, and exclusions; [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) defines how to translate; [terminology.md](terminology.md) is the terminology source of truth. Routine agent work follows the lightweight path in [docs/AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md); the extended [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) workflow is available only through explicit user invocation.\n\n## The pairing contract\n\n- **Both languages carry equal authority.** A document may be authored and reviewed in either language first — a Chinese-first Agent Note is as legitimate as an English-first one — and the counterpart is translated from it. Neither file outranks the other; what binds them is that they must say the same thing.\n- **A pair is three sibling files.** The English `foo.md`, the Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`, all in the same directory. No locale directories, no separate translation repo, no interleaved bilingual files. Pairs merge whole: a PR never lands one language without the other two files.\n- **The consistency record.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last time the two were confirmed to say the same thing:\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  Blob hashes, not commit hashes, so the record is computable for files edited in the same PR (`git hash-object foo.md`) and consistency is a pure content comparison. `--write` stores those snapshots in the local Git object database before recording them, including uncommitted working-tree contents, and pins every distinct stored blob under a content-addressed `refs/dsh/translation-pairing/snapshots/` ref so garbage collection cannot invalidate a recorded recovery pointer. The recorded hashes therefore recover the exact last-confirmed text of either side, so an out-of-sync pair is updated by patching the counterpart minimally against the edited side's diff — never by re-translating whole files. Routine work makes that patch directly; when the user explicitly invokes the extended workflow, `pnpm run gen-translation-brief <pair>` can instead assemble the update at the narrowest safely aligned granularity and `--apply` can splice a code-fence-only change after structural validation ([briefed-updates Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md)). After bringing the pair back in line, `pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>` re-records both hashes; that yaml diff is the reviewable act of confirming consistency, which is why `--write` requires naming the pairs you confirmed (`--write --all` is the explicit corpus-wide form).\n\n  When two branches contain valid confirmations of the same pair, the installed `dsh-translation-pairing` Git merge driver composes a new record only if Git's default text merge succeeds for both recorded owner-blob triplets and the merged pair retains its required switchers and structural signature. The Chinese file must retain its English backlink; an authored English source must retain its Chinese link, while a listed generated English source is exempt. Any structure the driver cannot verify remains an ordinary conflict; `pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts` applies the same fail-closed operation to a merge that has already stopped, stages every safe pairing record, and exits unsuccessfully when other pairing conflicts remain. The [automatic pairing merges Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md) owns the mechanism and alternatives.\n- **Language switcher.** The Chinese file always links back immediately after its H1 heading with `[English](foo.md) | 中文`. An authored English file reciprocates there with `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)`; a listed generated English source omits that line so it remains byte-identical to generator output.\n- **Structure mirrors the counterpart.** Heading depths and order, list kinds, ordered-list starts, list item counts, table row and column counts, link targets, and verbatim code blocks match one to one across the pair — see [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) for the full preservation rules. Existing Markdown gates apply to `.zh.md` files unchanged (`verify-md-wrap`, `verify-md-links`).\n\n## The gate: verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing` (part of `doc-sync`, which contributors run locally for documentation changes and CI runs exhaustively) enforces the contract mechanically:\n\n1. Every document in scope has a complete pair. README discovery is case-insensitive on the basename, so `missions/readme.md` is in scope alongside the other documentation roots.\n2. Every pair artifact that exists at all is complete and consistent: all three files present, each side's current blob hash equals the recorded one (editing either side without re-confirming the pair goes red), the Chinese side and every authored English source carry their language switchers (listed generated English sources are exempt), and the structural signatures match in order — heading depths, verbatim code blocks (info string and content), table row and column counts, list kinds, ordered-list starts, item counts, and every link target apart from the switcher.