Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/feat/windows-pwsh-default' into feat/windows-acl-sandbox

# Conflicts: # apps/cli/reference/README.i18n.yaml # knip.json # packages/sandbox/sandbox-local/package.json # pnpm-lock.yaml # scripts/check-workspace-constraints.ts
2026-08-08 17:50:39 +08:00
parent 07c7e2f0bd d1b080a68d
commit cc64c729db
841 changed files with 13282 additions and 5966 deletions
@@ -376,6 +376,9 @@
    "simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.i18n.yaml": "sha256:531c446f0e95054f8ced17be9a180f8b0a823f7e9d5ce466c94c2f9cff90a111",
    "simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md": "sha256:a35a6372aabdf7cbc211f1bd5820d85d3467c9ed50f84e05caa3339382379ce7",
    "simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.zh.md": "sha256:a6ed9530289a783c3d7a1ddb038fba6b7daf7feb773298a57e811791e354d438",
+    "simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.i18n.yaml": "sha256:5466161f3fb8f2e8117fe8ff242675cc9fe9ef264d1e29b9bc586891c73c051a",
+    "simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md": "sha256:f23accae7d05c2e75cb73ec69b492307f1ce7526ecfa9f6b12a621e02fd1a0c3",
+    "simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md": "sha256:a32d2c6ecf748a16a2c35b59cd2da2fda75769e3ab24be6a2e026d8655466db4",
    "testing/2026-06-20-remove-redundant-snapshot-log-expected-output.i18n.yaml": "sha256:4177012c0821a8c22499852ecdf096af56d7263cb91c5d9d1bcd552cc26a3e00",
    "testing/2026-06-20-remove-redundant-snapshot-log-expected-output.md": "sha256:45234e7cc04b6010c6141f8d5924c04547300098f96262d423c50108e7c7011a",
    "testing/2026-06-20-remove-redundant-snapshot-log-expected-output.zh.md": "sha256:15e5a4ad3dee0bb711480cabe45cd97ec37bbdba19c2c2b47d1e9c203b07a48b",
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md
-2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md: e0d1e954d9cef472ea59345a3d2ef5a67bd03ae8
-2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md: b5b464e3b45a6f3909bbf087f7005ad3f819424a
+2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md: 4474e786b3a99ff0ee81ac54fcb6eb5aaff5ee04
+2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md: 11b7b27c7560aaa43a9fdcfb12a9a17f9433e619
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 # Agent Note: Explicit-config dsh entrypoint

 Status: implemented
+Archived: 2026-08-08

 English | [中文](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md)

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-# Agent Note：显式配置的 dsh 入口
+# Agent Note: 显式配置的 dsh 入口

 Status: implemented
+Archived: 2026-08-08

 [English](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) | 中文

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md
-2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md: 66b73b60ceec9497f1f1226747b8cebd831eb426
-2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md: 424ce6ec7384e8af7b979a29f58c31379a1d1850
+2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md: 12131ebf8380fb8ba816618f0cbaf72cb004623a
+2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.zh.md: a11926b602651d8a7dc641f61371e882685b508b
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Extract a backend-agnostic `PersistenceCoordinator` into `dsh-session-persistenc

 Composition, not inheritance. The coordinator is a concrete class the backend holds, not a base class the backend extends. The Agent Note's risk — "a coordinator must not make unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy" — is avoided: a backend exposes only the hooks and cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state. A third-party backend MAY still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator, including immutable logical inspection and the default preparation fallback through `load`.

-The coordinator holds one controller for each exact live `Session`; the controller combines initialization, pending events, and the shared flush promise. Each `session/event` starts an eager drain, and `session/flush` observes quiescence rather than initiating the ordinary write path. The [flush-controller simplification](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md) owns this lifecycle.
+The coordinator holds one lifecycle entry for each exact live `Session`: initialization plus a package-private write controller that owns pending events, a fixed batching deadline, the active write, failure retention, and the shared flush barrier. Each `session/event` enters that bounded write path, and `session/flush` bypasses the wait to observe quiescence. The [flush-controller simplification](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md) owns controller consolidation; the [bounded batching decision](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md) owns scheduling cadence.

 The coordinator retires a session from `session/disposed`: it waits for the controller's initialization and current flush, serializes a final drain, and removes the controller and owned per-id state only after success. A failure leaves the controller discoverable for backend teardown to retry. Settled per-id chain tails remove themselves only when they are still current, so a completion cannot erase a newer operation for the same id. Backend teardown unregisters write-path listeners, flushes every remaining controller, awaits per-id operations, and then closes the backend.

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The single design choice that keeps the seam clean: the crash-repair "where is t

 ## Testing

-The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) runs for every backend and proves that `inspect` balances an interrupted logical view without changing storage or revisions before `prepare` or `load` commits recovery. `runCoordinatorContract` (`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`) covers adoption, HMR, collision, session and backend disposal drains, and crash-tail repair through an in-memory reference, JSONL, and SQLite. `persistence.spec.ts` and `preparations.spec.ts` cover preparation reuse and reservation, bounded prepared-state eviction, eager follow-up batches, live-controller cleanup, same-id chain-tail races, failed-drain retry, and close ordering. The per-backend specs retain storage mechanics only. A through-coordinator torn-tail repair test per real backend keeps the opaque-marker branch covered because the contract crash case produces synthetic closers without a torn marker.
+The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) runs for every backend and proves that `inspect` balances an interrupted logical view without changing storage or revisions before `prepare` or `load` commits recovery. `runCoordinatorContract` (`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`) covers adoption, HMR, collision, session and backend disposal drains, and crash-tail repair through an in-memory reference, JSONL, and SQLite. `persistence.spec.ts`, `preparations.spec.ts`, and `write-behind.spec.ts` cover preparation reuse and reservation, bounded prepared-state eviction, fixed-window follow-up batches, live-controller cleanup, same-id chain-tail races, failed-batch retry, and close ordering. The per-backend specs retain storage mechanics only. A through-coordinator torn-tail repair test per real backend keeps the opaque-marker branch covered because the contract crash case produces synthetic closers without a torn marker.

 ## Alternatives considered

@@ -44,4 +44,4 @@ The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) runs for every backend

 ## Consequences

-The coordinator adds one indirection, an opaque torn marker, detached session-retirement tasks, and bounded prepared Session state, but centralizes correctness-heavy orchestration previously duplicated by every backend. Session disposal remains an observe-only event, so the session owner does not await persistence retirement; the coordinator contains failures, preserves pending events in the live controller, and makes backend teardown the quiescence boundary. Its hook surface stays narrow: identity, adoption, collision checks, preparation, and immutable inspection reuse `loadStored`; materialization stays atomic inside `appendBatch`; and listing bypasses the coordinator. Read models use `inspect` rather than `load`, so observing a persisted open turn does not commit interruption closers; the [Session preparation decision](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md) owns reuse, reservation, and publication. New backends implement storage primitives rather than copy the eager write lifecycle.
+The coordinator adds one indirection, an opaque torn marker, detached session-retirement tasks, and bounded prepared Session state, but centralizes correctness-heavy orchestration previously duplicated by every backend. Session disposal remains an observe-only event, so the session owner does not await persistence retirement; the coordinator contains failures, preserves pending events in the live controller, and makes backend teardown the quiescence boundary. Its hook surface stays narrow: identity, adoption, collision checks, preparation, and immutable inspection reuse `loadStored`; materialization stays atomic inside `appendBatch`; and listing bypasses the coordinator. Read models use `inspect` rather than `load`, so observing a persisted open turn does not commit interruption closers; the [Session preparation decision](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md) owns reuse, reservation, and publication. New backends implement storage primitives rather than copy the bounded write lifecycle.
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented

 组合，而非继承。协调器是后端持有的具体类，不是后端继承的基类。本 Agent Note 的风险——「协调器不得让非常规后端与继承层级作斗争」——由此规避：后端只暴露钩子，无法触及协调器的私有编排状态。第三方后端仍然可以完全不使用协调器、直接实现抽象服务，包括不可变逻辑检查，以及通过 `load` 实现的默认准备回退。

-协调器为每个存活的 `Session` 实例持有一个控制器；该控制器统合初始化、待处理事件与共享 flush promise。每个 `session/event` 都会立即启动排空，而 `session/flush` 只观察完全停稳，不会发起常规写入路径。[flush 控制器简化](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md)定义该生命周期。
+协调器为每个存活的 `Session` 实例持有一个生命周期条目：初始化，加上一个包私有写入控制器，后者负责待处理事件、固定批处理截止时间、活跃写入、失败保留和共享 flush 屏障。每个 `session/event` 都进入这条有界写入路径，`session/flush` 则绕过等待以观察完全停稳。控制器归并由 [flush 控制器简化](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md)定义；调度节奏由[有界批处理决策](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md)定义。

 协调器通过 `session/disposed` 退役会话：它等待控制器完成初始化和当前 flush，串行执行最后一次排空，且仅在成功后才移除控制器与其拥有的每 id 状态。失败时保持控制器可被找到，以供后端 teardown（拆除）重试。每个 id 的已结算链尾仅在其仍是当前链尾时才移除自身，因此旧操作完成后不会抹除同一 id 的新操作。后端 teardown 会注销写入路径监听器、flush 每个剩余的控制器、等待所有按 id 串行化的操作，最后关闭后端。

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 测试

-共享的 `runPersistenceContract`（公开 API 契约）为每个后端运行，并证明 `inspect` 会配平被中断的逻辑视图但不改变存储或修订版本，随后由 `prepare` 或 `load` 提交恢复。`runCoordinatorContract`（`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`）通过内存参考实现、JSONL 与 SQLite 覆盖接管、HMR、碰撞、会话与后端 dispose 排空和崩溃尾部修复。`persistence.spec.ts` 与 `preparations.spec.ts` 覆盖准备复用与预留、有界准备状态淘汰、立即执行的后续批次、存活控制器清理、同 id 链尾竞态、排空失败重试与关闭顺序。各后端自身的测试规格只保留存储机制。每个真实后端都有一个经由协调器的崩溃尾部修复测试，以覆盖不透明 marker 分支，因为契约中的崩溃用例会产生合成 closers，却不会产生 torn marker。
+共享的 `runPersistenceContract`（公开 API 契约）为每个后端运行，并证明 `inspect` 会配平被中断的逻辑视图但不改变存储或修订版本，随后由 `prepare` 或 `load` 提交恢复。`runCoordinatorContract`（`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`）通过内存参考实现、JSONL 与 SQLite 覆盖接管、HMR、碰撞、会话与后端 dispose 排空和崩溃尾部修复。`persistence.spec.ts`、`preparations.spec.ts` 与 `write-behind.spec.ts` 覆盖准备复用与预留、有界准备状态淘汰、固定窗口后续批次、存活控制器清理、同 id 链尾竞态、失败批次重试与关闭顺序。各后端自身的测试规格只保留存储机制。每个真实后端都有一个经由协调器的崩溃尾部修复测试，以覆盖不透明 marker 分支，因为契约中的崩溃用例会产生合成 closers，却不会产生 torn marker。

 ## 曾考虑的替代方案

@@ -44,4 +44,4 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 后果

-协调器增加了一层间接、一个不透明的 torn marker、脱离会话生命周期的退役任务，以及有界的已准备 Session 状态，但将此前每个后端重复的、对正确性要求很高的编排逻辑集中到一处。会话 dispose 仍是仅观察事件，因此会话所有者不会等待持久化退役；协调器会收容失败、在存活控制器中保留待处理事件，并以后端 teardown 为完全停稳边界。其钩子面保持窄小：标识校验、接管、碰撞检查、准备与不可变检查共用 `loadStored`；物化保持在 `appendBatch` 内原子完成；列举绕过协调器。读模型使用 `inspect` 而非 `load`，因此观察已持久化但仍开放的轮次时不会提交中断 closers；复用、预留与发布由 [Session 准备阶段决策](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md)定义。新后端只需实现存储原语，而无需复制立即写入生命周期。
+协调器增加了一层间接、一个不透明的 torn marker、脱离会话生命周期的退役任务，以及有界的已准备 Session 状态，但将此前每个后端重复的、对正确性要求很高的编排逻辑集中到一处。会话 dispose 仍是仅观察事件，因此会话所有者不会等待持久化退役；协调器会收容失败、在存活控制器中保留待处理事件，并以后端 teardown 为完全停稳边界。其钩子面保持窄小：标识校验、接管、碰撞检查、准备与不可变检查共用 `loadStored`；物化保持在 `appendBatch` 内原子完成；列举绕过协调器。读模型使用 `inspect` 而非 `load`，因此观察已持久化但仍开放的轮次时不会提交中断 closers；复用、预留与发布由 [Session 准备阶段决策](2026-08-05-session-preparation.md)定义。新后端只需实现存储原语，而无需复制有界写入生命周期。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md
-2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: a8ffe91c431cdc7907626bbc3eaf8096035777de
-2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: ac4affce583d5d81253f320ff022f670d4d66cc8
+2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: ad9d65805c8f0c96bd811b5036310d019760627e
+2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: 3021c7fcca00f2e929d997625c303f9a27dbf673
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The provider-neutral identity is owned by `dsh-llm` (`packages/llm/llm/src/attri

 - product token for `User-Agent`: `deepseek-harness` (continuity with the pre-Agent Note wire value and the repo/org identity)
 - version: read from the owning package's manifest via `createRequire`, never a hand-copied constant
- app URL: `https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` - the planned public home; a `FIXME` in `attribution.ts` blocks release until that repository actually exists
+- app URL: `https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` - the planned public home, which must exist before release

 The default is mandatory and non-empty. White-label deployments pass their own `AppIdentity` to `attributionHeaders(identity)` - the override seam is the function parameter, with no deployment config plumbing until a consumer needs it - and omission falls back to the harness default rather than suppressing attribution. There is no per-request API for the model, user prompt, session id, cwd, user email, API key owner, or local machine identity to influence these fields.

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The landed contract:

 **Providers see that traffic comes from the harness.** That is the point, but it means deployments that previously blended into generic SDK traffic become identifiable. Mitigation: send only static public product data and let forks/white-label deployments pass their own `AppIdentity`.

-**The app URL points at a repository that does not exist yet.** `deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` is the planned public home; until it is created the URL is a dangling promise. The `FIXME` marker on the constant blocks a release from shipping with it unresolved (see `docs/development.md` marker semantics).
+**The app URL points at a repository that does not exist yet.** `deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` is the planned public home; until it is created the URL is a dangling promise that blocks release.

 **Header support differs by client library.** The hand-rolled adapter sets headers directly; the pi-ai-backed adapter depends on pi-ai continuing to honor `StreamOptions.headers` (merged last over provider defaults). The wire-level mock-server tests are the guard: if a pi-ai upgrade stops delivering the header, the suite goes red. This is useful pressure on the abstraction: a provider adapter that cannot set mandatory headers cannot fully implement the harness LLM contract.

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这

 - `User-Agent` 的产品 token：`deepseek-harness`（与 Agent Note 之前的线路值及仓库/组织身份保持连续性）
 - 版本：通过 `createRequire` 从所属包的 manifest（元数据清单）读取，绝不手动复制常量
- 应用 URL：`https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk`——计划中的公开主页；`attribution.ts` 中的 `FIXME` 标记在该仓库实际存在之前阻塞发布
+- 应用 URL：`https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk`——计划中的公开主页，且必须在发布前实际存在

 默认值是强制的且非空。白标部署通过向 `attributionHeaders(identity)` 传入自己的 `AppIdentity` 来覆盖——覆盖 seam 就是函数参数，在有消费方需要之前不做部署配置管道——省略时回退到 harness 默认值而非抑制归属。没有逐请求 API 允许模型、用户提示词、会话 id、cwd、用户邮箱、API key 所有者或本地机器身份影响这些字段。

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这

 **提供方看到流量来自 harness。** 这正是目的，但意味着此前混在通用 SDK 流量中的部署变得可识别。缓解措施：仅发送静态公开产品数据，并允许 fork/白标部署传入自己的 `AppIdentity`。

-**应用 URL 指向一个尚不存在的仓库。** `deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` 是计划中的公开主页；在它创建之前，该 URL 是一个悬空承诺。常量上的 `FIXME` 标记阻塞发布，不允许带着未解决的问题出门（见 `docs/development.md` 标记语义）。
+**应用 URL 指向一个尚不存在的仓库。** `deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness-sdk` 是计划中的公开主页；在它创建之前，该 URL 是一个阻塞发布的悬空承诺。

 **不同客户端库的头部支持有差异。** 手写适配器直接设置头部；基于 pi-ai 的适配器依赖 pi-ai 继续尊重 `StreamOptions.headers`（最后合并覆盖提供方默认值）。线路级 mock 服务器测试是守卫：如果 pi-ai 升级后不再投递该头部，套件会变红。这对抽象施加了有益的压力：一个无法设置强制头部的提供方适配器不能完整实现 harness 的 LLM 契约。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md
-2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: d82141f519bff66df000f1316093aacd38b8e42b
-2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: e145908e019e71765a475b0ca9d22414e9b42d23
+2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: 67607b2848305439513503d7e03ad5e2a2e4020a
+2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: 9cbab75ce87f6d313ca4b6ac8dda043733361f0d
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A tool declares how its calls render in a UI (an editor's tool-call card) throug
 - Which combinations are *valid* is unwritten: a `terminal` call that also sets `content` means "description above the card"; a generic call that sets `terminal` is meaningless but representable. The type permits nonsense.
 - There is no way to express the one file-tool affordance an editor most wants — a **diff card** (`{path, oldText, newText}`, which Zed renders as an inline diff / new-file preview). `ToolCallPresentation.content` is the *LLM* `ContentBlock[]` vocabulary (text/image), so a tool literally cannot ask for a diff.

-The existing `FIXME(tool-presentation)` in `packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` named the fix: "redesign the type so a tool declares its render INTENT once (e.g. a tagged union over card kinds) rather than a bag of optional fields the bridge stitches together." An earlier rejected collapse-tool-owned-presentation proposal deferred it explicitly: rich rendering "should return later as a tagged render-intent union after there are at least two real tools and two real consumers to validate the vocabulary." That bar is met by multiple producer families plus the TUI and host/client-runtime (Web) consumers.
+An earlier rejected collapse-tool-owned-presentation proposal deferred rich rendering until it could "return later as a tagged render-intent union after there are at least two real tools and two real consumers to validate the vocabulary." That bar is met by multiple producer families plus the TUI and host/client-runtime (Web) consumers.

 ## Decision

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
 - 哪些组合是*合法的*没有文档说明：一个设置了 `content` 的 `terminal` 调用意味着「卡片上方的描述」；一个设置了 `terminal` 的 generic 调用毫无意义但类型上可表达。类型允许无意义的状态存在。
 - 无法表达编辑器最需要的文件工具能力：**diff 卡片**（`{path, oldText, newText}`，Zed 将其渲染为内联 diff / 新文件预览）。`ToolCallPresentation.content` 使用的是 *LLM（大语言模型）* 的 `ContentBlock[]` 词汇（text/image），工具根本无法请求 diff 展示。

-`packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` 中已有的 `FIXME(tool-presentation)` 指出了修复方向：「重新设计类型，让工具一次性声明其渲染意图（例如按卡片种类的带标签联合类型），而非一堆由 bridge 拼接的可选字段。」一个早先被否决的折叠工具自有呈现提案明确推迟了此事：富渲染「应当在至少有两个真实工具和两个真实消费方验证词汇之后，以带标签 render-intent 联合类型的形式回归。」该条件已由多个生产者族，加上 TUI 与宿主/客户端运行时（Web）这些消费方满足。
+一个早先被否决的折叠工具自有呈现提案把富渲染推迟到它能够「在至少有两个真实工具和两个真实消费方验证词汇之后，以带标签 render-intent 联合类型的形式回归」之时。该条件已由多个生产者族，加上 TUI 与宿主/客户端运行时（Web）这些消费方满足。

 ## 决策

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md
-2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md: 94f5fa409e7b539b48750d12576c7a342a30c9ba
-2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.zh.md: 341b3a89f423c9cc7d2fc56f1ea25a1985680d0d
+2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md: a3b5021daf323971308760bde4f97651db8edbda
+2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.zh.md: 490d41302ea4f4e14e11e301acbf47170f95cace
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The assembled system prompt had four defects, all of one family: facts the harne

 **The model could not know its own name.** `AgentOptions.model` drives every request, but no prompt text carried it — and nothing COULD carry it: sections in `dsh-system-prompt` were context-global while the model name is per-agent, and `assemble()` took no per-agent input at all.

-**Tool guidance was hand-written prose in leaf YAML.** The bash/subagent/todo_write usage guidance lived in the coding-agent and ACP persona strings — two drifting copies (the ACP one was already abridged) — while `dsh-tool-fs` and `dsh-tool-web` owned their guidance as `ctx.systemPrompt.section()` contributions. Loading or dropping a tool plugin meant editing every deployment's persona by hand; both YAMLs carried a `FIXME(config-comments)` apologizing for a symptom of the split, and the old terminal welcome banner hand-enumerated the tool set too.
+**Tool guidance was hand-written prose in leaf YAML.** The bash/subagent/todo_write usage guidance lived in the coding-agent and ACP persona strings — two drifting copies (the ACP one was already abridged) — while `dsh-tool-fs` and `dsh-tool-web` owned their guidance as `ctx.systemPrompt.section()` contributions. Loading or dropping a tool plugin meant editing every deployment's persona by hand, and the old terminal welcome banner hand-enumerated the tool set too.

 **The persona rendered after tool guidance.** The loop string-joined `agent.options.systemPrompt` AFTER the assembled sections, so the model read "Use the read tool…" before "You are a coding agent" — backwards relative to the identity-first convention (Claude Code, Codex) and a second composition path besides the section pipeline.

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented

 **模型无法知道自己的名字。** `AgentOptions.model` 驱动每个请求，但没有任何提示词文本携带它——也不可能携带：`dsh-system-prompt` 中的 section 是上下文全局的，而模型名称是 per-agent 的，`assemble()` 根本不接受任何 per-agent 输入。

-**工具指导是 leaf YAML 中的手写行文。** bash/subagent/todo_write 的使用指导存放在 coding-agent 和 ACP persona 字符串里——两份漂移的副本（ACP 那份已经被删减）——而 `dsh-tool-fs` 和 `dsh-tool-web` 则通过 `ctx.systemPrompt.section()` 贡献各自的指导。加载或卸载一个工具插件意味着手动编辑每个部署的 persona；两份 YAML 都带着一条 `FIXME(config-comments)` 为这种分裂的症状道歉，旧终端欢迎横幅也手动枚举了工具集。
+**工具指导是 leaf YAML 中的手写行文。** bash/subagent/todo_write 的使用指导存放在 coding-agent 和 ACP persona 字符串里——两份漂移的副本（ACP 那份已经被删减）——而 `dsh-tool-fs` 和 `dsh-tool-web` 则通过 `ctx.systemPrompt.section()` 贡献各自的指导。加载或卸载一个工具插件意味着手动编辑每个部署的 persona，旧终端欢迎横幅也手动枚举了工具集。

 **Persona 渲染在工具指导之后。** agent loop（智能体循环）将 `agent.options.systemPrompt` 字符串拼接在已组装的 section 之后，于是模型先读到「Use the read tool…」再读到「You are a coding agent」——与 identity-first 约定（Claude Code、Codex）相反，且是 section 流水线之外的第二条组合路径。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md
-2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md: 2f559a3052b9fb84f788975a64799e4f020b0d3e
-2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.zh.md: 26abdc024a166856e51ebf09f086c7868fc8236d
+2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md: ebca9b99cad791159302da9c2bbce9f4df147aab
+2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.zh.md: 91ef3fd04502f2c2f092da60a8bd909cf7fa25df
@@ -53,4 +53,3 @@ Like MiniCode, the conversation advances append-only and resets only when model-
 - Tool-result trimming (planned) needs no new mechanism: a logged single-entry surface replace (`start === end`) carrying a trimmed `tool/result` under the same `callId` — compaction-family, replay-correct, cache-bust batched by the same pressure logic.
 - Session logs grow one `request/header` snapshot per loop instance plus snapshots on real changes. This is larger than a delta codec but small beside chunk-heavy logs and retains one replay representation. `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` stays `0`; legacy delta events are rejected rather than migrated.
 - Snapshot expected outputs changed once (every transcript gains its header events); the fs-writing fixtures are stored in the normalized authored form with cwd-relative tool arguments, because replay only round-trips cwd-independent argument paths.
- FIXME(call-config-shape): revisit `LlmCallConfig`'s exact field set — which fields are genuinely epoch-level for cache purposes (`model` certainly; the sampling scalars sit there out of caution), and where provider-specific extras (reasoning options, extra body params) belong when an adapter needs them.
@@ -53,4 +53,3 @@ Status: implemented
 - 工具结果裁剪（计划中）无需新机制：一个已记录的单条目 surface replace（`start === end`），携带同一 `callId` 下裁剪后的 `tool/result`——属压缩家族，回放正确，缓存击穿由相同的压力逻辑批量处理。
 - 会话日志每个循环实例增长一个 `request/header` 快照，并在真正变更时增加快照。它比 delta 编解码器更大，但相对分片密集型日志仍然很小，并只保留一种回放表示。`SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` 保持 `0`；旧的 delta 事件被拒绝而非迁移。
 - 快照预期输出变更一次（每个 transcript（文本记录）增加其 header 事件）；写入文件系统的 fixture（测试前置数据）以规范化的撰写形式存储，工具参数使用 cwd 相对路径，因为回放只对 cwd 无关的参数路径做往返。
- FIXME(call-config-shape)：重新审视 `LlmCallConfig` 的确切字段集——哪些字段对缓存而言真正属于 epoch 级别（`model` 毫无疑问；采样标量出于谨慎放在那里），以及当适配器需要时，提供方特定的额外项（推理（reasoning）选项、额外 body 参数）应归属何处。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md
-2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 34077302c53081f6ee9171d64dce9af342710d71
-2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: bc51542ac8159ee7cba234b4ee8b4db47a7f9b58
+2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 8e020e4fe9b60100671c0cf0e98e28532d850f94
+2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 55fa8084083aa83fbb4a38f8e41d2e5624b6e58e
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md)

 We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product UI shapes are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call these shapes Clients, uniformly, and want the following capabilities:

- One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh -p` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
+- One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh run` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
 - Launching inside Electron with the same Web technology shape as `dsh web`

 That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future client shapes plug in cleanly.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Directories layer as follows:
    - **Fetch-arrival plugin packages** (`ui-layout`, `ui-sidebar`, `ui-conversation`, `ui-trajectory`): dual-entry — the root index is the node half (an empty `apply`, existing so the host Loader governs lifecycle and the web plugin registry discovers the package.json `dshClient` declaration); the implementation lives under `src/client/`, shipped as the `./client` subpath (a tsdown closure-factory bundle). Cross-plugin consumption of `/client` is type-only; value cooperation goes through cordis services.
 - `apps/` holds the externally exported application shapes, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
    - `apps/web` (`dsh-frontend`) is the vite application: a thin `main.ts` over the shell surface exported by `dsh-client-web`.
-    - `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches shapes: `dsh web` = startHost + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh -p` = headless in-process calls, zero HTTP.
+    - `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches shapes: `dsh web` = startHost + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = headless in-process calls, zero HTTP.
    - A future Electron shape reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.

 ```
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation

 | Subclass | Package | doFetch | Purpose |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing — `dsh -p` headless is the protocol's second real consumer |
+| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing — `dsh run` headless is the protocol's second real consumer |
 | `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser shape; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
 | `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | unused (protocol-layer override) | serverless UI development (`?fixture`): overrides the `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` virtuals and is itself the fake server (frame rpcIds minted by it, semantics self-consistent) |
 | (future) IPC bridge subclass | apps/electron | IPC serialization round trip | swaps only doFetch; contract and base class unchanged |
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Status: implemented
 ## Problem

 需要提供 UI 对接层，除已有 ACP/stdio基础版本外，还需要 Web(server) 、 Electron 、等其他产品 UI 形态。我们把这些形态统一称为 Client。希望有如下能力支持:
- 以 `dsh` 进程，同时支持 `dsh web`(启动) 和 `dsh -p`(headless) ，一个进程两种模式（设计预留）
+- 以 `dsh` 进程，同时支持 `dsh web`(启动) 和 `dsh run`(headless) ，一个进程两种模式（设计预留）
 - 以与 `dsh web` 同构的 Web 技术形态，在 Electron 中启动

 那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型，便于以后接入各类 client 形态。
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Status: implemented
    - **fetch 到达插件包**（`ui-layout`、`ui-sidebar`、`ui-conversation`、`ui-trajectory`）：双入口——根入口是 node 半边（空 `apply`，其存在是为了让 host Loader 管辖生命周期、让 web 插件注册表发现 package.json 的 `dshClient` 声明）；实现住在 `src/client/` 下，经 `./client` 子路径发布（tsdown 闭包工厂 bundle）。跨插件消费 `/client` 只限类型；值层面的协作走 cordis 服务。
 - `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用形态入口，可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
    - `apps/web`（`dsh-frontend`）是 vite 应用：`dsh-client-web` 导出的壳表面之上的一层薄 `main.ts`。
-    - `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）做形态分发：`dsh web` = startHost + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh -p` = headless 进程内直调，零 HTTP。
+    - `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）做形态分发：`dsh web` = startHost + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh run` = headless 进程内直调，零 HTTP。
    - 将来的 Electron 形态经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。

 ```
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =

 | 子类 | 所在包 | doFetch | 用途 |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**：`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧——`dsh -p` headless 即协议第二真实消费者 |
+| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**：`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧——`dsh run` headless 即协议第二真实消费者 |
 | `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器形态；物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
 | `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | 不用（协议层覆写） | 无 server 的 UI 开发（`?fixture`）：覆写 `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` 虚方法，自己就是假 server（帧 rpcId 由它 mint，语义自洽） |
 | （将来）IPC 桥子类 | apps/electron | IPC 序列化往返 | 仅换 doFetch，契约/基类零改 |
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md
-2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md: 1a91d88818c374a1637b546fb3ddf6647af68570
-2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.zh.md: 5c0bacde9836d45812895f5d9c89a0e8974ed7a1
+2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md: cba029ea74e89b277f9079ebb3765deeeb105b47
+2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.zh.md: f700cc04fe1479d43957456c14b3abb4014d99c5
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Implementation homes: registry core and the props-share types in `packages/clien

 A service is a plugin's only API surface toward other plugins (UI components and injection faces are not APIs; a plugin nobody calls mounts no service — ui-trajectory is the minimal-plugin exemplar: no ctx service, only view-slot registrations). The roster: `ctx.connection` (api client + stream handles), `ctx.slots` (registry wrapper emitting `slots/changed`, render entry, renderer install seam), `ctx.sessions` (list store, current-session state, scope tree), `ctx.loader`, `ctx.theme`, `ctx.i18n`, `ctx.layout` (cross-plugin view navigation), `ctx.conversation` (send/cancel/startSession). Viewing state that used to live in service stores (panel widths, selection, drafts) now lives in entry-declared stores per the [slot system standard](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md).

-There is no registration model besides slots — the former view and tool rings both dissolved into it. Conversation views are entries of the `'conversation.view'` list slot ui-conversation declares, tab metadata rides the registration options (`id`/`order`/`label`), and per-view chrome lives inside the view components themselves. A tool row is a keyed child slot each view declares for itself — today `'conversation.chat.toolview'` (keyed/session), declared by the chat entry's `children` table; the key space is runtime-open (SlotMap declares slots, never keys), which is what the tool ring's open tool-name set required. The render site dispatches per row via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site `fallback`; the owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`), and `ToolRowProps` composes it with the session standard kit for registrant components. Registrants are plain plugins with zero dedicated machinery: `ctx.slots.inject('conversation.chat.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))`; the declaration is the load and reload dependency, independently from `ConversationService` ([decision](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)). Interaction drafts and other row state ride the ordinary store seat. Trajectory/waterfall get same-shaped slots (names fixed by the slot-naming discipline `<domain>.<entry>.<hole>`, one shared owner type) that land with their own row render sites — RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders, so the two slots cannot be declared early.
+There is no registration model besides slots — the former view and tool rings both dissolved into it. Conversation views are entries of the `'conversation.view'` list slot ui-conversation declares, tab metadata rides the registration options (`id`/`order`/`label`), and per-view chrome lives inside the view components themselves. Tool presentation crosses one explicit package boundary: ui-conversation places each ordered root call into the single `'conversation.chat.tool'` seat without interpreting Tool names or Code Dispatch topology; ui-tool selects `codeDispatches[rootCallId]` from the Runtime snapshot, renders that root/child shape, and declares the keyed/session `'tool.call.toolview'` child slot. The key space stays runtime-open (SlotMap declares slots, never keys), and both roots and children dispatch by `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the fallback. Business packages register atomic views through `ctx.slots.inject('tool.call.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'tool.call.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))`; the declaration is the load and reload dependency ([decision](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)). ui-conversation separately delegates the selected call's details body through `'conversation.details.tool'`, so ui-tool's card models remain the single presentation owner without making conversation import Tool components.

