Files
deepseek-harness/packages/code-runtime/code-runtime/README.md
T
Tianyi Cui 3707aaa72e Merge branch 'codex/simp-prune-tools-prompt-surface' into codex/simp-prune-code-runtime-surface
# Conflicts:
#	packages/code-runtime/code-runtime-worker/README.md
#	packages/code-runtime/code-runtime/README.md
2026-07-14 15:42:39 +08:00

30 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown

# @deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime
The **code-execution seam**: an abstract `CodeRuntime` service (`ctx.codeRuntime`) defining WHAT a code runtime does — run one model-written program against a set of host-provided async bindings and report `{ value, logs, error? }` — without saying HOW.
This package is the interface third of the capability (the bash trio is the template — see [capability seams](../../../docs/rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)): implementations subclass `CodeRuntime` and register the service; the consumer is the tool registry's Code Mode, which generates the model-facing SDK and bridges tool dispatch — both specified in the [Code Mode RFC](../../../docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md), whose first implementation is a Node worker-thread backend. The runtime knows nothing about tools or sessions: it is handed named async functions and a program string, and everything tool-shaped stays with the consumer.
## Service API (`ctx.codeRuntime`)
| Member | Semantics |
|---|---|
| `run(request)` | Execute one program against the request's bindings. **Resolves with an error FIELD for every program outcome** — parse/transform failure, thrown exception, budget expiry, abort, substrate death (`CodeRunFailure`'s orthogonal `kind` taxonomy); it rejects only for caller misuse of the seam itself (e.g. a run submitted after disposal). The program runs as the body of an async function: top-level `await`/`return` work, and the completion value becomes `result.value` when it survives the serialization boundary. |
| `language` | Readonly descriptor: the source language `run` expects (`'typescript'` is the well-known value). Informational, not gating — a consumer that generates language-specific presentation switches on it and fails loud on a language it cannot present. |
| `isolation` | Readonly descriptor: the execution substrate (`'worker-thread'`, `'process'`, `'container'`). A label for deployments and diagnostics, **not a security claim**. |
Semantics every implementation must honor (contract details in the class JSDoc): binding calls bridge to the caller's functions verbatim with structured-cloneable arguments/resolutions; the program is treated as a hostile peer (arbitrary binding names are own properties, malformed traffic never crashes the host); no state survives between runs; disposal terminates in-flight runs AND awaits their exit before completing.
## Vocabulary
`CodeRunRequest` (`program`, `bindings`, `signal?`) carries everything the runtime acts on — defaulting (time budgets, output caps) is the implementation's validated config, never a hidden `??` inside `run()`. `bindings` is a list of `CodeBindingNamespace`s (`global` + `functions`), each exposed to the program as one global object of async callables. `CodeRunResult` reports the completion `value?`, ordered capped `logs: string[]`, and the `error?` (`CodeRunFailure`: `kind` + model-feedable `message`). See `src/types.ts` for the full contracts.
## Model Experience
Indirectly, through Code Mode in `dsh-tools`, which exposes `run_code` and returns program logs, values, or failures as retained tool-result tokens.
## Known Limitations and Deferred Work
- **`run()` is one-shot** — `logs` arrive only on the resolved `CodeRunResult`; the seam exposes no streaming-log or progress surface for a live program's output.
- **A persistent REPL-style kernel is recorded future work** — the no-state-between-runs contract stands until a persistent-kernel backend brings its own logging story ([Code Mode RFC](../../../docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md)).
- **Only the worker-thread backend ships** — `'process'`/`'container'` are declared well-known `isolation` values with no implementation; a hard security boundary awaits a container backend.