\n3. Files listed as `excluded` have no `.zh.md` and no `.i18n.yaml` at all. Frozen Agent Notes under `.agents/notes/archived/` are outside this evolving gate; their dedicated verifier requires and seals the complete existing triplet instead.\n\nSource-oriented code gates consume an exact `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative of its unsuffixed sibling instead of compiling or manifesting the same code twice. The sequence must match in length, order, fence kind, and byte-exact body; otherwise both copies remain independently checked and the pairing gate reports the structural mismatch.\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` prints the current pairing state of every document in scope — missing, out-of-sync, or ok. It never fails; `missing` and `out-of-sync` rows identify violations that the normal check rejects.\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing <pair...>` checks just the named pairs — any of a pair's three files (or its bare stem) names it — so an update loop verifies its own pair in seconds instead of re-scanning the corpus. The no-argument corpus-wide form is what `doc-sync` and CI run; a scoped green never substitutes for it at PR level.\n\nThe practical rule this gate creates: **when a PR edits either side of a paired document, the same PR updates the counterpart directly in one terminology-guided pass and re-records the pair with `--write <pair>`**, exactly like the repo's existing doc-sync rule for code and READMEs. A PR that leaves a pair out of sync goes red in CI.\n\nThe gate's limit, stated plainly: **a green gate means the pair was confirmed consistent at these exact contents, not that the confirmation was sound.** It checks hashes and Markdown structure; it cannot judge whether the two sides actually say the same thing, or whether the wording is accurate, well-termed, and natural — that is the reviewer's half of the contract, per [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md). A re-recorded pair with a sloppy counterpart passes the gate; it must not pass review.\n\n## Scope and exclusions\n\n**Scope**: every non-vendor README, plus every active document under `.agents/notes/**`, `docs/**`, and `python/**`. README matching is case-insensitive on the basename and covers future directories without another manifest edit. Dependency and ignored build-output trees and the frozen `.agents/notes/archived/` tree are discovery exclusions, not evolving translation source.\n\nGenerated English references and graphs participate in pairing when a reviewed Chinese counterpart is available. Their generators remain the English source of truth, and freshness and pairing gates enforce their respective invariants independently; regeneration that changes English leaves the pair out of sync until the reviewed Chinese counterpart is updated and re-recorded. Generated English sources omit the language switcher that ordinary authored sources carry, because adding it would make the generator stale; their Chinese counterparts still link back to the English source. A generated page's Chinese counterpart may rewrite only self-referential generation and maintenance statements that would otherwise be false for the reviewed translation; all technical content remains subject to the ordinary faithfulness rules.\n\n**Excluded** (never paired, and the gate rejects a `.zh.md` or `.i18n.yaml` for them):\n\n- [cordis-api/inherited.md](../cordis-api/inherited.md) — generated without a reviewed Chinese counterpart, so both website locales project the English source.\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`, `.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md`, and their `CLAUDE.md` instruction symlinks — agent instructions, maintained in English only like the root `AGENTS.md`.\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` and [style-samples.md](style-samples.md) — both are bilingual by construction.\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md) — the automated pipeline's prompt template; its body is machine-consumed verbatim, so a paired translation would change pipeline behavior.\n- `.agents/notes/archived/` — frozen historical triplets. [`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) validates their completeness and content seals; translation maintenance must never rewrite them.\n\n**Universal requirement**: every current or future document in scope must merge as a complete bilingual pair. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions; there is no per-file rollout list, date cutoff, or README-specific policy class.