 **Scope addressing** mirrors the host's agent-scope idiom: services are root singletons whose methods take no sessionId — they read the caller's scope mark (`scopeOf(ctx)`). Inside a session scope, `ctx.conversation.send('hi', 'queue')` targets that session; cross-session calls re-target by switching ctx (`ctx.sessions.scope(id)!.conversation.send(...)`); calling a scoped method from root ctx throws. Client session scopes are minted like host agent scopes (a no-op plugin fiber + a scope-key extend), built lazily on first viewing and torn down only when the session is removed and unwatched — host-session death alone does not tear a scope (it freezes into a read-only viewport).

@@ -86,22 +86,24 @@ The glue package is the whole ctx↔React boundary; components stay framework-fr

 ## Directory shape

-Twelve `packages/client/*` packages (ui-slots, ui-primitives, web-react, connection, runtime, ui-layout, ui-sidebar, ui-conversation, ui-trajectory, ui-theme, i18n, web) plus `apps/web` — the vite application, a thin `main` over the shell's boot export. Plugin packages keep their browser half under `src/client/`; **every build artifact lands in `lib/`** — the node half as `lib/index.js`/`lib/invariant.js`, the browser bundle as `lib/client.js` (the shared tsdown client preset emits both; there is no `dist/` directory, and `exports["./client"]` points at `./lib/client.js`). Dependency direction: `ui-slots ← web-react ← runtime ← ui-* (peers) ← web`, with ui-primitives/ui-theme/i18n as zero-dependency side paths.
+Client packages live under `packages/client/*`, with `apps/web` as the thin Vite application over the shell's boot export. Plugin packages keep their browser half under `src/client/`; **every build artifact lands in `lib/`** — the node half as `lib/index.js`/`lib/invariant.js`, the browser bundle as `lib/client.js` (the shared tsdown client preset emits both; there is no `dist/` directory, and `exports["./client"]` points at `./lib/client.js`). `ui-slots`, web-react, and runtime form the infrastructure direction; feature plugins cooperate through services and slots rather than importing presentation implementations.

 A multi-domain plugin package additionally splits its client half by future package boundaries — ui-conversation is the exemplar:

 ```
 src/client/
-  contract/    the only shared face between domains (types + composed props shares)
-  service.ts   cross-domain orchestration (imports contract only)
-  skeleton/    domain: shell components (ConversationRoot/InputBar/EmptyState/DetailsPanel)
-  chat/        domain: the chat view
-  toolviews/   domain: sample tool-row registrants (third-party posture)
-  apply.ts     the ONLY file allowed to import across domains (assembly point)
-  index.ts     thin re-export shell (contract + apply + components)
+  contract/    shared slot and cross-domain types
+  service.ts   cross-domain orchestration
+  skeleton/    conversation shell and details host
+  chat/        ordered conversation view
+  input/       composer state machine
+  queue/       queued-message presentation
+  settings/    conversation settings rows
+  apply.ts     cross-domain assembly point
+  index.ts     public contract surface
 ```

-Domain implementation files never import a sibling domain — shared surfaces route through `contract/` (e.g. the toolviews samples take `ToolRowProps` from the contract, never chat internals). `scripts/verify-client-domain-graph.ts` enforces the layering (contract=0, domains=1, apply/index=2; imports may only point at levels ≤ own; sibling-domain edges fail). A future package split promotes each domain directory to a package and mechanically rewrites import paths.
+Domain implementation files never import a sibling domain; shared surfaces route through `contract/`. `scripts/verify-client-domain-graph.ts` enforces the layering (contract=0, domains=1, apply/index=2; imports may only point at levels ≤ own; sibling-domain edges fail). Tool presentation is already a separate `ui-tool` package and reaches chat and details only through the slots ui-conversation declares.

 ## How to develop

@@ -122,5 +124,5 @@ Token streams no longer shake the render tree: a frame storm costs unsubscribed
 | One statically-linked SPA bundle | Plugins must be host-composable at runtime (config-driven); a monolith re-couples every UI feature to one build |
 | window globals / import maps for shared deps | The DI require table keeps sharing explicit, fail-loud, and swappable; globals leak identity and version silently |
 | Business data in zustand slices | The event window/accumulator is a behavioral state machine, not a flat slice; the object layer keeps snapshot granularity and batching controllable |
-| String-keyed global component registry for tool rows | Per-view keyed child slots plus in-component session branching carry the same need with the one registration model; a parallel registry does not come back ([toolview dissolution](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md)) |
+| Parallel string-keyed component registry for Tool rows | ui-tool's keyed child slot carries the runtime-open Tool-name set through the one slot registration model ([toolview dissolution](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md)) |
 | Progressive/Suspense boot in P-I | One-flip boot is strictly simpler; the loader's per-plugin status face is kept so progressive lighting can land later without re-architecture |
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ slot 体系有自己的 RFC——[slot 体系标准](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-

 服务是插件对其他插件的唯一 API 面（UI 组件与注入面都不是 API；无人调用的插件不挂服务——ui-trajectory 即最小插件样板：无 ctx 服务，只做视图坑注册）。名册：`ctx.connection`（api client + 流句柄）、`ctx.slots`（注册表包装层，发 `slots/changed`，渲染入口，渲染器安装缝）、`ctx.sessions`（列表 store、当前会话状态、scope 树）、`ctx.loader`、`ctx.theme`、`ctx.i18n`、`ctx.layout`（跨插件视图导航）、`ctx.conversation`（send/cancel/startSession）。过去住在服务 store 里的观看态（面板宽、选中、草稿）现按 [slot 体系标准](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md) 住 entry 声明的 store。

-slot 之外不存在第二种注册模型——原视图环与工具环都已溶解进来。会话视图即 ui-conversation 声明的 `'conversation.view'` list 坑的 entry，tab 元数据随注册 options（`id`/`order`/`label`）走，per-view chrome 住视图组件自身。工具行是各视图自己声明的 keyed 子槽——今天是 `'conversation.chat.toolview'`（keyed/session），由 chat 条目的 `children` 表声明；key 空间运行时开放（SlotMap 声明槽、从不声明 key），这正是工具环「tool 名开放集」的原需求。渲染点逐行以 `entryKey: toolName` 分发、以 `GenericToolCard` 作调用点 `fallback`；owner 载荷是统一的 `ToolRowOwnerProps`（`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`），`ToolRowProps` 把它与 session 标配 kit 预组合供注册方组件取用。注册方就是普通插件、零专用设施：`ctx.slots.inject('conversation.chat.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))`；声明本身就是加载与重载依赖，不依赖 `ConversationService`（[决策](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)）。交互草稿等行内状态走普通 store 席位。trajectory/waterfall 得同形槽（槽名按槽名纪律 `<域>.<条目>.<孔位>` 已定死，共用一张 owner 类型），随各自的行渲染点落地——RendersCheck 拒绝无人渲染的声明，两槽无法提前声明。
+slot 之外不存在第二种注册模型——原视图环与工具环都已溶解进来。会话视图即 ui-conversation 声明的 `'conversation.view'` list 坑的 entry，tab 元数据随注册 options（`id`/`order`/`label`）走，per-view chrome 住视图组件自身。Tool 展示跨越一条显式包边界：ui-conversation 把每个已排序 root call 放进 single `'conversation.chat.tool'` seat，不解释 Tool 名称或 Code Dispatch 拓扑；ui-tool 从 Runtime snapshot 选择 `codeDispatches[rootCallId]`、渲染 root/child 形状，并声明 keyed/session 的 `'tool.call.toolview'` 子 slot。key 空间仍在运行时开放（SlotMap 声明 slot、从不声明 key），root 与 child 都按 `entryKey: toolName` 分发，以 `GenericToolCard` 兜底。业务包通过 `ctx.slots.inject('tool.call.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'tool.call.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))` 注册原子视图；声明本身就是加载与重载依赖（[决策](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)）。ui-conversation 还通过 `'conversation.details.tool'` 委托选中调用的详情正文，使 ui-tool 的 card model 保持为唯一展示所有者，同时避免 conversation 导入 Tool 组件。

 **scope 寻址**与 host 侧 agent scope 惯例同构：服务是 root 单例，方法不收 sessionId——它们读调用方 ctx 上的 scope 标（`scopeOf(ctx)`）。在会话 scope 内，`ctx.conversation.send('hi', 'queue')` 自动打到该会话；跨会话调用换 ctx 定向（`ctx.sessions.scope(id)!.conversation.send(...)`）；从 root ctx 直接调 scoped 方法即 throw。client 会话 scope 的铸造方式与 host agent scope 相同（no-op 插件 fiber + scope 键 extend），首次观看时惰性建，只有会话被移除且无人观看才拆——仅 host 会话死亡不拆 scope（冻结为只读视窗）。

@@ -86,22 +86,24 @@ Notifier 微任务合批 ──► ConversationSnapshot 缓存 ──uSES──

 ## 目录形态

-十二个 `packages/client/*` 包（ui-slots、ui-primitives、web-react、connection、runtime、ui-layout、ui-sidebar、ui-conversation、ui-trajectory、ui-theme、i18n、web）加 `apps/web`——vite 应用，壳 boot 导出之上的薄 `main`。插件包的浏览器半边在 `src/client/` 下；**一切构建产物落 `lib/`**——node 半边为 `lib/index.js`/`lib/invariant.js`，浏览器 bundle 为 `lib/client.js`（共享 tsdown client 预设两者皆出；无 `dist/` 目录，`exports["./client"]` 指向 `./lib/client.js`）。依赖方向：`ui-slots ← web-react ← runtime ← ui-*（并列）← web`，ui-primitives/ui-theme/i18n 为零依赖旁路。
+Client 包位于 `packages/client/*`，`apps/web` 是壳 boot 导出之上的薄 Vite 应用。插件包的浏览器半边在 `src/client/` 下；**一切构建产物落 `lib/`**——node 半边为 `lib/index.js`/`lib/invariant.js`，浏览器 bundle 为 `lib/client.js`（共享 tsdown client 预设两者皆出；无 `dist/` 目录，`exports["./client"]` 指向 `./lib/client.js`）。`ui-slots`、web-react 与 runtime 构成基础设施方向；功能插件通过 service 与 slot 协作，不导入展示实现。

 多域插件包的 client 半边还按未来包边界再拆——ui-conversation 即样板：

 ```
 src/client/
-  contract/    the only shared face between domains (types + composed props shares)
-  service.ts   cross-domain orchestration (imports contract only)
-  skeleton/    domain: shell components (ConversationRoot/InputBar/EmptyState/DetailsPanel)
-  chat/        domain: the chat view
-  toolviews/   domain: sample tool-row registrants (third-party posture)
-  apply.ts     the ONLY file allowed to import across domains (assembly point)
-  index.ts     thin re-export shell (contract + apply + components)
+  contract/    shared slot and cross-domain types
+  service.ts   cross-domain orchestration
+  skeleton/    conversation shell and details host
+  chat/        ordered conversation view
+  input/       composer state machine
+  queue/       queued-message presentation
+  settings/    conversation settings rows
+  apply.ts     cross-domain assembly point
+  index.ts     public contract surface
 ```

-域实现文件永不 import 兄弟域——共享面一律走 `contract/`（如 toolviews 样例从契约取 `ToolRowProps`，永不碰 chat 内部）。`scripts/verify-client-domain-graph.ts` 把守分层（contract=0、域=1、apply/index=2；import 只准指向 ≤ 自己的层级；兄弟域边即失败）。将来拆包=每个域目录升格为包+机械改写 import 路径。
+各领域实现文件不 import 兄弟领域；共享面统一经过 `contract/`。`scripts/verify-client-domain-graph.ts` 把守分层（contract=0、domain=1、apply/index=2；import 只准指向不高于自身的层级；兄弟领域依赖会失败）。Tool 展示已经拆为独立 `ui-tool` 包，只通过 ui-conversation 声明的 slot 到达 chat 与 details。

 ## 怎么开发

@@ -122,5 +124,5 @@ token 流不再震荡渲染树：帧风暴对未订阅会话只花一个脏位
 | 静态链接的单 SPA bundle | 插件必须由 host 在运行时按配置组合；单体把每个 UI 功能重新耦回一次构建 |
 | window 全局变量 / import map 供共享依赖 | DI require 表让共享显式、大声失败、可替换；全局变量静默泄漏身份与版本 |
 | 业务数据进 zustand 切片 | 事件窗口/累积器是行为状态机，不是扁平切片；对象层保住快照粒度与合批的可控性 |
-| 工具行走字符串键的全局组件注册表 | per-view keyed 子槽 + 组件内会话分支以唯一注册模型承载同一需求；平行 registry 不复活（[toolview 溶解](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md)） |
+| Tool 行使用平行的字符串键组件注册表 | ui-tool 的 keyed 子 slot 通过唯一的 slot 注册模型承载运行时开放的 Tool 名称集合（[toolview 溶解](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md)） |
 | P-I 就做渐进/Suspense 启动 | 一次成型严格更简单；loader 的按插件状态面已保留，渐进点亮日后可落地而无需重构 |
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md
-2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md: 97d8beb4de43d9bc6348d942e5460d0321592b32
-2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.zh.md: db93c6252d5d42d1fd85ce81ad430d95f4324cf2
+2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md: be1bd9d161714194855988d76a632c667fae8c84
+2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.zh.md: afe5e03e8345fca2a0f097d86873974f6d417ff2
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented

 English | [中文](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.zh.md)

-> Scope: why the standalone tool ring (ToolViewRegistry/ctx.toolviews/outlet) was retired and what replaced it. The [web client architecture note](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md) carries the shipped-state narrative this decision produced; the [slot system standard](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md) owns the registration model everything now runs on.
+> Scope: why the standalone tool ring (ToolViewRegistry/ctx.toolviews/outlet) was retired and what replaced it. The [web client architecture note](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md) carries the shipped-state narrative this decision produced; the [slot system standard](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md) owns the registration model everything now runs on. The later [Client Tool presentation ownership](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md) decision supersedes only this note's per-view placement: Tool-name dispatch remains a keyed slot rather than a parallel registry.

 ## Problem

@@ -14,24 +14,22 @@ After the view ring dissolved into the slot system, the client kept exactly one

 The tool ring is gone as independent infrastructure: a tool row is a **keyed child slot each view declares for itself**, and the client has exactly one registration model. The justification above was hollow — a keyed slot's *key space* is already runtime-open (SlotMap declares slots, never keys; the ask-user composer's `key: 'question'` was the precedent), so the open tool-name set fits `entryKey` dispatch natively.

-Shipped shape (current-state narrative also in the [architecture note](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): the chat entry's `children` table declares `'conversation.chat.toolview'` (keyed/session); the render site dispatches per row via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site `fallback` (the default card is domain property; the fallback option is ordinary renderSlot grammar). The owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails` — details being a session-level facility, not chat-private), and `ToolRowProps` pre-composes it with the session standard kit for registrant components. A registrant is a plain plugin using `ctx.slots.inject('conversation.chat.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))`; the declaration itself governs activation and replacement, without a false `ConversationService` edge ([decision](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)). The bash sample is the third-party-posture exemplar and paints the same ToolRow chrome as Think (`Bash · {description}`). Trajectory/waterfall toolview slots share this exact shape (names fixed by the slot-naming discipline `<domain>.<entry>.<hole>`, one shared owner type) and land with their own row render sites — RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders, so the type system, not convention, blocks early empty declarations.
-
-Registry-era responsibilities all have successor homes: inject caching and row error isolation ride the framework renderer (entry×scope cache, per-entry `SlotErrorBoundary`); subscribe/getVersion ride the slot core's per-key version machinery; the future "store seat" is the ordinary store seat keyed slots already have (interaction-draft durability is its first named consumer); miss fallback is the call-site `fallback` option.
+This decision originally placed `'conversation.chat.toolview'` under the chat entry and made the chat render site dispatch each row. The follow-up [Tool presentation ownership](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md) moves that placement into a whole-Tool seat and gives `ui-tool` one keyed `'tool.call.toolview'` child slot. That follow-up changes the presentation owner, not this decision's core constraint: Tool registration continues to use ordinary keyed-slot machinery, with framework-owned activation, replacement, caching, error isolation, versioning, and fallback behavior.

 ## Accepted semantic changes

-Four behavioral deltas were accepted deliberately, not overlooked. Cross-view appearance is per-view registration — a row must adapt to each view's layout anyway, so one registration per view is the correct coupling, and reuse is the same component in two register calls. Same-key double registration is a loud throw where the registry let later-wins silently override — a discipline correction, not a loss. Session-dimension dispatch, when a row needs it, belongs inside the component (the standard kit already carries `useSessions`), not in registry predicates — there is no shipped session-variant exemplar today. Registry-level shape override by third parties (a scoped registration shadowing a global one) has no equivalent; a real future need routes through key-naming conventions or a small in-component resolver, never a revived parallel registry.
+Four behavioral deltas were accepted deliberately, not overlooked. Cross-view appearance was initially per-view registration; the follow-up note records why root/subcall composition later justified one Tool-wide presentation owner. Same-key double registration is a loud throw where the registry let later-wins silently override — a discipline correction, not a loss. Session-dimension dispatch, when a row needs it, belongs inside the component (the standard kit already carries `useSessions`), not in registry predicates — there is no shipped session-variant exemplar today. Registry-level shape override by third parties (a scoped registration shadowing a global one) has no equivalent; a real future need routes through key-naming conventions or a small in-component resolver, never a revived parallel registry.

 ## Alternatives considered

-**Keep the standalone registry (the original shape).** Rejected: each of its multi-dimensional dispatch axes has a more correct home — the view dimension belongs to each view's own declared child slot (declaring is claiming, so specialization ownership lands right), and the session dimension belongs inside the component, which already holds the standard kit. What remained after both moves was a second copy of slot machinery with no distinguishing capability.
+**Keep the standalone registry (the original shape).** Rejected: each of its multi-dimensional dispatch axes has a more correct home — presentation ownership belongs to an explicitly declared child slot, and the session dimension belongs inside the component, which already holds the standard kit. What remains is a second copy of slot machinery with no distinguishing capability.

-**Promote `renderToolView` into the standard kit and move the registry into the runtime package.** Rejected: "tool row" is a conversation-domain concept; hoisting it into runtime would leak a domain vocabulary into the framework layer and still leave two registration models.
+**Promote `renderToolView` into the standard kit and move the registry into the runtime package.** Rejected: Tool presentation is Client UI vocabulary; hoisting it into runtime would leak presentation into the data object layer and still leave two registration models.

 **Derive slot declarations from subscription refCounts** (declare the slot implicitly when the first registrant subscribes). Rejected for implicit coupling and debounce complexity; noted as a possible revisit only if a genuinely multi-viewer surface appears.

-**A thin `registerToolView` facade over slots.register.** Deferred, not rejected: after dissolution the facade would carry only compile-time sugar (slot-name literal narrowing, tool→key vocabulary, props pre-composition) with zero runtime. Per "enforce at the operation boundary" (a facade is not an enforcement point) and "don't split preemptively" (today's registrant population is one bash sample), it stays unbuilt; the type sugar ships as the exported `ToolRowProps` alias. Regret clause: if registrants grow to three-to-five or a bulk-registration pattern appears, the facade is ten lines added without disturbing direct registration.
+**A thin `registerToolView` facade over slots.register.** Deferred, not rejected: after dissolution the facade would carry only compile-time sugar (slot-name literal narrowing, tool→key vocabulary, props pre-composition) with zero runtime. Per "enforce at the operation boundary" (a facade is not an enforcement point), it stays unbuilt; the useful type composition ships as the exported Tool view props alias. A later facade can be added without disturbing direct registration if repeated registration ceremony justifies it.

 ## Consequences

-The client has one registration model; auditing who renders tool rows = reading register calls, the same audit as every other slot. Registrants get the framework's error isolation, inject caching, and store seat for free — no capability ships twice. The costs are the accepted semantic changes above (chiefly: per-view registration for cross-view rows, and no third-party registry-level override). Independent registrants name the typed slot in `ctx.slots.inject`, so the dependency is explicit and follows declaration replacement without a service-order convention.
+The client has one registration model; auditing who renders Tool calls means reading slot register calls, the same audit as every other slot. Registrants get the framework's error isolation, inject caching, and store seat for free — no capability ships twice. The costs are the accepted semantic changes above, chiefly loud duplicate-key failure and no third-party registry-level override. Independent registrants name the typed slot in `ctx.slots.inject`, so the dependency is explicit and follows declaration replacement without a service-order convention.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented

 [English](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md) | 中文

-> 范围：独立工具环（ToolViewRegistry/ctx.toolviews/outlet）为何退役、被什么取代。本决策产出的落地态叙述归 [Web 客户端架构注](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)；一切现在所运行其上的注册模型归 [slot 体系标准](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md) 所有。
+> 范围：独立工具环（ToolViewRegistry/ctx.toolviews/outlet）为何退役、被什么取代。本决策产出的落地态叙述归 [Web 客户端架构注](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)；一切现在所运行其上的注册模型归 [slot 体系标准](2026-07-22-slot-type-chain-implementation.md)所有。后续的 [Client Tool 展示所有权](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md)决策仅取代本篇的 per-view 放置方式：Tool 名称分发仍使用 keyed slot，而非平行注册表。

 ## Problem

@@ -14,24 +14,22 @@ Status: implemented

 工具环作为独立基础设施已消失：工具行是**各视图为自己声明的 keyed 子槽**，client 全域只剩一种注册模型。上述理由是空的——keyed slot 的 *key 空间*本就运行时开放（SlotMap 声明槽、从不声明 key；ask-user composer 的 `key: 'question'` 即先例），开放的 tool 名集合天然适配 `entryKey` 分发。

-落地形态（现状叙述同见[架构注](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)）：chat 条目的 `children` 表声明 `'conversation.chat.toolview'`（keyed/session）；渲染点逐行以 `entryKey: toolName` 分发、以 `GenericToolCard` 作调用点 `fallback`（默认卡片是域产权；fallback 选项就是普通 renderSlot 文法）。owner 载荷是统一的 `ToolRowOwnerProps`（`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`——details 是会话级设施，非 chat 私货），`ToolRowProps` 把它与 session 标配 kit 预组合供注册方组件取用。注册方是使用 `ctx.slots.inject('conversation.chat.toolview', () => ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row))` 的普通插件；声明本身控制激活与替换，不再引入虚假的 `ConversationService` 依赖（[决策](2026-08-05-slot-declaration-injection.md)）。bash 样例即第三方姿态的样板，并与 Think 绘制同一套 ToolRow chrome（`Bash · {description}`）。trajectory/waterfall 的 toolview 槽共用这套形状（槽名按槽名纪律 `<域>.<条目>.<孔位>` 定死，共用一张 owner 类型），随各自的行渲染点落地——RendersCheck 拒绝无人渲染的声明，挡住提前空声明的是类型系统而非约定。
-
-registry 时代的职责各有后继居所：inject 缓存与行错误隔离乘框架渲染器（entry×scope 缓存、per-entry `SlotErrorBoundary`）；subscribe/getVersion 乘 slot core 的 per-key 版本机；将来的「store 席位」就是 keyed slot 本就拥有的普通 store 席位（交互草稿耐久性是其首个具名消费者）；miss 兜底即调用点 `fallback` 选项。
+本决策最初把 `'conversation.chat.toolview'` 放在 chat 条目下，由 chat 渲染点逐行分发。后续的 [Tool 展示所有权](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md)引入整体 Tool 席位，并让 `ui-tool` 拥有唯一的 keyed `'tool.call.toolview'` 子 slot。后续决策改变的是展示所有者，而非本决策的核心约束：Tool 注册继续使用普通 keyed-slot 机制，激活、替换、缓存、错误隔离、版本与 fallback 行为仍归框架所有。

 ## 接受的语义变化

-四项行为增量是刻意接受而非疏漏。跨视图出场=逐视图注册——行本须适配各视图版式，一视图一注册是正确耦合，复用即同一组件写两次 register。同 key 重复注册从注册表的 later-wins 静默覆盖变为 loud throw——纪律修正而非损失。会话维分发若行需要，归组件内部（标配 kit 已带 `useSessions`），不走注册表谓词——今天没有已落地的会话变体样例。第三方在 registry 级覆盖形态（scoped 注册压过 global）不复存在；真出现的未来需求走 key 命名空间约定或组件内小 resolver，永不复活平行注册表。
+四项行为增量是刻意接受而非疏漏。跨视图出场最初采用逐视图注册；后续 Note 记录了 root/subcall 编排为何足以支持一个 Tool 级展示所有者。同 key 重复注册从注册表的 later-wins 静默覆盖变为 loud throw——纪律修正而非损失。会话维分发若行需要，归组件内部（标配 kit 已带 `useSessions`），不走注册表谓词——今天没有已落地的会话变体样例。第三方在 registry 级覆盖形态（scoped 注册压过 global）不复存在；真出现的未来需求走 key 命名空间约定或组件内小 resolver，永不复活平行注册表。

 ## Alternatives considered

-**保留独立注册表（原形态）。** 拒绝：其多维分发的每一维都有更正确的家——视图维归各视图自己声明的子槽（declaring is claiming，特化面权属自然落对），会话维归已持有标配 kit 的组件内部。两步移完后剩下的只是一份没有任何独有能力的 slot 机器副本。
+**保留独立注册表（原形态）。** 拒绝：其多维分发的每一维都有更正确的家——展示所有权归显式声明的子 slot，会话维归已持有标配 kit 的组件内部。两步移完后剩下的只是一份没有任何独有能力的 slot 机器副本。

-**把 `renderToolView` 提进标配 kit、注册表迁入 runtime 包。** 拒绝：「工具行」是 conversation 域概念；上提进 runtime 会把域词汇泄漏进框架层，且依然留着两套注册模型。
+**把 `renderToolView` 提进标配 kit、注册表迁入 runtime 包。** 拒绝：Tool 展示是 Client UI 词汇；上提进 runtime 会把展示概念泄漏进数据对象层，且依然留着两套注册模型。

 **以订阅 refCount 推导槽声明**（首个注册方订阅时隐式声明槽）。拒绝：隐式耦合加去抖复杂度；记为将来真出现多观看面时的备选。

-**slots.register 之上的薄 `registerToolView` 门面。** 缓建而非拒绝：溶解后该门面只剩编译期三糖（槽名字面量收窄、tool→key 词汇翻译、props 预组合），运行时为零。按「enforce at the operation boundary」（门面不是强制点）与「don't split preemptively」（今天注册方人口只有一个 bash 样例）保持不建；类型糖以导出的 `ToolRowProps` 别名兑现。后悔药条款：注册方长到三五家或出现批量注册模式时，门面十行可补，不扰直注。
+**slots.register 之上的薄 `registerToolView` 门面。** 缓建而非拒绝：溶解后该门面只剩编译期语法糖（slot 名字面量收窄、tool→key 词汇翻译、props 预组合），运行时为零。按「enforce at the operation boundary」（门面不是强制点）保持不建；有用的类型组合以导出的 Tool view props 别名兑现。若重复注册仪式今后足以证明其价值，可在不扰动直接注册的前提下补充门面。

 ## Consequences

-client 只有一种注册模型；审计谁渲染工具行 = 读 register 调用，与其他所有 slot 同一套审计。注册方免费获得框架的错误隔离、inject 缓存与 store 席位——没有能力要建两遍。代价即上文接受的语义变化（主要是：跨视图行要逐视图注册、第三方无 registry 级覆盖）。独立注册方在 `ctx.slots.inject` 中点名有类型约束的 slot，因此依赖关系既显式，又能跟随声明替换，无需服务顺序约定。
+client 只有一种注册模型；审计谁渲染 Tool 调用就是读 slot register 调用，与其他所有 slot 同一套审计。注册方免费获得框架的错误隔离、inject 缓存与 store 席位——没有能力要建两遍。代价即上文接受的语义变化，主要是重复 key 会 loud failure，且第三方无 registry 级覆盖。独立注册方在 `ctx.slots.inject` 中点名有类型约束的 slot，因此依赖关系既显式，又能跟随声明替换，无需服务顺序约定。
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-27-compiler-independent-typert-model.md: 338476924dfb5d9832d0b64bf01b8d3c297cd6d6
-2026-07-27-compiler-independent-typert-model.zh.md: a88f4dbba50696071552ea12a63b69ecac202418
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-27-compiler-independent-typert-model.md
+2026-07-27-compiler-independent-typert-model.md: 15641e5f785c5d2daecbfc2d5cffedd64d8384a7
+2026-07-27-compiler-independent-typert-model.zh.md: 7bddd3ffde343346c163f55ef493c32bad1e8314
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ PackageModel recognizes Cordis services, events, `@typert object` reference obje

 [`dsh-typert-registry`](../../../../packages/typert/registry/README.md) provides `ctx.typert` and handles runtime registration only: one contribution atomically carries package-face reflection and an optional Zod schema, and Cordis effect disposal revokes it. The registry neither analyzes TypeScript nor merges the two faces. JSON Schema is an on-demand projection of registered Zod schemas.

-Package artifact publication is explicit opt-in. When invoked, `WorkspaceTypertGenerator` validates that each requested host face exposes the user-facing subpath `package/typert` from the root artifact `package/lib/typert.host.{js,d.ts}`, or that each requested client face exposes `package/client/typert` from `package/lib/typert.client.{js,d.ts}`. It neither edits exports nor runs as part of the ordinary root build or typecheck, so those commands do not generate whole-workspace Typert artifacts. Generated declarations keep `TYPERT` typed as `unknown`, so business packages do not depend on the registry.
+Package artifact publication remains explicit opt-in through package exports. When invoked, `WorkspaceTypertGenerator` validates that each requested host face exposes the user-facing subpath `package/typert` from the root artifact `package/lib/typert.host.{js,d.ts}`, or that each requested client face exposes `package/client/typert` from `package/lib/typert.client.{js,d.ts}`; it never edits those exports. The later [TypeRT Remote design](2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md) adds a whole-workspace Host contract pass to root build, typecheck, lint, and documentation typecheck. For opted-in Host packages, that pass emits both local reflection and strict Host-for-Client `/remote` contracts before consumers resolve them. Generated local declarations keep `TYPERT` typed as `unknown`, so business packages do not depend on the registry.

 At build time, `CordisCatalogProjector` consumes the analyzed `FaceModel` and `TypeGraph` once to generate `docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`, `docs/cordis-catalog/services.md`, and the static `SERVICE_API`, `EVENT_API`, and `TYPE_API` catalog committed for `tool-cordis`. `tool-cordis` reads that static catalog and has no runtime dependency on `ctx.typert`. [`dsh-typert-loader`](../../../../packages/typert/loader/README.md) and the registry remain an independent runtime path: the loader follows Cordis Loader entry lifecycle events, imports an explicitly published `./typert` host artifact, and registers it through `ctx.typert`; neither component supplies the current `cordis_inspect` catalog.

@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ For each supported node kind and literal category, Zod emitter tests run both su

 New generation targets and static checks can reuse the same TypeGraph, and business categories can extend PackageModel without parsing the AST again. Preserving pre-evaluation types and independent faces makes the model more complex than a flattened schema; emitters must explicitly declare their supported scope and fail on missing capabilities.

