retire the stale ACP plan-mapping claim in the todo note

The automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation (its
edge test asserts plan updates are omitted; the todo-write tool note records
the mapping's retirement). Chinese counterpart updated, pair re-recorded;
the TodoPanel header comment drops the same claim.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: b08c50b2f1a0aea03382b9e012ac364d697a21ee
-2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: daff6d4a18a621f3fd336ff6feb4433f5cbf9b16
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md: 8b7bc8cbe0c072613c9b4ad01983df74466e81da
+2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md: 4d5565f805386cf33eaae81e7dcc48e6260e3313

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-`todo_write` appends `todo/write` whole-list snapshots to the session log; the TUI renders a persistent plan panel and the ACP bridge maps the event to native `plan` updates. The web client dropped the event entirely: the host mux stream already forwards every session event, but `todo/write` is not a surface type (it never folds into `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`), and no side-effect branch accumulated it — the browser had no consumption point and no display surface.
+`todo_write` appends `todo/write` whole-list snapshots to the session log; the TUI renders a persistent plan panel (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation). The web client dropped the event entirely: the host mux stream already forwards every session event, but `todo/write` is not a surface type (it never folds into `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`), and no side-effect branch accumulated it — the browser had no consumption point and no display surface.
 
 ## Decision
 
-Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it on two surfaces matching the split the TUI and ACP already draw.
+Consume `todo/write` as a Session side effect, not a surface node, and render it on two surfaces matching the split the TUI already draws.
 
 ### Side-effect channel, converging with window replay
 
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ The dedicated `todo_write` chat row is a plain registrant plugin (`todoToolview`
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The ACP bridge's todo → `plan` mapping and the TUI panel are untouched; the web surfaces render the same event with no new wire vocabulary. Cold-load reconstruction is host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; the seeded value is preserved across window rebuilds and overwritten by any later write.
+Replay correctness is owned by one code path: any future change to window rebuild keeps todos consistent for free, and the fixture (fx-alpha turn 65) plus the assembled keyless snapshot (`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`) pin the full chain (row summary and state, dock panel content, collapse round-trip) over the built client graph. `todos` is a required `ConversationSnapshot` field, so scripted fakes in specs must carry it. The TUI panel is untouched (the automation-only ACP bridge deliberately omits todo presentation); the web surfaces render the same event with no new wire vocabulary. Cold-load reconstruction is host-backed: the tail history page carries `todos` — the full-log latest `todo/write`, computed independently of the page window (the same backscan posture the view pairing uses) — so a reopened session restores the plan even when the last write precedes the window; the seeded value is preserved across window rebuilds and overwritten by any later write.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-web-todo-display.zh.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
-`todo_write` 把 `todo/write` 的整份列表快照追加进会话日志；TUI 渲染一块常驻的 plan 面板，ACP 桥接把该事件映射为原生 `plan` 更新。Web 客户端把这个事件整个丢弃了：host mux 流本已转发每一个会话事件，但 `todo/write` 不是 surface 类型（它从不 fold 进 `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`），也没有任何副作用分支累积它——浏览器既无消费点，也无展示面。
+`todo_write` 把 `todo/write` 的整份列表快照追加进会话日志；TUI 渲染一块常驻的 plan 面板（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）。Web 客户端把这个事件整个丢弃了：host mux 流本已转发每一个会话事件，但 `todo/write` 不是 surface 类型（它从不 fold 进 `ConversationSnapshot.nodes`），也没有任何副作用分支累积它——浏览器既无消费点，也无展示面。
 
 ## Decision
 
-把 `todo/write` 当作 Session 副作用消费，而非 surface 节点，并在两个面上渲染它，这两个面正对应 TUI 与 ACP 已经绘制的那套划分。
+把 `todo/write` 当作 Session 副作用消费，而非 surface 节点，并在两个面上渲染它，这两个面正对应 TUI 已经绘制的那套划分。
 
 ### 副作用通道，与窗口回放收敛
 
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Consequences
 
-回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管：未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致；fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture（测试前置数据）加 assembled keyless snapshot（`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`）在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链（行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返）。`todos` 是 `ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段，所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。ACP 桥接的 todo → `plan` 映射与 TUI 面板均未受改动；Web 各面渲染同一个事件，不引入任何新的协议词汇。冷加载重建由 host 兜底：history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上最新一次 `todo/write` 的投影，独立于分页窗口计算（与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势）——因此重开会话时即使最后一次写入落在窗口之前，计划也照常恢复；播种值跨窗口重建保留，之后的任何写入照常覆盖。
+回放正确性由一条代码路径掌管：未来对窗口重建的任何改动都免费保持 todos 一致；fx-alpha 第 65 轮的 fixture（测试前置数据）加 assembled keyless snapshot（`apps/web/tests/todo-display.snapshot.ts`）在构建产物客户端全图上钉住整条链（行摘要与状态、dock 面板内容、折叠往返）。`todos` 是 `ConversationSnapshot` 的必填字段，所以 spec 里脚本化的 fake 必须带上它。TUI 面板未受改动（自动化专用的 ACP 桥接刻意不做 todo 呈现）；Web 各面渲染同一个事件，不引入任何新的协议词汇。冷加载重建由 host 兜底：history 尾页附带 `todos`——全量 log 上最新一次 `todo/write` 的投影，独立于分页窗口计算（与 view 配对同一种 backscan 姿势）——因此重开会话时即使最后一次写入落在窗口之前，计划也照常恢复；播种值跨窗口重建保留，之后的任何写入照常覆盖。

packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/skeleton/TodoPanel.tsx

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // TodoPanel: persistent plan strip above the composer (the web counterpart
-// of the TUI plan panel; ACP maps the same event to its native plan). Renders
+// of the TUI plan panel). Renders
 // the latest todo/write whole-list snapshot off the session snapshot — no
 // data of its own, hidden while the list is empty. Mounted through the
 // 'conversation.input.dock' slot (QueueDock posture): the standard session