\n\n## Division of labor\n\nRoutine counterparts are updated directly by the working agent in one shot and one pass after it loads [terminology.md](terminology.md); it does not invoke a translation skill, generate a briefing, run a separate translation-review pass, or delegate to a subagent. The extended [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) workflow retains those heavier mechanisms for explicit user invocation. The gate checks pair completeness, recorded hashes, the Chinese backlink and authored-source switcher (with the documented generated-source exception), and its documented structural signature. Review still owns translation quality, terminology, and structural requirements that the signature does not encode. The prompt contract is executable: [scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) renders the committed template (terminology injected; the template carries its own calibrated rules) into either direction and parses the three-section response, while `verify-translation-prompt` exercises both render directions and the checked-in example in `doc-sync`.\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "# 双语文档\n\n[English](README.md) | 中文\n\n本仓库的文档会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）阅读，因此范围内的每篇文档都以英文和简体中文维护。本页定义配对约定、检查、范围与排除规则；[translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md) 定义如何翻译；[terminology.md](terminology.md) 是术语真源。agent 的日常工作遵循 [docs/AGENTS.md](../AGENTS.md) 中的轻量路径；扩展版 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 工作流仅在用户显式调用时可用。\n\n## 配对约定\n\n- **两种语言同权。** 一篇文档可以先用任一语言撰写和评审（先写中文的 Agent Note 与先写英文的一样正当），另一侧由它翻译而来。两个文件谁也不高于谁；约束它们的是二者必须说同样的话。\n- **一对文档是三个同目录文件。** 英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，加一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`，都在同一目录。不用语言目录，不用独立翻译仓库，不用中英混排的单文件。配对必须整体合并：PR（Pull Request）永远不会只带一种语言而缺其余两个文件。\n- **一致性记录。**`foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次被确认「说同样的话」时各自的完整 git blob hash：\n\n  ```yaml\n  foo.md: 3f786850e387550fdab836ed7e6dc881de23001b\n  foo.zh.md: 89e6c98d92887913cadf06b2adb97f26cde4849b\n  ```\n\n  用 blob hash 而不是 commit hash，这样同一个 PR 里改动的文件也能算出记录（`git hash-object foo.md`），一致性是纯内容比较。`--write` 会先把这些快照存入本地 Git 对象库再写下记录，未提交的工作树内容也不例外；它还会在内容寻址的 `refs/dsh/translation-pairing/snapshots/` ref 下固定每个不同的已存 blob，使垃圾回收无法让已记录的恢复指针失效。因此记录的 hash 能还原任一侧上次确认时的确切文本，所以失去同步的配对是「按被改一侧的 diff 最小化地修补另一侧」，从不整篇重译。日常工作会直接完成这份修补；用户显式调用扩展工作流时，可改由 `pnpm run gen-translation-brief <pair>` 以能安全对齐的最窄粒度汇集这次更新，并由 `--apply` 在结构校验后拼接仅涉及围栏代码块的改动（[briefed-updates Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md)）。两侧对齐后，`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>` 重新记录两个 hash；那份 yaml diff 就是「确认一致」这个动作本身，可以被评审，也正因如此，`--write` 要求点名你确认过的配对（`--write --all` 是显式的全语料形式）。\n\n  当两个分支都包含同一配对的有效确认时，已安装的 `dsh-translation-pairing` Git 合并驱动只会在 Git 默认文本合并能分别干净合并记录所指向的英文三方 blob 与中文三方 blob，且合并后的配对仍保留必需的语言切换行和结构签名时，组合出一份新记录。中文文件必须保留指向英文的反向链接；普通撰写的英文源必须保留指向中文的链接，而清单内的生成英文源不作此要求。任何合并驱动无法验证的结构都保留为普通冲突；`pnpm run resolve-translation-pairing-conflicts` 会对已经停止的合并执行同一套遇错即保留冲突的操作，暂存每份可安全生成的配对记录，并在还有其他配对冲突时以非零状态退出。[自动配对合并 Agent Note](../../.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-08-automatic-translation-pairing-merges.md) 负责记录该机制与备选方案。\n- **语言切换行。** 中文文件一律在 H1 标题后立即以 `[English](foo.md) | 中文` 链回英文。普通撰写的英文文件在同一位置以 `English | [中文](foo.zh.md)` 互链；清单内的生成英文源省略此行，以便与生成器输出逐字节一致。\n- **结构与另一侧一一对应。** 标题深度与顺序、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量、表格行列数、链接目标与逐字节一致的代码块在配对两侧一一对应；完整保持规则见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。既有 Markdown 门禁对 `.zh.md` 文件原样生效（`verify-md-wrap`、`verify-md-links`）。\n\n## 门禁：verify-translation-pairing\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing`（`doc-sync`（文档同步门禁）的一环，贡献者会针对文档变更在本地运行，CI 则会完整运行）机械地强制执行这份约定：\n\n1. 范围内的每篇文档都有完整配对。发现 README 时，basename 不区分大小写，因此 `missions/readme.md` 与其他文档根一样属于范围。\n2. 任何已存在的配对产物都完整且一致：三个文件齐全、每一侧的当前 blob hash 等于记录值（改了任一侧而没重新确认配对就变红）、中文侧和所有普通撰写的英文源都带语言切换行（清单内的生成英文源除外）、结构签名按序一致：标题深度、逐字节一致的代码块（信息字符串与内容）、表格行列数、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量，以及除切换行之外的每个链接目标。\n3. 列为 `excluded` 的文件完全没有 `.zh.md`，也没有 `.i18n.yaml`。`.agents/notes/archived/` 下冻结的 Agent Note 不受这个持续演进的门禁约束；专用校验器会要求其现有的三个配对文件完整，并将其封存。\n\n面向源码的代码门禁会把精确的 `.zh.md` 围栏序列视为其无后缀兄弟文件的派生内容，而不会再次编译相同代码或在 manifest 中重复登记。该序列必须在长度、顺序、围栏类型和按字节精确的正文上一致；否则两份副本仍会独立受检，配对门禁也会报告结构不匹配。\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --list` 打印范围内每篇文档的当前配对状态（missing、out-of-sync 或 ok）。它从不失败；其中 missing 与 out-of-sync 行指出普通检查会拒绝的违规。\n\n`pnpm run verify-translation-pairing <pair...>` 只检查被点名的配对——配对的三个文件中的任意一个（或其裸词干）都能点名它——因此更新循环几秒内就能验证自己的配对，而不必重新扫描全语料。`doc-sync` 与 CI 运行的是无参数的全语料形式；限定范围的绿灯在 PR 层面永远不能替代它。\n\n这个门禁带来的实际规则是：**当一个 PR 修改了已配对文档的任一侧时，同一个 PR 在术语指导下直接一次完成对侧文件的更新，并用 `--write <pair>` 重新记录配对**，与本仓库既有的代码与 README 的 doc-sync 规则完全一致。留下失去同步的配对的 PR 会在 CI 变红。\n\n门禁的限制很明确：**门禁通过意味着这组文档在当前内容上的一致性得到了确认，不代表确认本身正确可靠。** 它检查记录的 hash 与 Markdown 结构；它无法判断两侧是否真的在说同样的话，也无法判断措辞是否准确、术语是否得当、行文是否自然；这部分约定由评审者把关，见 [translation-rules.md](translation-rules.md)。重新记录了 hash 但另一侧翻得潦草的配对能通过门禁；它不得通过评审。\n\n## 范围与排除\n\n**范围**：除 vendor 源码外的全部 README，以及 `.agents/notes/**`、`docs/**` 与 `python/**` 下的全部活跃文档。匹配 README 时只看文件名且不区分大小写，因此今后新增的目录无需再修改 manifest。依赖目录、被忽略的构建产物目录以及冻结的 `.agents/notes/archived/` 目录树只在发现阶段排除，不属于持续演进的翻译源文档。\n\n有经评审中文对侧的生成英文参考文档和图文档遵循配对规则。生成器仍是英文真源，新鲜度门禁与配对门禁各自独立强制其约束；重新生成导致英文变化后，配对会保持失去同步状态，直至经评审的中文对侧完成更新并重新记录。生成的英文源文件不含普通撰写文档所带的语言切换行，因为添加该行会使生成器新鲜度检查失败；中文对侧仍链接回英文源。