-Explicit opt-in keeps artifact publication and package exports under package ownership, while ordinary root builds and typechecks incur no whole-workspace Typert generation phase. The static Cordis catalogs remain reproducible from the canonical model without coupling `tool-cordis` to runtime registry state. `ctx.typert` reflects only artifacts mounted in the current runtime, and unloading does not control Zod instances that consumers retain after importing them directly.
+Explicit package opt-in keeps artifact publication and exports under package ownership. Repository orchestration may still run the whole-workspace Host contract pass for every opted-in package; that pass remains owned by the later Remote Gateway Agent Note. The static Cordis catalogs remain reproducible from the canonical model without coupling `tool-cordis` to runtime registry state. `ctx.typert` reflects only artifacts mounted in the current runtime, and unloading does not control Zod instances that consumers retain after importing them directly.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ PackageModel 识别 Cordis service、event、`@typert object` 引用对象和 `@

 [`dsh-typert-registry`](../../../../packages/typert/registry/README.md) 提供 `ctx.typert`，且只负责运行时注册：一个 contribution 原子携带 package-face reflection 与可选 Zod schema，并随 Cordis effect 撤销。注册表不分析 TypeScript，也不合并两个 face。JSON Schema 是对已注册 Zod schema 的按需投影。

-包产物发布采用显式 opt-in。`WorkspaceTypertGenerator` 仅在被调用时校验所请求 face 的根目录产物协议：host face 必须通过面向用户的 subpath `package/typert` 暴露 `package/lib/typert.host.{js,d.ts}`，client face 必须通过 `package/client/typert` 暴露 `package/lib/typert.client.{js,d.ts}`。它既不修改 exports，也不作为根目录普通 build 或 typecheck 的一部分运行，因此这些命令不会生成全仓 Typert 产物。生成的声明将 `TYPERT` 类型保持为 `unknown`，因此业务包不依赖注册表。
+包产物发布仍通过 package exports 采用显式 opt-in。`WorkspaceTypertGenerator` 仅在被调用时校验所请求 face 的根目录产物协议：host face 必须通过面向用户的 subpath `package/typert` 暴露 `package/lib/typert.host.{js,d.ts}`，client face 必须通过 `package/client/typert` 暴露 `package/lib/typert.client.{js,d.ts}`；它不会修改这些 exports。后续的 [TypeRT Remote 设计](2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md) 为根目录 build、typecheck、lint 与文档类型检查增加了全仓 Host 契约 pass。对于已 opt-in 的 Host 包，该 pass 会在消费方解析两者之前生成本地反射产物与严格的 Host-for-Client `/remote` 契约。生成的本地声明将 `TYPERT` 类型保持为 `unknown`，因此业务包不依赖注册表。

 构建期的 `CordisCatalogProjector` 一次消费分析后的 `FaceModel` 与 `TypeGraph`，生成 `docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`、`docs/cordis-catalog/services.md`，以及为 `tool-cordis` 提交的静态 `SERVICE_API`、`EVENT_API` 和 `TYPE_API` catalog。`tool-cordis` 读取该静态 catalog，运行时不依赖 `ctx.typert`。[`dsh-typert-loader`](../../../../packages/typert/loader/README.md) 与注册表仍是独立的运行时路径：loader 监听 Cordis Loader 配置项生命周期事件，导入显式发布的 `./typert` host 产物，并通过 `ctx.typert` 注册；两者都不是当前 `cordis_inspect` catalog 的数据源。

@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@ Zod emitter 对支持的节点和各类 literal 逐类执行成功与失败 pars

 新增生成目标或静态检查可复用同一 TypeGraph，业务类目也可在 PackageModel 上扩展，而无需再次解析 AST。保留计算前类型和独立 face 的代价是模型比打平后的 schema 更复杂，emitter 必须显式声明支持范围并对缺失能力失败。

-显式 opt-in 使产物发布与 package exports 由各包自行管理，根目录普通 build 和 typecheck 不会引入全仓 Typert 生成阶段。静态 Cordis catalog 可从标准模型复现，同时不把 `tool-cordis` 与运行时注册表状态耦合。`ctx.typert` 只反映当前运行时中已挂载的产物；对于消费方直接导入后仍持有的 Zod 实例，卸载流程无法控制。
+包级显式 opt-in 使产物发布与 exports 由各包自行管理。仓库编排仍可为每个已 opt-in 的包运行全仓 Host 契约 pass；该 pass 仍由后续 Remote Gateway Agent Note 负责说明。静态 Cordis catalog 可从标准模型复现，同时不把 `tool-cordis` 与运行时注册表状态耦合。`ctx.typert` 只反映当前运行时中已挂载的产物；对于消费方直接导入后仍持有的 Zod 实例，卸载流程无法控制。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md
-2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md: 21e912c7c7bbdd70142c202105d9a3035442884a
-2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.zh.md: dc6150b7017777eea99778cc9813e17402354462
+2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.md: aabe6c2d6a92b5cc6568eee1d42df3a6998cf0ca
+2026-07-29-dsh-source-launch-tsx-esm.zh.md: fdeb8a976e02bb9311a6ec9d097d09151a998a04
@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ The node-compat CI matrix (Node 22.19 and 26) gains `dsh-source-launch-smoke` (`
 - One launch vector across the whole engines range, including future Node lines that change native TypeScript support; the smoke gate enforces it per matrix line.
 - TypeScript transformation is delegated to tsx/esbuild again, reversing the prior note's goal of proving Node-native transformation; that goal is unreachable while vendored sources use non-erasable syntax and Node ships no transform mode.
 - The runtime declared-dependency enforcement in source launches is gone; undeclared workspace imports now surface only through static gates or built-mode resolution failures.
- Startup improves ~0.4s over the full tsx default (`demo:headless` and ACP keep `--import tsx`; their graphs were not audited for CJS-hook dependence and their launch latency is not on the interactive path).
+- Startup improves ~0.4s over the full tsx default (`demo:headless` now aliases the same `dsh run` source launch; ACP keeps `--import tsx` because its graph was not audited for CJS-hook dependence and its launch latency is not on the interactive path).
@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ node-compat CI 矩阵（Node 22.19 与 26）新增 `dsh-source-launch-smoke`（`
 - 整个 engines 范围（包括未来改变原生 TypeScript 支持的 Node 版本线）只有一个启动向量；冒烟门禁按矩阵行强制执行。
 - TypeScript 转换重新委托给 tsx/esbuild，逆转了前一篇 Agent Note「证明 Node 原生转换可用」的目标；在 vendor 源码使用不可擦除语法且 Node 不再提供 transform 模式的情况下，该目标不可达。
 - 源码启动中的运行时依赖声明强制不复存在；未声明的 workspace import 现在只能通过静态门禁或构建模式的解析失败暴露。
- 启动相比完整 tsx 默认形态快约 0.4s（`demo:headless` 与 ACP 保持 `--import tsx`：其依赖图未就 CJS 钩子依赖性做审计，且其启动延迟不在交互路径上）。
+- 启动相比完整 tsx 默认形态快约 0.4s（`demo:headless` 现为同一条 `dsh run` 源码启动命令的别名；ACP 保留 `--import tsx`，因为它的依赖图尚未就 CJS 钩子依赖性做审计，且其启动延迟不在交互路径上）。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md
-2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md: 215c647bcd7413b92625ee670022dc7316e3045a
-2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.zh.md: 0ce431b7cbc948e937f722f2769b15a1d26dcec9
+2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.md: f3db8b9eec5eb8fb610fc58edad9313e4f715326
+2026-08-02-typert-remote-method-calls.zh.md: da4459432e8c9e08821bcded2921cbd33fc5e8c8
@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ Host lib build

 The existing top-level `build` still runs `build:lib` before `build:web`, but `build:lib` must complete the Host and Remote artifacts before starting Client TypeScript compilation. A clean build must not depend on stale `.d.ts` files from an earlier build.

+Compiler-backed repository gates that resolve the consumer surface have the same prerequisite even when their primary inputs are source files. The public `typecheck`, `lint`, and `doc-typecheck` commands run the Host contract pass first. The gate scheduler may use their `*:contracts-ready` variants only after an explicit TypeRT-contract or complete-build dependency, so parallel lanes neither read missing declarations nor run concurrent generators against the same outputs.
+
 ## The `/remote` package entry

 Every business package that provides Remote methods exports a generated `/remote` subpath:
@@ -490,6 +492,7 @@ The package topology is `api/remotes → api/gateway → client/connection → h

 - Goal Service directly decorates mutation methods whose business signatures already match the Remote contract and keeps `remoteExportCreate(...)` only to adapt `GoalView` into `CreateGoalResult`, without a second route, codec, or Client method list.
 - A clean `build:lib` emits Host and consumer Remote artifacts before Client compilation, including the business package's JS, DTS, and declaration map under `/remote`.
+- After `clean`, standalone `typecheck`, `lint`, and `doc-typecheck` regenerate the Remote contracts; the pre-push hook uses the same prepared typecheck, and CI source consumers wait for one shared contract pass.
 - Importing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal/remote` adds the strict `ctx.remote.goals.create(...)` type and declaration navigation to `remoteExportCreate`; omitting that import omits the namespace.
 - Mounting the same import's JS contribution supplies endpoint, parameter, result, lookup, Context, and Zod reflection and materializes the call without a handwritten stub.
 - Root and Agent-scoped calls cross the real shared `/api` carrier, resolve `agentId` to the live Agent, invoke the original Goal receiver, and return through the existing RPC envelope.
@@ -501,7 +504,7 @@ The package topology is `api/remotes → api/gateway → client/connection → h

 ## Consequences

-Remote API types depend on generated `lib` declarations. Build orchestration must finish the Host contract pass before compiling Host and Client consumers; an incorrect order makes a clean build depend on stale artifacts.
+Remote API types depend on generated `lib` declarations. Build and gate orchestration must finish the Host contract pass before compiling or semantically analyzing Host and Client consumers; an incorrect order makes a clean command depend on stale artifacts.

 Source navigation requires a Remote package to publish both its declaration map and the `src` file referenced by the map. If package `files` omits either side, types still compile but consumer navigation stops at the generated DTS. The workspace manifest check must therefore treat both as one publication contract.

@@ -217,6 +217,8 @@ Host lib build

 现有顶层 `build` 仍表现为先 `build:lib`、再 `build:web`，但 `build:lib` 内部必须先完成 Host 与 Remote artifact，再启动 Client TypeScript 编译。一次干净构建不能依赖上次残留的 `.d.ts`。

+即使主要输入是源文件，需要通过编译器解析消费方 surface 的仓库门禁也有相同的前置条件。公共 `typecheck`、`lint` 和 `doc-typecheck` 命令会先执行 Host 契约 pass。门禁调度器仅可在显式的 TypeRT 契约依赖或完整构建依赖完成后使用对应的 `*:contracts-ready` 变体，使并行 lane 既不会读取缺失的声明，也不会针对同一输出并发运行多个生成器。
+
 ## `/remote` 包入口

 每个提供 Remote 方法的业务包导出生成的 `/remote` 子路径：
@@ -490,6 +492,7 @@ Connection 提供共享 channel interceptor 与当前 HTTP carrier 映射。WebS

 - Goal Service 直接装饰业务签名已经符合 Remote 契约的变更类方法，仅保留 `remoteExportCreate(...)` 把 `GoalView` 适配为 `CreateGoalResult`，无需第二条路由、第二份 codec 或 Client 方法清单。
 - 一次干净的 `build:lib` 会在 Client 编译前生成 Host 与消费方 Remote 产物，包括业务包 `/remote` 下的 JS、DTS 和 declaration map。
+- `clean` 后，单独运行 `typecheck`、`lint` 或 `doc-typecheck` 都会重新生成 Remote 契约；pre-push 钩子使用同一个已包含契约准备步骤的 typecheck，CI 中的源码消费方则等待一次共享的契约 pass。
 - 导入 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal/remote` 会加入严格的 `ctx.remote.goals.create(...)` 类型，并可通过 declaration 导航到 `remoteExportCreate`；不导入时不会出现该 namespace。
 - 挂载同一次 import 得到的 JS contribution 会提供 endpoint、参数、结果、lookup、Context 和 Zod 反射，并在无需手写 stub 的情况下实体化调用。
 - Root 与 Agent-scoped 调用会经过真实的共享 `/api` carrier，将 `agentId` 解析为活 Agent，调用原始 Goal receiver，并通过既有 RPC envelope 返回。
@@ -501,7 +504,7 @@ Connection 提供共享 channel interceptor 与当前 HTTP carrier 映射。WebS

 ## 后果

-Remote API 类型依赖生成的 `lib` 声明，构建编排必须在 Host 和 Client 消费端编译前完成 contract pass；顺序错误会让干净构建依赖陈旧产物。
+Remote API 类型依赖生成的 `lib` 声明，构建与门禁编排必须在对 Host 和 Client 消费方进行编译或语义分析之前完成 Host 契约 pass；顺序错误会使干净环境中的命令依赖陈旧产物。

 源码导航依赖 Remote package 同时发布 declaration map 和 map 指向的 `src`。package `files` 漏掉任一侧时类型仍可编译，但消费端跳转会停在生成 DTS，因此 workspace manifest 校验必须把两者作为同一发布契约。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog.md
-2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog.md: d75b6bdb91d60026636bf320f8c6625590849a41
-2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog.zh.md: f8dba9900b1a7a3abcb16c70a35cc18f0c44219f
+2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog.md: f908eb6293b77680193fcd8f7be7a9089477855a
+2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog.zh.md: ce91abd6dc71f790c72766cd3f819096d596182c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The adapter also streamed through `streamSimple` from `@earendil-works/pi-ai/com

 A provider route is a **declaration**, and the installed catalog is its default. `resolveProfiles` no longer checks route keys against `getBuiltinProviders()`. Instead each route resolves to a materialized model list plus the pi-ai `Provider` that serves it:

- `catalog.ts` merges the installed catalog under the profile's own entries. A profile's `models` list *replaces* the route's catalog (an absent or empty list serves it unchanged), and each entry defaults its unset fields from the installed model of the same `id`. Only the fields the harness consumes are configurable — `id`, `name`, `contextWindow`, `maxTokens`. Pricing and input modalities are absent from the surface because nothing reads them: `replay.ts` zeroes pi-ai's cost metadata and `context.ts` keeps only text blocks. Reasoning is absent for a different reason: a bare capability flag would make pi-ai advertise effort levels with no `thinkingLevelMap` to spell them, so it rides the installed entry or is absent. Materialization spreads the installed entry and overrides those four fields, rather than enumerating the result: an enumerated rebuild silently drops every `Model` field this package does not model, which is how `headers` went missing from an nvidia route once already.
+- `catalog.ts` merges the installed catalog under the profile's own entries. A profile's `models` list *replaces* the route's catalog (an absent or empty list serves it unchanged), and each entry defaults its unset fields from the installed model of the same `id`. Only the fields the harness consumes are configurable — at this note's writing `id`, `name`, `contextWindow`, `maxTokens`; [[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] later added `reasoningEfforts` and `compat`, which is also where the original "reasoning rides the installed entry or is absent" stance was revisited (a bare capability flag stays rejected; a full per-level declaration with wire spellings does not have its problem). Pricing and input modalities remain absent from the surface because nothing reads them: `replay.ts` zeroes pi-ai's cost metadata and `context.ts` keeps only text blocks. Materialization spreads the installed entry and overrides the configured fields, rather than enumerating the result: an enumerated rebuild silently drops every `Model` field this package does not model, which is how `headers` went missing from an nvidia route once already.
 - `provider.ts` builds the route's `Provider`. A catalog route that keeps its catalog protocol **reuses** the installed provider with `getModels()` replaced; every other route is built by `createProvider()` over a protocol table whose entries are the same `@earendil-works/pi-ai/api/*.lazy` factories pi-ai's own provider factories use. That table is narrower than pi-ai's full API set on purpose — it holds only protocols a profile can completely describe with a key, an endpoint, and headers, so Bedrock (SigV4 plus a region), Vertex (project, location, ADC), Azure (provider environment plus an api-version), and Codex (OAuth) are absent rather than offered as routes that cannot authenticate. Catalog routes still reach them through their own provider; only an explicit override is refused.
 - `adapter.ts` turns each resolution into an **immutable snapshot** — the profiles plus a `createModels()` collection holding those providers — and every operation captures a whole snapshot before its first `await`.
 - A model's **explicitly configured** `maxTokens` becomes the seam's `defaultMaxTokens`. The value inherited from the installed catalog does not: pi-ai requires `Model.maxTokens` as the model's output *capability*, while `defaultMaxTokens` is a cap the deployment chose to send on requests that name none, and materializing the former as the latter would start capping every request at a number nobody picked.
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The configurable-provider directory is now the installed catalog **joined with**

 pi-ai reports a model with no reasoning metadata as supporting the single level `off`, and the adapter used to pass that straight through. It reaches the seam as a one-item effort list, which every surface renders as a picker holding one selectable control — and that control is a lie: `off` becomes an *omitted* reasoning option at dispatch, byte-for-byte the request that naming no effort already produces. A provider whose own default is to think keeps thinking while the surface shows `off` selected.

-`reasoningInfo` therefore omits the seam's `reasoning` field whenever `model.reasoning` is falsy. The condition is the model's own metadata, not where the model came from, so this covers every hand-declared model **and** the 251 installed-catalog models pi-ai marks as non-reasoning. Those previously offered the lone `off`; they now offer nothing, and the surface shows the provider default alone. Models that do carry reasoning metadata are untouched — their level list still crosses the seam unfiltered, `off` included, because there it selects between real alternatives.
+`reasoningInfo` therefore omits the seam's `reasoning` field whenever `model.reasoning` is falsy. The condition is the model's own metadata, not where the model came from, so this covers every hand-declared model whose entry declares no `reasoningEfforts` ([[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] made declared efforts carry that metadata) **and** the 251 installed-catalog models pi-ai marks as non-reasoning. Those previously offered the lone `off`; they now offer nothing, and the surface shows the provider default alone. Models that do carry reasoning metadata are untouched — their level list still crosses the seam unfiltered, `off` included, because there it selects between real alternatives.

 ### Credentials stay outside pi-ai

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ A route's auth follows from that. A catalog route keeps the installed provider's
 - **Keep `createProvider()` but skip the `Models` collection**, streaming through `provider.streamSimple(model, ctx, {apiKey})`. Smallest diff and the credential path is untouched, but `createProvider`'s `auth` is a required field that this path never invokes — a required-by-signature implementation with no caller. It also leaves `refreshModels` needing a hand-built `RefreshModelsContext`, and keeps the adapter off the runtime pi-ai actually supports.
 - **Reuse the installed provider for catalog routes and `createProvider()` only for declared ones**, with no shared resolution. Zero risk to catalog behavior, but catalog materialization, endpoint override, and per-model configuration would each exist twice, and a catalog route that repoints its protocol would have to jump paths mid-resolution. The chosen split confines the asymmetry to provider construction, where it is forced by pi-ai not exposing a built provider's API implementations.
 - **Rebuild every route through `createProvider()`**, including catalog ones. Fully symmetric, but a built `Provider` does not expose its `api`, so the protocol table would become the ceiling on which providers work — Bedrock loads its Smithy module through a separate entry point and would silently stop working.
- **Expose pi-ai's whole `Model` shape** (cost, input modalities, `thinkingLevelMap`, `compat`). Maximum configurability, but no current consumer reads those fields, so a configured price or modality would change nothing while reading as supported.
+- **Expose pi-ai's whole `Model` shape** (cost, input modalities, `thinkingLevelMap`, `compat`). Maximum configurability, but no current consumer read those fields then, so a configured price or modality would change nothing while reading as supported. The consumer-driven half of this arrived later: [[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] opened reasoning (as `reasoningEfforts`, not a raw `thinkingLevelMap`) and the two reasoning-dispatch `compat` switches once selectors and dispatch actually consumed them; cost and modalities stay closed for the original reason.

 - **Keep one mutable `Models` collection and re-sync it.** Fewer allocations, and correct for every operation that resolves synchronously. It is exactly wrong for the one that does not: `stream()` awaits a credential between capturing its model and dispatching it.
 - **Simulate an atomic directory swap with dispose-then-register.** No seam change, and it works whenever the new set is valid — which is the case that never needed atomicity.
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented

 提供方路由是一份**声明**，已安装 catalog 是它的默认值。`resolveProfiles` 不再拿路由键去核对 `getBuiltinProviders()`，而是把每条路由解析成一份物化模型列表，外加服务它的 pi-ai `Provider`：

- `catalog.ts` 把已安装 catalog 合并到 profile 自身条目之下。profile 的 `models` 列表*替换*该路由的 catalog（列表缺席或为空则原样服务），每个条目从同 `id` 的已安装模型继承自身未设置的字段。只有 harness 会消费的字段可配置——`id`、`name`、`contextWindow`、`maxTokens`。定价与输入模态不出现在配置面，因为没有任何读取方：`replay.ts` 把 pi-ai 的成本元数据清零，`context.ts` 只保留文本块。推理缺席则是另一个理由：一个孤立的能力布尔量会让 pi-ai 公布出没有 `thinkingLevelMap` 可供拼写的档位，因此它沿用已安装条目或直接缺席。物化时以已安装条目铺底、再覆盖那四个字段，而不是逐字段枚举结果：枚举式重建会静默丢弃本包未建模的每一个 `Model` 字段——`headers` 就是这样从某条 nvidia 路由上消失过一次。
+- `catalog.ts` 把已安装 catalog 合并到 profile 自身条目之下。profile 的 `models` 列表*替换*该路由的 catalog（列表缺席或为空则原样服务），每个条目从同 `id` 的已安装模型继承自身未设置的字段。只有 harness 会消费的字段可配置——本 note 写就时为 `id`、`name`、`contextWindow`、`maxTokens`；[[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] 之后加入了 `reasoningEfforts` 与 `compat`，当初「推理沿用已安装条目或直接缺席」的立场也在那里被重新审视（孤立的能力布尔量仍被拒绝；带 wire 拼写的逐档位完整声明没有它那个问题）。定价与输入模态仍不出现在配置面，因为没有任何读取方：`replay.ts` 把 pi-ai 的成本元数据清零，`context.ts` 只保留文本块。物化时以已安装条目铺底、再覆盖已配置的字段，而不是逐字段枚举结果：枚举式重建会静默丢弃本包未建模的每一个 `Model` 字段——`headers` 就是这样从某条 nvidia 路由上消失过一次。
 - `provider.ts` 构造路由的 `Provider`。保持 catalog 协议不变的 catalog 路由会**复用**已安装提供方，只替换 `getModels()`；其余路由都由 `createProvider()` 基于一张协议表构造，表中条目正是 pi-ai 自己的提供方工厂所用的 `@earendil-works/pi-ai/api/*.lazy` factory。该表刻意窄于 pi-ai 的完整 API 集合——只保留 profile 能用密钥、端点与标头完整描述的协议，因此 Bedrock（SigV4 加 region）、Vertex（project、location、ADC）、Azure（提供方环境加 api-version）与 Codex（OAuth）不在其中，而不是被当作无法认证的路由提供出去。catalog 路由仍可经自己的 provider 抵达它们；被拒的只有显式覆盖。
 - `adapter.ts` 把每次解析变成一份**不可变快照**——profiles 加上持有这些 provider 的 `createModels()` 集合——每个操作都在自己第一个 `await` 之前整体捕获一份。
 - 模型**显式配置**的 `maxTokens` 会成为 seam 的 `defaultMaxTokens`；从已安装 catalog 继承来的那份不会：pi-ai 要求 `Model.maxTokens` 表示模型的输出**能力**，而 `defaultMaxTokens` 是部署选定、发给未点名上限的请求的那个值，把前者物化成后者会让每个请求都被一个无人选择的数字封顶。
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Status: implemented

 pi-ai 把没有推理元数据的模型报告为只支持 `off` 一档，而适配器此前原样透传。它抵达 seam 时是一个单元素的 effort 列表，任何界面都会把它渲染成一个只有一项可选控件的选择器——而这个控件在撒谎：`off` 在派发时变成被*省略*的 reasoning 选项，与「不点名任何档位」产出的请求逐字节相同。自身默认就在思考的提供方会继续思考，界面却显示 `off` 已选中。

-因此只要 `model.reasoning` 为假，`reasoningInfo` 就省略 seam 的 `reasoning` 字段。判据是模型自身的元数据，而非模型的来源，所以它覆盖每一个手工声明的模型**以及** pi-ai 标记为不具备推理能力的那 251 个已安装 catalog 模型。它们此前提供那个孤零零的 `off`，现在什么也不提供，界面只剩提供方默认。携带推理元数据的模型不受影响——其档位列表仍不经筛选地穿过 seam、`off` 也在内，因为在那里它是在真实备选之间做选择。
+因此只要 `model.reasoning` 为假，`reasoningInfo` 就省略 seam 的 `reasoning` 字段。判据是模型自身的元数据，而非模型的来源，所以它覆盖条目未声明 `reasoningEfforts` 的每一个手工声明模型（[[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] 让声明的档位携带这份元数据）**以及** pi-ai 标记为不具备推理能力的那 251 个已安装 catalog 模型。它们此前提供那个孤零零的 `off`，现在什么也不提供，界面只剩提供方默认。携带推理元数据的模型不受影响——其档位列表仍不经筛选地穿过 seam、`off` 也在内，因为在那里它是在真实备选之间做选择。

 ### 凭据留在 pi-ai 之外

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ pi-ai 的 `Models` 自带一套凭据概念——按提供方 id 索引的 `Cred
 - **保留 `createProvider()` 但不建 `Models` 集合**，改由 `provider.streamSimple(model, ctx, {apiKey})` 发起。改动最小且凭据路径原封不动，但 `createProvider` 的 `auth` 是必填字段，这条路上它永远不会被调用——一份因签名而必填、却没有调用方的实现。它还让 `refreshModels` 需要手工构造 `RefreshModelsContext`，并使适配器始终不在 pi-ai 真正支持的运行时上。
 - **catalog 路由复用已安装提供方，只有声明式路由走 `createProvider()`**，且两者不共享解析。对 catalog 行为零风险，但 catalog 物化、端点覆盖与每模型配置这三件事都要各写两遍，而改指协议的 catalog 路由还得在解析中途跳到另一条路径。已采纳的拆法把不对称收敛在提供方构造这一处——那里的不对称是 pi-ai 不暴露已构造提供方的 API 实现所强加的。
 - **让每条路由都经 `createProvider()` 重建**，包括 catalog 路由。完全对称，但已构造的 `Provider` 不暴露自己的 `api`，于是协议表会成为「哪些提供方能用」的天花板——Bedrock 经独立入口加载其 Smithy 模块，会因此静默失效。
- **完整暴露 pi-ai 的 `Model` 形状**（成本、输入模态、`thinkingLevelMap`、`compat`）。可配置性最大，但这些字段当前没有任何读取方，因此配了价格或模态什么也不会改变，却看起来像是受支持的。
+- **完整暴露 pi-ai 的 `Model` 形状**（成本、输入模态、`thinkingLevelMap`、`compat`）。可配置性最大，但这些字段当时没有任何读取方，因此配了价格或模态什么也不会改变，却看起来像是受支持的。这条否决里由消费方驱动的那一半后来兑现了：[[2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations]] 在选择器与分派真正消费之后开放了推理（以 `reasoningEfforts` 的形态，而非裸 `thinkingLevelMap`）和两个推理分派 `compat` 开关；成本与模态仍因原有理由保持关闭。

 - **保留单个可变 `Models` 集合并重新同步。** 分配更少，且对每个同步完成解析的操作都是正确的；唯独对那个不同步的操作恰恰是错的：`stream()` 会在捕获模型与派发模型之间 await 一次凭据。
 - **用「先 dispose 再注册」模拟目录原子替换。** 无需改 seam，且在新集合有效时确实可用——而那正是从不需要原子性的那种情形。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md
-2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 11a8ac3d4005371ca9596ba237aaf42a8e770dee
-2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: 0e9ebf657ccb9d05967d90a935b356acf287a24c
+2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 8613e600ad633818abb4319e614230340c3b3876
+2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: 03a771364c4f3262801f28e68b96ec5de633e5ec
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ The `dsh` launcher hardcoded its compositions: `base.cordis.yml` + `web.cordis.y

 Everything becomes a **profile**: a directory `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>` with a `package.json` (pnpm-managed out-of-tree plugin `dependencies` plus the profile manifest `dsh.profile` with its ordered `bundles` layer list) and a user `cordis.patch.yml`. A **bundle** is an npm package declaring `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }`; the two manifest kinds live under distinct `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` keys so a package.json states which role it plays. The tree composes over an empty root by applying each bundle's patch in `dsh.profile.bundles` order, then the user layer, then `--patch` overlays, then flag patches — one `applyEntryPatches` call, identical for boot, flag derivation, and `--dump-config`.

-The shipped compositions became bundles: `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (the former base rows as one insert), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (the former web overlay plus a runtime glue plugin that owns what used to be launcher code — frontend-dist resolution, the web-surface prompt section, bash runtime variables, the URL line), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a one-shot runner plugin over base + web-app). `dsh web` stays as an alias for `--profile web` carrying the Web flag family; `dsh --profile headless "task"` replaces `-p`; `dsh --config` is removed (its uses migrate to `--patch`). `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` after `add`/`remove` (a bundle-less package warns and stays a plain dependency).
+The shipped compositions became bundles: `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (the former base rows as one insert), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (the former web overlay plus a runtime glue plugin that owns what used to be launcher code — frontend-dist resolution, the web-surface prompt section, bash runtime variables, the URL line), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a one-shot runner plugin over base + web-app). `dsh web` stays as an alias for `--profile web` carrying the Web flag family; `dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` owns one-shot execution and defaults to the headless profile, while generic `dsh --profile <name>` boots without a task; `dsh --config` is removed (its uses migrate to `--patch`). `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` after `add`/`remove` (a bundle-less package warns and stays a plain dependency).
+
+The [`dsh run` command decision](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) owns the one-shot grammar; this note owns the profile composition it selects.

 Resolution is two-anchored by construction: `dsh.profile.bundles` names resolve from the dsh installation first, then the profile directory — so in-box bundles always come from the same installation as the running `dsh` and pnpm never manages them — while bare plugin names in patch rows resolve through the profile directory's Node parent-walk into the maintained flat fallback `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules` (one symlink per package the installation's app and bundles depend on, healed on every launch).

