Bring the TUI diff footer onto the same terminator rule and distinct-path
count the Web DiffBlock uses (a trailing newline terminates its line; two
hunks in one file read as 1 file), so the two front ends' `+A -R · N file(s)`
footers agree. Reserve space in the diff path header for the floating copy
button so a long path no longer scrolls under it. Pass the tool's raw path to
the injected openFile (which already resolves against cwd) instead of resolving
twice. Rename the shared block-body CSS class to a card-neutral cardBody so a
terminal-spacing tweak cannot silently move the diff card. Add a same-file
two-hunk TUI unit test and an assembled built-boot assertion that the write
turn renders +1 -0 · 1 file end to end.
- webCardModel returns null for an unknown web `kind` (wire from a newer host)
instead of drawing it as a malformed fetch, matching the unknown-`card` and
terminal-model wire-boundary default.
- Fixture WEB_SEARCH_RESULT/WEB_FETCH_RESULT and the source type derive from the
contract's ToolResultView via Extract, so a new contract field fails at the
type level rather than drifting silently.
- built-boot smoke asserts the web_search/web_fetch turns render their keyed
WebRow cards, giving the registration and wire projection an assembled check.
- DetailsPanel comment no longer claims the card omits content for search.
- ui-primitives README inline-Chinese limitation now lists WebBlock's controls.
The Web composer now renders a request that declares the `plan-review` intent
as its own surface: the waiting-approval card language — amber "Plan review"
strip, the plan as the scrolling markdown body, the question as the card's
accessible name — over one decision row of Chat about it / Refuse / Approve.
Gone from that surface are the 1/1 pager, the numbered radio rows, the custom
answer row, and Skip/Submit, which made approving a plan read as sitting an
exam.
Approve and Refuse answer with the asker's own option labels and keep its
descriptions as tooltips; Chat about it cancels the request so the composer
returns and the user can simply say what they want. Copy is bilingual under the
existing `question` namespace.
The shape choice lives inside the single composer entry rather than a second
chain registration, so the two surfaces cannot race the same carrier, and
`planReviewOf` falls back to the generic flow for any request it cannot render
as a card — the client sits downstream of a wire boundary and every request
must stay answerable.
Review follow-ups on the approval takeover:
The scroll region is now a tab stop (tabIndex + named role="group"). The
question composer's scroll body needs none — its option rows are focusable and
pull the container along — but this one holds nothing but text, so a
keyboard-only user could reach the buttons and never the command's tail, and
approve what they could not finish reading.
The action row's padding reproduces the 14px gap it had inside the body: the
flex gap of 6 plus its 8px top margin, neither of which reaches it now that the
row sits outside the scroll region. The resting card is unchanged again.
The answered-transcript golden captured the OS's own refusal of the denied
first attempt — "bash: notes.txt: Operation not permitted" on macOS against
"bash: line 1: notes.txt: Read-only file system" on Linux — so it passed
locally and failed the Linux snapshot lane.
The scenario now keeps one golden (the waiting panel, platform-neutral) and
asserts the answered state on the world instead: the decided outcome, the file
the escalated command actually wrote, DONE, the panel gone, and the composer
re-enabled. The file assertion is stronger evidence than the transcript dump
it replaces — it proves the grant reached the executor.
Chinesezjc
imccyu
Yichen Jiang
Hypatia May
ZiyaZhang
kingwl
Tianyi Cui
07akioni
creatixchu
NI0317
_Kerman