生成页的中文对侧只能改写若直译便不再符合经评审译文事实的自指生成与维护说明；所有技术内容仍受普通忠实性规则约束。\n\n**排除**（永不配对，门禁拒绝为它们建 `.zh.md` 或 `.i18n.yaml`）：\n\n- [cordis-api/inherited.md](../cordis-api/inherited.md)：该生成文档没有经评审的中文对侧，因此网站的两个 locale 都投影英文源文件。\n- `docs/AGENTS.md`、`.agents/notes/**/AGENTS.md` 以及指向它们的 `CLAUDE.md` 指令符号链接：agent 指令，与根 `AGENTS.md` 一样只以英文维护。\n- `docs/i18n/terminology.md` 与 [style-samples.md](style-samples.md)：二者本身即为中英对照文档。\n- [translation-prompt.md](translation-prompt.md)：自动翻译流水线的提示词模板；正文逐字进入模型请求，配对翻译会改变流水线行为。\n- `.agents/notes/archived/`：冻结的历史三文件配对。[`verify-archived-agent-notes`](../../scripts/verify-archived-agent-notes.ts) 校验其完整性和内容封存记录；翻译维护绝不能重写这些文件。\n\n**统一要求**：当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档，合并时都必须构成完整的双语配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项；不存在逐文件推进清单、日期分界或 README 专用政策类别。\n\n## 分工\n\n日常更新对侧文件时，负责处理的 agent 会先加载 [terminology.md](terminology.md)，再直接一次性更新且只处理一遍；它不会调用翻译 skill（技能）、生成简报、执行单独的翻译评审轮次，也不会委派给 subagent。扩展版 [dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 工作流保留这些较重的机制，仅供用户显式调用。门禁负责检查配对是否完整、记录的 hash、中文反向链接和普通撰写源的切换行（生成源按本文规则例外），以及本文列出的结构签名；翻译质量、术语和签名未涵盖的结构要求仍由评审把关。提示词约定也有可执行实现：[scripts/translation-prompt.ts](../../scripts/translation-prompt.ts) 会把仓库内置的模板（注入术语表；模板自带经人工校准的规则）渲染为英译中或中译英两个方向的提示词，并解析三段式响应；`doc-sync` 中的 `verify-translation-prompt` 会检查两个渲染方向与仓库内示例。\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "# Translation rules\n\nEnglish | [中文](translation-rules.zh.md)\n\nHow to translate between the two sides of a documentation pair in this repo. Both languages carry equal authority ([README.md](README.md)): a change is authored in either language, and that side is the source for that update — these rules govern producing or updating the counterpart. They bind humans and agents equally. Routine agent work translates the changed content directly in one terminology-guided pass; the extended [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) workflow runs only when the user explicitly invokes it. Rule levels follow RFC 2119 usage: **MUST** / **MUST NOT** are gate- or review-blocking; **SHOULD** needs a stated reason to deviate; **MAY** is discretionary.\n\n## Faithfulness\n\n- The counterpart *MUST* say what the authored side says — no added behavior, prerequisites, warnings, version claims, or examples, and no dropped ones. If the pair disagrees on substance, neither language wins by default: fix the side that is wrong, then bring the other along in the same change.\n- The counterpart *SHOULD* read as natural technical writing in its own language, not word-by-word gloss. Translate meaning, restructure sentences where the target grammar wants it, and keep the author's register — terse stays terse.\n- Do not translate the untranslatable: if a sentence resists natural rendering because it leans on an idiom of the source language, translate the idea, not the idiom.\n\n## Voice\n\n- The register is calibrated by [style-samples.md](style-samples.md) — human-approved gold pairs, one per document genre. The counterpart MUST match the target-language side of the nearest sample; where its voice and a prose voice rule disagree, the sample wins. Chinese targets use institutional technical Chinese; English targets use concise professional developer prose.\n- Write as a native technical author restating the content, not as a translator transposing sentences, while preserving every source clause: nothing added, nothing dropped — fluency never justifies losing a clause.\n- Give sentences an explicit actor when the target language would otherwise obscure it; for Chinese, replace vague passives or abstract subjects with the actual actor (系统、门禁、评审人).\n- Prefer established target-language engineering idiom over calques (误报／漏检 for false positive/negative, 执行红线 for enforcement frontier); localize metaphors instead of transplanting them, and unpack noun chains where the target language requires it.\n- Split long paragraphs by semantic unit — one idea per paragraph. Paragraph boundaries MAY differ from the source; the structural signature does not count paragraphs.\n- When translating into Chinese, category nouns use Chinese with a first-mention English annotation (实操手册（cookbook）); when translating into English, use the conventional English category name. Literal directory or file references stay code-formatted English.\n\n## Structure preservation\n\nThe pairing gate checks heading depths, fenced code blocks, table row and column counts, list kinds, ordered-list starts, list item counts, and link targets. Preserve the rest of the frame manually; the paired files MUST match one to one in:\n\n- heading hierarchy (same levels, same order — heading TEXT is translated),\n- list shape and numbering,\n- tables (same columns, same row order; header cells translated per terminology),\n- fenced code blocks — **byte-identical, including comments**; the pairing signature compares their info strings and contents, and ` ```ts ` blocks compile under `doc-typecheck`,\n- inline code spans (commands, flags, config keys, file paths, event names, API names, version numbers) — verbatim, never translated or reformatted,\n- links and anchors: every relative link MUST point at the same target in both files — by convention the `.md` path, not the `.zh.md` sibling — so links never dangle when one pair lands before its neighbors. The ONLY zh-specific link is the language switcher. Link TEXT is translated; the target is not.