@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ Status: implemented

 一切都变成 **profile**：即目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>`，其中包含一个 `package.json`（pnpm 管理的树外插件 `dependencies`，加上 profile manifest `dsh.profile` 及其有序的 `bundles` 层列表）和一份用户 `cordis.patch.yml`。**组合包**（bundle）是声明了 `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }` 的 npm 包；两种 manifest 分别位于互不相同的 `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` 键下，因此一份 package.json 能说明自己扮演哪种角色。配置树在空的根之上组合：按 `dsh.profile.bundles` 顺序应用每个组合包的 patch，然后是用户层，然后是 `--patch` overlay，最后是 flag patch——全部收敛为一次 `applyEntryPatches` 调用，启动、flag 派生与 `--dump-config` 使用完全相同的路径。

-已交付的组合改造成了组合包：`@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`（原有基础行合并为一次插入）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`（原 web overlay，外加一个接管原启动器代码的运行时粘合插件——前端 dist 解析、web 表层提示词段落、bash 运行时变量、URL 行）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`（叠加在 base + web-app 之上的一次性 runner 插件）。`dsh web` 保留为携带 Web flag 家族的 `--profile web` 别名；`dsh --profile headless "task"` 取代 `-p`；`dsh --config` 被移除（其用途迁移到 `--patch`）。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器，负责初始化 profile，并在 `add`／`remove` 后调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`（没有组合包声明的包会给出警告，保持为普通依赖）。
+已交付的组合改造成了组合包：`@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`（原有基础行合并为一次插入）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`（原 web overlay，外加一个接管原启动器代码的运行时粘合插件——前端 dist 解析、web 表层提示词段落、bash 运行时变量、URL 行）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`（叠加在 base + web-app 之上的一次性 runner 插件）。`dsh web` 保留为携带 Web flag 家族的 `--profile web` 别名；`dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` 负责一次性执行，默认使用 headless profile，而通用的 `dsh --profile <name>` 只启动 profile，不携带任务；`dsh --config` 被移除（其用途迁移到 `--patch`）。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器，负责初始化 profile，并在 `add`／`remove` 后调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`（没有组合包声明的包会给出警告，保持为普通依赖）。
+
+[`dsh run` 命令决策](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md)负责一次性语法；本 Agent Note 负责该语法所选择的 profile 组合。

 解析在构造上就是双锚点的：`dsh.profile.bundles` 中的名称先从 dsh 安装目录解析，再从 profile 目录解析——因此内置组合包始终来自与运行中 `dsh` 相同的安装，pnpm 从不管理它们——而 patch 行中的裸插件名称经 profile 目录的 Node 父目录逐级查找，落到受维护的扁平回退目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules`（安装目录的应用与各组合包所依赖的每个包各一个符号链接，每次启动时修复）。

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md
+2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md: 46dc612492fa1bfa805f77f865f14b168f52776f
+2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.zh.md: 4aafdd652aad87cfe74a449428cdbbf13312d260
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Agent Note: Bounded session persistence write batching
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Streaming responses can emit many `assistant/chunk` events in a short interval. The persistence coordinator previously scheduled a backend append as soon as an idle queue received one event. Events arriving while that append was active shared a follow-up batch, but a fast backend could still produce many small durable appends. Each JSONL append creates and syncs a Zstandard frame or raw suffix, while each SQLite append opens and commits a transaction and increments the session revision.
+
+Dropping chunk events or replacing them with assembled messages would reduce logical storage, but it would also change the event log, replay, sequence numbers, timestamps, and provenance. The write-amplification problem does not require that larger semantic change.
+
+### Quantified baseline
+
+Repository fixtures make the logical volume concrete. Decoding the current packed rows in [`goal-multi-turn-actions`](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/goal-multi-turn-actions/session.jsonl) yields 2,098 events: 2,017 chunks (96.1%). Their unpacked JSONL lines occupy 332,647 of 379,225 event bytes (87.7%), while chunk packing reduces the committed file to 89,176 bytes and 182 storage rows, including 23 packed chunk rows. [`permission-policy-context`](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/permission-policy-context/session.jsonl) yields 813 events: 746 chunks (91.8%) and 118,935 of 184,821 unpacked event bytes (64.4%); its packed file is 84,917 bytes and 123 storage rows, including 14 packed rows. These are tracked deterministic fixtures, not a production workload distribution, but they demonstrate why deleting chunks would reduce logical volume and why the existing packed-row layout already removes much of their JSON envelope cost.
+
+SQLite stores one row per logical event, so those same logical logs would retain 2,098 and 813 event rows respectively; batching does not change those counts. JSONL writes one Zstandard frame and fsync per durable append batch, while SQLite performs one transaction and one session-revision increment per batch. Runtime files do not record former append boundaries, so fixture row counts cannot honestly be presented as fsync or transaction counts.
+
+The scheduling bound is deterministic. With an immediately resolving sink, the former immediate controller could issue one append for each event arriving after the previous append completed. A controller test admits 20 events 10 ms apart: the 200 ms fixed window hands all 20 to one append. This is a 20-to-1 reduction for that cadence, not a universal ratio. Sparse events, mandatory flushes, slow prior writes, and different arrival rates produce different batch sizes.
+
+## Decision
+
+The first-party JSONL and SQLite plugins expose `writeBatchMaxDelayMs`, a positive integer no greater than Node's timer limit. Its default is `200`. Each plugin resolves the value at load and passes it to `PersistenceCoordinator`; the coordinator remains the single owner of batching behavior.
+
+Each live Session receives a package-private `SessionWriteBehind`. When its pending queue changes from empty to non-empty, the controller starts one fixed window. Later events join that batch without resetting the deadline: this is bounded coalescing, not debounce. When the deadline expires, the controller hands the complete pending prefix to the existing per-id serialization and `appendBatch` path. At most one write for a Session is active. Events admitted during that write form a new pending prefix with their own fixed deadline; if that deadline expires before the active write completes, the new prefix starts immediately after it.
+
+`writeBatchMaxDelayMs` bounds only the controller's intentional batching wait. Event-loop scheduling, initialization, an earlier serialized operation, and backend I/O can delay durable completion, so the option is not a hard fsync or crash-loss SLA.
+
+`session/flush` cancels any remaining wait and becomes a shared quiescence barrier. It drains the active attempt and every event admitted while the barrier is running before it resolves. Session retirement and backend disposal use that same barrier, so lifecycle teardown never waits for the batching timer. The checkpoint policy continues to place mandatory barriers before model requests and top-level tool side effects.
+
+Every event remains durable in its original order and shape. The controller copies each event on admission; no `assistant/chunk`, `seq`, `time`, surface metadata, or storage record is removed or rewritten. JSONL can therefore encode more events in one append frame, and SQLite can insert more event rows in one transaction, without changing either on-disk format or schema version.
+
+A failed background append restores its complete batch before any newer pending events, reports the failure once, and pauses automatic retry. The next newly admitted event opens a fresh fixed window; an explicit flush, retirement, or disposal retries immediately and surfaces a repeated failure to its caller. This avoids a timer-driven failure loop while preserving the existing recoverable flush boundary.
+
+This decision supersedes only the immediate scheduling cadence in [Collapse live persistence into one flush controller](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md). That note remains authoritative for one controller per live Session, retained failed batches, per-id serialization, retirement, and quiescent disposal. The [shared persistence coordinator](2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md) remains the owner of the backend hook boundary.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Do not persist streaming chunk events.** Rejected here: it changes the event-sourced authority and recovery semantics rather than only physical write cadence. The existing [assembled-message rejection](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-assembled-assistant-messages-only.md) remains the guardrail until a no-information-loss replacement defines replay, fork, provenance, sequence, and crash behavior independently. The [packed-row decision](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md) remains the complementary JSONL storage-size optimization.
+
+**Write only at semantic checkpoints.** Rejected: it maximizes batching but makes the ordinary crash-loss window depend on a separately mounted policy. Bounded background writes preserve progress between checkpoints while mandatory flushes keep their stronger ordering contract.
+
+**Debounce from the latest event.** Rejected: a continuously streaming response could postpone its first write indefinitely. A fixed window from the first pending event provides a real upper bound on intentional coalescing wait.
+
+**Implement timers separately in JSONL and SQLite.** Rejected: scheduling, failure retention, flush races, and teardown are backend-neutral lifecycle concerns. Duplicating them would reopen the drift that `PersistenceCoordinator` removed.
+
+## Verification
+
+The controller tests use a fake clock to prove the fixed, non-resetting 200 ms window; immediate and shared flush barriers; events admitted during a barrier; an over-budget tail behind an active write; ordered failure retention; paused automatic retry; and explicit retry of an overlapping background failure. Coordinator tests run the controller through Session notifications, retirement, collision reclamation, and teardown. The JSONL and SQLite suites retain their storage-format, transaction, recovery, and shared persistence-contract coverage.
+
+## Consequences
+
+High-frequency event bursts normally produce fewer durable append operations while preserving the exact logical event count. The reduction depends on arrival rate and backend latency: a burst inside one 200 ms window becomes one batch, while mandatory flushes and sparse events can still produce small batches.
+
+This decision does not cap pending event count or bytes behind a slow backend, and it does not reduce SQLite rows or the decoded logical log. A demonstrated memory bound or logical-retention policy would require its own failure and replay contract rather than another hidden timer rule.
+
+An admitted event can remain only in memory during the configured window, and then while scheduling or backend work is outstanding. Deployments choose a smaller value for a narrower ordinary loss window or a larger value for stronger batching. Explicit durability boundaries remain unchanged and bypass the wait.
+
+The new deep module gives the timer, active write, pending prefix, retry pause, and barrier one owner. `PersistenceCoordinator` retains initialization and identity serialization; backends retain only durable storage primitives. Neither `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` nor SQLite `SCHEMA_VERSION` changes.
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# Agent Note: 为会话持久化写入批处理设定上界
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+流式响应可能会在短时间内发出大量 `assistant/chunk` 事件。此前，只要空闲队列收到一个事件，持久化协调器就会立即调度一次后端追加。该追加仍在进行时到达的事件会共用一个后续批次，但如果后端速度很快，仍可能产生大量小规模的持久化追加。每次 JSONL 追加都会创建并同步一个 Zstandard 帧或原始格式后缀，而每次 SQLite 追加都会打开并提交一个事务，同时递增会话修订版本。
+
+丢弃分片事件或用组装后的消息替代它们可以减少逻辑存储量，但也会改变事件日志、回放、序列号、时间戳和来源信息。写放大问题不要求采取这项语义变化更大的方案。
+
+### 量化基线
+
+仓库 fixture（测试前置数据）让逻辑数据量有了具体依据。对当前 [`goal-multi-turn-actions`](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/goal-multi-turn-actions/session.jsonl) 中的打包行进行解码，可得到 2,098 个事件，其中 2,017 个是分片（96.1%）。这些分片解包后的 JSONL 行共 332,647 字节，占全部事件 379,225 字节的 87.7%；分片打包则把仓库中的已提交文件缩小到 89,176 字节和 182 个存储行，其中包括 23 个打包分片行。[`permission-policy-context`](../../../../apps/web/tests/snapshots/permission-policy-context/session.jsonl) 可得到 813 个事件，其中 746 个是分片（91.8%）；这些分片解包后的 JSONL 行共 118,935 字节，占全部事件 184,821 字节的 64.4%。其打包文件为 84,917 字节，共 123 个存储行，其中包括 14 个打包行。这些是纳入版本控制的确定性 fixture，不代表生产工作负载分布；但它们说明了删除分片为何会降低逻辑数据量，也说明现有打包行布局已经消除了大量 JSON 包装开销。
+
+SQLite 每个逻辑事件存储一行，因此同样的逻辑日志会分别保留 2,098 和 813 个事件行；批处理不会改变这些数量。JSONL 每个持久化追加批次会写入一个 Zstandard 帧并执行一次 fsync，SQLite 每个批次会执行一次事务并递增一次会话修订版本。运行时文件不记录原有追加边界，因此不能把 fixture 的存储行数当作 fsync 或事务次数。
+
+调度上界是确定的。当写入端会立即完成每次操作时，原来的即时控制器可能对每个在前一次追加完成后到达的事件分别发起一次追加。一个控制器测试以 10 ms 的间隔接纳 20 个事件：200 ms 固定窗口会把全部 20 个事件交给一次追加。对于这种到达节奏，追加次数从 20 次降至 1 次，但这不是普遍比例。稀疏事件、强制 flush、较慢的前序写入和不同到达速率都会产生不同的批次大小。
+
+## 决策
+
+第一方 JSONL 与 SQLite 插件公开 `writeBatchMaxDelayMs`，其值必须是一个不超过 Node 计时器上限的正整数，默认值为 `200`。每个插件都会在加载时解析该值，再传给 `PersistenceCoordinator`；批处理行为仍只由协调器负责。
+
+每个活跃的 Session 都有一个包私有 `SessionWriteBehind`。当其待处理队列从空变为非空时，控制器会启动一个固定窗口。后续事件加入该批次但不会重置截止时间：这属于有界合并，而不是防抖。截止时间到达后，控制器会把完整的待处理前缀交给现有的按 id 串行化机制，并沿 `appendBatch` 路径写入。同一 Session 同时最多有一个活跃写入。该写入期间接纳的事件会形成新的待处理前缀，并拥有自己的固定截止时间；如果该截止时间在活跃写入完成前到期，新前缀会在前一次写入完成后立即开始写入。
+
+`writeBatchMaxDelayMs` 只限制控制器为批处理而主动等待的时间。事件循环调度、初始化、此前的串行化操作和后端 I/O 都可能延后持久化完成时间，因此该选项并不对 fsync 完成时间或崩溃数据丢失提供硬性 SLA。
+
+`session/flush` 会取消剩余等待，并充当共享的完全停稳屏障。它会在完成前等待活跃写入尝试，并排空屏障运行期间接纳的每个事件。Session 退役与后端 dispose（资源释放）共用该屏障，因此生命周期 teardown 绝不会等待批处理计时器。检查点策略仍会在模型请求与顶层工具副作用之前设置强制屏障。
+
+每个事件仍会按原有顺序和形态持久化。控制器会在接纳时复制每个事件；任何 `assistant/chunk`、`seq`、`time`、surface 元数据或存储记录都不会被删除或重写。因此，JSONL 可以在一个追加帧中编码更多事件，SQLite 可以在一个事务中插入更多事件行，而无需改变任一种磁盘格式或 schema 版本。
+
+后台追加失败后，控制器会把完整批次恢复到所有较新的待处理事件之前，报告一次该失败，并暂停自动重试。随后新接纳的第一个事件会开启新的固定窗口；显式 flush、退役或 dispose 会立即重试，如果故障再次发生，则会向调用方暴露该故障。这可以避免计时器驱动的失败循环，同时保留现有可恢复的 flush 边界。
+
+本决策仅取代[将实时持久化归并到单个刷新控制器](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md)中的即时调度节奏。对于每个活跃 Session 使用一个控制器、保留失败批次、按 id 串行化、退役和完全停稳的 dispose，原 Agent Note 仍是权威记录。后端钩子边界仍由[共享持久化协调器](2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md)定义。
+
+## 备选方案
+
+**不持久化流式分片事件。** 这里不采纳：这会改变事件日志作为真源的地位及恢复语义，而不只是改变物理写入节奏。在无信息损失的替代方案独立定义回放、fork、来源信息、序列和崩溃行为之前，现有的[拒绝仅保留组装消息的决策](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-assembled-assistant-messages-only.md)仍是防护规则。[打包行决策](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md)仍是配套的 JSONL 存储体积优化。
+
+**仅在语义检查点写入。** 不采纳：此方案会最大化批处理，却让普通的崩溃丢失窗口取决于另行挂载的策略。有界后台写入会在检查点之间持久化进度，而强制 flush 继续提供更强的顺序契约。
+
+**按最新事件重置防抖窗口。** 不采纳：持续不断的流式响应可能无限期推迟首次写入。由第一个待处理事件启动的固定窗口，为主动合并等待提供了真正的上界。
+
+**分别在 JSONL 与 SQLite 中实现计时器。** 不采纳：调度、失败保留、flush 竞态和 teardown 都是后端无关的生命周期问题。重复实现这些机制会重新引入 `PersistenceCoordinator` 已消除的实现漂移。
+
+## 验证
+
+控制器测试使用假时钟证明固定且不会重置的 200 ms 窗口、即时且可共享的 flush 屏障、屏障运行期间接纳的事件、在活跃写入之后已超过窗口时限的尾部批次、有序保留失败批次、暂停自动重试，以及显式 flush 会重试与其重叠发生的后台失败。协调器测试会在 Session 通知、退役、冲突回收和 teardown 路径中验证该控制器。JSONL 与 SQLite 测试套件继续覆盖存储格式、事务、恢复和共享持久化契约。
+
+## 后果
+
+高频事件突发通常会减少持久化追加操作，同时保持逻辑事件数量完全不变。减少幅度取决于事件到达速率和后端延迟：位于同一 200 ms 窗口内的突发事件会成为一个批次，而强制 flush 与稀疏事件仍可能产生小批次。
+
+本决策不会限制因后端缓慢而积压的待处理事件数量或字节数，也不会减少 SQLite 行数或解码后的逻辑日志。若要建立经过验证的内存上界或逻辑保留策略，就必须为其另行定义失败与回放契约，而不是再引入一条隐式计时器规则。
+
+接纳后的事件在配置窗口内可能只存在于内存中，此后在等待调度或后端工作完成期间也可能如此。部署可以选择较小的值以缩短普通丢失窗口，也可以选择较大的值以加强批处理。显式持久性边界保持不变，并会绕过等待。
+
+新的 deep module 让计时器、活跃写入、待处理前缀、重试暂停和屏障由一个所有方统一负责。`PersistenceCoordinator` 继续负责初始化和按标识串行化；后端仍只负责持久存储原语。`SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` 与 SQLite `SCHEMA_VERSION` 均不变。
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md
+2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md: e61c2030457cc9f0fda214e896b76afb37d0d2bc
+2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.zh.md: 5c56b8c17ef5ca6695f3b28f6b93218dade356c7
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# Agent Note: Client Tool presentation ownership
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The Client Runtime already projects Tool calls into a stable lifecycle: it pairs call/result events by `callId`, preserves running and settled forms, and indexes Code Dispatch children by their root call. The chat view nevertheless owned the entire presentation stack. It placed root calls in ChatFlow, composed each root with its subcalls, dispatched every atomic call by Tool name, carried the generic fallback and card models, registered first-party Tool views, and reused those models in the details panel.
+
+That ownership made `ui-conversation` interpret business Tool names and made subcalls an orphaned concern if an atomic Tool view moved elsewhere. A business package such as `ui-skill` could register a row, but it still depended on conversation's Tool-specific composition contract. Adding Tool-specific Session projection would duplicate a data model the Runtime already owns, while moving only individual React components would leave the composition and model coupling in place.
+
+## Decision
+
+Tool is a first-class Client UI concept with one presentation owner, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-tool`. Session Event, projection, fold, `ConversationSnapshot` construction and caching, historical paging, and Code Dispatch indexing remain unchanged.
+
+“First-class concept” describes UI ownership only; it adds no Runtime data kind. `ConversationNode` remains the transcript projection, `ChatFlowItem` remains the render unit produced when conversation sorts and groups nodes, `ToolCallBlock` remains the standard data for one call, and `ToolCallTree` only composes root/subcall presentation within Tool. Command continues to render through the separate `'conversation.chat.commandview'` seat and does not become Tool.
+
+`ui-conversation` owns ordered placement. `deriveChatFlow()` still decides where a settled Tool group appears, and `ChatView` still appends running calls, maintains scroll anchors and selection, and supplies host actions. For each root call it renders the single/session `'conversation.chat.tool'` seat with the root block, selected call id, session cwd, and open-file/inspect callbacks. It does not read Code Dispatch children, branch on Tool names, or import Tool-specific views and card models.
+
+`ui-tool` occupies that whole-Tool seat. Through its standard session slot props, `ToolCallTree` selects the Runtime-projected `codeDispatches[rootCallId]` array, renders the root followed by that one currently supported child level, and routes both forms through one keyed/session `'tool.call.toolview'` child slot using `entryKey: toolName`. An absent business registration renders `GenericToolCard`. This is deliberately one-level composition, not a claim that the Runtime supports an arbitrary recursive call graph.
+
+Business plugins register only atomic views against `'tool.call.toolview'`. Their owner payload is the standard Tool call block plus identity, cwd, and host actions; it carries no Session projector or conversation service. Skill remains an ordinary Tool and `ui-skill` registers the `skill` key through this seam. Existing first-party views live in `ui-tool` until a business package has a reason to own one independently.
+
+The details panel is a second Tool presentation site but not a call-tree owner. `ui-conversation` delegates its selected output body through the single/session `'conversation.details.tool'` seat; `ui-tool` renders the card-aware output and the seat fallback preserves raw result text when the plugin is absent. Card models therefore have one production owner without introducing a reverse implementation import.
+
+The Runtime remains the authority for Tool lifecycle and call topology. Code Dispatch stays a top-level official concept because it changes `codeDispatches` and parent/child identity; ordinary Tool business differences stay at the keyed presentation seam. This package boundary does not add a Tool projector/fold registry.
+
+## Runtime and render path
+
+This boundary starts at the Client's `ConversationSnapshot`; the full render path is:
+
+```text
+ConversationSnapshot.nodes
+  -> deriveChatFlow()
+  -> settled tool-group positions ----+
+                                      |
+ConversationSnapshot.runningCalls     |
+  -> ChatView flow tail ---------------+-> ToolSeat
+                                           -> conversation.chat.tool
+                                           -> ToolCallTree
+ConversationSnapshot.codeDispatches[rootCallId] -+
+                                                  +-> root ToolCall + one-level child ToolCall
+                                                      -> tool.call.toolview(entryKey = toolName)
+                                                           |- registered atomic view
+                                                           `- GenericToolCard fallback
+```
+
+The live Session's [`Session.buildSnapshot()`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/session.ts) caches arrays or maps such as `nodes`, `runningCalls`, and `codeDispatches` against independent revisions. Their references stay stable when the corresponding business state has not changed, allowing React selectors and memoization to skip unrelated updates. The historical projection's [`projectConversationHistory()`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/session-history/history-fold.ts) reconstructs the same running-call and Code Dispatch shapes from entries in its window. Tool UI consumes the snapshot shapes already unified by those paths; presentation packages do not repeat call/result pairing, historical replay, or cache indexing.
+
+[`ChatView`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/ChatView.tsx) reruns [`deriveChatFlow()`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/chat-flow.ts) only when the `nodes` reference changes. It groups consecutive settled Tool results into a `tool-group`, while running root calls append at the flow tail. Both paths ultimately enter the same `ToolSeat`, so settled and running forms share the whole-Tool seat. `ToolCallTree` selects only the current root's `codeDispatches[rootCallId]`; it does not introduce a business projector for presentation of other roots.
+
+## Code and responsibility boundaries
+
+| Owner | Primary code | Owns | Explicitly does not own |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Client Runtime | [`Session`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/session.ts), [`history-fold.ts`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/session-history/history-fold.ts) | call/result pairing, running/settled lifecycle, Code Dispatch parent/child index, snapshot reference stability | Business views selected by Tool name |
+| `ui-conversation` | [`chat-flow.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/chat-flow.ts), [`ChatView.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/ChatView.tsx), [`slots.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/contract/slots.ts) | ChatFlow order, settled groups, running tail, scroll anchors, selection and host actions, whole-Tool seat declaration | subcall composition, `toolName` dispatch, Generic fallback, Tool card models |
+| `ui-tool` | [`apply.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/apply.ts), [`ToolCallTree.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolCallTree.tsx), [`slots.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/contract/slots.ts) | root/subcall composition, atomic keyed dispatch, Generic fallback, Tool card models and built-in Tool views | ChatFlow ordering, Session Event fold |
+| Business Tool plugins | [`ui-skill` registration example](../../../../packages/client/ui-skill/src/client/index.ts) | Atomic views for one or more wire Tool names | root/subcall placement and lifecycle pairing |
+| Details path | [`DetailsPanel.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/DetailsPanel.tsx), [`ToolDetails.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolDetails.tsx) | selected-call lookup, card-aware output, and raw fallback | chat call-tree composition |
+
+## Slot and owner contract
+
+A slot declaration also constrains render ownership. The conversation chat entry declares `'conversation.chat.tool'` through `children`, so only `ChatView` places the whole-Tool seat. When `ui-tool` registers that seat, its `children` declares `'tool.call.toolview'`, so only `ToolCallTree` renders the atomic Tool seat. Business plugins register keyed entries only; they neither participate in root/subcall composition nor establish a registry parallel to slots.
+
+The whole seat's `ToolTreeOwnerProps` carries the root `callId`, `toolName`, `ToolCallBlock`, `selectedCallId`, session `cwd`, `openFile(path)`, and `inspectCall(callId)`. `ToolCallTree` converts either a root or child into the same `ToolCallOwnerProps` and narrows inspect to a callback for that call. The atomic owner carries no `ReactNode`, Cordis `Context`, Session service, or projector; a business view consumes only one standard call block and host actions.
+
+The seat filler also preserves the conversation DOM contract on every root and child wrapper: `data-chat-anchor-key="call:<callId>"`, `data-chat-call-id`, and `data-selected="true"` on the selected call. `ChatView` consumes the anchor key to restore prepend/paging position; the Tool owner emits it because it alone composes child wrappers.
+
+Business plugins use one registration shape:
+
+```text
+ctx.slots.inject('tool.call.toolview', () =>
+  ctx.slots.register({
+    name: 'tool.call.toolview',
+    key: '<wire tool name>',
+  }, BusinessToolRow))
+```
+
+`ui-tool`'s [`apply()`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/apply.ts) registers the whole-Tool renderer, details renderer, and existing built-in atomic views. An existing independent business package can move only its keyed registration, as `ui-skill` does, without changing `ui-conversation` or Session.
+
+## Details path
+
+[`DetailsPanel`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/DetailsPanel.tsx) still locates the selected call in `nodes`, `runningCalls`, and `codeDispatches`, and it owns input arguments, empty states, and panel lifecycle. It passes only `{ block, cwd }` to `'conversation.details.tool'`; [`ToolDetails`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolDetails.tsx) reuses Tool card models to render the output. When `ui-tool` is absent, a settled call falls back to raw result text and a running call shows conversation's running fallback, so details never imports the Tool implementation in reverse.
+
+## Verification
+
+Test ownership follows production ownership. `ui-conversation` tests install a local whole-Tool seat probe and assert only ChatFlow placement, owner payload, and host contracts such as selection, open-file, and inspect; they do not import `ui-tool` production code or test helpers. `ui-tool` tests mount a real conversation host and verify root/subcall composition, keyed dispatch, generic fallback, concrete Tool UI, and plugin lifecycle.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Keep atomic Tool slots under every conversation view.** Rejected: each view would have to reproduce root/subcall composition, and a Tool registration would be isolated by view even though its business meaning is Tool-wide. A whole-Tool seat preserves view-owned placement while giving the call tree one owner. This supersedes the per-view placement selected by the earlier [toolview dissolution](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md), while retaining its keyed-slot and no-parallel-registry decisions.
+
+**Move only the Tool React components and card models.** Rejected: `ChatView` would still own Tool-name dispatch and Code Dispatch composition, so the dependency would change file paths without changing responsibility.
+
+**Add business-specific Session projectors or folds.** Rejected: ordinary Tool views consume the standard call block already reconstructed by Runtime. A second registry would create two authorities for call identity and historical replay. Only a feature that changes logged topology or lifecycle earns a Runtime-level extension.
+
+**Make each atomic Tool view render its own subcalls recursively.** Rejected: the atomic registrant receives one Tool call and should not know whether it is a root or child. Root/child composition belongs to `ui-tool`, and the current wire/runtime shape only supports one Code Dispatch child level.
+
+**Import `ui-tool` components directly from `ui-conversation`.** Rejected: it would reverse the intended feature direction and make Tool presentation mandatory. Declared slots retain lifecycle ownership, fallback behavior, and independent plugin loading.
+
+## Consequences
+
+`ui-conversation` becomes independent of Tool-name business presentation while retaining ChatFlow, selection, and host interaction responsibilities. Root calls and subcalls cannot drift onto different dispatch paths, and business packages can own atomic Tool presentation without Session changes. The cost is one new Client package and two cross-package slot seams; `ui-tool` also deliberately depends on conversation's declared seats and locale namespace. The assembled Web bundle therefore mounts `ui-tool`; omitting it leaves chat Tool seats empty while the details seat keeps its raw-result fallback, without changing Session reconstruction.
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# Agent Note: Client Tool 展示所有权
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-08-client-tool-presentation-ownership.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+Client Runtime 已经把 Tool 调用投影成稳定的生命周期：它按 `callId` 配对 call/result 事件，保留 running 与 settled 两种形态，并按 root call 索引 Code Dispatch 子调用。但 chat view 仍拥有整套展示链路：它在 ChatFlow 中放置 root call，把每个 root 与 subcall 编排在一起，按 Tool 名称分发每个原子调用，携带通用 fallback 与 card model，注册第一方 Tool view，并在 details panel 中复用这些 model。
+
+这种所有权迫使 `ui-conversation` 解释业务 Tool 名称；一旦原子 Tool view 被迁走，subcall 就会成为无主的遗留关注点。`ui-skill` 等业务包虽能注册一行视图，仍依赖 conversation 的 Tool 专属编排契约。增加 Tool 专属 Session projection 会重复 Runtime 已拥有的数据模型，而只移动单个 React 组件则会把编排与 model 耦合留在原地。
+
+## Decision
+
+Tool 成为 Client UI 的一级概念，并由 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-tool` 统一拥有展示。Session Event、projection、fold、`ConversationSnapshot` 构建与缓存、历史分页及 Code Dispatch 索引保持不变。
+
+这里的“一级概念”只描述 UI 所有权，不增加 Runtime 数据种类。`ConversationNode` 仍是 transcript projection，`ChatFlowItem` 仍是 conversation 对节点进行排序与分组后得到的渲染单元，`ToolCallBlock` 仍是单次调用的标准数据，而 `ToolCallTree` 只负责 Tool 内部的 root/subcall 展示编排。Command 继续通过独立的 `'conversation.chat.commandview'` 席位渲染，不并入 Tool。
+
+`ui-conversation` 拥有有序放置。`deriveChatFlow()` 仍决定 settled Tool group 在哪里出现，`ChatView` 仍追加 running call、维护滚动 anchor 与 selection，并提供宿主动作。对于每个 root call，它使用 root block、selected call id、session cwd 以及 open-file/inspect 回调渲染 single/session 的 `'conversation.chat.tool'` 席位。它不读取 Code Dispatch child、不按 Tool 名称分支，也不导入 Tool 专属 view 或 card model。
+
+`ui-tool` 占据这个整体 Tool 席位。`ToolCallTree` 通过标准 session slot props 选择 Runtime 投影的 `codeDispatches[rootCallId]` 数组，先渲染 root，再渲染当前支持的一层 child；两种调用都通过同一个 keyed/session 的 `'tool.call.toolview'` 子 slot，以 `entryKey: toolName` 分发。业务未注册时渲染 `GenericToolCard`。这里刻意只编排一层，并不声称 Runtime 已支持任意递归调用图。
+
+业务插件只对 `'tool.call.toolview'` 注册原子 view。其 owner payload 是标准 Tool call block 加 identity、cwd 与宿主动作，不携带 Session projector 或 conversation service。Skill 仍是普通 Tool，`ui-skill` 通过该 seam 注册 `skill` key。现有第一方 view 暂留在 `ui-tool`，直到某个业务包确有理由独立拥有它。
+
+details panel 是第二个 Tool 展示点，但不是调用树所有者。`ui-conversation` 通过 single/session 的 `'conversation.details.tool'` 席位委托 selected output body；`ui-tool` 渲染能够识别 card 的输出，插件缺席时由席位 fallback 保留 raw result text。因此 card model 只有一个生产代码所有者，也不需要引入反向实现依赖。
+
+Runtime 仍是 Tool 生命周期与调用拓扑的权威。Code Dispatch 会改变 `codeDispatches` 与 parent/child identity，因此继续作为官方顶级概念；普通 Tool 业务差异停留在 keyed 展示 seam。这个包边界不会增加 Tool projector/fold registry。
+
+## Runtime 与渲染链路
+
+这项边界从 Client 的 `ConversationSnapshot` 开始，完整渲染链路如下：
+
+```text
+ConversationSnapshot.nodes
+  -> deriveChatFlow()
+  -> settled tool-group positions ----+
+                                      |
+ConversationSnapshot.runningCalls     |
+  -> ChatView flow tail ---------------+-> ToolSeat
+                                           -> conversation.chat.tool
+                                           -> ToolCallTree
+ConversationSnapshot.codeDispatches[rootCallId] -+
+                                                  +-> root ToolCall + one-level child ToolCall
+                                                      -> tool.call.toolview(entryKey = toolName)
+                                                           |- registered atomic view
+                                                           `- GenericToolCard fallback
+```
+
+Live Session 的 [`Session.buildSnapshot()`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/session.ts) 按独立 revision 缓存 `nodes`、`runningCalls`、`codeDispatches` 等数组或 map；没有对应业务变化时，它们保持引用稳定，供 React selector 与 memo 跳过无关更新。历史 projection 的 [`projectConversationHistory()`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/session-history/history-fold.ts) 从窗口内 entry 重建相同的 running call 与 Code Dispatch 形态。Tool UI 直接消费这两个路径已经统一的 snapshot，不在展示包中重复 call/result 配对、历史 replay 或缓存索引。
+
+[`ChatView`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/ChatView.tsx) 只在 `nodes` 引用变化时重新执行 [`deriveChatFlow()`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/chat-flow.ts)，把连续 settled Tool result 合为 `tool-group`；running root call 则追加在 flow tail。两条路径最终都进入同一个 `ToolSeat`，因此 settled/running 形态共享整体 Tool 席位。`ToolCallTree` 只选择当前 root 的 `codeDispatches[rootCallId]`，不会因其他 root 的展示逻辑引入业务 projector。
+
+## 代码与职责边界
+
+| 所有者 | 主要代码 | 拥有的责任 | 明确不拥有 |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| Client Runtime | [`Session`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/session.ts)、[`history-fold.ts`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/session-history/history-fold.ts) | call/result 配对、running/settled 生命周期、Code Dispatch parent/child 索引、snapshot 引用稳定性 | Tool 名称对应的业务视图 |
+| `ui-conversation` | [`chat-flow.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/chat-flow.ts)、[`ChatView.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/chat/ChatView.tsx)、[`slots.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/contract/slots.ts) | ChatFlow 顺序、settled group、running tail、scroll anchor、selection 与宿主动作、整体 Tool 席位声明 | subcall 组合、按 `toolName` 分发、Generic fallback、Tool card model |
+| `ui-tool` | [`apply.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/apply.ts)、[`ToolCallTree.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolCallTree.tsx)、[`slots.ts`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/contract/slots.ts) | root/subcall 组合、原子 keyed dispatch、Generic fallback、Tool card model 与内置 Tool view | ChatFlow 排序、Session Event fold |
+| 业务 Tool 插件 | [`ui-skill` 注册例](../../../../packages/client/ui-skill/src/client/index.ts) | 一个或多个 wire Tool name 的原子 view | root/subcall 位置与生命周期配对 |
+| details 路径 | [`DetailsPanel.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/DetailsPanel.tsx)、[`ToolDetails.tsx`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolDetails.tsx) | selected call 定位、card-aware output 与 raw fallback | chat 调用树编排 |
+
+## Slot 与 owner 契约
+
+slot 声明同时限定渲染所有权。conversation chat entry 通过 `children` 声明 `'conversation.chat.tool'`，因此只有 `ChatView` 放置整体 Tool 席位；`ui-tool` 注册该席位时再通过 `children` 声明 `'tool.call.toolview'`，因此只有 `ToolCallTree` 渲染原子 Tool 席位。业务插件只注册 keyed entry，不参与 root/subcall 编排，也不建立与 slot 平行的 registry。
+
+整体席位的 `ToolTreeOwnerProps` 携带 root `callId`、`toolName`、`ToolCallBlock`、`selectedCallId`、session `cwd`、`openFile(path)` 与 `inspectCall(callId)`。`ToolCallTree` 把 root 或 child 转成相同的 `ToolCallOwnerProps`，并把 inspect 收窄成当前 call 的回调。原子 owner 不携带 `ReactNode`、Cordis `Context`、Session service 或 projector；业务 view 只消费一个标准调用块和宿主动作。
+
+席位填充方还要在每个 root 和 child wrapper 上保留 conversation DOM 契约：`data-chat-anchor-key="call:<callId>"`、`data-chat-call-id`，以及 selected call 上的 `data-selected="true"`。`ChatView` 用 anchor key 恢复 prepend/paging 位置；child wrapper 由 Tool owner 独自编排，因此这些属性也由它输出。
+
+业务插件遵循同一个注册形态：
+
+```text
+ctx.slots.inject('tool.call.toolview', () =>
+  ctx.slots.register({
+    name: 'tool.call.toolview',
+    key: '<wire tool name>',
+  }, BusinessToolRow))
+```
+
+`ui-tool` 的 [`apply()`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/apply.ts) 注册整体 Tool renderer、details renderer 与现有内置原子 view；已有独立业务包可以像 `ui-skill` 一样只迁走自己的 keyed 注册，无需改动 `ui-conversation` 或 Session。
+
+## Details 路径
+
+[`DetailsPanel`](../../../../packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/DetailsPanel.tsx) 仍从 `nodes`、`runningCalls` 与 `codeDispatches` 中定位选中的 call，并拥有 input 参数、空态和面板生命周期。它只把 `{ block, cwd }` 交给 `'conversation.details.tool'`；[`ToolDetails`](../../../../packages/client/ui-tool/src/client/tool/ToolDetails.tsx) 复用 Tool card model 渲染 output。`ui-tool` 缺席时，settled call 回退为 raw result text，running call 显示 conversation 的 running fallback，因此 details 不反向导入 Tool 实现。
+
+## Verification
+
+测试归属跟随生产所有权。`ui-conversation` 的测试安装本地整体 Tool 席位替身，只验证 ChatFlow 位置、owner payload 与 selection、open-file、inspect 等宿主契约；它们不导入 `ui-tool` 的生产实现或测试 helper。`ui-tool` 的测试挂载真实 conversation 宿主，验证 root/subcall 编排、keyed dispatch、generic fallback、具体 Tool UI 与插件生命周期。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**在每个 conversation view 下保留原子 Tool slot。** 拒绝：每个 view 都必须重复 root/subcall 编排，而且 Tool 注册会按 view 隔离，即使它的业务语义本应是 Tool 级。整体 Tool 席位保留 view 对放置位置的所有权，同时让调用树只有一个所有者。它取代了早期 [toolview 溶解](2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md)所选择的 per-view 放置方式，但保留 keyed slot 与不设平行 registry 的决策。
+
+**只移动 Tool React 组件与 card model。** 拒绝：`ChatView` 仍会拥有 Tool 名称分发与 Code Dispatch 编排，只是改变文件路径，没有改变责任。
+
+**增加业务专属 Session projector 或 fold。** 拒绝：普通 Tool view 消费 Runtime 已重建的标准 call block。第二套 registry 会为 call identity 与历史 replay 建立两个权威。只有会改变日志拓扑或生命周期的能力才应获得 Runtime 级扩展。
+
+**让每个原子 Tool view 递归渲染自己的 subcall。** 拒绝：原子注册方只接收一个 Tool call，不应知道自己是 root 还是 child。root/child 编排归 `ui-tool`，且当前 wire/runtime 形态只支持一层 Code Dispatch child。
+
+**让 `ui-conversation` 直接导入 `ui-tool` 组件。** 拒绝：这会反转预期的 feature 依赖方向，并把 Tool 展示变成必选能力。声明式 slot 能保留生命周期所有权、fallback 行为与独立插件装载。
+
+## Consequences
+
+`ui-conversation` 不再依赖 Tool 名称对应的业务展示，同时保留 ChatFlow、selection 与宿主交互责任。root call 与 subcall 不会漂移到不同分发路径，业务包无需修改 Session 即可拥有原子 Tool 展示。代价是新增一个 Client package 与两个跨包 slot seam；`ui-tool` 也明确依赖 conversation 声明的席位与 locale namespace。因此组装后的 Web bundle 会挂载 `ui-tool`；省略该插件时，chat Tool 席位为空，details 席位则保留 raw-result fallback，且 Session 重建不受影响。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md
-2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 7de1f4f631cec90048ccc8eab7a6654560d84846
-2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 6ce642eb4a18a1a412fb63c3bb00042a921f4da3
+2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 89edd4529cc16617fdca736dbbea4b170400d6bd
+2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 673921c913a9f1fefe6f85303cf5952f8edbcc1d
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ A TUI run against an unreachable DeepSeek endpoint failed with the single notice
 - Durable `turn/end` error messages include cause detail. Existing snapshot fixtures replay byte-identically because their scripted errors carry no `cause` (for such errors `errorChain(err)` equals `err.message`); only unit-test expectation strings changed. A fixture recorded from a real transport failure would carry the chain.
 - `errorChain` renders `message` without the class name (`String(error)` rendered `Error: <message>`), so a bare `TypeError` in a log line loses its type label unless its message is empty (then the name is the fallback). The chain detail was judged worth more than the class name at these seams.
 - `dsh-stdio` output for failed turns is no longer silent; piped consumers that parsed the transcript see new `[turn …]` lines.
- Remaining `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-subagent`, `dsh-workflow`, `dsh-skill`, `dsh-workflow-workerthread`, and `cli-demo` still render without the chain; they wrap package-local errors that carry their own messages, and can adopt `errorChain` when their diagnostics prove insufficient.
+- Remaining `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-subagent`, `dsh-workflow`, `dsh-skill`, and `dsh-workflow-workerthread` still render without the chain; they wrap package-local errors that carry their own messages, and can adopt `errorChain` when their diagnostics prove insufficient.
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ TUI 连接不可达的 DeepSeek 端点时，失败只显示一条 `fetch failed`
 - 持久化的 `turn/end` 错误消息包含 cause 细节。现有快照 fixture（测试前置数据）字节级一致地回放，因为其脚本化错误不带 `cause`（对这类错误 `errorChain(err)` 等于 `err.message`）；只有单元测试的期望字符串有变化。从真实传输失败录制的 fixture 会携带完整链。
 - `errorChain` 渲染 `message` 而不带类名（`String(error)` 会渲染 `Error: <message>`），因此日志行里的裸 `TypeError` 会丢失类型标签，除非消息为空（此时回退到类名）。在这些诊断界面上，链细节被判断为比类名更有价值。
 - `dsh-stdio` 对失败轮次的输出不再沉默；解析 transcript 的管道消费方会看到新的 `[turn …]` 行。
- `dsh-subagent`、`dsh-workflow`、`dsh-skill`、`dsh-workflow-workerthread`、`cli-demo` 里剩余的 `renderThrown` 副本仍不渲染链；它们包装的是自带消息的包内错误，等诊断信息证明不足时再采用 `errorChain`。
+- `dsh-subagent`、`dsh-workflow`、`dsh-skill`、`dsh-workflow-workerthread` 里剩余的 `renderThrown` 副本仍不渲染链；它们包装的是自带消息的包内错误，等诊断信息证明不足时再采用 `errorChain`。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md
-2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: d05d25cfa7c3984ce0ce75c38068a91a0e07dfe8
-2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: f31c33e680b3db60a6fb758a522addca63224fea
+2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: fb6524846f837b783423b3ed0e043cd4e1f7849d
+2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: e6072313b7089b9dda14c298fcb94db786220501
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Auto-compaction always anchors at the surface head, so the shadowed region is th
 - **Keep the summarizer system prompt but reuse the rest** — rejected: the system slot is the very first token region a provider caches on, so a distinct summarizer system prompt invalidates the whole prefix regardless of what follows. Only moving the directive off the front recovers the cache.
 - **Send only the shadowed region without the `system`/`tools` head** — rejected: a differently-headed sequence still diverges from the cached request at the first token, so it caches no better while losing the framing the summary needs.
 - **Omit `tools` from the summarization request** (the model never calls one) — rejected: tool schemas are part of the cached token sequence; omitting them misaligns every following token and defeats reuse.
- **A dedicated `assistant/chunk`-emitting summarization sub-session for snapshot replay** — out of scope here; the replay gap predates this change and is tracked in the [compaction-seam note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md).
+- **A dedicated `assistant/chunk`-emitting summarization sub-session for snapshot replay** — rejected: the durable `compact/summary` event records the successful local call's position and complete output, while its explicit call marker prevents replay from treating template or remote output as a local stream.

 ## Consequences

@@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ Auto-compaction always anchors at the surface head, so the shadowed region is th

 - **Unit:** `compact-basic.spec.ts` asserts the auxiliary call forwards `system`/`tools`/leading messages and appends the compaction instruction as the final message, and that `compactRegion` replays the latest routed header prefix. Existing content assertions read the summarizer input through the replayed messages rather than a transcript string.
 - **Loop:** `compact-loop-repro.spec.ts` classifies the summarization request by the compaction instruction in its trailing user message, and the overflow-recovery tests continue to pin conversation-vs-summary request counts across the real loop.
- **Snapshot gap unchanged:** the summarization call still emits no `assistant/chunk` events, so it remains outside keyless replay; the pre-existing gap is owned by the [compaction-seam note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md).
+- **Snapshot:** keyless replay reconstructs one canonical successful stream from a marked `compact/summary`; the [compaction-seam note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) owns the durable marker contract.
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Status: implemented
 - **保留摘要器系统提示词但复用其余部分**——否决：system 槽位正是提供方最先做缓存的 token 区域，因此一个不同的摘要器系统提示词无论后面跟着什么都会使整个前缀失效。只有把指令移离前端才能恢复缓存。
 - **只发送被遮蔽区域而不带 `system`/`tools` 头部**——否决：头部不同的序列在第一个 token 处仍然与已缓存请求分叉，因此缓存效果并不更好，反而丢失了摘要所需的框架。
 - **从摘要请求中省略 `tools`**（模型从不调用任何工具）——否决：工具 schema 是已缓存 token 序列的一部分；省略它们会让后续每个 token 失去对齐，破坏复用。
- **为快照回放专门建立一个发出 `assistant/chunk` 的摘要子会话**——此处超出范围；该回放缺口早于本次改动，记录在 [compaction-seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) 中。
+- **为快照回放专门建立一个发出 `assistant/chunk` 的摘要子会话**——否决：持久的 `compact/summary` 事件会记录成功本地调用的位置和完整输出，而显式调用标记可防止回放把模板或远程输出当作本地流。

 ## 后果

@@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ Status: implemented

 - **单元：** `compact-basic.spec.ts` 断言辅助调用转发 `system`/`tools`/前导消息，并把压缩指令作为最后一条消息追加，且 `compactRegion` 回放最新的已路由 header 前缀。现有的内容断言通过回放的消息而非 transcript 字符串来读取摘要器输入。
 - **循环：** `compact-loop-repro.spec.ts` 依据摘要请求尾部 user 消息中的压缩指令对其分类，溢出恢复测试则继续在真实循环中固定对话请求与摘要请求的数量。
- **快照缺口未变：** 摘要调用仍然不发出 `assistant/chunk` 事件，因此它仍处于无密钥回放之外；这一既有缺口归 [compaction-seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) 所有。
+- **快照：** 无密钥回放会从带标记的 `compact/summary` 重建一条规范成功流；[compaction-seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) 负责持久标记契约。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md
-2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md: e2e951cd9f78b319a701a3e60afba48786633f03
-2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.zh.md: 8ba35f4bbc2a4b408a01e11f09bd767860964875
+2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md: c3eeeca01a7820b5f410bd895de998e944e58eb2
+2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.zh.md: 388b67c67052074fa7423eae294e00b4122b2fe8
@@ -8,9 +8,13 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.zh.md)

 ACP snapshot comparison normalizes generated UUIDs, cwd aliases, spill locators, embedded event times, and omitted-byte counts, but refresh write-back persisted the fresh raw values. A behaviorally unchanged refresh therefore rewrote fixtures with new randomness or host-specific path spellings even though the comparison contract considered both logs equal.

+Message identity needs a weaker structural precondition than aligned records: an unrelated log event can break record alignment while an inherited message's identity-free value remains unchanged across parent and child logs. Record mode also begins with freshly minted message UUIDs when it replaces an existing fixture.
+
 ## Decision

-Refresh write-back uses `normalizeSessionLog` as its sole volatile-value authority. It normalizes the original harvested records with the fresh run's ids, cwd, and every cwd alias, while normalizing fixture records with the fixture header context; literal replacements affect only the raw values being written. After existing record alignment, it recursively compares fresh and existing leaves through those normalized records: normalized-equivalent leaves retain the existing raw value, while normalized-distinct leaves retain the fresh semantic value.
+Before record or refresh writes session fixtures, the shared snapshot support passes fixture-ready logs to one structural message-ID owner. It recognizes surface carriers through the session package's authoritative surface-type predicate and the correlated queued copies in `agent/inbox/spliced`, fingerprints every complete message with its top-level `id` removed, and records every ID-to-fingerprint edge across all parent/child logs. It reuses an existing UUID only when both its ID and fingerprint have degree one in the fresh and existing graphs, then rewrites only validated message `id` fields in those carriers. Repeated inherited occurrences with the same ID remain one candidate, while new, changed, duplicate-content, malformed, and conflicting messages keep their fresh IDs. ACP, JSON-RPC, and Web recorders run this pass after header scrubbing and cwd tokenization, so fixture spellings rather than raw host paths determine identity.
+
+Refresh write-back uses `normalizeSessionLog` as its volatile-value authority for aligned leaves. It normalizes the original harvested records with the fresh run's ids, cwd, and every cwd alias, while normalizing fixture records with the fixture header context; literal replacements are limited to fresh-run session IDs, cwd values, and spill paths. After existing record alignment, it recursively compares fresh and existing leaves through those normalized records: normalized-equivalent leaves retain the existing raw value, while normalized-distinct leaves retain the fresh semantic value. Complete message IDs in surface or inbox carriers are excluded from this path so positional reuse and structural reuse cannot assign the same committed UUID independently.

 Before reuse, the complete logical-record layout must align, apart from the existing packed-chunk and inserted-title equivalences. Normalized-equivalent changed strings form a log-wide bijection: one fresh string maps to exactly one existing string and vice versa, so repeated IDs remain correlated across records. An unexplained record mismatch or conflicting mapping disables normalized string reuse for that log.

@@ -26,6 +30,6 @@ Object fields align by key. Array elements align only when all corresponding arr

 ## Consequences

-Repeated refreshes no longer rewrite aligned fixture values solely because the normalizer classifies them as volatile, and new volatile categories added to the normalizer automatically inherit the write-back behavior. Structural ambiguity remains conservative: unmatched records, conflicting string mappings, resized arrays, and strings containing both semantic and volatile changes use fresh values rather than risk reusing misaligned data.
+Record and refresh no longer rewrite an unchanged unique message UUID solely because another event changed the surrounding record layout, regardless of whether ACP, JSON-RPC, or Web owns the recording. Repeated refreshes also retain aligned fixture values that the normalizer classifies as volatile, and new volatile categories added to the normalizer automatically inherit that write-back behavior. Structural ambiguity remains conservative: unmatched records, conflicting string mappings, resized arrays, strings containing both semantic and volatile changes, malformed messages, and any message graph with a non-unique ID or fingerprint use fresh values rather than risk reusing misaligned data.

-Focused unit coverage pins recursive object/array behavior, correlated IDs, ambiguous-layout fallback, conflicting mappings, fresh cwd aliases, volatile strings, and fresh semantic fields. Keyless refresh coverage proves approval UUIDs, cwd aliases, spill paths, and event-read volatility leave their committed fixtures byte-identical.
+Focused unit coverage pins all authoritative surface-message shapes, durable inbox/surface correlation, scenario-wide parent/child correlation, cwd-bearing fixture-ready matching, unrelated event insertion, malformed-message isolation, both-axis graph ambiguity, single-owner write-back, recursive object/array behavior, conflicting mappings, fresh cwd aliases, volatile strings, and fresh semantic fields. Keyless refresh coverage proves approval UUIDs, cwd aliases, spill paths, and event-read volatility leave their committed fixtures byte-identical.
@@ -8,9 +8,13 @@ Status: implemented

 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）快照比较会归一化生成的 UUID、cwd 别名、spill locator、嵌入的事件时间和省略字节数，但刷新写回会持久化本次生成的原始值。因此，即使比较契约将两份日志视为相等，一次行为未发生变化的刷新仍会用新的随机值或宿主特有的路径写法改写 fixture（测试前置数据）。

+消息身份所需的结构前提比记录对齐更弱：无关的日志事件可能破坏记录对齐，但继承而来的消息去除身份后的值在父级和子级日志之间仍保持不变。录制模式在替换现有 fixture 时也会从新生成的消息 UUID 开始。
+
 ## 决策

-刷新写回以 `normalizeSessionLog` 作为易变值的唯一判定依据。系统使用本次运行的 id、cwd 及全部 cwd 别名归一化原始收集记录，并使用 fixture 头部上下文归一化 fixture 记录；字面量替换只影响要写入的原始值。现有记录完成对齐后，系统基于这些归一化记录，递归比较本次生成记录与现有记录的叶节点：归一化后等价的叶节点保留现有原始值，归一化后不同的叶节点则保留本次生成的语义值。
+在录制或刷新写入会话 fixture 前，共享快照支持层会将可写入 fixture 的日志交给一个负责结构化处理消息 ID 的组件。该组件通过会话包的权威 surface 类型谓词识别 surface 载体，并识别 `agent/inbox/spliced` 中与这些载体关联的已排队消息副本；随后移除每条完整消息的顶层 `id` 并计算指纹，同时记录所有父级/子级日志中每条 ID 与指纹之间的关联边。仅当该 ID 与指纹在本次生成图和现有图中的度均为 1 时，才会复用现有 UUID，随后仅改写这些载体中通过验证的消息 `id` 字段。具有相同 ID、重复出现的继承消息仍算作一个候选项；新增、发生变化、内容重复、格式错误和存在冲突的消息则保留本次生成的 ID。ACP、JSON-RPC 和 Web 录制器会在擦除 header 并对 cwd 进行 token 化后执行这一步，因此消息身份取决于 fixture 中的写法，而非宿主机原始路径。
+
+刷新写回以 `normalizeSessionLog` 作为已对齐叶值的易变值判定依据。系统使用本次运行的 id、cwd 及全部 cwd 别名归一化原始收集记录，并使用 fixture 头部上下文归一化 fixture 记录；字面量替换仅限于本次运行生成的会话 ID、cwd 值和 spill 路径。现有记录完成对齐后，系统基于这些归一化记录，递归比较本次生成记录与现有记录的叶节点：归一化后等价的叶节点保留现有原始值，归一化后不同的叶节点则保留本次生成的语义值。surface 或 inbox 载体中的完整消息 ID 不参与这一路径，以免按位置复用与结构复用各自独立分配同一个已提交 UUID。

 复用前必须确保完整逻辑记录布局对齐，现有的打包分片与插入标题等价情形除外。归一化后等价但发生变化的字符串在整份日志范围内形成双射：一个本次生成的字符串只映射到一个现有字符串，反向亦然，因此跨记录重复出现的 ID 仍保持关联。出现无法解释的记录不匹配或映射冲突时，该日志会停用归一化字符串复用。

@@ -26,6 +30,6 @@ ACP（Agent Client Protocol）快照比较会归一化生成的 UUID、cwd 别

 ## 后果

-重复刷新不再仅仅因为规范化器将已对齐的 fixture 值归类为易变值，就改写这些值；以后加入规范化器的新易变值类别也会自动继承该写回行为。结构有歧义时仍采取保守策略：记录无法匹配、字符串映射冲突、数组尺寸发生变化，或字符串同时包含语义变化与易变变化时，均使用本次生成的值，避免冒险复用未对齐的数据。
+录制和刷新不再仅仅因为另一个事件改变了周边记录布局，就改写未变化且唯一的消息 UUID，无论该录制由 ACP、JSON-RPC 还是 Web 负责。重复刷新也会保留规范化器归类为易变值的已对齐 fixture 值；以后加入规范化器的新易变值类别也会自动继承该写回行为。结构有歧义时仍采取保守策略：记录无法匹配、字符串映射冲突、数组尺寸发生变化、字符串同时包含语义变化与易变变化、消息格式错误，或消息图中的 ID 或指纹不唯一时，均使用本次生成的值，避免冒险复用未对齐的数据。

-聚焦的单元测试固定了递归处理对象与数组的行为、关联 ID、有歧义布局时的回退、映射冲突、本次运行的 cwd 别名、易变字符串以及本次生成的语义字段。无密钥刷新测试证明，审批 UUID、cwd 别名、spill 路径和事件读取中的易变值不会改变已提交 fixture 的任何字节。
+聚焦的单元测试固定了会话包权威谓词识别的所有 surface 消息形态、持久 inbox/surface 关联、场景范围内的父级/子级消息关联、带 cwd 的可写入 fixture 消息匹配、无关事件插入、格式错误消息隔离、消息图在 ID 与指纹两条轴上的歧义、由单一处理方负责的写回、递归处理对象与数组的行为、映射冲突、本次运行的 cwd 别名、易变字符串以及本次生成的语义字段。无密钥刷新测试证明，审批 UUID、cwd 别名、spill 路径和事件读取中的易变值不会改变已提交 fixture 的任何字节。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.md
-2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.md: 743535d0394cbea0374c412ba6968910ce858de4
-2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.zh.md: 1e51070f88dead17b9d3f5625e337c558786aba2
+2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.md: 74b672b3f90ea445ad1a8e283a5904056059b2f8
+2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.zh.md: 32c667dc09e561504e8e053bf2a338ed2190d9e8
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-29-pnpm-setup-runner-isolation.zh.md)

 ## Problem

-`pnpm/action-setup@v4` defaults its install destination to `~/setup-pnpm` and replaces that directory during setup. The self-hosted CI failover runs six GitHub Actions runner services under one VM user, so concurrent jobs shared the same destination. In [run 30375670773](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/30375670773), three jobs entered pnpm setup within 73 milliseconds; one setup removed another process's current working directory and two jobs failed in Node's `uv_cwd` initialization. A retry on another runner passed, making the failure timing-dependent rather than a repository-test regression.
+`pnpm/action-setup@v4` defaults its install destination to `~/setup-pnpm` and replaces that directory during setup. The self-hosted CI failover runs six GitHub Actions runner services under one VM user, so concurrent jobs shared the same destination. In the reproducing run, three jobs entered pnpm setup within 73 milliseconds; one setup removed another process's current working directory and two jobs failed in Node's `uv_cwd` initialization. A retry on another runner passed, making the failure timing-dependent rather than a repository-test regression.

 ## Decision

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 问题

-`pnpm/action-setup@v4` 的安装目标目录默认为 `~/setup-pnpm`，并会在设置期间替换该目录。自托管 CI 故障切换在同一个 VM 用户下运行六个 GitHub Actions runner 服务，因此并发作业会共用同一目标目录。在 [run 30375670773](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/actions/runs/30375670773) 中，三个作业在 73 毫秒内进入 pnpm 设置；其中一个设置过程删除了另一个进程的当前工作目录，导致两个作业在 Node 的 `uv_cwd` 初始化阶段失败。换到另一台 runner 重试后通过，说明该故障取决于时序，并非仓库测试回归。
+`pnpm/action-setup@v4` 的安装目标目录默认为 `~/setup-pnpm`，并会在设置期间替换该目录。自托管 CI 故障切换在同一个 VM 用户下运行六个 GitHub Actions runner 服务，因此并发作业会共用同一目标目录。在复现运行中，三个作业在 73 毫秒内进入 pnpm 设置；其中一个设置过程删除了另一个进程的当前工作目录，导致两个作业在 Node 的 `uv_cwd` 初始化阶段失败。换到另一台 runner 重试后通过，说明该故障取决于时序，并非仓库测试回归。

 ## 决策

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md
-2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md: 558d60cf6f6638c3e776396dd754d31b95819b28
-2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.zh.md: 2eb216fd1970700fb54a2aa17ec5ce515869e5b0
+2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.md: 3b7aaeb1178ff79e38a1b9646a9dc78efaeae48b
+2026-07-30-web-transcript-log-ordered-projection.zh.md: acd198b6d3f3c5d57e233e09ee66f5d151e4f8f1
@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ Node order is seq-monotonic by construction, and three things follow. The log-on

 `foldDegraded` is gone from `ConversationSnapshot`, and with it the padding sentinels, the `baseSeq` arithmetic they needed, and `degradedSeqs()`. They existed only to satisfy the core fold's `seq === index` assertion and to survive its throw; the fold they describe is no longer run. Deleting the flag is part of the fix, not cleanup after it — `degradedSeqs()` was already almost the log-ordered projection, reached after a thrown error instead of intended.

-The marker's summary text comes from the checkpoint's own `compact/summary` provenance, never from the framed checkpoint payload, which is an instruction envelope written for the model. A window cut that left the provenance outside makes the row non-expandable rather than empty, the same soft-fall as a call-less tool result, and a later page supplying the provenance resolves the text.
+The marker's summary text, replaced-item count, and estimated shadowed-token count come from the checkpoint's own `compact/summary` provenance, never from the framed checkpoint payload, which is an instruction envelope written for the model. A window cut that left the provenance outside makes those fields unavailable, the same soft-fall as a call-less tool result, and a later page supplying the provenance resolves them.

-No persisted event, RPC envelope, compaction transaction, or model-visible surface changed, and no migration is required.
+The [manual compaction command](../feature/2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md) returns the summary event's seq as the successful `CommandResult.sourceEventSeq`, and `command/done` persists that optional reference. Chat pairs only a successful named `/compact` command whose reference equals exactly one loaded `CompactionSummaryNode.summaryEventSeq`. The running command first renders `compact · Compacting context…`; after the checkpoint lands, the same React key renders one collapsed `compact` disclosure at the checkpoint's flow position with the count and token estimate. Input rejection, no compactable history, cancellation, and failure remain generic command rows with complete handler-authored text. Automatic compaction has no command reference and keeps the standalone context-compacted marker.
+
+The explicit event reference matters because manual compaction permits durable context injection while its asynchronous summary is running: command and checkpoint rows are not guaranteed to be adjacent. The command lifecycle event gains one optional field, but the compaction transaction, RPC envelope, and model-visible surface do not change; pre-release persisted logs without the field keep the former two-row soft-fall and require no migration.

 ## Recognizing a checkpoint: one declaration, pinned at compile time

@@ -57,6 +59,10 @@ The unmerged manual-compaction-queueing branch fixes the same interleaving bug b

 **Keep `foldDegraded` as a defensive flag.** Rejected: it described a specific failure of a fold that no longer runs. A flag no consumer can act on, reachable only through a `console.error`, is a false contract.

+**Pair the nearest `/compact` row with the next checkpoint.** Rejected: context injection may land between them, and concurrent or malformed lifecycle records must degrade without stealing another checkpoint. The command result instead names the authoritative summary event, and ambiguous references pair nothing.
+
+**Parse the English settlement text for item and token counts.** Rejected: handler copy is presentation text, not a stable data contract. The marker reads the structured `compact/summary` payload already owning both values.
+
 ## Consequences

 Compaction no longer erases web history; a session compacted several times shows one marker per landed compaction, in log order, and the same window renders identically live and after a cold resume. The pagination hole is closed by construction rather than defended against, and `ConversationSnapshot` loses a published field, which touched thirteen files.
@@ -65,8 +71,8 @@ Compaction no longer erases web history; a session compacted several times shows

 The performance contract is unchanged and now simpler to state: one append materializes one node, an event that changes no node keeps the previous array reference — so a chunk storm costs nothing and `nodes()` is not even recomputed — and unchanged nodes keep their object identity. The window still grows with session length rather than with the surface, which is the trade the fix exists to make; a compaction used to bound the projection for exactly the long sessions compaction serves.

-The web e2e scenario now seeds a real compaction transaction over its recorded turn, so the aria golden pins both halves of the fix through the real host and a real browser: the recorded prompt and full tool output are still on screen, and one marker sits after them. The seed recording itself is untouched and stays model-authentic — replay derives the compacted turn from the recording's own surface.
+The web e2e scenario now seeds a real manual command lifecycle around a compaction transaction over its recorded turn, so the aria golden pins the complete behavior through the real host and a real browser: the recorded prompt and full tool output are still on screen, exactly one `compact` row reports scale after them, and its disclosure opens the exact summary. The seed recording itself is untouched and stays model-authentic — replay derives the manual compaction from the recording's own surface.