\n\nThe repo's Markdown conventions apply to `.zh.md` files unchanged: one physical line per paragraph (`verify-md-wrap`), resolving relative links (`verify-md-links`), exactly one trailing newline.\n\n## Terminology\n\n- [terminology.md](terminology.md) is the source of truth in both directions. Before translating, load it; every listed term MUST follow its row and its \"不要译作\" prohibitions. A Chinese target uses the \"中文\" column and its \"首次出现\" annotation; an English target uses the \"English\" column without adding a Chinese gloss.\n- For a Chinese target, an unlisted technical term MAY use an established rendering from a major Chinese-language OSS or vendor source (K8s/Vue/MDN Chinese docs, 微软简中风格指南, big-tech project docs), cited in the PR. Without such precedent it MUST stay in English and be listed under 「待定术语」(pending terms) with a suggested rendering.\n- For an English target, use the established English technical term. If the source term has no unambiguous established equivalent, preserve it with a short explanatory gloss and list it under pending terms. Neither direction may invent a rendering inline; a decided term enters [terminology.md](terminology.md) in the same PR or a follow-up.\n\n## Typography\n\nThese rules govern the Chinese side; the English side follows the repo's normal Markdown conventions (root `AGENTS.md`). The mixed-script rules below follow the cross-project consensus of the [MDN Simplified Chinese translation guide](https://github.com/mdn/translated-content/blob/main/docs/zh-cn/translation-guide.md), the [Kubernetes zh-cn localization guide](https://kubernetes.io/zh-cn/docs/contribute/localization_zh/), the [Vue.js Chinese translation conventions](https://github.com/vuejs-translations/docs-zh-cn/wiki/%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91%E9%A1%BB%E7%9F%A5), and [中文文案排版指北](https://github.com/sparanoid/chinese-copywriting-guidelines), which in turn ground in [W3C clreq](https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/) and GB/T 15834—2011:\n\n- MUST put one half-width space between Chinese text and Latin words, and between Chinese text and numerals: `每个 plugin 注册 3 个 tool`。No space between a full-width punctuation mark and anything.\n- MUST use full-width (Chinese) punctuation in Chinese prose: `，。：；？！（）「」`. Half-width punctuation stays inside code spans, inside complete English sentences quoted as-is, and in numbers (`3.5`, `1,024`).\n- Chinese prose *SHOULD* prefer colons, periods, commas, or parentheses over em dashes. Keep an em dash only when no other punctuation preserves the sentence naturally.\n- Enumeration commas: a Chinese list of parallel items uses 顿号（、）, not commas.\n- MUST NOT use full-width digits or full-width Latin letters — `１２３` never, `123` always.\n- Proper nouns keep their canonical casing: GitHub, TypeScript, DeepSeek — never `github`/`Github` unless quoting code.\n- Second person is 你, not 您 (matches the Vue and Kubernetes Chinese conventions and this repo's direct voice).\n- Emphasis markers (`**bold**`, `*italic*`) stay on the same spans as the source; Chinese has no italics, so the rendered emphasis may look identical — do not substitute quotation marks or other decoration.\n\n## Quality bar\n\n- A pair is done when a bilingual engineer reading either file alone gets everything a reader of the other gets — same facts, same caveats, same tone — and nothing extra.\n- Run `pnpm run verify-translation-pairing` and the rest of `doc-sync` for records, switchers, heading depths, code blocks, table row and column counts, list kinds, ordered-list starts, list item counts, links, and repository Markdown rules. Human review owns list and table order, noncanonical list numbering, inline code, emphasis, meaning, terminology, and tone.\n\n## References\n\nAuthorities cited by these rules, for humans and agents who want the underlying reasoning:\n\n- [中文文案排版指北](https://github.com/sparanoid/chinese-copywriting-guidelines) — the de-facto community standard for mixed CJK/Latin spacing and punctuation.\n- [MDN zh-CN translation guide](https://github.com/mdn/translated-content/blob/main/docs/zh-cn/translation-guide.md) — an in-repo translation-rules file of the same shape as this one; spacing, punctuation, and glossary practice.\n- [Kubernetes zh-cn localization guide](https://kubernetes.io/zh-cn/docs/contribute/localization_zh/) — terminology-first-occurrence and punctuation practice from the largest zh localization team.\n- [Vue.js docs-zh-cn 翻译须知](https://github.com/vuejs-translations/docs-zh-cn/wiki/%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91%E9%A1%BB%E7%9F%A5) — per-term translate/keep decisions and tone.