 ## Deferred

-The terminal's [archived compaction progress decision](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md) uses the live standalone bracket to drive a one-cell indicator and does not change this browser projection. The marker still carries no **scale**: the checkpoint's `sourceEventSeqs` hold the shadowed count, so a separately justified count or range can be added without coupling it to progress.
+The terminal's [archived compaction progress decision](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md) uses the live standalone bracket to drive a one-cell indicator and does not change this browser projection.
@@ -18,9 +18,11 @@ surface 顺序还让另外两个问题成为结构性的。一次替换之后它

 `foldDegraded` 从 `ConversationSnapshot` 消失，随之消失的是哨兵填充、它们所需的 `baseSeq` 算术，以及 `degradedSeqs()`。它们的存在只为满足核心 fold 的 `seq === index` 断言并在其抛错时存活；它们所描述的 fold 已不再运行。删除该标志是修复的一部分，而非修复之后的清理——`degradedSeqs()` 本身已几乎就是按日志顺序的投影，只是作为抛错后的落点而非本意到达。

-标记的摘要文本来自检查点自己的 `compact/summary` 溯源，绝不取自成框的检查点载荷——那是为模型撰写的指令信封。窗口切分把溯源留在窗口外时该行不可展开而非空白，与无调用的工具结果同一种软退让；后续补上溯源的分页会解析出文本。
+标记的摘要文本、被替换条目数量和估算的被遮蔽 token 数量都来自检查点自己的 `compact/summary` 溯源，绝不取自成框的检查点载荷——那是为模型撰写的指令信封。窗口切分把溯源留在窗口外时这些字段不可用，与无调用的工具结果同一种软退让；后续补上溯源的分页会解析出它们。

-没有任何持久化事件、RPC 信封、压缩事务或模型可见 surface 发生变化，也不需要迁移。
+[手动压缩命令](../feature/2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md)会把摘要事件的 seq 作为成功结果的 `CommandResult.sourceEventSeq` 返回，`command/done` 则持久化这项可选引用。Chat 只会配对成功且名称为 `/compact`、其引用恰好等于唯一一个已加载 `CompactionSummaryNode.summaryEventSeq` 的命令。运行中的命令先渲染为 `compact · Compacting context…`；检查点落地后，同一个 React key 会在检查点的消息流位置渲染一条收起的 `compact` 展开项，并显示条目数量和 token 估算值。输入被拒绝、没有可压缩历史、取消和失败时仍使用通用命令行，并保留处理器撰写的完整文本。自动压缩没有命令引用，继续使用独立的上下文已压缩标记。
+
+显式事件引用之所以重要，是因为手动压缩允许在异步摘要运行期间注入持久上下文：命令行与检查点行不保证相邻。命令生命周期事件增加一个可选字段，但压缩事务、RPC 信封和模型可见 surface 均不变化；不含该字段的预发布持久日志继续采用原先的两行软退让，无须迁移。

 ## 识别检查点：同一份声明，在编译期钉住

@@ -57,6 +59,10 @@ const COMPACT_PLUGIN: typeof COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE.plugin = 'compact'

 **把 `foldDegraded` 留作一个防御性标志。** 已拒绝：它描述的是一个已不再运行的 fold 的特定失败。一个消费方无法据以行动、只能通过 `console.error` 到达的标志，是一份虚假契约。

+**把最近的 `/compact` 行与下一个检查点配对。** 已拒绝：两者之间可能落入上下文注入，并发或格式异常的生命周期记录也必须降级而不误取其他检查点。命令结果则指明权威摘要事件；引用存在歧义时不配对任何内容。
+
+**解析英文结算文本中的条目数量和 token 数量。** 已拒绝：处理器文案是呈现文本，而非稳定的数据契约。标记读取本已持有这两个值的结构化 `compact/summary` 载荷。
+
 ## Consequences

 压缩不再抹掉 Web 历史；一个被压缩多次的会话按日志顺序显示每次落地压缩一个标记，而同一窗口在实时与冷恢复之后渲染完全相同。分页缺口是被构造性闭合而非被防御，`ConversationSnapshot` 少了一个已发布字段，这触及十三个文件。
@@ -65,8 +71,8 @@ const COMPACT_PLUGIN: typeof COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE.plugin = 'compact'

 性能契约未变，且现在更易表述：一次追加物化一个节点，不改变任何节点的事件保持上一次的数组引用——因此分片风暴零成本、`nodes()` 甚至不会重算——未变化的节点保持其对象标识。窗口仍随会话长度而非随 surface 增长，这正是本修复存在所要做的交换；一次压缩过去恰好为压缩所服务的长会话限制了投影规模。

-Web e2e 场景现在在它录制的那一轮之上播种一次真实的压缩事务，因此 aria 基准经真实宿主与真实浏览器钉住修复的两半：录制的提问与完整工具输出仍在屏幕上，其后坐着一个标记。录制本身未被触碰、保持模型真实——回放从录制自身的 surface 派生出被压缩的那一轮。
+Web e2e 场景现在围绕它录制的那一轮上的压缩事务播种一次真实的手动命令生命周期，因此 aria 基准经真实宿主与真实浏览器钉住完整行为：录制的提问与完整工具输出仍在屏幕上，其后恰好一条 `compact` 行报告规模，展开后会显示确切摘要。录制本身未被触碰、保持模型真实——回放从录制自身的 surface 派生出手动压缩。

 ## Deferred

-终端的[已归档压缩进度决策](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md)使用实时独立标记对驱动单格指示器，并不改变此浏览器投影。标记仍不携带**规模**信息：检查点的 `sourceEventSeqs` 保存被遮蔽的数量，因此可以另行论证后添加计数或区间，而无须将其与进度耦合。
+终端的[已归档压缩进度决策](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-compaction-progress-visibility.md)使用实时独立标记对驱动单格指示器，并不改变此浏览器投影。
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-01-ask-user-delegated-caller-guard.md
+2026-08-01-ask-user-delegated-caller-guard.md: 0350a7383f7ace6ecd742c98db18f8b977720cf9
+2026-08-01-ask-user-delegated-caller-guard.zh.md: 9c19722feb4586e07845fd20279574301267542d
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Agent Note: Reject human interaction from runtime-owned subagents
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-01-ask-user-delegated-caller-guard.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+A one-shot subagent that calls `ask_user_question` can block indefinitely. The call waits for a human answer, but the child has no independently owned human channel, so the child's completion and the parent waiting on that completion both stall.
+
+Durable session lineage cannot decide whether an answerer exists. A child session may later be resumed as a new top-level runtime root, while a live runtime-owned child may carry a zero or absent durable delegation depth. Error guidance at the shared seam must also fit every consumer: `exit_plan_mode` uses `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` without calling `ask_user_question`.
+
+## Decision
+
+When `AskUserQuestionRequest.agent` is present, `UserInteractionService.ask()` authenticates the exact live agent through `ctx.agents` and admits it only when `ctx.agents.roots()` contains that instance. A missing registry or stale same-id object fails with `CALLER_NOT_LIVE`; a live agent owned by another live agent fails with `DELEGATED_CALLER`. The check runs after the existing aborted and empty-batch guards and before intent validation or provider dispatch, so an owned child never creates a UI wait.
+
+Runtime ownership is the authority. A lineage-bearing session resumed without an owner is a runtime root and may ask; a live child remains ineligible even when its durable `delegationDepth` is zero. Agentless programmatic calls retain the existing provider path.
+
+The shared failure text is consumer-neutral and actionable: the child includes the unresolved question or decision in its final result. The parent already receives that result through the delegation contract and can decide whether to ask the human. Neither the service nor a child claims an upward messaging or answer-forwarding capability that does not exist.
+
+This safety boundary is independent of the browser's composer election. The proposed [semantic composer phases](../../proposed/architecture/2026-08-08-semantic-composer-chain-phases.md) address how an already-pending interaction and a read-only subagent surface should be ordered; they do not weaken this runtime guard.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Use `session.header.delegationDepth > 0`.** Rejected because durable lineage survives resume and does not attest the current process-local owner. It rejects valid resumed roots and can admit a live child whose durable header is incomplete.
+
+**Reject only inside `dsh-tool-ask-user`.** Rejected because `exit_plan_mode` and direct callers share `ctx.userInteraction.ask()`. The service is the narrow operation boundary common to every human-interaction consumer.
+
+**Tell the child to delegate upward or wait for forwarding.** Rejected because one-shot delegation exposes no child-to-parent request channel and no answer-forwarding protocol. The only guaranteed return path is the child's final result.
+
+**Rely on the browser composer fix.** Rejected because presentation cannot make an ownerless human channel exist, and non-browser deployments still need the call to terminate.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Runtime-owned child calls fail fast with a stable structured error instead of hanging. Exact live roots and agentless programmatic calls remain eligible, including resumed sessions with historical child lineage. `ask_user_question` and `exit_plan_mode` receive the same neutral corrective guidance, while their model-visible schemas and system-prompt prefixes remain unchanged; only the appended error result differs, so existing KV-cache prefixes remain reusable.
+
+## Testing
+
+Service tests cover a zero-depth live child, a depth-one resumed runtime root, a missing registry, a stale same-id object, and provider non-invocation on every rejection. Tool and plan-mode tests prove both consumers surface the neutral `DELEGATED_CALLER` result and never reach the provider. The keyless assembled snapshot delegates to a child that attempts `ask_user_question`, pins the child's error tool result and final handoff, and proves the parent completes instead of waiting for an answer.
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# Agent Note: 拒绝运行时中归属于其他 agent 的 subagent 向人类发起交互
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-01-ask-user-delegated-caller-guard.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+一次性 subagent 调用 `ask_user_question` 时可能无限阻塞。该调用会等待人类回答，但子级没有由自身独立拥有的人类交互通道，因此子级无法完成，等待其完成的父级也会随之停滞。
+
+持久化会话谱系无法判断应答者是否存在。子会话之后可能恢复为新的顶层运行时根，而运行时中归属于其他 agent（智能体）的存活子级，其持久化委托深度却可能为零或缺失。共享 seam 上的错误指引还必须适用于每个消费方：`exit_plan_mode` 会使用 `ctx.userInteraction.ask()`，但不会调用 `ask_user_question`。
+
+## 决策
+
+如果存在 `AskUserQuestionRequest.agent`，`UserInteractionService.ask()` 会通过 `ctx.agents` 验证该 agent 就是注册表中的存活实例，并且只在 `ctx.agents.roots()` 包含该实例时才允许调用。缺失注册表或传入仅 id 相同的陈旧对象时，以 `CALLER_NOT_LIVE` 失败；存活 agent 归属于另一个存活 agent 时，以 `DELEGATED_CALLER` 失败。该检查位于现有的已中止和空批次守卫之后、意图校验或提供方分派之前，因此归属于其他 agent 的子级绝不会触发 UI 等待。
+
+以运行时所有权为权限依据。携带谱系的会话在无所有者的情况下恢复时就是运行时根，可以提问；存活子级即使持久化 `delegationDepth` 为零，仍无资格提问。不带 agent 的程序化调用继续沿用现有提供方路径。
+
+共享失败文本与具体消费方无关，并给出可执行指引：子级把尚未解决的问题或决策写入最终结果。委托契约本就会把该结果传给父级，父级可据此决定是否询问人类。服务和子级都不会宣称存在实际上并不存在的向上消息传递或回答转发能力。
+
+该安全边界与浏览器的 composer 选举相互独立。提议的[语义 composer 阶段](../../proposed/architecture/2026-08-08-semantic-composer-chain-phases.md)解决已有待处理交互与只读 subagent 界面的排序方式；它不会削弱此运行时守卫。
+
+## 备选方案
+
+**使用 `session.header.delegationDepth > 0`。** 不予采用：持久化谱系会在恢复后继续存在，却不能证明当前进程内所有者。该方案会拒绝有效的已恢复根，也可能放行持久化 header 不完整的存活子级。
+
+**仅在 `dsh-tool-ask-user` 内拒绝。** 不予采用：`exit_plan_mode` 与直接调用方共用 `ctx.userInteraction.ask()`。服务是所有人机交互消费方共同经过的最窄操作边界。
+
+**让子级向上委托或等待转发。** 不予采用：一次性委托没有公开从子级向父级请求的通道，也没有回答转发协议。唯一有保证的返回路径是子级的最终结果。
+
+**依赖浏览器的 composer 修复。** 不予采用：呈现方式无法凭空产生由所有者负责的人类通道，非浏览器部署仍然需要该调用能够终止。
+
+## 影响
+
+运行时中归属于其他 agent 的子级调用会以稳定的结构化错误快速失败，而不是挂起。注册表中的确切存活根和不带 agent 的程序化调用仍有资格提问，包括带有历史子级谱系的已恢复会话。`ask_user_question` 与 `exit_plan_mode` 会收到相同的中性纠正指引，而其模型可见 schema 和系统提示词前缀保持不变；只有追加的错误结果发生变化，因此现有 KV Cache 前缀仍可复用。
+
+## Testing
+
+服务测试覆盖持久化深度为零的存活子级、深度为一的已恢复运行时根、缺失注册表、仅 id 相同的陈旧对象，以及每次拒绝都不调用提供方。工具与 plan-mode 测试证明两个消费方都会呈现中性的 `DELEGATED_CALLER` 结果，且绝不触达提供方。无密钥组装快照委托一个尝试调用 `ask_user_question` 的子级，固定其错误工具结果和最终交接，并证明父级可以完成，而不是一直等待回答。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md
-2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md: 2746b5784baad0f3b14258280cd56a621db07c15
-2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md: 0bda83327d4cc8fe2edb61f8145a89138610901e
+2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.md: 7c9715c37ee57be9fa0f67af0c19f0bfa84845da
+2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md: f3485edc9e453c0b774f442bfce6d678d63f2224
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-03-cli-signal-shutdown-escalation.zh.md)

 ## Problem

-The default telemetry mount added SIGINT/SIGTERM handlers to `dsh web` and `dsh -p` so process exit could drain the Cordis tree instead of dropping queued telemetry. Each handler used a one-way boolean latch and exited only after `ctx.fiber.dispose()` settled. Headless normal completion also awaited that disposal without a bound.
+The default telemetry mount added SIGINT/SIGTERM handlers to `dsh web` and the headless command (now `dsh run`) so process exit could drain the Cordis tree instead of dropping queued telemetry. Each handler used a one-way boolean latch and exited only after `ctx.fiber.dispose()` settled. Headless normal completion also awaited that disposal without a bound.

-A user then reproduced `dsh -p` hanging immediately after the observation URL and ignoring repeated `Ctrl+C`; `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` removed the hang, while a standalone Node handler in the same Linux sandbox received SIGINT. This isolated the pending disposer to telemetry rather than terminal signal forwarding. OTel's `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` awaits `exporter.forceFlush()` before the `exportTimeoutMillis`-bounded completion promise, and the OTLP exporter's `forceFlush()` waits directly on its in-flight HTTP Promise. A proxy/sandbox connection that never obtains a socket can therefore leave provider shutdown pending despite both configured SDK timeouts.
+A user then reproduced the headless command hanging immediately after the observation URL and ignoring repeated `Ctrl+C`; `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` removed the hang, while a standalone Node handler in the same Linux sandbox received SIGINT. This isolated the pending disposer to telemetry rather than terminal signal forwarding. OTel's `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` awaits `exporter.forceFlush()` before the `exportTimeoutMillis`-bounded completion promise, and the OTLP exporter's `forceFlush()` waits directly on its in-flight HTTP Promise. A proxy/sandbox connection that never obtains a socket can therefore leave provider shutdown pending despite both configured SDK timeouts.

 The latch then turned that telemetry defect into an unkillable CLI: normal completion was already awaiting the single-shot root disposal; the first SIGINT joined the same pending disposal and set the signal latch; later SIGINTs returned at the latch, so the process had no remaining escape. A signal received before normal completion had the same unbounded wait. Web used the same latch shape.

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@

 ## 问题

-默认挂载遥测后，`dsh web` 与 `dsh -p` 新增了 SIGINT/SIGTERM 处理器，使进程退出时可以排空 Cordis 插件树，而不是丢弃排队中的遥测数据。每个处理器都使用单向布尔闩锁（latch），并且只有在 `ctx.fiber.dispose()` 结算后才退出。headless 正常完成时同样会无界等待整棵树执行 dispose（资源释放）。
+默认挂载遥测后，`dsh web` 与 headless 命令（现为 `dsh run`）新增了 SIGINT/SIGTERM 处理器，使进程退出时可以排空 Cordis 插件树，而不是丢弃排队中的遥测数据。每个处理器都使用单向布尔闩锁（latch），并且只有在 `ctx.fiber.dispose()` 结算后才退出。headless 正常完成时同样会无界等待整棵树执行 dispose（资源释放）。

-随后有用户复现，`dsh -p` 在打印观察 URL 后立即卡死，重复按 `Ctrl+C` 也没有反应；设置 `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` 后不再卡死，而同一 Linux 沙箱中的独立 Node 信号处理器能够收到 SIGINT。这将待结算的 disposer 定位到遥测，而非终端信号转发。OTel 的 `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` 会先等待 `exporter.forceFlush()`，再进入受 `exportTimeoutMillis` 限制的完成 promise；OTLP 导出器的 `forceFlush()` 则直接等待正在进行的 HTTP Promise。因此，代理／沙箱连接始终无法取得 socket 时，即使已经配置两项 SDK 超时，也会让提供方关闭一直待结算。
+随后有用户复现，headless 命令在打印观察 URL 后立即卡死，重复按 `Ctrl+C` 也没有反应；设置 `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` 后不再卡死，而同一 Linux 沙箱中的独立 Node 信号处理器能够收到 SIGINT。这将待结算的 disposer 定位到遥测，而非终端信号转发。OTel 的 `BatchLogRecordProcessor.shutdown()` 会先等待 `exporter.forceFlush()`，再进入受 `exportTimeoutMillis` 限制的完成 promise；OTLP 导出器的 `forceFlush()` 则直接等待正在进行的 HTTP Promise。因此，代理／沙箱连接始终无法取得 socket 时，即使已经配置两项 SDK 超时，也会让提供方关闭一直待结算。

 闩锁随后把这个遥测缺陷变成无法终止的 CLI（命令行界面）：正常完成流程已经在等待单次根级 dispose；第一次 SIGINT 会加入同一个待结算的 dispose，并设置信号闩锁；后续 SIGINT 在闩锁处直接返回，因此进程再无退出途径。正常完成之前收到信号时，同样会陷入无界等待。Web 使用的闩锁结构与此相同。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-05-context-meter-blind-to-compaction.md
-2026-08-05-context-meter-blind-to-compaction.md: ab39ae4e109f238960fd60de5e5b61075344f525
-2026-08-05-context-meter-blind-to-compaction.zh.md: c93aa509530e48acf906b18ba85bab4c7d355d69
+2026-08-05-context-meter-blind-to-compaction.md: 8f4845c3c9bf52c5c3a2d39dee2ff25bda30c7bd
+2026-08-05-context-meter-blind-to-compaction.zh.md: 94ada0a9118db63876d5805ef5a8197d9c764102
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ The panel's composition rows still do not sum to the header, and now for one cle

 ## Testing

-`packages/llm/token-meter/tests/token-usage-projection.spec.ts` covers the carry-forward across surface growth and a compaction (the sample holding still while the projection shrinks) and the zero clamp when heuristic error would drive the figure negative. `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/context-meter.spec.tsx` pins the ring reading the projected figure, and `chat-stats-bash-sample.spec.tsx` pins `contextOccupancy`'s preference and its fallback. The end-to-end numbers above came from driving `BasicCompactService.compactNow` through a real `AgentLoop` with the projection registry mounted.
+`packages/llm/token-meter/tests/token-usage-projection.spec.ts` covers the carry-forward across surface growth and a compaction (the sample holding still while the projection shrinks) and the zero clamp when heuristic error would drive the figure negative. `packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/context-meter.spec.tsx` pins the ring reading the projected figure, and `chat-stats.spec.tsx` pins `contextOccupancy`'s preference and its fallback. The end-to-end numbers above came from driving `BasicCompactService.compactNow` through a real `AgentLoop` with the projection registry mounted.
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ AFTER  compact:  ring=4%  header=~4227/100000   rows=[system 18, tools 0, messag

 ## 测试

-`packages/llm/token-meter/tests/token-usage-projection.spec.ts` 覆盖了样本在表层增长与一次压缩上的推进（样本保持不动而投影值缩小），以及启发式误差会把数字压到负数时的零钳制。`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/context-meter.spec.tsx` 钉住圆环读取投影值这一点，`chat-stats-bash-sample.spec.tsx` 钉住 `contextOccupancy` 的优先级与回退。上面那组端到端数字来自在挂载了投影注册表的真实 `AgentLoop` 上驱动 `BasicCompactService.compactNow`。
+`packages/llm/token-meter/tests/token-usage-projection.spec.ts` 覆盖了样本在表层增长与一次压缩上的推进（样本保持不动而投影值缩小），以及启发式误差会把数字压到负数时的零钳制。`packages/client/ui-conversation/tests/context-meter.spec.tsx` 钉住圆环读取投影值这一点，`chat-stats.spec.tsx` 钉住 `contextOccupancy` 的优先级与回退。上面那组端到端数字来自在挂载了投影注册表的真实 `AgentLoop` 上驱动 `BasicCompactService.compactNow`。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md
-2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md: e9ca76ede06080f2b868f6436998d163e642adbc
-2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.zh.md: 5666a884d4c9478291072375681d8d3526b2632a
+2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.md: 2174cb466c6af72f15005ce1ba3dec8100de6f2f
+2026-08-06-api-key-format-validation.zh.md: f9b7d6518fedc42e5264c46beaa1a78619139c58
@@ -14,13 +14,11 @@ Pasting a key containing an emoji, CJK text, or a full-width punctuation mark in

 Whitespace passed every check. `ProviderEditor` tested `keyDraft.length`, so a key of three spaces was stored and then authenticated as `Bearer` plus blanks. Neither adapter checked a credential- or environment-sourced key — the path the Models page writes, and therefore the path users actually take.

-Sources: deepseek-harness#1594 and #1595; dsh-external#247, #249, #266, and #210.
-
 ## Decision

 One rule defines a legal key: **after trimming, non-empty, and every character within `[\x21-\x7E]`** — printable ASCII, space excluded.

-This single predicate covers every input the sources list: empty, leading and trailing whitespace, interior whitespace, C0 control characters, emoji, CJK text, and full-width punctuation. It is also exactly the constraint that produced the ByteString failure, so the two issues close on one definition rather than on two coincidentally related fixes.
+This single predicate covers every reported input: empty, leading and trailing whitespace, interior whitespace, C0 control characters, emoji, CJK text, and full-width punctuation. It is also exactly the constraint that produced the ByteString failure, so the failures share one definition rather than two coincidentally related fixes.

 A second, narrower rule catches a pasted environment line: input matching `^[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*=[^=]` or wrapped in matching quotes is refused. Restricting the prefix to upper-case keeps real keys clear of it — `sk-` forms break the identifier match at the hyphen — and requiring a non-`=` character after the separator keeps base64 padding clear of it too. It reports the same format failure as an illegal character rather than its own message: the reader's next move is identical either way, so a separate line would name a cause without changing what to do.

@@ -76,7 +74,7 @@ The client cannot import any of this: client packages reference only client pack

 **Running the shape heuristic in the resolvers too.** Symmetric, and it would stop a pasted environment line written directly into `.env`. Rejected for the lockout described above: a false positive in a resolver leaves the user no working path, while a false positive in the browser leaves the environment open.

-**Probing the provider at save time to prove the key works.** It would close the complaint the sources actually open with — a save that reports success and fails at the first turn. Rejected as out of scope and, on the code as it stood, unbuildable: `discoverModels` short-circuits to the installed catalog before any network call for exactly the providers pi-ai ships catalogs for, so it verified nothing about the key, and the DeepSeek card has no probe at all. A verifier's value is distinguishing "key rejected" from "cannot reach", which is the distinction this change makes reliable; building it first would have produced a verifier unable to tell its own outcomes apart. Comparable products also do not verify on save, so a blocking network call there would be an unexpected behavior rather than a missing one.
+**Probing the provider at save time to prove the key works.** It would close the original complaint — a save that reports success and fails at the first turn. Rejected as out of scope and, on the code as it stood, unbuildable: `discoverModels` short-circuits to the installed catalog before any network call for exactly the providers pi-ai ships catalogs for, so it verified nothing about the key, and the DeepSeek card has no probe at all. A verifier's value is distinguishing "key rejected" from "cannot reach", which is the distinction this change makes reliable; building it first would have produced a verifier unable to tell its own outcomes apart. Comparable products also do not verify on save, so a blocking network call there would be an unexpected behavior rather than a missing one.

 ## Consequences

@@ -14,13 +14,11 @@ Status: implemented

 空白字符能通过每一道检查。`ProviderEditor` 判的是 `keyDraft.length`，于是三个空格构成的 Key 会被存下，随后以 `Bearer` 加若干空格去认证。两个适配器都不检查来自凭据或环境的 Key——而那正是 Models 页写入的路径，也就是用户真正走的路径。

-来源：deepseek-harness#1594 与 #1595；dsh-external#247、#249、#266、#210。
-
 ## Decision

 一条规则定义什么是合法 Key：**trim 之后非空，且每个字符都落在 `[\x21-\x7E]`**——可打印 ASCII，不含空格。

-这一个断言覆盖了来源列出的全部输入：空值、首尾空白、中间空白、C0 控制字符、emoji、中文、全角标点。它同时正是造成 ByteString 失败的那条约束，所以两个 issue 收敛于同一个定义，而不是两个恰好相关的修复。
+这一个断言覆盖了所有已报告的输入：空值、首尾空白、中间空白、C0 控制字符、emoji、中文、全角标点。它同时正是造成 ByteString 失败的那条约束，所以这些故障收敛于同一个定义，而不是两个恰好相关的修复。

 第二条更窄的规则用于识别整行粘贴的环境变量：匹配 `^[A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*=[^=]` 或首尾成对引号的输入会被拒绝。把前缀限定为全大写可以让真实 Key 与之绝缘——`sk-` 这类形态会在连字符处中断标识符匹配——而要求分隔符之后必须是非 `=` 字符，则让 base64 的 padding 也与之绝缘。它报出的是与非法字符相同的那条格式失败，而不是自己的一句：读到它的人下一步动作完全一样，因此单列一句只会点出一个原因，却不改变该怎么做。

@@ -76,7 +74,7 @@ Status: implemented

 **让形状启发式也在 resolver 中运行。** 更对称，且能拦住直接写进 `.env` 的整行环境变量。因上文所述的锁死风险而否决：resolver 中的一次误判会让用户无路可走，浏览器中的一次误判则仍留有环境变量这条路。

-**在保存时探测 provider 以证明 Key 可用。** 它能关掉来源真正开篇抱怨的那件事——保存报成功、第一轮才失败。因超出范围而否决，且在当时的代码上无法建成：对 pi-ai 恰好自带 catalog 的那些 provider，`discoverModels` 会在任何网络调用之前短路到内置 catalog，因而对 Key 什么都验证不了；而 DeepSeek 卡片根本没有探测。验证器的价值在于分清「Key 被拒」与「无法连通」，而这正是本次改动让其变得可靠的区分；先建验证器只会得到一个分不清自身结果的验证器。同类产品也不在保存时验证，因此保存时的阻断式网络调用会是一个意外行为，而非一处缺失。
+**在保存时探测 provider 以证明 Key 可用。** 它能关掉最初报告的那件事——保存报成功、第一轮才失败。因超出范围而否决，且在当时的代码上无法建成：对 pi-ai 恰好自带 catalog 的那些 provider，`discoverModels` 会在任何网络调用之前短路到内置 catalog，因而对 Key 什么都验证不了；而 DeepSeek 卡片根本没有探测。验证器的价值在于分清「Key 被拒」与「无法连通」，而这正是本次改动让其变得可靠的区分；先建验证器只会得到一个分不清自身结果的验证器。同类产品也不在保存时验证，因此保存时的阻断式网络调用会是一个意外行为，而非一处缺失。

 ## Consequences

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
-2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 26e6e2468c7bea661d85c8fb994adf8b109105ee
-2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 8f9cd1f6bc31e648a5b923e816cad75ebc1a0bd8
+2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 390d091fd6e6f7fa1694ba78b90522b70948fe92
+2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: d72793e6adde911a8623ac1c6b65df899381923e
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ This is not a coupling smell — it is the contract's domain. The "only cordis"

 An earlier draft put the full algorithm (the retention walk, token-summing, text extraction) as concrete methods on the interface. That recouples the contract to one strategy: a backend that wants a different retention policy or event sequence would have to fight inherited concrete code. Making all three operations abstract puts every *how* decision in the backend and keeps the interface a statement of *what*. Token measurement is not a compaction hook at all; the singleton service lets multiple consumers share one per-session replay fold.

-`compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` takes an explicit `'pressure' | 'context-overflow'` trigger and cancellation. It reads only the latest durable routed request; no header means no work, while any routed provider/model target uses the singleton estimator. `compactNow(agent, signal)` requires an idle agent and performs one useful balanced reduction even below pressure, returning `null` without writes when none exists. `compactRegion(start, end, agent, signal?)` uses `agent.session` as its single session identity and keeps an optional signal for explicit callers. The default summarizer resolves its target from explicit config, the latest logged routed target, then agent options, and records the provider/model pair after any `llm/stream` routing. It replays the routed request's prefix and appends the compaction directive as a trailing user message so the provider's warm KV cache is reused — see the [summary prefix-cache Agent Note](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md). The call sets the provider-neutral `GenerateOptions.purpose` to `compaction`; adapters may map that purpose to model-hidden transport metadata, and the DeepSeek adapter sends `x-deepseek-harness-compact: 1`.
+`compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` takes an explicit `'pressure' | 'context-overflow'` trigger and cancellation. It reads only the latest durable routed request; no header means no work, while any routed provider/model target uses the singleton estimator. `compactNow(agent, signal)` requires an idle agent and performs one useful balanced reduction even below pressure, returning `null` without writes when none exists. `compactRegion(start, end, agent, signal?)` uses `agent.session` as its single session identity and keeps an optional signal for explicit callers. The default summarizer resolves its target from explicit config, the latest logged routed target, then agent options, and records the provider/model pair after any `llm/stream` routing. It replays the routed request's prefix and appends the compaction directive as a trailing user message so the provider's warm KV cache is reused — see the [summary prefix-cache Agent Note](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md). The result carries `llmStreamCall: true` because it consumed exactly one call through this context's LLM service; a subclass sets that marker only under the same condition, since retained `rawOutput` alone does not identify the call path. The call sets the provider-neutral `GenerateOptions.purpose` to `compaction`; adapters may map that purpose to model-hidden transport metadata, and the DeepSeek adapter sends `x-deepseek-harness-compact: 1`.

 ### Automatic pressure runs after successful durable step work

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Because `SurfaceEventType` is closed, the summary cannot ride on a `compact/*` e
 ```
 compact/start    → log-only. Acquires the lock.
 [summarize older range via the backend]
-compact/summary  → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
+compact/summary  → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
 user/message     → canonical checkpoint source + surfaceOp { op:'replace', start, end }.
                   THE surface mutation (framed summary).
                   deriveMessages() renders it as a user-role message.
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ The lifecycle boundary makes crash state unambiguous:
 - **Loop:** Tests pin pre-step after the preceding `step/end` and before the next `step/start`, actual `agent/request` routing, closed failed steps, fresh retry numbering, and complete thrown/in-band overflow → compaction → reconstructed retry composition.
 - **Manual:** Maintenance serialization, marker ordering, injection retention, live/stale orphan classification, cancellation, close/flush failures, command mapping, and the queued TUI journey are pinned without a model key.
 - **With-key e2e:** A real model and bash session with lowered limits triggers compaction, records a complete `compact/start…end` pair, shrinks the surface, and finishes the task.
- **Snapshot gap:** Runaway-turn compaction cannot yet replay because the summarization call records no `assistant/chunk` events or `sessionId`; interleaved summarization-call replay remains follow-up work.
+- **Snapshot:** The assembled context-overflow scenario derives the auxiliary call from `compact/summary` only when `llmStreamCall: true` proves that the local LLM service consumed it; canonical reconstructed blocks pin the complete recovery without provider delta partitioning.
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Status: implemented

 早期草案将完整算法（保留遍历、token 求和、文本提取）作为接口上的具体方法。这会将契约重新耦合到一种策略：想要不同保留策略或事件排序的后端必须与继承来的具体代码对抗。将三个操作都设为抽象，把所有*怎么做*的决策放在后端，并让接口保持为*做什么*的声明。token 测量根本不是压缩钩子；单例服务使多个消费方能够共享逐会话的回放折叠。

-`compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` 接受显式的 `'pressure' | 'context-overflow'` 触发原因与取消信号。它只读取最新的持久化已路由请求；没有 header 就不执行工作，任何已路由的提供方/模型目标都使用单例估算器。`compactNow(agent, signal)` 要求 agent 处于 idle，即使未达到压力也进行一次有效的平衡缩减；不存在这种范围时返回 `null`，且不写入任何内容。`compactRegion(start, end, agent, signal?)` 将 `agent.session` 作为唯一会话身份，并为显式调用方保留可选 signal。默认摘要器依次从显式配置、最新记录的已路由目标和 agent 选项解析目标，并在任何 `llm/stream` 路由后记录提供方/模型对。它回放已路由请求的前缀，并将压缩指令追加为尾部 user 消息，从而复用提供方的热 KV cache；见[摘要前缀缓存 Agent Note](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md)。该调用将提供方无关的 `GenerateOptions.purpose` 设为 `compaction`；适配器可以将此用途映射为对模型隐藏的传输元数据，DeepSeek 适配器会发送 `x-deepseek-harness-compact: 1`。
+`compactIfNeeded(agent, trigger, signal)` 接受显式的 `'pressure' | 'context-overflow'` 触发原因与取消信号。它只读取最新的持久化已路由请求；没有 header 就不执行工作，任何已路由的提供方/模型目标都使用单例估算器。`compactNow(agent, signal)` 要求 agent 处于 idle，即使未达到压力也进行一次有效的平衡缩减；不存在这种范围时返回 `null`，且不写入任何内容。`compactRegion(start, end, agent, signal?)` 将 `agent.session` 作为唯一会话身份，并为显式调用方保留可选 signal。默认摘要器依次从显式配置、最新记录的已路由目标和 agent 选项解析目标，并在任何 `llm/stream` 路由后记录提供方/模型对。它回放已路由请求的前缀，并将压缩指令追加为尾部 user 消息，从而复用提供方的热 KV cache；见[摘要前缀缓存 Agent Note](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md)。该结果携带 `llmStreamCall: true`，因为生成它时恰好通过此上下文的 LLM 服务发起了一次调用；只有满足相同条件时，子类才设置该标记，因为单有保留的 `rawOutput` 并不能判定调用路径。该调用将提供方无关的 `GenerateOptions.purpose` 设为 `compaction`；适配器可以将此用途映射为对模型隐藏的传输元数据，DeepSeek 适配器会发送 `x-deepseek-harness-compact: 1`。

 ### 成功的持久步骤工作完成后运行自动压力检查

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ retry → next numbered step/start      ⟵ derives from the replacement surface
 ```
 compact/start    → log-only. Acquires the lock.
 [summarize older range via the backend]
-compact/summary  → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
+compact/summary  → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
 user/message     → canonical checkpoint source + surfaceOp { op:'replace', start, end }.
                   THE surface mutation (framed summary).
                   deriveMessages() renders it as a user-role message.
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ compact/end      → log-only. Releases the lock (carries `error` on a recoverab
 - **循环测试：** 测试固定 pre-step 发生在前一个 `step/end` 之后、下一个 `step/start` 之前，使用实际 `agent/request` 路由，关闭失败步骤，分配新的重试编号，并覆盖完整的抛出/带内溢出 → 压缩 → 重建重试组合。
 - **手动测试：** 无需模型密钥即可固定 maintenance 串行化、标记顺序、注入保留、活动／陈旧未匹配标记分类、取消、闭合／flush 失败、命令映射以及排队 TUI 流程。
 - **带密钥 e2e：** 真实模型和 bash 会话在降低的限制下触发压缩，记录完整的 `compact/start…end` 对，缩小 surface，并完成任务。
- **快照缺口：** 失控轮次压缩尚无法回放，因为摘要调用未记录 `assistant/chunk` 事件或 `sessionId`；交错摘要调用的回放仍是后续工作。
+- **快照：** 组装后的上下文溢出场景仅在 `llmStreamCall: true` 证明本地 LLM 服务执行了辅助调用时，才从 `compact/summary` 派生该调用；规范重建的块在不固定提供方增量切分的情况下固定完整恢复过程。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.md
-2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 3c21b7599e6bb2dd759e4a040c1b999f1b0516cd
-2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: e913ecb22b4692e1ee7b96d4f5effe2606775cf8
+2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 53a580aee50752b7c6daeff5caa42ba6409c8885
+2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: dc1d6b5dc2c9f576e7298c891a3a1145f123a8db
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The lifecycle has two distinct classes of content. The initial applicable chain

 ## Decision

-The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/pre-step`, `tools/post-execute`, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.
+The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/pre-step`, immutable `tools/result` outcomes, `session/event` boundaries, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.

 The plugin does not statically inject `fs`. Providerless product trees therefore boot normally and the plugin no-ops until a filesystem provider exists. All production reads go through that provider. Candidate probes resolve each path and stat the result, so a final-component symlink is followed to its target: a link to a regular file loads, while a missing path or a non-file target is a confirmed absence. Following repository-owned links across the trust boundary is a deliberate reversal of the original no-follow probe; the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns that decision and its residual risk. The step signal and dynamic tool execution signal propagate through resolution, metadata probes, and streaming reads, so cancellation does not wait for an unrelated filesystem scan. A resolve or stat exception is classified as unavailable: it skips only that candidate and is never interpreted as the deletion of an already-loaded scope.

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ The baseline is a user-role `<system-reminder>` with `Instructions from: <path>`

 ### Dynamic Discovery And Refresh

-After a successful first-party `read`, `write`, or `edit` call, the `tools/post-execute` listener reconciles the touched descendant chain and every scope already known to the session. A newly reached scope is returned through `additionalContexts` for the next request using an `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder. Under Code Mode, `run_code` defers sub-dispatch contexts onto its outer result, so the same update is appended only after the parent result rather than being injected mid-call.
+After a successful first-party `read`, `write`, or `edit` call, the immutable `tools/result` observer reconciles the touched descendant chain and every scope already known to the session, then queues an `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder in the agent inbox for the next request. Under Code Mode, successful sub-dispatch touches bubble through opaque parent execution tokens until the top-level result settles. A touch produced inside an agent-loop step does not begin its asynchronous projection until the durable `step/end`; a direct tool execution outside an open step projects immediately. The two boundaries keep result and step adjacency deterministic without making the tool pipeline await filesystem discovery.

 A content edit appends `Updated instructions from: <path>`, states that the new content replaces the previous content, and includes the complete current file. If precedence changes from one candidate to another, the message also names the previous path and says it no longer applies. If no candidate remains, the plugin appends `Instructions removed: <path>` and states that the previously loaded instructions no longer apply.

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Shell commands are not discovery triggers. Local bash calls start fresh shells,

 Every workspace context event stores versioned metadata with `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`, where `digest` is SHA-1 over the loaded content. Complete baselines additionally carry `baseline: true` and `baselineIdentity`. The model-facing prompt has no HTML comments, hidden markers, or headings that are parsed back into state.

-At reconciliation time the plugin scans workspace-sourced `user/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. A short per-session pending map begins only after the immutable top-level `tools/result` proves an `additionalContexts` entry survived every post-execute listener, then covers the interval before the loop appends that context to the log. Each entry records the open `{ turn, step }`: an equal durable `user/message` at or after its sequence boundary confirms and removes it, while a matching `step/end` arriving first means the loop discarded its context buffer, so the plugin removes both the pending entry and its version-cache fast path. A nested Code Mode result stages its changes under the parent's opaque execution token so repeated sub-dispatches in one run do not duplicate them; the parent result rolls that provisional state back and commits only contexts retained by outer policy.
+At reconciliation time the plugin scans workspace-sourced `user/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. Successful nested touches aggregate under their parent execution token, including when a later composite result is blocked; the top-level result transfers them either to the open session step or directly to a per-agent projection queue. A `step/end` releases its staged touches only after that boundary is durable, and the next `agent/pre-step` waits for the serialized projections. Each projection composes against visible history plus the current inbox and replaces the single pending workspace context instead of accumulating intermediate renderings.

 An unchanged path and digest is suppressed. A logged removal is a tombstone, so a reappearing candidate becomes a new `set`. Resume works from persisted metadata: a compatible visible baseline supplies comparison state rather than causing another complete baseline to be appended. If compaction removes an instruction event from the visible surface, that state no longer suppresses a later load, matching the fact that the model can no longer see it. Only changes actually included under the byte budget enter metadata or pending state, so an omitted file remains eligible on a later touch.

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc

 `maxBytes` is required and applies separately to a rendered baseline or one dynamic reconciliation batch; there is no implicit or unbounded render budget. Non-positive and non-finite values disable loading. When content exceeds the budget, broader files are omitted before the most-specific file is truncated. A visible `Workspace instruction budget ...` notice names omitted and truncated paths and byte counts, and output never exceeds the configured bytes.

-`maxSourceBytes` is a positive per-file cap with a 1 MiB default. The loader checks reported size before reading and still consumes content through `streamText()` with a running UTF-8 byte count, so missing/stale metadata cannot force an unbounded allocation. An oversized winning candidate is unavailable rather than a reason to fall through to another same-directory name. The plugin deliberately keeps no process-wide cache and never retains instruction prose. It keeps only `{ path, version, digest }` per effective scope in a `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>`: a matching provider `FsVersion` plus matching effective prompt state skips the read, while a changed version triggers a bounded read and SHA-1 confirmation. SHA-1 remains the cross-provider content identity persisted in visible structured metadata; provider versions are only an in-memory invalidation fast path. Cache transitions for model-visible changes commit only when the corresponding context survives the complete tool-result policy chain, and are invalidated if that accepted context is later dropped with its aborted step before reaching the log.
+`maxSourceBytes` is a positive per-file cap with a 1 MiB default. The loader checks reported size before reading and still consumes content through `streamText()` with a running UTF-8 byte count, so missing/stale metadata cannot force an unbounded allocation. An oversized winning candidate is unavailable rather than a reason to fall through to another same-directory name. The plugin deliberately keeps no process-wide cache and never retains instruction prose. It keeps only `{ path, version, digest }` per effective scope in a `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>`: a matching provider `FsVersion` plus matching effective prompt state skips the read, while a changed version triggers a bounded read and SHA-1 confirmation. SHA-1 remains the cross-provider content identity persisted in visible structured metadata; provider versions are only an in-memory invalidation fast path. Dynamic cache transitions occur while a serialized projection composes the one desired inbox context, and the next pre-step waits for that projection before deciding what enters the request.

 ## Alternatives considered

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc

 ## Consequences

-Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through injected messages and post-tool `additionalContexts` arrays without flattening entries.
+Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through inbox-staged and durably entered user messages without flattening entries.

 Repository text remains untrusted input. Lower-authority user-role framing, explicit precedence language, and delimiter escaping reduce risk but do not eliminate prompt injection. Following a candidate symlink to its target widens that surface to off-tree content, so the permission and sandbox layers that confine `ctx.fs` to trusted roots are the boundary that treats workspace files as data rather than authority (the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns the residual risk).

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 决策

-该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context` 中，包（package）名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展，不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它；`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算，Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/pre-step`、`tools/post-execute` 和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。
+该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context` 中，包（package）名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展，不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它；`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算，Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/pre-step`、不可变的 `tools/result` 结果、`session/event` 边界和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。

 插件不会静态注入 `fs`。因此，不带提供方的产品树仍能正常启动；在文件系统提供方出现之前，插件保持无操作。所有生产读取都通过该提供方完成。候选项探测会解析每个路径并对结果执行 stat，因此会跟随最终路径组件的符号链接至其目标：指向普通文件的链接会被加载，缺失路径或非文件目标则确认为不存在。允许仓库拥有的链接跨越信任边界，是对最初不跟随探测方式的刻意反转；[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明该决策及其残余风险。步骤信号与动态工具执行信号会贯穿解析、元数据探测和流式读取，因此取消不会等待无关的文件系统扫描。解析或 stat 异常归类为不可用：它只跳过该候选项，绝不被解释为已经加载的作用域被删除。

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ### 动态发现与刷新

-第一方 `read`、`write` 或 `edit` 调用成功后，`tools/post-execute` 监听器会协调被触及的后代路径链，以及该会话已经知道的每个作用域。新到达的作用域通过 `additionalContexts` 返回，并在下一次请求中使用 `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder。在 Code Mode 下，`run_code` 会把子分发上下文延后至其外层结果，因此同一更新只会在父结果之后追加，而不会在调用中途注入。
+第一方 `read`、`write` 或 `edit` 调用成功后，不可变的 `tools/result` 观察器会协调被触及的后代路径链，以及该会话已经知道的每个作用域，然后在 agent inbox 中排入一条 `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder，供下一次请求使用。在 Code Mode 下，成功的子分派 touch 会沿不透明的父级执行 token 逐层上浮，直到顶层结果落定。在 agent loop 步骤内产生的 touch，须等持久 `step/end` 后才开始异步投影；打开的步骤之外直接执行工具时，则立即投影。这两个边界在不让工具流水线等待文件系统发现的前提下，保证结果／步骤的相邻关系具有确定性。

 内容编辑会追加 `Updated instructions from: <path>`，说明新内容取代先前内容，并包含当前的完整文件。如果优先级从一个候选项变为另一个，消息还会指出先前路径并说明它不再适用。如果没有候选项保留，插件会追加 `Instructions removed: <path>`，并说明先前加载的指令不再适用。

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell，

 每个工作区上下文事件都会存储带版本的元数据，其形态为 `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`；`digest` 是对已加载内容计算的 SHA-1。完整基线还会额外携带 `baseline: true` 和 `baselineIdentity`。模型可见提示词中没有 HTML 注释、隐藏标记，也没有会被解析回状态的标题。

-协调时，插件扫描带工作区来源的 `user/message` 事件，并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。一个简短的逐会话待处理映射只会在不可变的顶层 `tools/result` 证明某个 `additionalContexts` 条目经过所有 post-execute 监听器后仍然保留时开始记录；随后，它覆盖循环将该上下文追加到日志之前的间隔。每个条目记录开启状态的 `{ turn, step }`：如果相同的持久 `user/message` 出现在其序列边界或之后，该条目得到确认并被移除；如果匹配的 `step/end` 先到达，则说明循环丢弃了上下文缓冲区，插件会同时移除待处理条目及其版本缓存快速路径。嵌套的 Code Mode 结果会把变更暂存在父级的不透明执行 token 下，确保一次运行中的重复子分发不会产生重复项；父级结果会回滚这份临时状态，并且只提交外层策略保留的上下文。
+协调时，插件扫描带工作区来源的 `user/message` 事件，并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。即使后续复合结果被拦截，成功的嵌套 touch 也会聚合到父级执行 token 下；顶层结果会将它们交给打开的会话步骤，或直接交给逐 agent 投影队列。`step/end` 只会在自身边界持久化后释放其暂存的 touch；下一次 `agent/pre-step` 会等待串行投影完成。每次投影都会根据可见历史和当前 inbox 进行组合，并替换唯一一条待处理工作区上下文，而不会累积中间渲染结果。

 路径和 digest 均未变化时会被抑制。日志中的移除操作是一条墓碑记录，因此重新出现的候选项会成为新的 `set`。恢复操作从持久化元数据继续工作：兼容的可见基线会提供比较状态，而不会导致再次追加完整基线。如果压缩从可见表面移除某条指令事件，该状态不再抑制后续加载，这与模型已经无法看见它的事实一致。只有真正纳入字节预算的变更才会进入元数据或待处理状态，因此被省略的文件在之后的触碰中仍有资格加载。

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell，

 `maxBytes` 是必填项，分别作用于渲染后的基线或单个动态协调批次；系统不存在隐式或无界的渲染预算。非正数或非有限值会禁用加载。内容超过预算时，系统会先省略较宽泛的文件，再截断最具体的文件。可见的 `Workspace instruction budget ...` 提示会指出被省略和截断的路径与字节数，并且输出绝不超过配置字节数。

-`maxSourceBytes` 是正数的逐文件上限，默认为 1 MiB。loader 会在读取前检查报告的大小，同时仍通过 `streamText()` 消费内容并持续统计 UTF-8 字节数，因此缺失／陈旧的元数据无法迫使其进行无界分配。过大的胜出候选项会被视为不可用，而不是改为同目录中的下一个名称。插件刻意不保留进程级缓存，也绝不保留指令正文。它只为每个有效作用域保存 `{ path, version, digest }`，并将这些状态放在 `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>` 中：提供方 `FsVersion` 与有效提示词状态同时匹配时跳过读取；版本变化则触发有界读取和 SHA-1 确认。SHA-1 仍是持久化在可见结构化元数据中的跨提供方内容标识；提供方版本只作为内存中的失效快速路径。模型可见变更的缓存转换只有在相应上下文通过完整的工具结果策略链后才会提交；如果该已接受上下文随后与中止步骤一起被丢弃、未能进入日志，缓存转换就会失效。
+`maxSourceBytes` 是正数的逐文件上限，默认为 1 MiB。loader 会在读取前检查报告的大小，同时仍通过 `streamText()` 消费内容并持续统计 UTF-8 字节数，因此缺失／陈旧的元数据无法迫使其进行无界分配。过大的胜出候选项会被视为不可用，而不是改为同目录中的下一个名称。插件刻意不保留进程级缓存，也绝不保留指令正文。它只为每个有效作用域保存 `{ path, version, digest }`，并将这些状态放在 `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>` 中：提供方 `FsVersion` 与有效提示词状态同时匹配时跳过读取；版本变化则触发有界读取和 SHA-1 确认。SHA-1 仍是持久化在可见结构化元数据中的跨提供方内容标识；提供方版本只作为内存中的失效快速路径。动态缓存转换发生在串行投影组合唯一一条目标 inbox 上下文时；下一次 pre-step 会等待该投影完成，再决定哪些内容进入请求。

 ## 考虑过的替代方案

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell，

 ## 后果

-工作区指引按会话隔离，并由 demo 入口、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始、嵌套与变更指令都保持持久且可回放。通用的会话／agent 上下文契约通过注入消息与工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 数组携带带类型的来源数据，而不会把条目展平。
+工作区指引按会话隔离，并由 demo 入口、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始、嵌套与变更指令都保持持久且可回放。通用的会话／agent 上下文契约通过先在 inbox 中暂存、再持久进入的 user 消息携带带类型的来源数据，而不会把条目展平。

 仓库文本仍是不受信任的输入。低权威 user 角色框架、显式优先级说明和分隔符转义可以降低风险，但无法消除提示词注入。跟随候选符号链接到目标，会把该攻击面扩大至树外内容；因此，把 `ctx.fs` 限制在可信根目录内的权限与沙箱层才是真正的边界，它们让系统把工作区文件当作数据而不是权威（[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明残余风险）。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-skill-system.md
-2026-07-05-skill-system.md: dd2fb1d22949f55ea7cb2c9f280e7cfbfcbbb226
-2026-07-05-skill-system.zh.md: 96656a8e1dfc2ae1ce7301ba29e7739349b6aab6
+2026-07-05-skill-system.md: a998d70ec934aed4bf7ce32aa711abd47b508a1d
+2026-07-05-skill-system.zh.md: 4fa7c4fd657c2f41f16b30679ec95e61a75f8a0c
@@ -14,9 +14,11 @@ DeepSeek Harness uses the same primitive so project-specific review, plugin-auth

 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill` is the pure provider registry (`ctx.skills`), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill-local` is the shipped local filesystem provider, and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-skill` owns the durable session catalog and model-facing loader tool. `dsh-agent-spine-demo` loads the registry, local provider, and consumer by default so TUI, headless, and ACP apps get the same behavior while embedded or remote providers contribute skills without changing the registry or consumer. Its `skills` config forwards `registry`, `local`, and `tool` branches to those owners.

+Dedicated packaged providers can contribute immutable skills without filesystem discovery. The shipped CLI declares `@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill-badge` disabled by default; enabling its composition row contributes the official badge instructions through the same registry and consumer ([decision](2026-08-06-bundled-dsh-badge-skill.md)).
+
 Provider plugins register synchronously during `apply()`. Provider membership is direct effect-owned state: registration and disposal invalidate completed catalogs synchronously, and discovery reads the current provider map on demand rather than observing registry-change events. Provider catalogs return ranked candidates from awaited `list()` calls, where remote providers perform initialization, authentication, and discovery while honoring the lookup abort signal. The registry validates each candidate, resolves same-name skills first-wins by rank, provider registration order, and provider-local order, then sorts summaries by skill name for deterministic consumers. It caches only completed catalog snapshots and retries when a provider/runtime revision changes during discovery, so an unload cannot freeze a stale, unresolvable skill into a session catalog. Runtime `ctx.skills.register(...)` remains a convenience for embedded in-process skills and uses project-over-user priority; `runtime` is reserved as the registry-owned provider name.

-The local provider scans cwd-sensitive project roots, custom roots, and user roots in first-wins rank order: project `.dsh`, project `.agents`, `customSkillDirs`, user `.dsh`, then user `.agents`. The user `.dsh/skills` scan skips `.system` so a system-owned directory is not treated as normal user content. DeepSeek Harness does not ship built-in system skills; embedded or remote providers supply additional skills when configured.
+The local provider scans cwd-sensitive project roots, custom roots, and user roots in first-wins rank order: project `.dsh`, project `.agents`, `customSkillDirs`, user `.dsh`, then user `.agents`. The user `.dsh/skills` scan skips `.system` so a system-owned directory is not treated as normal user content. The local provider does not synthesize built-in system skills; configured bundled roots and dedicated providers supply additional skills.

 Each skill is either `<name>/SKILL.md` or `<name>.md` with YAML frontmatter. `name` and `description` are required; `whenToUse`, `metadata`, `disable-model-invocation`, and `user-invocable` are optional. Names are kebab-case. The invocation fields project into a typed nested policy as defined by the [independent model and user invocation decision](2026-07-28-skill-invocation-policy.md); the parser rejects the old camel-case spellings. YAML frontmatter is parsed with the `yaml` package instead of `js-yaml` or a hand-written parser: `yaml` is the already-declared modern parser for this package's limited frontmatter needs, and a narrow parser would either reject valid YAML users expect to work or grow into an unreviewed YAML subset.

@@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ The data structures and catalog/tool contract are documented in [skills.md](../.

 The agent-core spine includes one catalog contributor, one local provider, and one model-facing tool. Skill discovery is cwd-sensitive, so callers that create agents with different session cwd values can observe different project skill overrides by design.

-The catalog is deterministic for a fixed root set and runtime registration revision, but disk changes are not watched; discovery is memoized until runtime registration invalidates the cache or the process restarts.
+The catalog is deterministic for a fixed root set and runtime registration revision. The local provider watches configured roots and invalidates completed catalogs after relevant disk changes; runtime registration and provider disposal also invalidate them.

 ## Deferred

@@ -14,9 +14,11 @@ DeepSeek Harness 使用同一原语，使项目特定的评审、插件编写和

 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill` 是纯提供方注册表（`ctx.skills`），`@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill-local` 是随附的本地文件系统提供方，`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-skill` 负责持久化会话目录与面向模型的 loader 工具。`dsh-agent-spine-demo` 默认加载注册表、本地提供方和消费方，使 TUI、headless 与 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）应用获得相同行为，同时嵌入式或远程提供方可在不修改注册表或消费方的前提下贡献 skill。其 `skills` 配置将 `registry`、`local` 和 `tool` 分支分别转发给对应的所有者。

+专用的随包提供方可以贡献不可变的 skill，无需文件系统发现。交付的 CLI（命令行界面）默认将 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-skill-badge` 声明为禁用；启用其组合配置行，就会通过同一个注册表和消费方贡献官方徽章指令（见[决策](2026-08-06-bundled-dsh-badge-skill.md)）。
+
 提供方插件在 `apply()` 期间同步注册。提供方成员资格是由直接 effect 持有的状态：注册与 dispose（资源释放）同步地使已完成的目录失效，发现操作按需读取当前提供方映射而非监听注册表变更事件。提供方目录从等待的 `list()` 调用返回排序后的候选项，远程提供方在此过程中执行初始化、认证和发现，同时遵守查找的 abort 信号。注册表校验每个候选项，按排名、提供方注册顺序和提供方内部顺序以先到先得方式解决同名 skill 冲突，然后按 skill 名称排序摘要以保证消费方获得确定性结果。它仅缓存已完成的目录快照，并在发现过程中提供方/运行时修订版本发生变化时重试，因此卸载操作不会将一个陈旧且不可解析的 skill 冻结到会话目录中。运行时 `ctx.skills.register(...)` 仍作为嵌入式进程内 skill 的便捷方式保留，使用 project 优先于 user 的优先级；`runtime` 保留为注册表拥有的提供方名称。

-本地提供方按先到先得的排名顺序扫描 cwd 敏感的项目根目录、自定义根目录和用户根目录：项目 `.dsh`、项目 `.agents`、`customSkillDirs`、用户 `.dsh`，然后是用户 `.agents`。用户 `.dsh/skills` 扫描跳过 `.system`，以免系统拥有的目录被当作普通用户内容处理。DeepSeek Harness 不随附内置系统 skill；嵌入式或远程提供方在配置后提供额外 skill。
+本地提供方按先到先得的排名顺序扫描 cwd 敏感的项目根目录、自定义根目录和用户根目录：项目 `.dsh`、项目 `.agents`、`customSkillDirs`、用户 `.dsh`，然后是用户 `.agents`。用户 `.dsh/skills` 扫描跳过 `.system`，以免系统拥有的目录被当作普通用户内容处理。本地提供方不会合成内置系统 skill；已配置的 bundled 根目录和专用提供方会提供额外 skill。

 每个 skill 是 `<name>/SKILL.md` 或带 YAML frontmatter 的 `<name>.md`。`name` 和 `description` 为必填；`whenToUse`、`metadata`、`disable-model-invocation` 和 `user-invocable` 为可选。名称采用 kebab-case。调用字段会投影到类型化的嵌套策略中，具体由[模型与用户独立调用决策](2026-07-28-skill-invocation-policy.md)定义；解析器会拒绝旧的驼峰拼写。YAML frontmatter 使用 `yaml` 包（package）解析，而非 `js-yaml` 或手写解析器：`yaml` 是本包有限 frontmatter 需求已声明的现代解析器，窄解析器要么拒绝用户预期可用的合法 YAML，要么膨胀为一个未经评审的 YAML 子集。

@@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ DeepSeek Harness 使用同一原语，使项目特定的评审、插件编写和

 agent-core 主干包含一个目录贡献者、一个本地提供方和一个面向模型的工具。Skill 发现是 cwd 敏感的，因此以不同会话 cwd 值创建 agent 的调用方可以按设计观察到不同的项目 skill 覆盖。

-目录对于固定的根目录集合和运行时注册修订版本是确定性的，但不监视磁盘变化；发现结果被缓存，直到运行时注册使缓存失效或进程重启。
+目录对于固定的根目录集合和运行时注册修订版本是确定性的。本地提供方会监视已配置的根目录，并在发生相关磁盘变化后使已完成的目录失效；运行时注册和提供方释放也会使其失效。

 ## 延后

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
-2026-07-06-sandbox.md: aed5ac1ceb02130ce97a8c83c0f77869fdc32146
-2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: db95b1a5b7a7cae1e0fcdd8deba9dcb6ad020a67
+2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 583b388815cd9b2b9cf94ce393839169ce3ffac3
+2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: e435b671a42ca5c3ea4f6800bf91d6e006da35d3
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Left open, for the phase that needs them: whether network restriction arrives as

 The launcher is a ~300-line C program (plain C11 over the raw Landlock UAPI — no libraries beyond a statically linked musl, so the audit surface is that one file plus the kernel's stable syscall contract): `--ro <path>` / `--rw <path>` grants, `--`, the wrapped argv; it installs the ruleset on itself and `exec`s (rulesets are inherited across `execve`, and it sets `no_new_privs` before restricting); `--probe` enforces a maximal ruleset in a short-lived child and exits 0 only when the kernel actually enforces; every launcher failure exits 125 without running the child and prints a fatal `landlock-run:` line. A successfully exec'd child may also return 125, so status alone is not launcher evidence. An older ABI prints the exact `landlock-run: partial enforcement (older Landlock ABI)` notice before it executes the child, so that line is not fatal evidence.

-The Landlock launcher source and package workspace live at `native/landlock-run`, next to the harness consumers. The standalone [`node-addon-landlock-run`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/node-addon-landlock-run) repository is the release mirror used to pack and publish the npm package family; `native/README.md` owns the export procedure. Platform binaries are selected by npm, and the entry package owns path resolution, probing, CLI flags, the fatal prefix, and the partial-enforcement notice while the harness maps sandbox modes to grants. Versioning the entry point with its binaries keeps probe parsing and launch syntax aligned.
+The Landlock launcher source and package family live at `native/landlock-run`, next to the harness consumers and inside the root pnpm workspace. The [in-repository Landlock release decision](../process/2026-08-06-in-repository-landlock-release.md) owns the shared lockfile, native build, pack rehearsal, and npm publication boundary. Platform binaries are selected by npm, and the entry package owns path resolution, probing, CLI flags, the fatal prefix, and the partial-enforcement notice while the harness maps sandbox modes to grants. Versioning the entry point with its binaries keeps probe parsing and launch syntax aligned.

 Backend profiles share the mode contract but differ in necessary host grants. Landlock and Seatbelt allow only `/dev/null` in read-only mode; workspace-write also permits their required host temp roots. Each wrap carries backend-specific denial signatures. Landlock reports partial enforcement on older ABIs that cannot govern every operation, while successful bwrap and Seatbelt profiles report full enforcement.

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ fs/web/todo execute in-process, so their sandbox semantics are policy at their s
 ### Testing

 - **Unit:** pin platform selection and profiles, direct provider-argv handoff, spawn-level failures with invalid-workdir controls, missing/non-executable/missing-interpreter evidence, malformed-runner negative controls, confined `BASH_ENV` ordering, structured runner classification (including partial-Landlock notice-only child outcomes, gated fatal evidence, child exits 126/127, and foreground/background parity), per-call mode/root resolution, per-process facts, escalation validation and outcomes, permission preset folding and write-through, and runtime-context ordering and materialization.
- **Keyless real-runner:** exercise bwrap, Landlock, and Seatbelt against real filesystem effects at provider and bash-consumer layers; one real Cordis context concurrently drives two project sessions through shipped bash and fs tools, proving own-root success and sibling-root denial. Packed-install coverage proves the registry launcher remains executable. CI rejects a silent all-skip.
+- **Keyless real-runner:** exercise bwrap, Landlock, and Seatbelt against real filesystem effects at provider and bash-consumer layers; one real Cordis context concurrently drives two project sessions through shipped bash and fs tools, proving own-root success and sibling-root denial. Packed-install coverage installs the current checkout's native tarballs and proves the launcher remains executable and byte-identical. CI rejects a silent all-skip.
 - **With-key:** start the real ACP composition in read-only mode, let a model-driven bash write hit the runner's denial marker, then drive the bridge answerer and disk effect through granted and rejected workspace-write retries; unavailable credentials or runners self-skip.
 - **Snapshot:** pin the atomic current-policy context and both scripted approval branches. A real ACP example scenario places its session under the user home while the deployment fallback points at `/tmp`, then pins both the workspace-write runtime-context message and a successful deployment-selected mutation; this distinguishes session-root resolution from the process fallback without depending on runner-specific denial text. A POSIX fake partial-Landlock provider pins direct bash `false` as an ordinary child result and a missing provider executable as foreground/background infrastructure failure through the assembled app. Other snapshots start unconfined so unrelated fixtures remain platform-independent.

@@ -128,15 +128,15 @@ Each phase gets its full design when picked up, validated against the code at th

 - **Second consumer** — `subagent-acp` optionally confines child agents (per-call policy; unconfined default — a child agent must write its own persistence).
 - **More environments** — an environment-coherent capability group example (e.g. bash+fs against one container).
- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect, denial signatures, and runner-failure rules. Wrapping the third-party landstrip runner instead was [considered and rejected](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md) — not battle-tested enough for a security invariant.
+- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from the main repository under `native/` following the `@deepseek-ai/node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect, denial signatures, and runner-failure rules. Wrapping the third-party landstrip runner instead was [considered and rejected](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md) — not battle-tested enough for a security invariant.