\n- [zh-style-guide](https://zh-style-guide.readthedocs.io) — a community Chinese technical-writing style guide whose rule-level taxonomy (and RFC 2119 keyword levels) this file borrows; aggregates GB/T 15834/15835, clreq, and vendor guides.\n- [W3C clreq](https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/) and the [Microsoft Simplified Chinese style guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/globalization/reference/microsoft-style-guides) — the formal typographic and vendor-localization baselines.\n- GB/T 19682-2005《翻译服务译文质量要求》 — the national standard whose three base requirements (忠实原文、术语统一、行文通顺) this file's Faithfulness and Terminology sections operationalize.\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "# 翻译规则\n\n[English](translation-rules.md) | 中文\n\n本文规定：如何在本仓库文档配对的中英文两种语言之间进行翻译。两种语言同权（见 [README.md](README.md)）：每次变更可以用任一语言撰写，被编辑的一侧即为本次更新的源；本文的规则约束如何产出或更新对侧文件。这些规则对人类和 agent（智能体）同等生效。日常工作中，agent 会在术语指导下直接一次完成有改动内容的翻译；扩展版 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 工作流仅在用户显式调用时运行。规则级别沿用 RFC 2119 的用法：**必须（MUST）** ／ **禁止（MUST NOT）** 会卡门禁或评审；**应当（SHOULD）** 偏离时要说明理由；**可以（MAY）** 自行裁量。\n\n## 忠实性\n\n- 对侧文件*必须*传达与撰写侧相同的内容：不添加行为、前置条件、警告、版本声明或示例，也不漏掉任何一项。如果两侧在实质内容上不一致，没有哪种语言默认获胜；请修正错误的一侧，并在同一个变更里同步更新另一侧。\n- 对侧文件读起来*应当*是其语言自然的技术文字，而非逐词对照的译文。请根据语义翻译，在目标语言语法需要时重组句子，并保持原作者的语域（比如：简练的保持简练）。\n- 不要翻译不可译的内容：如果一句话依赖源语言的习语、无法自然转换，请翻译它的意思，而非习语本身。\n\n## 行文\n\n- 语体以 [style-samples.md](style-samples.md) 为校准锚点。人工定稿的金标样例按文体各一组，译文必须参照文体最接近的样例，采用其中目标语言一侧的语体；如果样例与本文的行文规则冲突，以样例为准。译成中文时，采用规范的技术制度文；译成英文时，采用简洁、专业的开发者文档语体。\n- 以母语技术作者的身份重述内容，而不是以译者身份逐句转写，同时保留原文的每个语义成分：不添加、不遗漏——流畅永远不是丢掉语义成分的理由。\n- 如果直译会让执行主体含糊，请明确写出实际执行者；译成中文时，应由「系统、门禁、评审人」等实际执行者作主语，避免含糊的被动句或抽象主语。\n- 优先采用目标语言中通行的工程表达，避免生硬直译（false positive/negative→误报／漏检、enforcement frontier→执行红线）；隐喻应自然改写，名词链则按目标语言的习惯拆开。\n- 长段按语义单元拆分，一段一件事。段落边界可以与原文不同；结构签名不比对段落数。\n- 翻译为中文时，类别名词使用中文并在首现括注英文（实操手册（cookbook））；翻译为英文时，使用通行的英文类别名。指目录或文件本身时保留代码体英文。\n\n## 结构保持\n\n配对门禁会检查标题深度、围栏代码块、表格行列数、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量与链接目标；门禁未覆盖的结构仍需人工核对。两个配对文件必须在以下方面一一对应：\n\n- 标题层级（相同级别、相同顺序；标题的**文字**要翻译）；\n- 列表形态与编号；\n- 表格（相同的列、相同的行序；表头单元格按术语表翻译）；\n- 围栏代码块：**逐字节一致，包括注释**。配对签名比对信息字符串与内容，` ```ts ` 块还要通过 `doc-typecheck` 编译；\n- 行内代码（命令、flag、配置键、文件路径、事件名、API 名、版本号）：原样保留，从不翻译或重排；\n- 链接与锚点：每个相对链接在两个文件中必须指向相同的目标（按约定是 `.md` 路径而非 `.zh.md` 兄弟文件），这样即使某对文档先于相邻文件落地，链接也不会悬空。唯一的 zh 特有链接是语言切换行。链接**文字**翻译；链接目标不翻。\n\n本仓库的 Markdown 约定对 `.zh.md` 文件原样生效：一个段落一个物理行（`verify-md-wrap`）、相对链接必须可解析（`verify-md-links`）、文件末尾恰好一个换行。\n\n## 术语\n\n- [terminology.md](terminology.md) 是双向的术语真源。翻译前请先加载它；表内术语必须遵守对应行与「不要译作」禁项。译成中文时，采用「中文」列，并按「首次出现」列括注；译成英文时，采用「English」列，不加中文括注。\n- 译成中文时，术语表未收录的技术术语只有在主流中文 OSS 文档或厂商资料中已有通行译法时才可以翻译（K8s／Vue／MDN 中文文档、微软简中风格指南、大厂项目文档），并须在 PR 中注明出处；否则必须保留英文，并在 PR 描述的「待定术语」中给出建议译法。\n- 译成英文时，采用通行的英文技术术语。如果源术语没有明确的通行对应词，则保留原词、附上简短说明，并列入「待定术语」。两个方向都不得自行创造译法；确定后的术语须在同一个 PR 或后续 PR 中加入 [terminology.md](terminology.md)。\n\n## 排版\n\n本节规则约束中文一侧；英文一侧遵循仓库常规的 Markdown 约定（根 `AGENTS.md`）。以下中西文混排规则遵循 [MDN 简体中文翻译指南](https://github.com/mdn/translated-content/blob/main/docs/zh-cn/translation-guide.md)、[Kubernetes 中文本地化指南](https://kubernetes.io/zh-cn/docs/contribute/localization_zh/)、[Vue.js 中文翻译须知](https://github.com/vuejs-translations/docs-zh-cn/wiki/%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91%E9%A1%BB%E7%9F%A5) 与[中文文案排版指北](https://github.com/sparanoid/chinese-copywriting-guidelines)的跨项目共识，其根据是 [W3C clreq](https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/) 与 GB/T 15834—2011：\n\n- 必须在中文与拉丁词之间、中文与数字之间各留一个半角空格：`每个 plugin 注册 3 个 tool`。全角标点与任何字符之间不加空格。\n- 中文行文必须使用全角（中文）标点：`，。：；？！（）「」`。半角标点保留在代码内、按原样引用的完整英文句子内、以及数字内（`3.5`、`1,024`）。\n- 中文行文*应当*优先使用冒号、句号、逗号或括号，尽量不用破折号；只有其他标点都无法自然表达时才保留破折号。\n- 顿号：中文的并列项之间使用顿号（、），而非逗号。\n- 禁止使用全角数字或全角拉丁字母：永远不写 `１２３`，永远写 `123`。\n- 专有名词保持规范大小写：GitHub、TypeScript、DeepSeek。除非引用代码，否则绝不写 `github`／`Github`。\n- 第二人称用「你」，不用「您」（与 Vue、Kubernetes 中文约定及本仓库的直接语气一致）。\n- 强调标记（`**加粗**`、`*斜体*`）落在与对侧相同的文字段上。中文没有斜体，渲染效果可能看不出差别，不要用引号或其他装饰替代。\n\n## 质量标准\n\n- 一对文档的完成标准：一位双语工程师只读其中任一文件，能获得与另一文件读者完全相同的信息（相同的事实、相同的告诫、相同的语气），并且没有任何多余的内容。\n- 请运行 `pnpm run verify-translation-pairing` 与 `doc-sync` 的其余门禁。这些门禁会检查一致性记录、切换行、标题深度、代码块、表格行列数、列表类型、有序列表起始编号、列表项数量、链接及仓库 Markdown 规则；列表与表格的顺序、非常规列表编号、行内代码、强调标记、语义、术语和语体则由人工评审负责。\n\n## 参考资料\n\n本文各规则引用的权威出处，供想了解底层依据的人和 agent 查阅：\n\n- [中文文案排版指北](https://github.com/sparanoid/chinese-copywriting-guidelines)：中西文混排空格与标点的社区事实标准。\n- [MDN 简体中文翻译指南](https://github.com/mdn/translated-content/blob/main/docs/zh-cn/translation-guide.md)：与本文同形态的仓库内置翻译规则文件；空格、标点与术语表实践。\n- [Kubernetes 中文本地化指南](https://kubernetes.io/zh-cn/docs/contribute/localization_zh/)：最大的中文本地化团队的术语首现与标点实践。\n- [Vue.js docs-zh-cn 翻译须知](https://github.com/vuejs-translations/docs-zh-cn/wiki/%E7%BF%BB%E8%AF%91%E9%A1%BB%E7%9F%A5)：逐术语的译／留决策与语气。\n- [zh-style-guide](https://zh-style-guide.readthedocs.io)：社区中文技术文档写作规范，本文借用了它的规则级别分类体系（与 RFC 2119 关键词分级）；它聚合了 GB/T 15834/15835、clreq 与各厂商指南。\n- [W3C clreq](https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/) 与[微软简体中文风格指南](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/globalization/reference/microsoft-style-guides)：排版学与厂商本地化的正式基线。\n- GB/T 19682-2005《翻译服务译文质量要求》：国家标准；本文「忠实性」与「术语」两节将其三项基本要求（忠实原文、术语统一、行文通顺）落实为可操作的规则。\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "# Agent Note: Bilingual documentation via paired sibling files and a pairing gate\n\nStatus: implemented\n\nEnglish | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)\n\n## Problem\n\nThis repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.\n\n## Decision\n\n- **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).\n- **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>`, which requires naming the confirmed pairs — bulk re-record is an explicit `--write --all`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, the Chinese side and every authored English source carry their switchers while listed generated English sources are exempt, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.\n- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.\n- **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.\n- **Translation is agent work with human review.** Routine changes use the direct one-pass path owned by the [lightweight-translation decision](2026-08-08-lightweight-routine-documentation-translation.md). The [extended translation skill](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) retains delegated translation and the other heavier mechanisms for explicit user invocation; both paths defer to the documentation contracts as their sources of truth.\n\n## Verification\n\nThe verification contract covers each boundary independently. `verify-translation-pairing` pins pair completeness, hashes, switchers, and structure; [`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) pins locale-specific source selection for published pairs; [`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) pins discovery of Loader YAML and exclusion of translation records; and the [translation-prompt runnable snapshot](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts) pins the rendered system message, five reviewed example pairs, source request, and consumed response. Together these checks make pair drift, publication drift, configuration misclassification, and model-visible prompt drift review-visible.\n\n## Alternatives considered\n\n- **English as the canonical source with a fingerprint inside the translation** — `.zh.md` files would carry an HTML comment recording the English source's blob hash, and translation would flow EN → ZH only. Rejected: the team wants Chinese-first authoring (write and review a Chinese Agent Note, then translate to English) with the two languages holding equal authority, which a one-directional canonical model cannot express. The sidecar record covering BOTH sides replaced the in-file one-directional fingerprint; the blob-hash mechanics survived unchanged.\n- **Locale directories (`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`, the Kubernetes/ECharts model)** — rejected: this repo has no docs-site framework to map locales to routes, moving every English file would churn every existing cross-reference, and `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` would need path-mapping logic instead of working unchanged.\n- **A separate translation repo (the PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` model)** — rejected: right for a docs product with independent release trains, overkill for a monorepo's own documentation; it also puts the translation outside the reach of this repo's gates.\n- **Interleaved bilingual files (single file, both languages)** — rejected: doubles every diff, breaks the one-line-per-paragraph convention's diff ergonomics, and makes partial inconsistency invisible.\n- **Commit-hash records (the MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` model)** — rejected in favor of blob hashes: a same-PR edit has no commit hash yet, so the MDN model cannot express \"consistent as of the state this PR introduces\", and verifying it requires git history instead of file content.\n- **Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record)** — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.\n\n## Industry precedent\n\nPaired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech convention (ant-design `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`; arco-design `README.zh-CN.md` with a top-of-file switcher; Apache ShardingSphere's 387 `.cn.md`/`.en.md` pairs) — but none of those repos *enforce* pairing or consistency in CI; the convention holds by review alone. Consistency automation exists outside China: MDN's `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter fingerprint, Vue's Ryu-Cho action (upstream-commit watcher that opens issues/PRs for stale translations), Kubernetes' localization drift scripts, and Microsoft's Azure co-op-translator (source-hash-driven LLM re-translation in CI). This design combines the two: the Chinese-ecosystem file layout with a hash-pair gate, plus an agent-run workflow in place of a bot service.\n\n## Consequences\n\n- Editing either side of a paired document obligates the same PR to update the counterpart and re-record the pair — the gate makes the doc-sync rule bilingual, and CI (not reviewer memory) carries the invariant.