 ## Alternatives considered

 - **Command-string heuristic preflight** — rejected: cannot understand expansion/subprocesses/symlinks; the strict attempt (run it, let the kernel decide) is the only trustworthy denial signal.
 - **Functionally probe even a platform's sole backend** — rejected: probing arbitrates between candidates; with one there is nothing to decide, and probe cost taxes the first confined command of every session (prohibitive for heavy future backends). The runner's own exec-time fail-closed refusal plus structured `runnerFailureRules` classification carries the safety property instead.
- **Commit the built launcher binaries** — rejected: a binary in a diff is unreviewable and churns history; reviewed source + native CI builds + the launcher repo's byte-pinned publish rehearsal keep bytes out of every tree.
+- **Commit the built launcher binaries** — rejected: a binary in a diff is unreviewable and churns history; reviewed source + native CI builds + the main repository's byte-pinned publish rehearsal keep bytes out of every tree.
 - **Compile the launcher on install** — rejected: pushes a C toolchain onto every consumer; a fallback that exists only where a compiler happens to be is not a fallback.
- **Cross-compile both architectures from one builder** — rejected: requires carrying a pinned cross toolchain (rustup targets, zig, or a container image) solely to rebuild two ~70 KB binaries; per-architecture native runners already exist and each builds its own platform package (the `node-addon-require-builtin` model, the launcher repo's own pipeline).
+- **Cross-compile both architectures from one builder** — rejected: requires carrying a pinned cross toolchain (rustup targets, zig, or a container image) solely to rebuild two ~70 KB binaries; per-architecture native runners already exist and each builds its own platform package (the `node-addon-require-builtin` model, retained by the main repository's native pipeline).
 - **No fallback (bwrap or fail closed)** — rejected: concentrates failure on the hosts a sandbox matters most, degrading to `danger-full-access` by resignation.
 - **Keep the mechanism inside `dsh-bash-sandbox`** — rejected: blocks the existing second consumer, makes future phases read mode out of a bash plugin's config, and cannot express escalation.
 - **Config-fixed mode on the provider** — rejected: one mode per process; cannot serve concurrent consumers with different policies nor the one-shot widened retry.
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
 - **The Seatbelt rung leans on Apple's deprecated-but-shipped `sandbox-exec` CLI.** As darwin's sole candidate it is selected without probing, so a future removal under a usable workdir surfaces as a runner-attributable spawn failure and an executable refusal through its fatal signature — both become `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`, and the command never runs; fail closed, never open.
 - **Landlock confinement is only as complete as the running kernel's ABI.** Reported as `enforcement: 'partial'` rather than refused — the deliberate trade that keeps the fallback available on older-kernel hosts.
 - **Runner attribution uses an in-band protocol.** Exit status plus stderr cannot cryptographically identify the writer, so a confined child can mimic a fatal runner line and status to cause an availability/diagnostic false attribution. The conjunction and exact notice exclusion reduce accidental matches; this is not a sandbox bypass because the child is already confined.
- **The launcher arrives as a registry dependency.** Trusted through its own repository's release pipeline (reviewed C source, native CI builders, byte-pinned publish rehearsal) plus this repo's version pin — the real-kernel e2e legs are what vouch for behavior through the installed bytes.
+- **The launcher is a workspace dependency in source and an npm dependency after publication.** The main repository tests reviewed C source, native CI builds, and byte-pinned local tarballs together before publishing the same package family; the real-kernel e2e legs vouch for behavior through those installed bytes.
 - **The model may over-ask.** Escalating without denial grounding, or picking `danger-full-access` where `workspace-write` suffices: the description steers and the enum forces the ladder, but the human prompt is the actual gate; the `approval/asked` reasons make over-asking auditable, and a `prepend` policy answerer can auto-reject patterns a deployment never wants.
 - **The advertised target set is static while the effective mode is per-session** (schemas are registry-global) — a session already at the widest mode is still offered the fields. Harmless by construction: the strict-wider check at execution, not the enum, is the safety boundary — a non-widening request fails with its own text and never prompts anyone.
 - **A granted escalation is not a working sandbox.** An unavailable backend still fails closed even for a granted escalation to a confining mode — at `confine()` when the platform has no chain or every probe fails, through the spawn channel when the selected executable cannot start, or through a structured rule when a started runner refuses — while a granted `danger-full-access` run never touches the provider at all: there the grant, not the probe, is the authority.
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
 - **A command came back with `[sandbox: file access denied under read-only mode]` — did it fail?** It RAN, and the kernel refused a file effect: the denial is a result fact orthogonal to exit code. The teaching forbids retrying around it; the one sanctioned move is the same command retried once with an escalation request.
 - **How is a BROKEN sandbox told apart from a failing command?** Any provider-argv spawn rejection proves the confined launch never started, but it identifies a broken runner only when the caller-owned workdir is usable and Node reports attributable `ENOENT` or `EACCES` for that argv[0]. A bare `syscall: 'spawn'` without an exact error path and all other rejections remain ordinary command-start errors. After a process starts, runner failure outranks denial only when one `runnerFailureRules` entry matches both its optional exit-code gate and a fatal stderr line after exact informational exclusions. Foreground failures throw structured `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with spawn or matched-line detail; an asynchronously rejected or settled background task stamps `sandbox.runnerFailed` and renders its own marker. A `SubprocessService` that synchronously throws the same provenanced `ENOENT`/`EACCES` shape makes background start throw the structured error; other synchronous errors propagate unchanged. A Landlock partial-enforcement notice plus an ordinary child failure remains a command result.
 - **What happens on a platform with no backend — Windows today?** `confine()` throws the fail-closed `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` and the command never spawns; `win32` is a reserved EMPTY chain, pinned by test to fail closed identically until a Windows runner fills it (§ Deferred phases).
- **`bwrap` is installed on my host but unusable (disabled unprivileged userns, an LSM denying `mount`) — what happens?** The chain probe is functional — it builds and enforces a real profile rather than checking `--version` — so a present-but-unusable `bwrap` fails its probe, selection falls to the registry-installed Landlock launcher, and the verdict is cached for the provider's lifetime.
+- **`bwrap` is installed on my host but unusable (disabled unprivileged userns, an LSM denying `mount`) — what happens?** The chain probe is functional — it builds and enforces a real profile rather than checking `--version` — so a present-but-unusable `bwrap` fails its probe, selection falls to the packaged Landlock launcher, and the verdict is cached for the provider's lifetime.
 - **Does the sandbox restrict network or process visibility?** No — `SandboxMode` claims FILE effects only; the bwrap profile deliberately does not unshare pid, and no backend claims network. Whether network restriction becomes its own knob is left open in § The seam.
 - **Which tools actually run confined?** OS subprocesses through `ctx.bash` — the bash tools, and hook commands transitively — plus the filesystem tools (`read`/`write`/`edit`) through the sandboxed `ctx.fs` provider (the [cross-family fs sandbox RFC](2026-07-14-cross-family-fs-sandbox.md)): bash confines via the OS runner, fs via an in-process path fence, both keying off the same `ctx.sandboxPolicy` mode. web/todo stay in-process and unfenced (web's only effect is network, outside the file-effect mode vocabulary).
 - **Does a granted escalation persist?** No. The grant is consumed by the exact foreground or background call that asked; every neighboring call keeps its own effective mode. A later background denial surfaces through `task_output` and may ground a new exact-command retry.
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ OS 子进程约束适用于 bash 执行器（包括钩子命令），后续还

 launcher 是一个约 300 行的 C 程序（纯 C11，直接使用 Landlock UAPI——除静态链接的 musl 外无其他库，因此审计面仅为该文件加内核的稳定 syscall 契约）：`--ro <path>` / `--rw <path>` 授权，`--`，被包装的 argv；它为自身安装规则集并执行 `exec`（规则集跨 `execve` 继承，且它在限制前设置 `no_new_privs`）；`--probe` 在一个短生命周期子进程中强制最大规则集，仅当内核确实强制时才以 0 退出；所有 launcher 失败都会以 125 退出且不运行子进程，并打印一行致命的 `landlock-run:` 诊断。成功完成 exec 的子进程也可能返回 125，因此仅凭退出状态不能作为 launcher 失败的证据。较旧的 ABI 会在执行子进程之前打印精确的 `landlock-run: partial enforcement (older Landlock ABI)` 通知，因此该行不是致命证据。

-Landlock launcher 源码和包工作区位于 `native/landlock-run`，与 harness 消费方同仓。独立的 [`node-addon-landlock-run`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/node-addon-landlock-run) 仓库是用于打包并发布 npm 包族的发布镜像；导出流程归 `native/README.md` 所有。平台二进制由 npm 选择，入口包拥有路径解析、探测、CLI 参数、致命前缀和部分强制执行通知，而 harness 将沙箱模式映射为授权。将入口点与其二进制一起版本化，使探测解析和启动语法保持对齐。
+Landlock launcher 源码和包家族位于 `native/landlock-run`，与 harness 消费方同仓，并属于根 pnpm workspace。[仓库内 Landlock 发布决策](../process/2026-08-06-in-repository-landlock-release.md)负责共享锁文件、原生构建、打包演练和 npm 发布边界。平台二进制由 npm 选择，入口包拥有路径解析、探测、CLI 参数、致命前缀和部分强制执行通知，而 harness 将沙箱模式映射为授权。将入口点与其二进制一起版本化，使探测解析和启动语法保持对齐。

 后端 profile 共享模式契约但在必要的主机授权上有所不同。Landlock 和 Seatbelt 在 read-only 模式下仅允许 `/dev/null`；workspace-write 还允许各自所需的主机临时目录根。每次包装携带后端特定的拒绝签名。Landlock 在较旧的 ABI 无法管控所有操作时报告 partial enforcement，而成功的 bwrap 和 Seatbelt profile 报告 full enforcement。

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
 ### 测试

 - **单元测试：** 固定平台选择和 profile、直接交接提供方返回的 argv、带有无效 workdir 对照的 spawn 层失败、runner 缺失／不可执行／解释器缺失证据、格式错误 runner 阴性对照、受约束的 `BASH_ENV` 求值顺序、结构化 runner 分类（包括只有部分强制执行通知的子进程结果、带门控的致命证据、子进程退出码 126／127，以及前台／后台一致性）、按调用的模式/根目录解析、按进程事实、升级验证和结果、权限 preset fold 和写入透传，以及运行时上下文排序与具体化。
- **Keyless 真实 runner：** 在提供方和 bash 消费方层面对 bwrap、Landlock 和 Seatbelt 执行真实文件系统效果测试；一个真实 Cordis 上下文通过已交付的 bash 和 fs 工具并发驱动两个项目会话，证明在自身根目录写入成功、在兄弟根目录写入被拒绝。打包安装测试证明注册表 launcher 保持可执行。CI 拒绝静默全跳过。
+- **Keyless 真实 runner：** 在提供方和 bash 消费方层面对 bwrap、Landlock 和 Seatbelt 执行真实文件系统效果测试；一个真实 Cordis 上下文通过已交付的 bash 和 fs 工具并发驱动两个项目会话，证明在自身根目录写入成功、在兄弟根目录写入被拒绝。打包安装测试会安装当前 checkout 的原生 tarball，并证明 launcher 保持可执行且字节完全一致。CI 拒绝静默全跳过。
 - **With-key：** 以只读模式启动真实 ACP 组合，让模型驱动的 bash 写入命中 runner 的拒绝标记，再通过已授权与被拒绝的 workspace-write 重试驱动 bridge 应答器和磁盘效果；不可用的凭证或 runner 自动跳过。
 - **快照：** 固定原子化的当前策略上下文和两个脚本化的 approval 分支。一个真实 ACP 示例场景把会话放在用户主目录下，同时让部署后备根目录指向 `/tmp`，然后固定 workspace-write 运行时上下文消息与一次成功的、由部署选定的变更；这能区分会话根目录解析与进程后备值，而不依赖 runner 特定的拒绝文本。一个模拟 Landlock 部分强制执行行为的 POSIX 提供方会在组装后的应用中固定直接执行 bash `false` 时仍得到普通子进程结果，并固定提供方可执行文件缺失时在前台／后台均为基础设施失败。其他快照以无约束启动，使无关 fixture（测试前置数据）保持平台无关。

@@ -128,15 +128,15 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层

 - **第二个消费方**——`subagent-acp` 可选地约束子 agent（按调用策略；默认无约束——子 agent 必须写入自己的持久化）。
 - **更多环境**——环境一致的能力组示例（如 bash+fs 对一个容器）。
- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空（失败关闭）；填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner，从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付，加上其 profile 方言、拒绝签名和 runner 失败规则。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——它所经受的实战检验还不足以承载安全不变式。
+- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空（失败关闭）；填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner，由主仓库在 `native/` 下按 `@deepseek-ai/node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付，加上其 profile 方言、拒绝签名和 runner 失败规则。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——它所经受的实战检验还不足以承载安全不变式。

 ## 曾考虑的替代方案

 - **命令字符串启发式预检**：否决。无法理解展开/子进程/符号链接；严格尝试（运行它，让内核决定）是唯一可信的拒绝信号。
 - **即使平台仅有一个后端也功能性探测**：否决。探测用于在候选者之间仲裁；只有一个时无需决策，且探测开销对每个会话的首次约束命令征税（对未来重量级后端而言代价过高）。runner 自身执行时的失败关闭拒绝加结构化 `runnerFailureRules` 分类承载了安全属性。
- **提交构建好的 launcher 二进制**：否决。diff 中的二进制不可审查且膨胀历史；经审查的源码 + 原生 CI 构建 + launcher 仓库的字节固定发布演练使二进制远离所有代码树。
+- **提交构建好的 launcher 二进制**：否决。diff 中的二进制不可审查且膨胀历史；经审查的源码 + 原生 CI 构建 + 主仓库的字节固定发布演练使二进制远离所有代码树。
 - **安装时编译 launcher**：否决。将 C 工具链强加给每个消费方；仅在碰巧有编译器时才存在的备选不是备选。
- **从一个构建器交叉编译两种架构**：否决。仅为重建两个约 70 KB 的二进制就需要携带一个固定的交叉工具链（rustup targets、zig 或容器镜像）；每架构的原生 runner 已存在，各自构建自己的平台包（`node-addon-require-builtin` 模式，launcher 仓库自己的流水线）。
+- **从一个构建器交叉编译两种架构**：否决。仅为重建两个约 70 KB 的二进制就需要携带一个固定的交叉工具链（rustup targets、zig 或容器镜像）；每架构的原生 runner 已存在，各自构建自己的平台包（`node-addon-require-builtin` 模式，由主仓库的原生流水线保留）。
 - **无备选（bwrap 或失败关闭）**：否决。将失败集中在沙箱最重要的主机上，最终因放弃而降级到 `danger-full-access`。
 - **将机制保留在 `dsh-bash-sandbox` 内部**：否决。阻塞既有的第二个消费方，使未来阶段从一个 bash 插件的配置中读取模式，且无法表达升级。
 - **提供方上的配置固定模式**：否决。每进程一个模式；无法服务具有不同策略的并发消费方，也无法表达一次性放宽重试。
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
 - **Seatbelt 层级依赖 Apple 已弃用但仍交付的 `sandbox-exec` CLI。** 作为 darwin 的唯一候选，它无需探测即被选中，因此在 workdir 可用时，未来移除会表现为可归因于 runner 的 spawn 失败，可执行文件拒绝则通过其致命签名体现——两者都会变为 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`，且命令绝不会运行；失败关闭，绝不开放。
 - **Landlock 约束的完整度取决于运行内核的 ABI。** 报告为 `enforcement: 'partial'` 而非拒绝——这是有意的权衡，使备选在旧内核主机上仍可用。
 - **Runner 归因使用带内协议。** 退出状态与 stderr 无法以密码学方式识别写入者，因此受限子进程可以模仿 runner 的致命诊断行和状态，造成可用性或诊断误归因。多项证据的合取与精确通知排除减少了意外匹配；这不是沙箱绕过，因为子进程已经受到限制。
- **launcher 作为注册表依赖到达。** 通过其自身仓库的发布流水线（经审查的 C 源码、原生 CI 构建器、字节固定的发布演练）加上本仓库的版本固定获得信任——真实内核 e2e 测试环节会验证安装产物的实际行为。
+- **launcher 在源码中是 workspace 依赖，发布后是 npm 依赖。** 主仓库会在发布同一个包家族之前，一起测试经审查的 C 源码、原生 CI 构建和字节固定的本地 tarball；真实内核 e2e 测试环节会验证这些安装字节的实际行为。
 - **模型可能过度请求。** 在没有拒绝依据的情况下升级，或在 `workspace-write` 足够时选择 `danger-full-access`：描述引导且枚举强制阶梯，但人的提示词是实际门控；`approval/asked` 原因使过度请求可审计，且 `prepend` 策略应答器可以自动拒绝部署永远不想要的模式。
 - **公布的目标集是静态的，而有效模式是按会话的**（schema 是注册表全局的）——已处于最宽模式的会话仍被提供这些字段。构造上无害：执行时的严格放宽检查（而非枚举）是安全边界——非放宽请求以自身文本失败且不提示任何人。
 - **授权的升级不等于可工作的沙箱。** 不可用的后端即使对授权升级到约束模式也仍然失败关闭——平台没有链或所有探测失败时在 `confine()` 阶段失败，所选可执行文件无法启动时通过 spawn 通道失败，已启动的 runner 拒绝时则通过结构化规则失败——而授权的 `danger-full-access` 运行根本不触及提供方：此时授权（而非探测）是权威。
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
 - **一个命令返回了 `[sandbox: file access denied under read-only mode]`——它失败了吗？** 它运行了，内核拒绝了一个文件操作：拒绝是与退出码正交的结果事实。相关指令禁止通过绕过限制来重试；唯一被认可的动作是以升级请求重试同一命令一次。
 - **如何区分损坏的沙箱与失败的命令？** 提供方 argv 的任何 spawn 拒绝都能证明受限启动从未开始，但只有在调用方拥有的 workdir 可用，且 Node 为该 argv[0] 报告可归因的 `ENOENT` 或 `EACCES` 时，才能据此判定 runner 损坏。没有精确错误路径的裸 `syscall: 'spawn'` 和其他所有拒绝仍是普通的命令启动错误。进程启动后，只有当 `runnerFailureRules` 中某一条目同时匹配其可选退出码门控，以及排除整行精确信息性行后的一行致命 stderr 诊断时，runner 失败才会优先于拒绝。前台失败会抛出结构化的 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`，并附带 spawn 错误或匹配行作为详细信息；遭异步拒绝或已结算的后台任务则盖章 `sandbox.runnerFailed` 并渲染自己的标记。如果 `SubprocessService` 同步抛出同样带有来源信息的 `ENOENT`／`EACCES` 形态，后台启动会抛出该结构化错误；其他同步错误原样传播。Landlock 部分强制执行通知加上普通子进程失败时，仍返回命令结果。
 - **在没有后端的平台上会发生什么——今天的 Windows？** `confine()` 抛出失败关闭的 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`，命令永不 spawn；`win32` 是保留的空链，由测试固定为同样失败关闭，直到 Windows runner 填充它（§ 延迟阶段）。
- **`bwrap` 已安装在我的主机上但不可用（禁用了非特权 userns、LSM 拒绝 `mount`）——会发生什么？** 链探测是功能性的——它构建并强制一个真实 profile 而非检查 `--version`——因此存在但不可用的 `bwrap` 探测失败，选择落到注册表安装的 Landlock launcher，结论在提供方生命周期内缓存。
+- **`bwrap` 已安装在我的主机上但不可用（禁用了非特权 userns、LSM 拒绝 `mount`）——会发生什么？** 链探测是功能性的——它构建并强制一个真实 profile 而非检查 `--version`——因此存在但不可用的 `bwrap` 探测失败，选择落到已打包的 Landlock launcher，结论在提供方生命周期内缓存。
 - **沙箱限制网络或进程可见性吗？** 不——`SandboxMode` 仅声称文件操作；bwrap profile 刻意不 unshare pid，没有后端声称网络。网络限制是否成为自己的旋钮留在 § seam 中开放。
 - **哪些工具实际在约束下运行？** 通过 `ctx.bash` 的 OS 子进程——bash 工具及传递性的钩子命令——再加上通过沙箱化 `ctx.fs` 提供方运行的文件系统工具（`read`/`write`/`edit`，见[跨工具族 fs 沙箱 Agent Note](2026-07-14-cross-family-fs-sandbox.md)）：bash 通过 OS runner 约束，fs 通过进程内路径围栏约束，二者都以同一个 `ctx.sandboxPolicy` 模式为键。web/todo 仍在进程内且不受限制（web 的唯一效果是网络，不在文件效果模式词汇内）。
 - **授权的升级会持久化吗？** 不会。授权由发起请求的确切前台或后台调用消费；每个相邻调用保留自己的有效模式。后续的后台拒绝通过 `task_output` 呈现，并且可以作为一次新的精确命令重试的依据。
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md
-2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md: 81ac687c6f55dd0ca1eaeb9d84c811edcfe17b5c
-2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.zh.md: a3a8cb6fa4b766657176f2827a3641d4874b834b
+2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md: 5f4c53a5fb866663bbfaae6b3fdafb4660424804
+2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.zh.md: f9629c1109c8428c74270de9475423d29b99e8f1
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The [`session-title` capability family](../../../../packages/session-title/READM

 Every accepted revision is a log-only `session/title` event. Its payload contains normalized non-empty text, the exact eligible human `user/message` seqs used to derive it, and either fallback provenance or the registered provider id plus optional provider/model route. Before an auxiliary title-model dispatch, the shared helper appends a log-only `session/title-llm-request` event containing the title-provider id, exact source seqs, route, system prompt, messages, and output-token cap; a later generation failure leaves the request auditable. The dispatched envelope is deep-frozen to preserve exact agreement with that record but carries no process-local agent-loop request identity, so loop-only reconstruction checks do not compare it with the main conversation header. Validation failures that never reach dispatch create no request event. `foldSessionTitle()` selects the latest title event and adds that event's seq and timestamp as `SessionTitleSnapshot`. Neither event enters `session.surface` or `deriveMessages()`.

-The title service appends `session/title` directly after checking its current revision and exact live session; the bundled model helper likewise appends its literal `session/title-llm-request` record before dispatch. Both records may sit between turns without inventing an execution boundary. Persistence observes them eagerly and drains through ordinary checkpoints and lifecycle teardown; title publication does not force a per-event flush. No generic marker, cast, or settlement queue sits between the event owner and `Session.append()`. This is the domain-specific application of the [standalone log-only event decision](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md).
+The title service appends `session/title` directly after checking its current revision and exact live session; the bundled model helper likewise appends its literal `session/title-llm-request` record before dispatch. Both records may sit between turns without inventing an execution boundary. Persistence admits them to bounded background batches and drains through ordinary checkpoints and lifecycle teardown; title publication does not force a per-event flush. No generic marker, cast, or settlement queue sits between the event owner and `Session.append()`. This is the domain-specific application of the [standalone log-only event decision](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md).

 ### Input and asynchronous timing

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented

 每个已接受的修订都是纯日志 `session/title` 事件。其载荷包含规范化后的非空文本、用于派生标题的所有合格且来源为人类的 `user/message` 的准确 seq，以及回退来源信息，或已注册的提供方 id 加可选的提供方和模型路由。辅助标题模型发起调用前，共享辅助组件会追加一个纯日志 `session/title-llm-request` 事件，其载荷包含标题提供方 id、准确的源 seq、路由、系统提示词、消息和输出 token 上限；即使后续生成失败，这次请求仍可审计。发送的请求信封经过深度冻结，以确保其与该记录精确一致，但它有意不携带进程本地的 agent loop（智能体循环）请求身份，因此仅针对 agent loop 的重建检查不会将它与主对话请求头进行比较。未进入调用阶段的验证失败不会创建请求事件。`foldSessionTitle()` 选择最新的标题事件，并将该事件的 seq 和时间戳加入 `SessionTitleSnapshot`。这两类事件都不会进入 `session.surface` 或 `deriveMessages()`。

-标题服务会在检查当前修订和确切的实时会话后，直接追加 `session/title`；随附模型辅助函数同样会在发起调用前追加其字面量 `session/title-llm-request` 记录。两类记录都可以位于轮次之间，而无需虚构执行边界。持久化会尽快观察它们，并通过常规检查点和生命周期 teardown 排空；标题发布不会强制逐事件 flush。事件所有方与 `Session.append()` 之间不存在通用标记、类型断言或结算队列。这是[独立纯日志事件决策](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md)在特定领域中的应用。
+标题服务会在检查当前修订和确切的实时会话后，直接追加 `session/title`；随附模型辅助函数同样会在发起调用前追加其字面量 `session/title-llm-request` 记录。两类记录都可以位于轮次之间，而无需虚构执行边界。持久化会将它们接纳到有界后台批次中，并通过常规检查点和生命周期 teardown 排空；标题发布不会强制逐事件 flush。事件所有方与 `Session.append()` 之间不存在通用标记、类型断言或结算队列。这是[独立纯日志事件决策](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md)在特定领域中的应用。

 ### 输入与异步时序

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 9e6e4914cd24d1db9271baa3d3fb6fdc56a9ac65
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: 5a5ac554b37c255a7d8c1ce821ebeb1b3f9f091f
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: bb66ef8512badea090b3b22030eef3f43f3b1119
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: 7270874d1e96bb0a553d57ba24b3bc2bb38a7a71
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The panel mounts through the `conversation.input.dock` slot (a plain registrant

 ### TodoRow: the per-call row through the keyed toolview slot

-The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`, mounted from `apply`) that registers into the keyed `conversation.chat.toolview` slot through `ctx.slots.inject`, the same declaration-lifetime posture as the bash sample but a product registration. The summary derives from call args (`N/M done · first active item`, with a `+<n>` count of the other active ones in `ToolRow`'s non-shrinking `summarySuffix` slot); unparseable args fall back to the generic row summary; clicking opens the details column with the raw args. No `ToolEventView` is added for todo — presentation is client-owned, and the durable list renders from the session event, not the tool card.
+The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`, mounted from `apply`) that registers into the keyed `tool.call.toolview` slot through `ctx.slots.inject`, the same declaration-lifetime posture as the bash sample but a product registration. The summary derives from call args (`N/M done · first active item`, with a `+<n>` count of the other active ones in `ToolRow`'s non-shrinking `summarySuffix` slot); unparseable args fall back to the generic row summary; clicking opens the details column with the raw args. No `ToolEventView` is added for todo — presentation is client-owned, and the durable list renders from the session event, not the tool card.

 ## Alternatives considered

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ### TodoRow：经 keyed toolview slot 的逐调用行

-专用的 `todo_write` 对话行是一个普通注册者插件（`todoToolview`，由 `apply` 挂载），经 `ctx.slots.inject` 注册进 keyed 的 `conversation.chat.toolview` slot，遵循与 bash 样例相同的声明生命周期，但属产品级注册。摘要由调用 args 推导（`N/M done · first active item`，其余活跃项的 `+<n>` 计数放在 `ToolRow` 的不收缩 `summarySuffix` 位里）；无法解析的 args 回退到通用行摘要；点击会以原始 args 打开 details 列。todo 不新增任何 `ToolEventView`——呈现归客户端所有，常驻列表从会话事件渲染，而非工具卡。
+专用的 `todo_write` 对话行是一个普通注册者插件（`todoToolview`，由 `apply` 挂载），经 `ctx.slots.inject` 注册进 keyed 的 `tool.call.toolview` slot，遵循与 bash 样例相同的声明生命周期，但属产品级注册。摘要由调用 args 推导（`N/M done · first active item`，其余活跃项的 `+<n>` 计数放在 `ToolRow` 的不收缩 `summarySuffix` 位里）；无法解析的 args 回退到通用行摘要；点击会以原始 args 打开 details 列。todo 不新增任何 `ToolEventView`——呈现归客户端所有，常驻列表从会话事件渲染，而非工具卡。

 ## 考虑过的替代方案

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-code-mode-chat-subcall-rows.md
-2026-07-26-code-mode-chat-subcall-rows.md: 7d666f0a9e4b8bdb9bd6f5d0d0984fee0c4b21e2
-2026-07-26-code-mode-chat-subcall-rows.zh.md: b6b7de6c34673a0a0fa801681d642067a324d4cd
+2026-07-26-code-mode-chat-subcall-rows.md: dc09e8fda9dbfb156b6218dec67584ee7bfead75
+2026-07-26-code-mode-chat-subcall-rows.zh.md: d445ddac4704fb940550d27ef7400e79d859393b
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ With Code Mode enabled, the chat view showed one opaque `run_code` row: raw prog
 **Sub-calls are `ToolResultNode`s indexed off the surface flow, rendered through the same keyed slot as native rows, nested always-visible under their parent.**

 - **Data layer**: `Session.applyEventSideEffects` folds each in-window `tool/code-dispatch` into `ConversationSnapshot.codeDispatches: ReadonlyMap<parentCallId, readonly CodeSubCall[]>`, where `CodeSubCall` IS `ToolResultNode` (the sub-call id as `callId`, the logged args JSON-stringified into `call.argsRaw`, the full logged `content`/`isError`). Live mux frames and history replay build the identical index (`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` clears and re-derives; copy-on-write per-parent arrays keep snapshot references memo-stable). Sub-calls never join `nodes` — the surface flow remains exactly the model-visible turn structure. The event is narrowed structurally at the wire-consumer boundary (dsh-tools' host types cannot enter the client program — the host/client `Context` merges collide), the same posture as every cross-wire payload.
- **Render layer**: `ChatView`'s `CallRow` renders the parent, then — for parents present in the index — a `[data-subcalls]` nest of `SubCallRow`s, each dispatching through the SAME `'conversation.chat.toolview'` keyed hole with `entryKey = sub-tool name` and the same `GenericToolCard` fallback. Identity with native rows holds by construction: a keyed registration (e.g. the bash sample) takes over sub-rows exactly as it takes over top-level rows, with zero registration changes. Running parents (`runningCalls`) nest their so-far dispatches the same way, so sub-rows stream in live during the run (PR1 logs each dispatch as it completes).
+- **Render layer**: `ChatView` passes each parent and its indexed children through the whole-Tool `'conversation.chat.tool'` seat. ui-tool's `ToolCallTree` renders the parent followed by a `[data-subcalls]` nest, and every atomic call dispatches through the same `'tool.call.toolview'` keyed slot with `entryKey = Tool name` and the same `GenericToolCard` fallback. A keyed registration therefore takes over child and top-level calls without registration changes. Running parents (`runningCalls`) receive their accumulated dispatches through the same owner payload, so child rows stream in during the run.
 - **`run_code` presentation**: a new `code` row variant (classifier `run_code → code`, `Code` title, `IconCodeOutline16`) summarizes with the model-authored `description` and expands to the program itself (monospace on the markdown code-block fill) rather than the args JSON envelope.
 - **Details panel**: `materialFor` falls through nodes → runningCalls → the dispatch index, so a selected sub-callId resolves to full args and complete output through the identical rendering path as a native settled call.

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Status: implemented
 **子调用在界面流之外单独索引为 `ToolResultNode`，经由与原生行相同的 keyed slot 渲染，以始终可见的方式嵌套在父行之下。**

 - **数据层**：`Session.applyEventSideEffects` 把窗口内的每条 `tool/code-dispatch` 折入 `ConversationSnapshot.codeDispatches: ReadonlyMap<parentCallId, readonly CodeSubCall[]>`，其中 `CodeSubCall` 本身就是 `ToolResultNode`（子调用 id 充当 `callId`，已记录的参数经 JSON 字符串化写入 `call.argsRaw`，完整记录的 `content`/`isError` 原样携带）。实时多路复用帧与历史回放构建出同一份索引（`rebuildDerivedFromWindow` 先清空再重新推导；逐父级的写时复制（copy-on-write）数组保持快照引用稳定，便于 memo 化）。子调用永不进入 `nodes`——surface 流始终精确等于模型可见的轮次结构。该事件在 wire 消费方边界作结构性收窄（dsh-tools 的宿主类型无法进入客户端程序——宿主端/客户端两侧的 `Context` 声明合并会冲突），姿态与所有跨 wire 载荷一致。
- **渲染层**：`ChatView` 的 `CallRow` 先渲染父行，随后对索引中出现的父级渲染一组 `[data-subcalls]` 嵌套的 `SubCallRow`，每一行都经由同一个 `'conversation.chat.toolview'` keyed slot、以 `entryKey = sub-tool name` 分发，并共用同一个 `GenericToolCard` 后备组件。与原生行的同一性由构造保证：一个 keyed 注册（例如 bash 样例）接管子行与接管顶层行的方式完全相同，注册本身零改动。运行中的父调用（`runningCalls`）也以同样的方式嵌套目前已产生的分发，因此子行在运行期间实时流入（PR1 在每次分发完成时即记录该分发）。
+- **渲染层**：`ChatView` 通过整体 Tool seat `'conversation.chat.tool'` 传递每个 parent 及其已索引的 child。ui-tool 的 `ToolCallTree` 先渲染 parent，再渲染一组 `[data-subcalls]` 嵌套；每个原子调用都通过同一个 `'tool.call.toolview'` keyed slot，以 Tool 名称作为 `entryKey`，并共用 `GenericToolCard` fallback。一个 keyed 注册因此无需变化即可同时接管 child 与顶层调用。运行中的 parent（`runningCalls`）通过同一 owner 载荷接收已累积的 dispatch，使 child 行在运行期间实时流入。
 - **`run_code` 的呈现**：新增一种 `code` 行变体（分类器映射 `run_code → code`、标题 `Code`、图标 `IconCodeOutline16`），以模型撰写的 `description` 作摘要，展开后显示程序本身（在 markdown 代码块的填充底色上以等宽字体呈现），而非参数的 JSON 封装。
 - **详情面板**：`materialFor` 按 nodes → runningCalls → 分发索引的顺序逐级回落，因此被选中的子调用 callId 会经由与已完结的原生调用完全相同的渲染路径，解析出完整参数与完整输出。

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md
-2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 2805ef894050d1b1cffe06fce59a4984d463f8d1
-2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 16b32daa05b10f24eacde4cec9622b2159cdef09
+2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 8d047f33ab1aebd8c0de2a0a5e90e7efb1b28154
+2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 26b7081e7b4e3688a46a2857da91ba45328532a9
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The durable-log invariant deliberately does NOT follow the flag. A log written w

 ## The display surfaces are part of the change

-Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign in [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) has since replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.
+Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.

 The row takes `planSummary` in `toolviews/plan-summary.ts`. It names the first active item and counts the rest, so the row reports how many tasks are running instead of implying one. Naming every active item was rejected: the row is a single line, and an unbounded join would overflow it — the count degrades predictably where a list does not. The derivation sits inside the toolviews domain rather than in `contract/`, the inter-domain face: the panel computes its own counts inline and shares nothing with the row, so a contract module would declare a sharing relationship that no longer exists.

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Status: implemented

 ## 展示面是本次改动的一部分

-解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。其后 [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) 的面板重做已把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。
+解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。面板重做把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。

 工具行改用 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 中的 `planSummary`。它给出第一个活跃条目，并计数其余活跃项，因此工具行报告的是有多少任务在跑，而不是暗示只有一个。列出全部活跃条目被否决了：工具行是单行，无上界的拼接会溢出——在列表做不到的地方，计数能够可预测地降级。该推导放在 toolviews 域内而非 `contract/`（域间共享面）：面板自行内联计算其计数，与工具行不共享任何东西，因此放进 contract 会声明一种已不存在的共享关系。

--- a/Show More
+++ b/Show More