\n- Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, \"who confirmed these consistent, and when\" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.\n- When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.\n- Generated English documents remain derived from source and freshness-gated by their owning generators. A generated page with a reviewed Chinese counterpart participates in the three-file pairing workflow, with one structural exception: the generated English source has no language switcher because adding one would make the generator stale, while the Chinese counterpart links back to it. Generated pages without a reviewed counterpart remain explicit exclusions and use an English website projection.\n- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.\n- The recorded hashes double as the update tool: [gen-translation-brief](2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md) recovers either side's last-confirmed text from them and assembles the minimal-update briefing, so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "# Agent Note: 通过配对兄弟文件与配对门禁实现双语文档\n\nStatus: implemented\n\n[English](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md) | 中文\n\n## 问题\n\n本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](../../archived/process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。\n\n## 决策\n\n- **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。\n- **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write <pair>`，要求点名所确认的配对；批量重新记录是显式的 `--write --all`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。\n- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对；每个现有配对都完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、中文侧和所有普通撰写的英文源都带切换行而清单内的生成英文源除外、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项，因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。\n- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对；政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。\n- **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。\n- **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 常规改动采用由[轻量翻译决策](2026-08-08-lightweight-routine-documentation-translation.md)确立的直接单遍路径。[扩展翻译 skill（技能）](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)保留委派翻译和其他较重机制，供用户显式调用；两条路径均以文档契约为真源。\n\n## 验证\n\n验证约定分别覆盖每个边界。`verify-translation-pairing` 固定配对完整性、hash、切换行和结构；[`project-doc-site.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/project-doc-site.spec.ts) 固定已发布配对按 locale 选择对应源文件；[`cordis-config-files.spec.ts`](../../../../scripts/cordis-config-files.spec.ts) 固定 Loader YAML 的发现以及翻译记录的排除；[翻译提示词可运行快照](../../../../scripts/translation-prompt.snapshot.ts)则固定渲染后的系统消息、五对经评审的示例、源请求和响应消费结果。这些检查共同使配对漂移、发布漂移、配置误分类和模型可见提示词漂移都可在评审中看见。\n\n## 曾考虑的替代方案\n\n- **英文为正典源、指纹放在译文内**：`.zh.md` 文件携带一条 HTML 注释记录英文源的 blob hash，翻译只沿 EN → ZH 单向流动。否决：团队需要中文先行的撰写方式（先写、先审中文 Agent Note，再译英文），两种语言同权，而单向正典模型无法表达这一点。覆盖**两侧**的伴随记录取代了文件内的单向指纹；blob hash 的机制本身保持不变。\n- **语言目录（`docs/en/` + `docs/zh/`，Kubernetes/ECharts 模式）**：否决。本仓库没有将 locale 映射到路由的文档站框架；如果移动所有英文文件，所有既有交叉引用都要随之修改；且 `verify-md-links`/`verify-doc-refs` 将需要路径映射逻辑，而非原样工作。\n- **独立翻译仓库（PingCAP `docs`/`docs-cn` 模式）**：否决。适合有独立发布节奏的文档产品，对 monorepo 自身的文档而言过重；还会把译文置于本仓库门禁触及不到的地方。\n- **中英混排单文件（一个文件、两种语言）**：否决。每个 diff 都翻倍，破坏一段一行约定的 diff 易读性，且局部不一致不可见。\n- **Commit hash 式记录（MDN `l10n.sourceCommit` 模式）**：否决，改用 blob hash。同一个 PR 内的改动还没有 commit hash，MDN 模式无法表达「与本 PR 引入的状态一致」，且校验它需要 git 历史而非文件内容。\n- **比较配对两侧的 git 时间戳（无记录）**：否决。纯格式化的改动会误报，一次无关改动之后提交的对侧文件会漏报；只有内容同一性这个信号才与门禁的承诺名实相符。\n\n## 业界先例\n\n带语言后缀的配对兄弟文件是中国大厂的主流约定（ant-design 的 `index.zh-CN.md`/`index.en-US.md`；arco-design 的 `README.zh-CN.md` 加顶部切换行；Apache ShardingSphere 的 387 对 `.cn.md`/`.en.md`），但这些仓库都没有在 CI 中**强制**配对或一致性检查；约定纯靠评审维系。一致性自动化存在于中国以外：MDN 的 `l10n.sourceCommit` front-matter 指纹、Vue 的 Ryu-Cho action（监视上游 commit，为陈旧译文自动开 issue/PR）、Kubernetes 的本地化漂移脚本、微软 Azure co-op-translator（CI 中由源 hash 驱动的 LLM 重译）。本设计将两者结合：中文生态的文件布局，加上 hash 配对门禁，再加一个由 agent 运行的工作流替代 bot 服务。\n\n## 后果\n\n- 修改已配对文档的任一侧，同一个 PR 就有义务更新对侧并重新记录配对。门禁将 doc-sync 规则双语化，不变式由 CI（而非评审者的记忆）承载。\n- 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。\n- 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。\n- 生成的英文文档仍由源码派生，并由各自的生成器实施新鲜度门禁。有经评审中文对侧的生成页面遵循三文件配对工作流，但有一项结构例外：生成的英文源文件不含语言切换行，因为添加该行会使生成器新鲜度检查失败；中文对侧仍链接回英文源。没有经评审对侧的生成页面保留为显式排除项，并在网站上投影英文。\n- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径，要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外，却看似已经强制执行。\n- 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具：[gen-translation-brief](2026-07-26-briefed-minimal-translation-updates.md) 会从中还原任一侧上次确认的文本并组装最小更新简报，因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。\n"
      },
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "---\nlayout: doc\n---\n\n# Snapshot note\n\nThe agent performs one step.\n"
      }
    ]
  },
  "response": {
    "translation": "---\nlayout: doc\n---\n\n# 快照说明\n\nagent（智能体）执行一个步骤。",
    "review": "- 无修正",
    "final": "---\nlayout: doc\n---\n\n# 快照说明\n\n[English](snapshot-note.md) | 中文\n\nagent（智能体）执行一个步骤。\n"
  }
}